Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


And now for Harry Potter and the wizard theme park...

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 April 2007
FANS OF Harry Potter have been dreaming about riding a Nimbus 2000, catching a golden snitch and winning a game of Quidditch since creator JK Rowling invented the sport 10 years ago.
Now aficionados of the boy wizard may not have to wait much longer. Universal Studios is seeking a deal with Rowling to build a $500m Harry Potter mini theme park in Florida.

Rowling is believed to have been in negotiations with Universal Studios
since 2005 over potential sites and the park's contents. Earlier talks with Disney, which has a Disneyworld in Orlando, are understood to have fallen through because the giant American leisure corporation wanted total control of the project.

The new Potter land is likely to be incorporated into Universal's existing Islands of Adventure attraction, which already hosts areas themed on Steven Spielberg's Jurassic Park and Marvel comic superheroes. Island of Adventure is close to Universal Studios, the company's main attraction and the third biggest-theme park in America.

Peter Alexander, a former vice president of Universal Studios and founder of a theme park design consultancy, said: "People keep screeching that it's an entirely separate park, but according to Steve Spielberg, who we talked to about it, he says it's going to be a 'land' within the confines of the existing Islands of Adventure theme park. If it's a 'land' it will cost at the very least $500m."

Alexander estimates that Rowling stands to earn up to £9m a year if the park goes ahead, to add to her already colossal £576m fortune.

"If I was negotiating for her I would ask for 5% of the gate fee," he said. "With an attraction like that getting around six million people a year paying £30 per head, that's £180m."

Sources say that both Universal Studios and Rowling, who owns the rights to the Harry Potter franchise, are agreed on the principle of the mini-park, but are still hammering out the details of a settlement.

Alexander, who has previously inquired about the possibility of a Potter theme park on behalf of a client, said: "Either she is a very shrewd businessperson or she is surrounded by people who are."

Once an agreement is reached, the attraction could be built in as little as 18 months.

What attracts theme park companies to the project is the huge, global Potter fan base.

More than 325 million Potter books have been sold around the world, and it has been translated into 62 languages. The final title in the seven-book series, Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows, will be published on July 21.

Theme park experts believe that like Mickey Mouse and the George Lucas-inspired Star Wars, Pottermania will have longevity. US bookstore Barnes and Noble has already received more than 500,000 pre-orders for the final novel.

Not only will the books continue to appeal to new generations of children, but the associated films have become holiday-time classics. The first four films have grossed £2bn at the box office with three more to follow.

The film of Harry Potter And The Order Of The Phoenix - the fifth novel in the series - will be released on July 13, ensuring maximum publicity for the book launch 10 days later.

Alexander said: "The property [Harry Potter] has legs - he is not going to be less popular in years to come. What is good about it is that it has family appeal and if they put some good rides in to the theme park there will be teenage and young adult appeal too."

Alexander believes making a Harry Potter attraction part of the bigger Islands of Adventure is the right commercial strategy.

"Usually a theme park devoted to one subject doesn't do very well because people want a variety of experiences," he said. "In France they made a Smurf theme park. They expected two million people per year but never got more than 800,000."

It closed last year.

The concept of a Potter attraction stretches back at least four years. At the time, reports suggested Disney approached Rowling with a project, possibly to be built in Singapore.

However, the project fell through. Alexander, also a former employee of Disney, believes it was due to Rowling's reputed protectiveness over her creations. "Disney would not want to cut her in to the action creatively," he said.

It took several years for Rowling to allow the books to be made into films by the Warner Bros studio, for fear of "Americanising" Harry. In 2001 she said: "I'm not against the idea of a film - I love films. The vital thing for me was that it would be true to the book."

Alexander said Universal was more used to yielding creative control to get a deal but that might be slowing down the negotiation process. "Universal did not ask [Rowling] for permission to do the park, they just came to her with a pitch," he explained. "Probably she did not like their designs and they had to start over."

He thinks Rowling would have objected to the proposed rides at the theme park if they did not replicate the action and adventure of the books.

Universal Studios, Warner Bros and Rowling all declined to comment.

Buckle up and hang on to your hat

Potter fans online are already speculating about the rides. Here are some of their ideas:

CRAZY QUIDDITCH

Giant quaffles, bludgers and golden snitches in which guests ride in a quidditch match where they are the ball.

FRED AND GEORGE WEASLEY'S LASER FUN HOUSE

Play laser wand tag in this mirrored maze, but watch out for dragons and trolls along the way.

AZKABAN PRISON

Prisoners find themselves in a spin on this high-speed whirligig.

SEARCH FOR THE PHILOSOPHER'S STONE

Encounter living chessmen and an unconscious troll as you take a boat ride in search of the Stone.

GRINGOTTS BANK GHOST TRAIN

Hang on to your hat as the Gringotts goblins guide you on a miniature indoor mine train.



Page 1 of 1

 
1

somerferg,

oz 22/04/2007 02:58:03

Heaven help us - the books are bad enough.

2

Boy Wonder,

22/04/2007 07:45:15

I'm fair looking forward to the last book. Only 3 months fron today - Woohoo!

Seriously though, why set a Harry Potter Theme Park in America?? If it should be anywhere, it should be here in Scotland.

Theme Parks are big business in the States. They know how to build and market them. So they could advise us, but I think it should be a Scottish venture. I think JK would prefer that too. Think of the tourist industry!

But it would have to be done right! No watering down of the books or the rides and exhibits. It would be thrilling and exciting for kids - and a few adults!

Is there no billionaire business person in THIS country willing to take it on? Do these things ALWAYS have to be in America??

3

Cadgers,

Perth 22/04/2007 09:23:05

#2 Boy Wonder I love HP too but only Americans would go to a HP theme park, unless heavily disguised that is.
Though as it'll be 'over there' it might be a subtle plot to force you to upgrade your passport.

4

alex paterson,

embra 22/04/2007 12:06:36

What a load of Trash,Clutching at straws or what,Why does America have to get into the act.

5

kingstch,

Florida 22/04/2007 12:52:50

I feel that the idea of a "Potter World" is nothing but pure brilliance! As for the rest of you, you're just jealous that the park is going to be built over here in the States!

6

Finbarr Saunders,

22/04/2007 15:22:41

#1 -somerferg - "Heaven help us - the books are bad enough."

How do you know?

If you read the first one and it was bad, why did you then waste time reading the others? Haven't you got anything better to do?

Or are you just talking tripe?

7

alex paterson,

embra 22/04/2007 16:23:02

#5 Kinda i would have expected from across the pond,Nope we aint of, Delighted that you have got all the trash where it belongs,The U.S. of A,Plastic garbage.

8

Violet44,

Mitcham 22/04/2007 16:40:21

I think that they should put the park in England
where we can get to it insted of having 2 go 2 the States.

9

kingstch,

USA 22/04/2007 17:24:08

#7, Calm down! My point being that the "idea of Potter world is great." Who cares where it is built. The best place for it ideally would be England; however that is not the case. It seems that because the park is not being built in Scotland, it’s a crappy idea. Nobody said a single thing about your country-good or bad so just back off! Oh one more thing, off is spelled with two ff. If your are gonna throw insults at least spell them right!

10

WI in GA,

23/04/2007 02:07:28

Yay Harry! I DO wish it would be in Scotland tho.... :(

11

jenny9,

US 23/04/2007 03:57:49

I am really excited about this..if it does end up happening. I'm about 500 miles away from Universal, so it would be cheaper for me to go there than some other theme park. It does suck that a Harry Potter theme park isn't going to be located where Harry Potter originated. But...there are Harry Potter fans here too! It would seriously suck (for me) if it was built in Scotland or the UK because I would probably never be able to visit it.
If you've ever been there, Islands of Adventure is REALLY awesome with their different "lands" and I think a Harry Potter area would fit in quite nicely. They have "Toon Lagoon," "Lost Continent," "Marvel Super Hero Island," "Jurassic Park," and "Seuss Landing." I'm not sure what they would call the Harry Potter area... my first guess would be "Hogwarts"...but what does everyone think?

oh and somerferg, no one's forcing you to go to the theme park OR read Harry Potter...

12

Leafclover2002,

Florida 23/04/2007 15:03:58

i do think that JK would much rather have it in Scotland or in the UK but you have to think of it as a money maker for her. If she has it here in Florida that is more money she is making every year. I mean there are a lot of people that come on holiday from the UK and all over the world. And just to let you know from me working at Universal Islands of Adventure it would be a great idea to have it here. and just as the news has reported EVERYTHING IS STILL IN THE WORKS NOTHING IS FINAL..

13

dbumblebeeie,

USA 24/04/2007 00:16:13

People! The reason most theme park locations are chosen is WEATHER. These places cost millions
upon millions. They have investors. They stay
open year round. Would you like to go on a
roller coaster ride in the rain and cold? If that
would even be a posibility due to safety issues.
Not every ride can be built indoors. How is the
weather in Scotland? or England? I would love
to visit as I heard these countries are beautiful.
But really, don't you think rich people in those
countries ever thought about amusement parks?
Why are there none? WEATHER!!

14

Jess Nixon ,

Good Ol' England 13/05/2009 19:52:17
So Far, No body has it right, It's because of the cost - It is much cheaper to make a theme park in the States than it is in the UK. if we were to have the park over this side of the pond, it would be an epic fail because for the same amount of money, much less would be able to be built - also, more people worldwide would rather go to a theme park in Florida/Orlando because of all of the other park's reputations, no one would go to a theme park if they had never heard of the place that it's in - Alton Towers is doing well over here in the UK , and they get a lot of visitors - but how many Americans have heard of Alton Towers? very Few. How many Britons have heard of Universal Studios? Lots.

It is just a matter of money and reliability. I wouldn't pay to go somewhere if it's somewhere with no reputation for Theme parks... Heck, I would even have doubts if the HP park was in Blackpool Pleasure Beach!

And As For dbumblebeeie's Comment - You'd be suprised how many people will still go into the Pleasure Beach and ride the Big One 7 times in the rain - the only ride they close when it's raining is Infusion because of the type of coaster it is.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.