Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 20th November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

US hands back blood-stained Anbar



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 September 2008
THE US military handed over Anbar province to Iraqi security forces yesterday, less than two years after it almost lost it to a Sunni Arab insurgency.
"We are in the last ten yards of this terrible fight. The goal is very near," Major-General John Kelly, commander of American forces in Anbar, told US, Iraqi and tribal officials at a ceremony in the provincial capital, Ramad, to mark the event.

"Your lives and the lives of your children depend on victory."

Maj-Gen Kelly and Anbar's governor, Mamun Sami Rasheed, embraced after signing a document making Anbar the 11th of Iraq's 18 provinces, and the first Sunni Arab one, to be returned to Iraqi control since the US-led invasion.

Police marched down a main street carrying Iraqi flags, followed by a parade of vehicles trimmed with flowers.

The US president, George Bush, praised the people of Anbar, scene of more than a quarter of US combat deaths in Iraq since 2003, for turning against al-Qaeda's Sunni Islam militants. "Today, Anbar is no longer lost to al-Qaeda – it is al-Qaeda that lost Anbar," he said.

Much of Anbar was once in the grip of al-Qaeda. The region witnessed fierce battles against US forces and Iraq's Shiite-led government.

Some of the bloodiest fights of the conflict have taken place there, including two devastating assaults by US forces on the city of Fallujah in 2004.

"We would not have even imagined this in our wildest dreams three or four years ago," Iraqi national security adviser Mowaffaq al-Rubaie said before the ceremony.

"If we had said that we were going to hand over security responsibility from the foreign troops to civilian authority, people would laugh at us. Now I think it's a reality."

The handover in Anbar had been pencilled in for June, but was delayed because of a row between local political leaders.

The handover was largely ceremonial because Iraqi forces have been working independently for several months.

Things changed in Anbar in late 2006, when Sunni tribal leaders, fed up with al-Qaeda's harsh tactics and puritanical brand of Islam, switched sides, helping the US military to largely expel the group from the region. The movement against al-Qaeda was known as Anbar's "Awakening".

Still, tensions simmer in Anbar among Awakening leaders, Iraqi government forces and local councillors led by the Islamic Party. Some Awakening fighters complain their members are not being incorporated into Iraqi security forces.

The changes in Anbar became a model for grassroots guard units across the country, which US officials credit with helping sharply to reduce violence across Iraq. Some 382 Iraqi civilians were killed in August, Iraqi government figures showed, far below the more than 1,770 killed in August 2007.

Violence against US troops has also dropped in the past year. Eleven US soldiers were killed in combat in Iraq in August. In August 2007, 56 US troops and four British soldiers were killed in combat.

But attacks continue in restive areas as prime minister Nuri al-Maliki, emboldened after success in battling Shiite militias this spring, presses the US in bilateral talks for assurances on gradually limiting the US troop presence.

Baghdad and Washington say they are close to agreement on a new security pact that will govern the presence of US forces in Iraq after a United Nations mandate expires at year's end.

BACKGROUND

FOR years, Anbar was the centre stage of the Sunni insurgency. The city of Fallujah became the symbol of resistance until it fell to US troops in November 2004 in the most intense urban combat of the war.

The province was the base of al-Qaeda in Iraq and its leader, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who used the area as a staging ground for attacks in Baghdad until he was killed.

The return of security control to Iraqi authorities does not mean that an estimated 25,000 US troops in the region will leave Anbar. But the US military will cut back on security patrols and focus on training Iraq's army and police.







The full article contains 686 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 September 2008 11:26 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Iraq
 
1

mike - across the pond,

hats off.... 02/09/2008 02:14:52
hats off to the surge...
2

W Smith,

Middle East 02/09/2008 03:34:13
WELL DONE GEORGE BUSH!

The surge did work as did the SAS's covert operations against the would be suicide bombers that resulted in thousands of these muslim thugs being taken out.

To think the SNP's Hanif was attending a terrorist training camp next door.

NO THANKS TO THE SNP!
3

Richardinho,

02/09/2008 08:12:02
Is the sunni rebelltion at an end-or is it just sleeping?
Somehow I suspect any declarations of 'victory' are premature.
4

Randomly Blocked Poster, ,

02/09/2008 08:45:59
"The city of Fallujah became the symbol of resistance until it fell to US troops in November 2004."
Americans walk about the streets of Fallujah at night do they?
Do they walk about any street in Iraq at any time?
5

,

02/09/2008 13:43:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

Postmark-55,

China, 02/09/2008 13:46:22
Just wet dreams, that war will never be won, it will flare up time and again, especially when the US is counting their chickens before the eggs have hatched.
7

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 02/09/2008 17:03:23
#6 PM 55

It's insurgents.. The war is winding down.. and the Sunnis are tired of insurgents from Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Iran. They have no reguard for Iraqi life. The Sunnis were more than willing to turn against the insurgency. No one is fooling themselves here, no eggs are being counted...but you would never know from the reporting, shoddy at it is, done by Scotsman.
8

Col. Blimp­IV*,

02/09/2008 18:46:24
#7
Lynne - "They have no reguard for Iraqi life"

And the US and British Governments do?

Close on one Million Iraqi corpses would beg to differ...If only they could.
9

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 02/09/2008 19:10:22
I'm not even answering that. It is pointless. We are not responsible for almost a million...you keep pushing phony numbers to make it true. It is Iraqi fighting Iraqi, led by foreign insurgents from Egypt, Iran, and Saudi Arabia.
What will you say about the assassination squads being trained by Hezbollah to kill Iraqi politicians? BTW, paid for by Iran.
10

Col. Blimp­IV*,

02/09/2008 21:18:26
#9

Lynne this is all happening in Iraq, the only valid perspective that it can be viewed from is from that of an Iraqi.

Neither you or I are particularly well quallified to do that.

So let us suppose that The USA was led by a cruel and powerful Tyrant, who the civilized world claimed was in possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction, which he steadfastly refused to turn over to UN inspectors and even had the nerve to deny their existence.

Some of those "civilized" counties invaded the USA, deposed the Tyrant, killed hundreds of thousands, destroyed the country's infrastructure, made millions homeless and unemployed, kicking of a multi-faceted civil war, creating shortages of food, water, electricity and medical supplies.

The occupying power then appointed companies from their country to take over the commanding heights of your economy and rebuild your country in it's Islamic image.
Then Installs some pro-islamic "Americans" into a semi-autonimous puppet government.

Five years after they "Liberated" you the foreign Army is still occupying your country and the death rate due to disease, malnourishment and poor medical facilities, outstrips by far anything experienced under the Tyrant despite him having to cope with ten years of economic sanctions.

How hostile would you be towards Christian insurgents trained and financed by Canada and Mexico?
11

57Nomad,

california 02/09/2008 23:34:20
#6 pms

pms said:

"Just wet dreams, that war will never be won, it will flare up time and again, especially when the US is counting their chickens before the eggs have hatched"

Just wet dreams. On this subject, pms, you are without a doubt the resident expert on the subject. As the gorgeous Sarah Silverman once told a guy, "Hey, I bet you get l%+d like.... never!" And so your vast knowledge of wet dreams is well earned.

It is, you see, not America's wet dream, it the anti-Americans nightmare.
12

57Nomad,

california 02/09/2008 23:50:30
#4 Randy

Randy said:

"Americans walk about the streets of Fallujah at night do they?
Do they walk about any street in Iraq at any time?"

Yes, Randy, I believe they do. The tipping point of the war actually came in Fallujah. The jihadis, few of whom, by the way were Iraqis, had imposed a Taleban type rule in Fallujah and terrorized the local population. Naturally, being human beings, they resented this. It was the citizens of Fallujah, slipping out of town at night that provided maps, addresses, and other vital information to the Marines.

The majority of the Iraqis are Shi'a. Saddam was a sunni. Consequently Americans are welcome in the Shia sections any time. In the past two years the same thing has happened in the Sunni region. The Sunni's are our best allies in their part of the country. It seems your friends, the murdering foreign jihadis, miscalculated when the murdered a Sunni sheik by blowing up a tanker truck full of chlorine when the sheik and his family were passing by. Rather than intimidating the other Sunni sheiks, it caused them to change sides. Now both the Sunni and the Shia are with us and nobody is on your side, loser.
13

57Nomad,

california 04/09/2008 03:55:24
#10 CB

CB said:

"Five years after they "Liberated" you the foreign Army is still occupying your country and the death rate due to disease, malnourishment and poor medical facilities, outstrips by far anything experienced under the Tyrant despite him having to cope with ten years of economic sanctions."

First lets talk about this 'occupation' business. In 1949 France, the UK, and the US occupied, in one form or another, the nation of Germany for almost 50 years. Not only that but the US,UK, and the ingrate piggy-back riding French didn't come to Germany as liberators, they came as conquerors and made no excuses about it.

We occupied Japan for almost eight years. Not only that but we wrote a constitution (really oversaw its writing) for them, and you wanna talk about cultural insensitivity, we de-deified the Japanese Emperor, and in a move that still mystifies many, especially around Detroit, lent them a couple of billion dollars and showed them how to make passenger cars, proving once again that no good deed goes unpunished.

As far as the "the death rate due to disease, malnourishment and poor medical facilities, outstrips by far anything experienced under the Tyrant" I find that dubious but I don't have the facts to either support or refute that claim. One thing is for sure, the death rates for being ran through wood chippers is considerably smaller. Also the death rate from having poison gas rained down on your city from bombs and artillery shells has fallen dramatically. If you will check with the Marsh Arabs, you will find that the ecological devastation to their environment is quickly healing itself and they too, like the residents of Halabja, haven't had to concern themselves with Saddam's WMD's (Now, hold on a second there Nomad, remember, Saddam had no WMD's!!). Sorry, not only did he have them, he used them on a city in his own country, Halabja, he also used them on the Marsh Arabs, his fellow countrymen, and he broke the back of the Irani
14

57Nomad,

california 04/09/2008 03:56:52
#13 contd.

Sorry, not only did he have them, he used them on a city in his own country, Halabja, he also used them on the Marsh Arabs, his fellow countrymen, and he broke the back of the Iranian army by showering them with poison gas.

Please cite your sources for your claims of death from malnutrition, disease, etc have gone up. I'm not arguing with you, and if what you say is true, I'd like to know about it. So, please cite your sources so we can take a look.
15

suchaparcelofrogues,

Scotland 15/09/2008 07:08:03
So in other words they have handed it back to the very "insurgents" they took it from.
Or do they actually believe that some of the "insurgents" no longer wear Iraqi police uniforms?

9

Still living in denial and expecting the rest of us to join you?
Every charity group and welfare organisation working in Iraq before and after the invasion all agree the death rate is over a million and still rising in spite of the so called "surge" and when the so called "surge" ends with the withdrawl of the extra troops the level of violence will go back to the level it was before the "surge" began.
16

suchaparcelofrogues,

Scotland 15/09/2008 07:11:33
2

So when do the extra troops pull out then now that its all a bed of roses?
Is there an acceptable level of violence which will allow US politicians to turn around and say we have finally won and if so what is that level? 5 dead a day 10 20 30 .....?
17

suchaparcelofrogues,

Scotland 15/09/2008 07:21:23
12

Dream on Walter Mitty.
Have you booked your holidays yet? how about Fallujah or Baghdad? or Basra?
You will have won your so called war of liberation when tourists are walking through the streets at night visiting restraunts bars and clubs with only the worry of being ripped off and getting stomach cramps from the local water.
The level of stupidy on these blogs is quite frankly breathtaking.
18

suchaparcelofrogues,

Scotland 15/09/2008 07:23:15
How many "surges" did the US armed forces perform in Vietnam?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.