Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 17th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Russia warns Iran it will back sanctions



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 February 2008
RUSSIA warned Iran last night that unless it ceases uranium enrichment within days, Moscow will support new United Nations sanctions being prepared by the West against the Islamic Republic.
The ultimatum is the strongest signal yet that Russia is toughening its stance towards Iran, which the US, Britain and France suspect of seeking nuclear weapons.

Russia's UN envoy, Vitaly Churkin, said Moscow could back a sanctions resolution that
the powers have drafted and want discussed in the Security Council this week.

"If Iran in the next few days does not stop the enrichment activities of its heavy water project, then yes, Russia ... has taken upon itself certain commitments … to support the resolution that has been drafted in the past month," Mr Churkin said in New York.

"Russia is constantly insisting that the (UN] Security Council adopt certain sanctions against Iran," he said.

Tehran denies it has a nuclear weapons programme and says it has a right to enrich uranium.

Russia, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has in recent weeks criticised Iran's test launch of a rocket and warned it not to ignore the international community.

It has urged Iran's leadership to give full information on its nuclear programme to the UN's nuclear watchdog.

Russia's support for sanctions appears to mark a shifting of stance. Moscow has a long history of co-operation with Iran.

The new sanctions resolution formally submitted by France and Britain calls for measures including asset freezes and mandatory travel bans for Iranian officials.

It also expands the list of Iranian officials and companies targeted by the sanctions.





The full article contains 272 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 February 2008 10:34 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Iran
 
1

SouthernGent,

28/02/2008 00:27:37
The question now is whether China will follow suit.
2

Carolyn 1,

28/02/2008 01:17:30
China is unpredictable, but my guess is they will speak with a well rehearsed doublespeak of 'diplomacy' until after the Olympics.
3

Guga II,

Rockall 28/02/2008 02:00:54
So when are they all going to support sanctions against Israel?
4

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 28/02/2008 03:41:41
#2 Carolyn 1

"China is unpredictable, but my guess is they will speak with a well rehearsed doublespeak of 'diplomacy' until after the Olympics".

....They probably learned how to do it from the masters, the USA.
5

Neil,

Glasgow 28/02/2008 11:20:34
China is very cautious about using its veto. It has no more interest in encouraging Iran than we have in encouraging the Kosovo drug lords. And probably rather more sense than our genocidal Nazi leaders have.
6

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 28/02/2008 11:57:45
"Russia warns Iran it will back sanctions"

....This has to be some sort of bluff as it was Russia that supplied the hardware and expertise to enable the enrichment in the first place.

I expect Iran is quacking in their collective boots (Not).
7

Neil,

Glasgow 28/02/2008 12:57:52
It take it whenn they do vote for it Let's will be on here to say how wrong he was - Not.
8

Sensor,

28/02/2008 17:44:02
Russia doesn't have an IMF or WB loan application pending, does she? (Just like the Gulf War One UN vote)
9

Farzad,

Iran 28/02/2008 19:26:31
Sanctioning iran for commiting what crime ? according to article 4 of NPT enreaching uranium for peaceful purposes is fully legal and iran has enjoyed this right . IAEA as the official organ of UN has approved in numerous repots that Iran,s nuclear activities are peaceful , so why talking about sanctions against iran . which country on this planet have been in cooperation with IAEA like Iran ? ISREAL ? USA ? INDIA OR PAKISTAN ?
10

Lynne,

USA 28/02/2008 20:22:32
This is what Ahmadinejad has wanted..first step to the caliphate. Has he convinced anyone?
Iran 'number one world power': Ahmadinejad
by Stuart WilliamsThu Feb 28, 8:08 AM ET
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad declared on Thursday that Iran was the world's "number one" power, as he launched a bitter new assault on domestic critics he accused of siding with the enemy.
"Everybody has understood that Iran is the number one power in the world," Ahmadinejad said in a speech to families who lost loved ones in the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq war.
"Today the name of Iran means a firm punch in the teeth of the powerful and it puts them in their place," added Ahmadinejad, who on Sunday will become the first president of the Islamic republic to visit neighbouring Iraq.
Ahmadinejad's comments come amid renewed Western efforts on the UN Security Council to agree a third package of sanctions against Tehran over its refusal to suspend sensitive nuclear activities.
They also came a day after former top nuclear negotiator Hassan Rowhani launched an unprecedented attack on Ahmadinejad's foreign policy, accusing him of using "coarse slogans and grandstanding".
"You can see how some people here... try to materialise the plans of the enemies and by showing that Iran is small and the enemy is big," seethed Ahmadinejad.
"These are the people who put the enemies of humanity in the place of God," said the deeply religious president.
Ahmadinejad once again insisted that Iran was winning the standoff over its atomic programme, which the West fears could be used to make nuclear weapons but Iran says is peaceful.
"The Iranian nation is on the verge of the final nuclear victory and no power can stop this nation."
"The enemies of the nation and bullying powers do not dare to admit that this nation has won in the nuclear field."
Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who this week congratulated Ahmadinejad for his role in Iran's nuclear case, said that Islamic countries do not need US approval t
11

Lynne,

USA 28/02/2008 20:23:32
continued...
Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who this week congratulated Ahmadinejad for his role in Iran's nuclear case, said that Islamic countries do not need US approval to achieve great works.
12

Carolyn 1,

28/02/2008 21:28:13
Why the jerk continues the saber rattling- who knows what crazy people have going on in their head? It's a sure thing he's leading the country into some tough sanctions and an even harsher economy if he doesn't stop.
The Iranian economy already tanked despite the mountains of income from oil. All that cash- can you imagine how much cash there must be? It's all going into weapons, terrorists pockets and the widespread corruption.
Honest Iranian citizens and infrastructure get zip/nada/nothing/zilch.
The citizens are in a lose lose situation until they get the maniac off the pulpit.

13

SouthernGent,

28/02/2008 23:33:42
#9

As I understand it, the IAEA has asked Iran about possible links between weapons testing and the nuclear program, and Iran has NOT come up with a satisfactory answer. If the IAEA is concerned, then we all should probalbly be concerned.
14

Lynne,

USA 29/02/2008 02:05:06
Carolyn1, SouthernGent, and they say the US has a bad reputation!!!
15

Farzad,

Iran 29/02/2008 04:27:58
A possible link is not regarded as a legal basis for punishment and sanctioning . the nuclear offence should be established beyond reasonable doubt .
16

Farzad,

Iran 29/02/2008 04:28:45
My comment was for #13
17

SouthernGent,

29/02/2008 16:37:12
#16

It is always better to err on the side of caution, especially when dealing with nuclear weapons. If there is the slightest doubt from the IAEA, then that is too much.
18

57Nomad,

california 29/02/2008 18:25:27
There has been mentioned in a couple of posts something of interest. Why, having sold all this stuff to the Iranians would they now support sanctions? It is puzzling. But, when the Russians are involved it's always puzzling. Churchills, "Russia is a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma," is as valid today as it was sixty years ago.

It is hard to see how a nuclear armed Iran is a good deal for the Russians. The Iranians are buddies with the Chechnyans. It takes a missile to hit Israel or the US, but it only takes a few guys to tote a bomb from Iran to Russia and the Russians know it.

It is likely that the Russians have saturated the Iranian program with spies and that every single tech they send to Iran to assist them is also a spy. The Russians, no doubt, know as much about the Iranian program as A'jad does. If the Iranian facilities get smacked it will likely be the Russians not the US or Israel that does it.
19

Lynne,

USA 01/03/2008 14:35:32
Nomad...also with Ahmadinenut declaring that Iran is the most powerful nation in the world ..does not help Putin's image..He has been slowly removing the democratic strides they made to try and get Russia back to prominence, and its place among the world powers.
20

thewitness,

12/03/2008 03:50:59
#18 57 Nomad

You said..."If the Iranian facilities get smacked it will likely be the Russians not the US or Israel that does it."

HahhHahhHahhHahhHahhHahh...don't think so dude! Israel dares attack Iran, it's ta,ta, toodaloo, no more rogue state! No more safe haven for the worlds criminals to hide out in, like the Lockerbie and 9/11 bombers.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.