Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Iran rules out new elections

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the scotsman.com site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 June 2009
Iran's top electoral body today rejected calls to scrap the country's disputed election, ending hopes of a rerun demanded by angry opposition supporters.
The announcement by the Guardian Council on Iran's state-run English language Press TV was another sign the regime is determined to crush unrest, the worst since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, rather than seek compromise.

Government warnings to the
protesters have intensified in recent days, with Iran's supreme leader ordering them off the streets and the feared Revolutionary Guards threatening a tough crackdown. At least 17 people have been killed in near-daily demonstrations.

In a boost for the embattled regime, Russia said that it respects the declared election result, which the Iranian government described as a landslide victory for hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

The US and many European countries have refrained from challenging the election outcome directly, but have issued increasingly stern warnings against continuing violence meted out to demonstrators.

Ahmadinejad's main challenger, Mir Hossein Mousavi, has said the election was a fraud and insists he is the true winner.

The Guardian Council found "no major fraud or breach in the election," a spokesman said. "Therefore, there is no possibility of an annulment taking place."

Yesterday the Guardian Council admitted there had been voting irregularities in 50 districts, including local vote counts that exceeded the number of eligible voters. However, the council said the discrepancies were not widespread enough to affect the result.

After a huge opposition rally a week ago, protests have become smaller, but demonstrators have been more willing to confront Iranian troops.
Yesterday Tehran riot police fired tear gas and live bullets to break up about 200 protesters paying tribute to those killed in the protests, including Neda Agha Soltan, whose shooting was captured on video and circulated worldwide.

Helicopters hovered overhead as riot police fired live rounds and lobbed tear gas to break up the gathering. Security forces ordered people to keep walking and prevented even small groups from gathering.

Ms Soltan's boyfriend Caspian Makan, a 37-year-old photojournalist in Tehran, said she had not been deterred by the risk of protesting. "She only ever said that she wanted one thing, she wanted democracy and freedom for the people of Iran," he said.



The full article contains 378 words and appears in scotsman.com newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 June 2009 11:27 AM
  • Source: scotsman.com
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Iran
 
1

Mashimaro,

China 23/06/2009 14:55:25
Ms Soltan's boyfriend Caspian Makan, a 37-year-old photojournalist in Tehran, said she had not been deterred by the risk of protesting. "She only ever said that she wanted one thing, she wanted democracy and freedom for the people of Iran," he said."

*rolls his eyes*
Revolution by Acme Advertising Agency... gimme a break
2

Wide Awake,

23/06/2009 15:12:44
There's no reason to hold another election just because a few wealthy Iranian city kids and the western press want one.
3

Julian Rapp,

23/06/2009 15:37:49
There is always problems with youths who want change and they'll stop at nothing until it has been achieved. Even burning down their beloved city.
4

Lynne,

23/06/2009 20:09:13
Why don't all of you, who want to live under the thumbs of mullahs, the Revolutionary Guard, the militias and the police, pack up and move to Iran. Surely, if you think that all these people should want to, and have such a womderful life, why don't you all go and join them. I'm sure Ahmadinejad would welcome you with open arms.
You would never have to worry.. especially you men.. who have to rule the roost. Your women would be enslaved, you would never have to pay for "new clothes" again and they could all look alike, peering out of their eye holes.

There are no gays in Iran, according to Ahmadinejad.. you can attend a hanging a week to rid the country of them.

If this is so good for them, then it must be good for all those who complain about the people who don't want to live like this.
5

Andrew BOD,

Aberdeenshire 23/06/2009 20:17:36
Ah, Russia. In love with all things democratic and fair.

What a predictable response from them. Always ready to stir it up with the EU or US.

What do they take us for? Even an unlearned foreigner knows that these elections were rigged. How could Ahmadinejad, after growing unrest during his last term, increase his majority?
6

Wally,

By The Rivers of Babylon (USA) 23/06/2009 20:46:38
http://www.terrorfreetomorrow.org/upimagestft/TFT Iran Survey Report 0609.pdf

there is no evidence that Mousavi won an election. Read link above that documents private poll done.

http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts06162009.html

Mousavi has a terrorist history. No wonder Lynne likes him. No wonder the US likes him. Remember the US funded Bin Laden & Saddam Hussein and each over a long period of time.

http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/spytalk/2009/06/mousavi-celebrated-in-iranian.html

http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/Article_56073.shtml

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_4823.shtml

http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/06/02/war-with-iran-has-it-already-begun/
7

Wally,

By The Rivers of Babylon (USA) 23/06/2009 20:48:56
President Obama is very concerned about justice in tehran. He's not concerned about opinion polls showing that the election results were honest. Perhaps President Obama should check and see how the $400 million that bush dedicated to the CIA to use to destabilize the iranian regime was used. and perhaps he could see if that program is active today. In 2007 Bush said that he'd authorized CIA to overthrow Iranian government by covert means. If Obama wants justice for Iranians, perhaps he could check up on that.

Also, perhaps Obama should be more concerned with justice in America. Some of our soldiers were hit by fantastic IED explosions. their arms and legs were blown off, yet they are still alive. From the first gulf war (1991) we have 10,000 US parents acting as full-time care-givers to their disabled adult children. A fantastically high percentage of the soldiers in that war became disabled (gulf war syndrome). we sustained birth defects. Perhaps mr. president you could address these injustices along with the injustices in Iran and just bring all our troops home from all our wars. Perhaps you could stop funding violence in Somalia and pakistan too. That would help the justice situation.

and perhaps if you have time mr. President, perhaps you could recall that your branch of government has responsibility for law enforcement. In 1993 in Waco, TX USA there were about 90 murders committed. I believe US government employees did the killing. You as president could have that crime investigated and prosecuted if justice for the americans means anything at all to you. I remind you that there is no federal statute of limitations on murder and that it is your job primarily to be concerned about the Americans' justice situation as well as their interests, not the Iranians' situation.
8

Rob Royston,

Bishopbriggs 23/06/2009 23:10:20
Wally, you are a breath of fresh air, I wish all US and UK people would spend some time thinking beyond the headline propaganda and do their own research.

We can be strong without being so racist and aggressive around this wonderful world that we all share.

I have never met an Iranian that I did not like, although there will be evil ones as there are evil ones among ourselves, so I would be quite happy leaving them to sort out their own problems instead of instigating division.
9

Andrew BOD,

Aberdeenshire 23/06/2009 23:51:57
Wally

Who said Mousavi won??

Your posts and links are littered with conspiracy theories, that may or may not be true. Who really knows?

One thing's for sure: you've not been gunned down for expressing your political viewpoint.

10

Mashimaro,

China 24/06/2009 00:33:03
Lynne you're being manipulated by the news you watch. By news like THESE reports. Please watch Wag the Dog. This dog is being wagged all over the place, just like the North Korean dog is being wagged. If you wag a dog hard enough it bites.
Personally, I don't care who rules Iran as long as everyone else stays out of it. I don't think Mousavi is any better than Armadinejad. Like it or not, Armadinejad has huge support.
11

,

24/06/2009 03:02:06
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

,

24/06/2009 04:03:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

,

24/06/2009 05:03:46
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

,

24/06/2009 05:23:38
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

,

24/06/2009 08:22:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

Ifan Har,

Scotland 24/06/2009 16:05:39
Ever thought for a moment of the consequences if in every country the loosers of an election refused to accept the result and continually organised protests against the perceived aparent winner???

17

Ifan Har,

Scotland 24/06/2009 16:10:52
Before criticising Iran's clampdown on speech let us examine the voume of red censorial ink in this column alone!

It has been decided for us what we are allowed to read or say, why the big deal about Iran?
18

Bryan Luxman,

Michigan 24/06/2009 17:23:42
The more pressure from outside Iran the less chance of a new election.
19

Rattlesnake,

15/07/2009 16:00:41
No need for new elections when these were fair and square.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.