Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Clinton turns heat on Pakistan

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 April 2009
US SECRETARY of State Hillary Clinton has broken cover to deliver the Obama administration's toughest line yet on Pakistan, describing the nation as a "mortal threat to the security and safety of our country and the world".
Amid fears that the Taleban is tightening its grip in a province close to Islamabad, and in a strongly worded statement that made a marked contrast to the more softly-softly approach of President Barack Obama, Mrs Clinton accused the Pakistani government of "abdicating" to insurgents.

Her comments, made to the foreign affairs committee of the US House of Representatives on Wednesday, came after the provincial government reached a peace deal with Taleban militants and agreed to impose sharia law in a district neighbouring the Swat Valley, 70 miles from the Pakistani capital. Local police say militants have made Islamic broadcasts there, set up checkpoints and warned barbers to stop shaving men's faces.

The Taleban has also taken parts of the district of Buner in the remote north of the country. Eight platoons of the Frontier Constabulary (FC) were yesterday sent to guard government buildings and bridges in Buner, just 62 miles from Islamabad.

Militants killed two policemen when a van escorting the paramilitary personnel conducting a patrol near Swabi village was ambushed.

The attack coincided with reports of over 30 Taleban fighters moving into Shangla, another district near Swat in North West Frontier Province.

"I think the Pakistani government is basically abdicating to the Taleban and to the extremists," Mrs Clinton told the hearing. She also echoed concerns that Islamic militants could overthrow the government and seize control of the 60 nuclear weapons estimated to be at Pakistan's disposal.

"We cannot underscore the seriousness of the existential threat posed to Pakistan by the continuing advances – now within hours of Islamabad – that are being made by a loosely confederated group of terrorists and others seeking the overthrow of the Pakistani state," she said.

Mrs Clinton also asked Pakistani expatriates to "speak out forcefully against a (Pakistani] policy that is ceding more and more territory to the insurgents – to the Taleban, to al-Qaeda, to the allies that are in this terrorist syndicate."

Analysts say her comments may damage relations between the US and Pakistan.

The Obama administration's so-called 'Af-Pak' strategy, which was announced recently and outlined the administration's policy for tackling unrest in Pakistan and Afghanistan, does not do enough to address threats emerging in Pakistan, according to a paper published by the Council on Foreign Relations. It recommended that Washington's primary regional objective should be "partnership".

Meanwhile, Pakistan has accused India and Afghanistan of backing an insurgency in its south-western province of Baluchistan.

Pakistan has accused India of meddling in Baluchistan in the past but Wednesday's comments from the interior ministry chief, Rehman Malik, in parliament were also the most explicit in recent years.

Mrs Clinton also called for "crippling" sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme if the US policy of engagement with Tehran should fail.



RICE APPROVED USE OF TORTURE

CONDOLEEZZA Rice, the former national security adviser to President George Bush, personally approved the CIA's request in July 2002 to subject a suspected terrorist to waterboarding – a simulated drowning technique that is classified as torture.

A report released on Wednesday by the Senate intelligence committee provides the most detailed timeline yet for how the CIA's controversial interrogation programme was conceived and approved at the highest levels in the White House.

The report contradicts evidence given by Ms Rice to the Senate armed services committee last autumn.

Previously, she said only that she had attended meetings where the CIA interrogation request was discussed.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 April 2009 10:10 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: International terrorism
 
1

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 24/04/2009 00:17:52
The US is pressuring the Pakistani government to join with the US in warring against a portion of the Pakistanis. The Pakistani government has been cooperating strongly too much against the will of Pakistanis. So far, 300,000 Pakistanis have been become refugees fleeing this fighting that is largely initiated by the Pakistani government. Also, the US has been doing the drone attacks, killing over 300 in the last several months in Pakistan. The typical US drone attack is controlled by soldiers sitting at a tv monitor in Nevada. It is remote control killing. Typically a military target is right in a populated area. They get the target, but 90% of who they kill are non-combatants. The neighbors' homes get blown up, despite that they hit the right house, the explosions are so large, lots of people die. The style of warfare the US uses results in many civilian deaths.

The Americans don't want their government to go a-warring all over the world. President Obama is illegitimate because he does not pay any heed to the desires of the Americans on these and other matters.
2

,

24/04/2009 00:29:19
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

,

24/04/2009 02:15:28
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

RDavis,

Vienna 24/04/2009 05:41:01
Bush,Rice & Blair should all be tried for war crimes. The torture I am sure goes against the Geneva Convention.
5

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 24/04/2009 08:15:00
RDavis in #4: A few years ago there was a public discussion here in the US about the Geneva Convention. The US government announced and it was decided that the US is not bound by it.

It is very unfortunate that we are unable to rule over ourselves in a decent manner. We should be able to punish the torturers, especially those who created the torture policy. We are unable to do it.

Let's not be foolish in our thinking. It has been very well documented that people in washington led us into doing torture. They orchestrated it and we've found their paper trail. Also, contrary to what many people think, there is overwhelming evidence that some people were tortured to death by US forces. The US also pays other countries to do torture and people are also tortured to death in that process.

A US Army officer (a captain I believe) was assigned to go to Abu Ghraib and find out what happened. He issued a report, in it he said that over the limited period of time he studied there were about 35 people tortured to death by US forces at Abu Ghraib. Also, a turkish newspaper reported years ago that 2 dozen people were tortured to death in one of their prisons and this program to do this was paid for by the US.

Also, lets be aware that even American born Americans have been tortured. (Jose Padilla at a minimum).
6

GONNYNODEATHAT,

Glasgow 24/04/2009 10:49:48
Everyone and their Dug knew Pakistan was and is one of the most corrupt nations in the world. Everyone also knows where Osama bin Laden is ~ PAKISTAN.
7

K McDonald,

Glasgow 24/04/2009 11:06:59
If and when the Talebs take over Pakistan the UK will be pressured into taking millions of Pakistani refugees.
8

Mashimaro,

China 24/04/2009 11:35:44
eh... I told you so
9

mike - across the pond,

wally.... 24/04/2009 18:30:02
good lord wally...

thats like saying the US government has announced that water is not wet...

which sends the morons off in their gleeful twittering fits...

and does sound equally as absolutely absurd...

HOWEVER.... if you take it in context... that water at -50 C is not wet... then its a "well of course" water at -50 c is frozen solid... and therefore must be warmed to allow anything to get wet from it...

so wally... your little self loathing rant about "the us determined that the geneva convention doesnt apply" requires context... without which your flagelation fit gives the same twittering idiots solace in their moronic rants...

question #1 for dear Wally
are you aware of any conditions that must be adhered to to make the geneva convention applicable to "combatants"?

question #2 for dear Wally
how sure are you that the "combatants in question" were in compliance with those requirements?

question #3 for dear Wally
care to retract your implied allegations?

ball is in your court dear Wally
10

,

25/04/2009 02:07:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

Barry Brock,

25/04/2009 02:21:24
Who cares about the Democrats it's the Republicans who were in power right or wrong?
12

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 25/04/2009 03:50:47
Mike in #9:

nice to hear from you Mike. I'm afraid that you perhaps didn't read the same news stories as I read. It was right in the news Mike. I don't remember the details and can't point you to a link. But the bush administration made it known that it is not bound by the Geneva Convention.
13

Wally,

By The Rivers Of babylon (USA) 26/04/2009 04:34:30
cutty sark in #15: I note that Lynne is hopelessly caught in partisan thinking. As George Washington said prophetically in his 'farewell address' of 1796 - the 'spirit of party' facilitates evil. All Lynne can think about is republican - democrat rivalry.
14

mike - across the pond,

wally.... 27/04/2009 21:03:06
the condition for the geneva convention to apply is...
1) uniformed... you MUST wear a uniform...
2) you must identify yourself
3) you must INVOKE the geneva convention...

if you dont comply with these requirements... the convention DOES NOT APPLY

now I understand that part of these guys ability to "bring the fight" is that they DONT wear uniforms... but give me a break... if you dont comply with the conventions... you cant invoke the conventions... this isnt Mrs Jones 3rd grade class here... where you pick and choose what rules you want to follow...

its THAT simple... ask 2 dogs... he has a friend who recently told him nearly word for word the SAME thing...
15

2dogs in D.C.,

18/07/2009 02:12:11
Sorry,Wally.Mikes right.Maybe a whole new set of international "rules" is in order?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Are US threats to cut tourism and business ties over the Megrahi case justified?
Yes, Americans have got a right to be angry
No, they’re in no position to claim the moral high ground
No, the decision to free Megrahi was the right one

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.