Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


World Bank chief fills girlfriend's account

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 April 2007
ON A recent visit to a Turkish mosque, Paul Wolfowitz, the president of the World Bank removed his shoes, as is the custom, revealing holes in both his socks. His girlfriend, to whom he had given a sizeable pay rise, could afford to buy him a new pair, but her controversial promotion could yet cost the president his job.
The World Bank's board of directors yesterday announced that Shaha Riza's promotion and pay rise were not reviewed by an ethics committee nor the board's chairman, before being authorised by Mr Wolfowitz, a former deputy defence secretary of the United States and a leading architect of the American invasion of Iraq.

Mr Wolfowitz directly intervened to arrange Miss Riza's move to the US state department in 2005, where her salary was increased from $132,660 to $193,590 (£97,000), topping the $186,000 salary of Condoleezza Rice, the secretary of state.

Miss Riza, who has dated Mr Wolfowitz since 2002, when he separated from his wife of 30 years, was moved, as World Bank regulations prohibit spouses or partners from supervising one another.

Miss Riza was working in the bank's Middle East and North Africa (MENA) section when Mr Wolfowitz was nominated for the job by George Bush, the US president in 2005.

While the board of directors' ethics committee recommended that Miss Riza, who is of Saudi and Libyan descent but carries a British passport, be transferred, it is understood Mr Wolfowitz went further and helped to secure her new position and pay grade. Miss Riza's salary was disclosed by a bank employee, who took it to the Government Accountability Project, a group in the United States that protects whistle-blowers. Another issue of concern to bank staff was reports that Miss Riza, while working at the bank, received fees paid by a US defence contractor that was doing consulting work in Iraq.

Yesterday the bank's board of directors conducted a review on whether their president broke staff rules when he approved his girlfriend's promotion, before she was assigned to the state department.

In a statement, the board said it found that Mr Wolfowitz signed off on Miss Riza's promotion and salary increase without a review by an ethics committee or the board's chairman. The statement continued: "The executive directors will move expeditiously to reach a conclusion on possible actions to take. In their consideration of the matter the executive directors will focus on all relevant governance implications for the bank."

On Thursday, Mr Wolfowitz said he had taken full responsibility for Miss Riza's promotion and apologised, explaining that he had made a mistake in the way he handled the issue.

He said: "In hindsight, I wish I had trusted my original instincts and kept myself out of the negotiations. I made a mistake, for which I am sorry."

The apology was welcomed by Alison Cave, chairwoman of the staff association of the World Bank, though she insisted it must be followed up by Mr Wolfowitz's resignation. She said he had "broken the staff's trust on this and many other issues". She also said that if the board failed to ask for his resignation, the staff association would call a vote of no confidence in him.

The situation Mr Wolfowitz has found himself in is compounded by his own vocal attack on corruption among recipients of World Bank aid. When he took over as president he ignored a shortlist of candidates for a new head of institutional integrity, the bank's internal investigation unit, and instead appointed a Republican colleague and doubled the department's budget.

Mr Wolfowitz has been an unpopular appointment. When he arrived, a poll of staff revealed 90 per cent were hostile to their new president and since then he has been accused of pursuing a political agenda by expanding aid to countries when the US and its allies have intervened militarily such as Lebanon and Iraq. He has also withheld aid to nations which he views as corrupt.

Last night, the White House said Mr Wolfowitz "has our full confidence".

AIMING TO END POVERTY

THE World Bank, which is based in Washington, employs 13,000 people in more than 100 countries and lends £13 billion a year to poor and middle-income nations.

The bank's official goal is "a world without poverty". It was established in 1944 during a conference on postwar reconstruction in New Hampshire in the United States..

Representatives of 40 nations agreed to create two new institutions. The International Monetary Fund was made responsible for stabilising the global currency market and what would become the World Bank had the job of helping to rebuild shattered nations.

Its first loan was to France in 1945.

In 1948 it lent money to Chile and in 1950 to Ethiopia and soon it was financing infrastructure work in Africa, Asia and Latin America.

As the US government is the World Bank's largest shareholder, it has always asserted the right to appoint its president.

In 1967, the US president Lyndon Johnson nominated Robert McNamara, the chief strategist of the Vietnam War, who during the next 13 years expanded the bank's role from infrastructure to include poverty, education, health care and family planning.

Page 1 of 1

 
1

Robin Bather,

Mexico 14/04/2007 01:40:49

So Wolfowitz is hot on ethics eh.
Authorizing a 35.5% pay increase to the woman he is sleeping with, when the World Bank regulations state that 12% is the maximum.
Then he deliberately bypassed the ethics committee.
Then he deliberately bypassed the board chairman.
Forget about the holes in his socks--that's a red herring.

"I made a mistake, for which I am sorry".
Sounds more like "I deliberately made three corrupt decisions, and regret being found out".

Throw him out on his corrupt backside!

2

Elliot,

Colorado 14/04/2007 02:12:35

You've got that right. It is a dark night here in America. The American revolution is under attack by these neo-cons but there is hope.

3

I'm no really here,

14/04/2007 02:17:00

I'll restrain myself, but the headline is tempting.

4

www.scottwebb.co.uk.,

14/04/2007 02:39:44

What a role model for the rest of The New World Order brigade he's turning out to be :)

5

Roopa,

USA 14/04/2007 02:49:45

There is no surprise ..Wolfie is immersed in the corrupt Republican politics. This idiot and his good governance ..my foot.

6

Roopa,

USA 14/04/2007 02:50:26

Throw him to the Thalibans ..let them lynch him.

7

Roopa,

USA 14/04/2007 02:52:12

He is a wolf ..out of the wolf pack in Washington

8

Jim A,

14/04/2007 05:08:49

LOL, I love the billboard behind him, very apt.

9

Fez,

Mauritius 14/04/2007 05:50:04

Sheer hypocrisy! Typical of Bush cronies!
They are no better than the corrupt despots in many parts of Africa whom they do not denounce but condone for political consideration.

10

Erse,

Middle East 14/04/2007 06:21:01

#3

I'm glad the Hootsmon's proof reader was on the ball with the headline.

11

GJM,

WALES 14/04/2007 06:39:03

Another great recommendation from you know who! cannot mention the name . no moral fibre just as bent as the the goverments we are pouring in aid.

12

Repton,

edinburgh 14/04/2007 07:43:10

Another case of the wee head ruling the big head.Silly old fool ,should have known better and should be sacked.

13

Yane,

Back o Beyond 14/04/2007 09:45:46

Where's Horrible Cankers?

14

DC Weeman,

Washington USA 14/04/2007 09:45:46

Hey, I think 97,000 quid salaray is justified - she has to sleep with that idiot. The smell of sulphur must be overpowering

15

buzz aldrin,

england 14/04/2007 10:08:32

roopa says throw wolfie to his fate, the article stated he was the architect of the iraqi war, that should do it for certain,what!

16

most things - if in moderation..,

14/04/2007 10:45:09

everyone has there vices... mine is sex with much younger women (I recommend it to everyone). However I am continually amazed at those whose vice is to grab as much money as possible by any means. surprizingly those at the top who don't need it are often the worst. I like to few bob in my pocket but I'm happy with my meger salary myself, i'm certainly not going to risk all to get more cash.

17

Carolyn 1,

Martha's Vineyard, MA, USA 14/04/2007 12:51:57

Reading Public

Avaaz is funded by Moveon.org

18

Carolyn 1,

Martha's Vineyard, MA, USA 14/04/2007 13:04:10

To keep perspective- Democrats hate Wolfowitz. (And that means MoveOn.org has an agenda to get rid of Wolfowitz)
Wolfowitz would be held under a microscope until something was found to ruin him. Was he right to hire her? No. Why is it any different than Jordan getting Lewinsky at job because of her favors for Clinton? He was not repremanded for it. I wonder why?

here's an interesting facts about the World Bank:
1.) They give loans to the chinese worker to help him rise from poverty-
considering china is the second largest trader in the world, why does a US funded bank help the chinese poverty striken? Because we care and because we can and because we do.
2.) The world bank in recent years (2003) helped iranians rise from poverty and gave money for shelter and housing. They lent money and worked with the iranian government on sanitation projects. You don't hear Iran saying thank you.
3) The world bank is putting a lot of work and money into Bangladesh- which is another poverty stricken country trying to pull itself up- it is a true emerging democracy- as long as it can keep the islamic sharia law and corruption out of the government

I think the achievement from the World Bank far outweighs Wolfowitz giving a job to a girl friend. Fire her.

The UN was SO CORRUPT , and there is so little outrage...

19

Mandelson,

UK 14/04/2007 13:53:45

Does anyone else see a strange coincidance that Wolfowitz, Lord Levy are both zionists who happen to be best of buddies; and that Mr Sarkozy, another pro-Israeli Jew who is now heading for French Presidency? Edinburgh conspiracy society sees a link to Middle East and attempt to prevent creation of Palestinian State.

20

Carolyn 1,

14/04/2007 14:25:55

#27
How true.
My point is that MoveOn.org has an agenda. The World Bank is universal, international and does not - not one that I can see

21

Rainbird,

Illinois/USA 14/04/2007 14:50:05

More of the same: "In hindsight, I wish I had trusted my original instincts and kept myself out of the negotiations. I made a mistake, for which I am sorry."

We've heard so many forms of the same thing from so many people associated with the current administration, that they should take out the plaque that says, "The Buck Stops Here," and replace with with "Mistakes were made."

Although, "The $$$ stops here" would also be fitting...

22

Rainbird,

Illinois/USA 14/04/2007 15:00:17

I have a busy weekend planned with the wife, and we may go out of town to visit my daughter and grand daughter. If so, I'll see everyone on Monday, and you Scotsmen (I am sure) can handle the RIght WIng Militant Nationalists all by yourself.

So far I see them SELLINH very hard, but very few of you are actually buying their hate fueled agenda.

Thank GOD there are still civilized people left somewhere!

23

Robin Bather,

Mexico 14/04/2007 16:49:21

#20 Reading Public:

12%

24

Robin Bather,

Mexico 14/04/2007 18:30:13

It's the same old story----sleeping with the boss always pays off.

25

Pilrig,

Livingston 14/04/2007 18:36:12

holes in his socks ! now how self negligent is that ? !

26

Pilrig,

Livingston 14/04/2007 18:38:19

His burd thinks so much of his she cannae buy him a new pair of socks : )

27

Bikewoman,

14/04/2007 22:57:41

#35 Reading Public

"I might point out that I believe wolfowitz has shot himself in the foot"

Indeed he has. Perhaps that accounts for the holes in his socks?

28

Bikewoman,

14/04/2007 23:48:53

#42 I rather thought it was exactly the kind of thing you would come up with. ;)

29

Bikewoman,

15/04/2007 00:12:17

#44 Reading Public

Well I do mean it. We are obviously coming form very different political standpoints but I respect your sharp intellect.

30

Djookers,

15/04/2007 13:33:45

#25 Carolyn 1

"To keep perspective- Democrats hate Wolfowitz. (And that means MoveOn.org has an agenda to get rid of Wolfowitz)"
To keep perspective, the whole world outside the bush white house and its supporters thought he was the wrong man for the job before his appointment and still do now. See my last link as to how he is perceived by people who deal with the world bank.

Here is a little taste of how badly qualified the man is in regard to other countries finances.

"There’s a lot of money to pay for this that doesn’t have to be U.S. taxpayer money, and it starts with the assets of the Iraqi people…and on a rough recollection, the oil revenues of that country could bring between $50 and $100 billion over the course of the next two or three years…We’re dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction, and relatively soon"
Source: House Committee on Appropriations Hearing on a Supplemental War Regulation, 3/27/03

We all know that none of the above happened.

This next is a bit misleading as you seem to be claiming that the US is the sole funder of the World Bank
"why does a US funded bank help the chinese poverty striken? Because we care and because we can and because we do."

Europe provides 60% of the banks fund and is under pressure from many organisations like Christian aid to withhold funds because of the polices put in place since Wolfowitz arrived.
http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/news/world/070307eu

In fact Wolfowitz has been trying to put a gloss on the slip in contributions from the US.
"What I would hope is that some of the donors whose shares have been slipping, including the United States, would do more," said Wolfowitz. "To be fair, the US didn't lower their contribution, it's just that others increased theirs more."
Source:Report Unsuitable

31

Arthur Borges,

Zhengzhou, China 15/04/2007 18:24:18

It's a real hoot to discover he's a cheapie when it comes to buying socks but yes, he's being edged out for reasons beneath the public radar screen.

Not sorry to see him go but his replacement will be another interchangeable part.

Plus ça change...

32

Carolyn 1,

15/04/2007 19:16:45

If it isn't broken don't fix it.
The UN is corrupt and in the slow process of redeeming itself- the Human Rights issue of course is still a joke. That leaves The World Bank to be the entity to help the poor and to help countries rebuild. The US provides the majority of the world bank's funds (on top of the other international aid programs)- it has purchased the right to appoint the leader. If another country doesn't like it then cough up an equal amount of money and take control, or invest the money elsewhere.
Wolfowitz has a lot of enemies. Why? He believes the money should be invested where there is the least corruption and the highest chance the money will be used for its intended purpose. That means working with emerging democracies. Most of the world disagrees with that theory. I don't. Every contract has its terms. Thats the terms. Period.

33

Carolyn 1,

watching the storm brew up 15/04/2007 19:42:37

#47
Djookers
I scanned most of the links
I am not going to commment much on Uzbekistan since I'm sure you forgot the reason was based on the Andijon crisis- which even the EU condemned; A complicated issue.
As for the 50% or 60% I odn't know what the discrepancy is since one is a EU figure and one is a US figure of the same time period. Could be value of the EU over the dollar. But I think this is good- it shows international support in an organization that is working
Anyhoo
I wonder if some of this 'squabbling' might have to do with citibank europe? - i haven't thought about it for awhile - but i think they were under 'scrutiny' for 'misused funds' involved with the world bank. Wolfowitz, according to reports, is really trying to crack down on waste. SOme big banks might be trying to get rid of him. Think France. Think oil for food....

34

Dagmar,

Schleswig-Holstein 15/04/2007 20:15:32

#55 Carolyn

I think the squabbling has to do with nepotism. Paul Wolfowitz has used his position by the bank to give his girlfriend a job. Also he is married and so if he cannot give this girlfriend a wedding ring he gives her a job with a lot of money to keep her happy. Why do you now try to find any excuse for his behavior because he is conservative? You make some far-fetched story to explain why he may be in trouble, but the reason is very simple. Nepotism is not of partisan politics - it is unethical.

35

Carolyn 1,

watching the storm brew up 15/04/2007 20:25:44

#56
Why?
because Wolfowitz was disliked and in trouble before the girl friend. I've never particualry liked him but supposedly he's brilliant. I still say if it ain't broken don't start tinkering. The World Bank is a huge bureaucracy that seems to doing its job

To hire a girl friend? Stupid. Stupid. Yes, its neptosim but it is not illegal if she is qualified. She is qualified. So her pay should be decreased or she should step down.

36

Dagmar,

15/04/2007 20:37:57

#57 Carolyn

It is abuse of the power in his position so we see now he can not be a good leader for the bank. It shows moral character is wanting. If he is not liked this is for his other actions, but we do not have to say this is important. It is enough he has used his power for a personal gain in the gain of his girlfriend. We can expect to have an ethical leader.

Here this is like the Clinton with Monica Lewinski affair. Also this is not illegal even if it is stupid, but an investigation is made of it, and he is also not liked I think by conservatives before he has this affair. This use of the ability to hire, to bypass correct procedures and to award too much pay is a worse issue of trust than the affair of Clinton. And Wolfowitz also has an affair here as well.

One standard is for all parties, liberal and conservative. If you use one standard for one party, another standard for the other party, then the commitment to moral action is not there.

37

Carolyn 1,

watching the storm brew up 15/04/2007 20:43:51

believe it or not, since Bill clinton, affairs don't mean too much in USA. Rudy Guiliani, who is running for president has been married three times, he met his third wife while still married to the second. He has the highest poll numbers of anyone running. I think after the clinton mess, most of america thinks sex is sex is sex and has little if anything to do with ability to manage or be a leader. All it really does is cause embarrassment to the people involved and make a headline sell faster. Roosevelt for example had a mistress, everyone knew it and no one cared because he was a good leader. So no, this girlfriend should not be the reason to get rid of someone.
Ability and qualification is the bar of standard.

38

Carolyn 1,

watching the storm brew up 15/04/2007 20:59:45

Dagmar-
the reference you made to clinton is not correct. Clinton was required to give testimony under oath about a sexual assault incident that happened before he was president. he lied under oath: and he did have to pay damages to settle the case. It was for the lieing under oath, and not the sexual indiscretion, that Clinton was held accountable. He still kept his job.
There are no charges of any kind againt Wolfowitz other than political differences. The salary issue, though not proper, does not rise to the level to fire of a crime.
As they say, a DA can indict a ham sandwich if he chooses: that is to say Wolfowitz was indicted, by his enemies, when he was appointed, and he is a ham sandwich like anyone in a political position

39

Djookers,

15/04/2007 21:04:03

#53 Carolyn

"The US provides the majority of the world bank's funds (on top of the other international aid programs)- it has purchased the right to appoint the leader."

Repeating it, does not make it true. The EU provides 60% of the world banks funding. Stop deluding yourself. Facts are facts. By your last sentence you seem to be saying that the US is not donating benevolently to help the poor, but is purchasing rights to the world. Have you any idea how much you OWE the world in various ways.

BTW your post to me at 55,
The Uzbekistan thing was very simple, they said no you cant put a base here. Wolfowitz, who is meant to be neutral, cut their aid..........
As I said above it is 60%, euros and dollars are near enough parity that it wouldn't make a difference.
You doo know that the world bank is part of the UN??
Nothing to do with citibank, nice attempt to swing it round to your favourite cause, Think whatever you want, but none of this has anything to do with france or oil for food.

40

Dagmar,

Schleswig-Holstein 15/04/2007 21:04:43

#60 Carolyn

This surprises me. If this is correct that affairs do not mean much after Clintons affair, and did not mean much before when Roosevent was leader, then this shows that the big fuss was one of politics. I think that what you say "Ability and qualification is the bar of standard" will again not be practiced when a democrat president is in office.

We would hear some voices about an affair here in Germany but there would be no serious consequence to the official who has an affair. This what Wolfowitz does with his girlfriend for a job and money is something else. This we would not allow because it affects the management of the company and its funds. That is a part of the collective trust and using it for personal gain is a very big violation of trust to us.

A different question. Do you know, why does the page let me select a location but when I leave the program, my location is erased? Can I make it so my location stays all the time when I come back?

41

Dagmar,

Schleswig-Holstein 15/04/2007 21:11:42

#61 Carolyn

Here you are saying Clinton has been made to give testimony because he has had an affair. Then he is in trouble because he lies about the affair. But Wolfowitz is indicted and it is because he has enemies. The affair of Clinton is not a crime, but he has to give testimony. Now no one cares about affairs, but the job and salary for his girlfriend is a matter not smaller than Clintons affair. But at this time he is being persecuted, if I underatand you right. Now he should have to testify to a court about his affair and the job just the same.

42

vriendje's pal,

15/04/2007 21:35:46

64 Dagmar

You've have stumbled onto the Republican double-standard.

Interesting fact: Newt Gingrich, who led the charge to try to impeach Clinton, has his own affair. Of course, now he is looking at the possibility of running for president, so he 'confessed' to it on conservative tv, and all the conservative commentators applauded him for his courage in admitting to his 'personal failure.'

If you look at the list of those Republicans who have had affairs, it will go far in explaining why the topic is no longer of import for the Republicans.

43

Carolyn 1,

Woods Hole, Ma with a raging storm out there 15/04/2007 21:41:45

#63
My location keeps erasing too
For Clinton-
It was a crime- it was for sexual assault and rape- which he settled out of court wih a cash settlement. The congress censured him for lieing about the affair with Monika, not for the sexual assault in Arkansas three years earlier, which was a different woman. (Actually there were many sexual cases against him at the time.)

I agree, but it is a fuzzy area for me, whether or not to fire someone over $20,000; I'm sure he is going to produce some "loophole' by which he will get out of the mess. I'd rather he be fired over incompetance.
I'm sticking with my don't fix what it isn't broken. Wolfowitz burn out and quit anyway. Most people only last two years.
The World Bank is getting a lot done. Why don't these objectors protest this loudly at the UN for example, or about the money that can't be found in Iraq another example.

No doubt an oversight committee will recommend something soon. It will be interesting if he has to quit and she stays but with less salary

44

Carolyn 1,

Woods Hole, Ma with a raging storm out there 15/04/2007 21:47:21

#65
It's not a double standard- Republican or democrat- It seems that in the last few years most of the country doesn't care who's sleeping with whom, because so many are doing it. The divorce rate is so high also. Politicians are no different than the people. I wouldn't say this except the country seems to accept Rudy Guiliani on his third marriage- he is the highest in polls for months.

45

Dagmar,

Schleswig-Holstein 15/04/2007 21:50:59

#65 vriendje's pal

Yes it seems to be this way - the argument changes. I read this also when people discuss Pelosi going to Iran because it is known that 3 men of the republican party have gone there as well one week before. It surprises me why there is a double standard when it can be seen by all.

We do get all the news here and hear about Foley and the young boys hired to help in the congress, and also the affair of Gingritch and some others. In Germany we would take this very seriously with the boys working at congress. This would be a very big scandal.

46

vriendje's pal,

15/04/2007 21:51:53

67 Carolyn 1

"The country" didn't care when it was Clinton - it was only the rabid Clinton-hating Republicans.

Clinton's affair was only investigated because the petty little Ken Starr squandered millions investigating Whitewater, coming up with nothing. You are just another historical revisionist.

47

vriendje's pal,

15/04/2007 21:55:57

68 Dagmar

Yes, the Republicans "the party of family values" tried to keep the lid on the Foley doings until after the elections - and the heck with the safety of the pages.

I know people people who are familiar with various countries in Europe, and it seems that most Europeans are still wondering why such things as marital fidelity are given so much attention, while there are many much more serious concerns.

48

Dagmar,

Schleswig-Holstein 15/04/2007 21:58:25

#67 Carolyn

By logic the good number in the poll for Giulliani can not mean that there is no double standard because Giulliani is of the Republican Party. At the other side we see Barak Obama being very criticized because he smokes cigarettes. I have seen the clip of Fox reporters saying they would not vote for a man who smokes. Something is not right in this way of judging.

49

Carolyn 1,

Woods Hole, Ma with a raging storm out there 15/04/2007 22:01:13

Your figure is the EU figure and my figure was from the World bank. It's a 10% discrepancy and possibly attributed to the exchange rate or a different date... Its not something I'm going to waste my time to verify since the figure changes rfequently, as it should.

I will repeat that as the largest shareholder the US has always appointed the chairman. What is, is. Get over it.

As for what I think "I owe the world in various ways", Djookers, I've got debt up the ying yang. I filed taxes today and near had a nervous breakdown.

50

Carolyn 1,

Woods Hole, Ma with a raging storm out there 15/04/2007 22:09:27

We're having a bad storm, so I don't even know if this posts.
Germany has reports that Obama smokes?
I think that's funny. It shows how small the world is. This is good. I think people here feel that makes him 'human'. Obama can't quit the same as lot of other people can't quit either. I wonder if Fox is different where you are because I haven't seen the stories as 'critical' of him- only as hey- he's the same as me.
(When my brother lived in Germany he paid rent with american cigarettes. They cost a fortune now because of tax, so you need a good income to support the habut. Arnould The Ternminator Schwarzineger smokes cigars and had a place built to do it. No one criticizes him for it.

51

Dagmar,

Schleswig-Holstein 15/04/2007 22:22:27

#73

Be careful if it is lightening and thunder there with posting.

We have not got Fox news but we have CNN with the cable. I don't have cable - we already pay license for tv so I don't like to spend too much on the television. I have seen clips at lnks from the internet. I am very slow typing English and I hope you can understand all what I write but I can read the English sites. Maybe there are certain reporters at Fox who are more opinion than others. I don't know very much about it.

We follow your politics here very closely because it affects our situation in Europe too. At least my friends at Uni do. Barak Obama seems to be a man of the people as you say. Maybe he can make good changes if he gets elected.

52

Carolyn 1,

Woods Hole, Ma with a raging storm out there 15/04/2007 22:38:56

Thanks.
We are having what is called a nor-easter.
There are red cross facilties just in case because the storm is supposed to be the worst in decades. I live on the ocean but I have hurricane glass so I'm staying here.

Many want Obama to win, especially Hollywood, but he is too young and has never been tested. We here in America are nervous about war and we could never elect anyone to office without the experience needed. The most Obama can hope for is to be vice president. I think he should have waited, learned, gained experience and then run. I call it backbone, which means strength under fire. John Kennedy, a truly great president, was young when he ran and he had only a few years experience- just like Obama. But, he was a navy war hero and was tested as a leader in that way. He had a congressional medal of honor and a pulitzer prize. Obama wrote a book, but it did not win a prize.

53

Peter Makossah,

England 15/04/2007 23:01:26

The World bank president has shown how power corrupts and why absolute power must corrupt absolutely. This is a shameful act coming from a man the world trusted with the purse. This must be a warning to others in power that whatever they do behind the scenes or under the lock and key will surely come out. Where there is an entry there is an exit.

Am at loss of words. Sad that Africa is backing him up for the wrongdoing - saying to err is human God is to divine - really?

54

Carolyn 1,

Woods Hole, MA 16/04/2007 00:18:16

#76
I disagree.
Yes, it is shameful hedid this, but all the facts are not in this article. Some sources say he did notify the ethics committee, etc.. It is not indicative that The World Bank is corrupt: - that's the United Nations.

The Europeans want to take control of the World Bank. Period. They want him out. Period.
The board's motives are transparent and in direct opposition to the US policy. The US wants The World Bank to invest in emerging democracies, who have control of the corruption and will spend the money wisely. You would think this would be a unifying policy? No, not to the Europeans; they oppose it.

K. Anan stayed on through all the corruption of the UN, and was never fired though he knew of all the corruption around him.

As for Africa, the United States has tried to get help for Africa for years- the UN Human Rights Council did nothing; which is why the US walked out- remember! Africa needs help. That is why they are backing Wolfowitz. He will pump money into the region but not into sharia law and policy of the United States.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.