Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


European Parliament calls for Wolfowitz resignation

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 April 2007
THE European Parliament on Wednesday called for the resignation of World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz, adding to the pressure on the head of the poverty-fighting institution to step down.
Wolfowitz, a former member of the Bush administration, has already faced calls to give up his post after revelations that he approved a promotion and pay raise for his bank-employee girlfriend before she was assigned to work at the US State Departmen
t.

Lawmakers asked EU leaders to press the White House over the subject at a EU-US summit in Washington on Monday.

They voted 333-251 with 31 abstentions to include a paragraph in a resolution on transatlantic relations calling on Germany, holder of the 27-nation bloc's rotating presidency, and the United States to ask Wolfowitz to stand down.

They should "signal to the president of the World Bank, Paul Wolfowitz, that his withdrawal from the post would be a welcome step towards preventing the bank's anti-corruption policy from being undermined," the paragraph said.

European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso and German Chancellor Angela Merkel are attending the summit with President George W. Bush, who nominated Wolfowitz for the World Bank job in early 2005.

The full EU resolution was passed by the parliament, the only EU institution that is directly elected by its citizens.

The call by the EU assembly comes as a special World Bank committee examines whether Wolfowitz abused his position or committed ethical lapses as it looks at the promotion of his girlfriend, Shaha Riza.

Wolfowitz, a former US deputy defence secretary who helped plan the US invasion of Iraq, has apologised for his handling of Riza's promotion and pledged to make changes to his management.

In Washington, the White House reiterated its support for Wolfowitz, despite the intensifying calls for his resignation.

Asked for a response to the EU lawmakers' resolution, White House spokesman Tony Fratto said: We continue to support President Wolfowitz.

"The World Bank board is engaged in a process and we understand that the process is continuing and we expect its assessment will include a thorough and respectful review of all of the relevant facts."

Earlier, Bush personally praised Wolfowitz for his efforts in leading the global fight against poverty during an event at the White House on malaria awareness, where the World Bank chief sat in the front row.

"I appreciate very much the fact that the World Bank has taken the lead in eradicating poverty in places like Africa. Paul Wolfowitz, thank you for your leadership of the World Bank," Bush said.

European countries, including Germany, Britain, the Netherlands, Norway and France - all large aid givers for anti-poverty projects in the developing world - have expressed concern that Wolfowitz's leadership is untenable and is damaging the credibility of the institution.

"By digging in his heels and refusing to resign as President of the World Bank, Wolfowitz is dragging the whole organisation into disrepute and further undermining the credibility of its anti-corruption policy," said Caroline Lucas, a British member of the Greens.

"If he won't jump himself, he must be pushed."



Page 1 of 1

 
1

Scullion,

Canada 26/04/2007 00:54:33

Well, he was helping fight poverty-his girlfriend's.
In a position such as this, trust, something the World Bank has trouble with, is paramount.
Step down Mr. Wolfowitz, if you wish the World Bank to be seen as more than an instrument of U.S. economic imperialism.

2

Carolyn 1,

Unity 08 26/04/2007 02:39:45

America believes a man is innocent until proven guilty. Wolfowitz has been proven guilty of nothing, unless his belief in the continued and safe existence of Isreal is a crime. The World Bank is not the stage for the European Union to fine tune its politics.

3

bill, england,

26/04/2007 08:34:00

2. Carolyn 1, Unity 08

Wolfowitz is one of the neocon gangsters. In common with Bush, Cheney and the rest, he is totally unfit to hold any public office.

For you to say he has been proven guilty of nothing is quite disingenuous. He hasn't been charged with anything, nor will he be while his gang have a stranglehold on the USA legal processes.

4

Boy Wonder,

26/04/2007 08:45:26

If Wolfowitz does not resign forthwith, he should be arrested for corrupt practices.

Anyone else would be!!!

5

,

26/04/2007 09:11:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

Carolyn 1,

unity 08 26/04/2007 12:00:52

#3For you to say he has been proven guilty of nothing is quite disingenuous."


Bill, england For you to say the above- is disingenuous. There are no charges against Wolfowitz. He did not give her the raises, nor did he ask for them to be given to her.

In America, one is innocent until proven guilty.
Wolfowitz has no charges against him.

His guilt is that he opposes the platter of politics that is passed around every banquet table; the platter served the UN, the UN human rights, the UN Security Council, the UN oil for food program; Wolfowitz, with the backing of the US, has decided the platter does not serve him.
Get over it, leave the politics behind and move on to unity.
Let emerging democracies have the chance they earned.

7

bill, england,

26/04/2007 12:23:24

7. Carolyn 1, unity 08

Quite so, there are no charges against Wolfowitz.

Nor will there be as he has the protection of his fellow gangsters Bush and Cheney.

Fiddling favours for his bird is the least of his worries, his proper place is in the dock at the Hague on war crime charges.

8

Carolyn 1,

unity 08 26/04/2007 12:30:42

#6
purchase a dictionery and look up the word megalomaniac.

Overuse of a word dilutes the function so that when the ocassion arises to use the word properly it will have lost its strength and diminish among other words around it.

Suffice to say, Wolfowitz is no megalomaniac; not even close. Let's save the word for proper use- for example- the leader of Iran- he IS a megalomaniac.

Another correction: leadership has EVERYTHING to do with personal belief; it is the foundation and structure of personal belief built over the person's lifetime

9

Carolyn 1,

unity 08 26/04/2007 12:39:38

#8 Bill, england

morning Bill, - I'm having my late morning coffee -looking at the very thick grey fog here... but then, this is America! haha

You said Wolfowitz' proper place was The Hague-
If so, charge him, and present the evidence.
Let the trials begin.
Otherwise, Wolfowitz is innocent.
Beat someone else to death who is worthy of it.
I can provide you a list of those who need a photo op at The Hague.

10

Faramars,

Iran 26/04/2007 12:55:34

7. Carolyn 1
You wrote : In America, one is innocent until proven guilty”
Not only in America . in any legal system this rule applies .

11

Thomas Paine,

26/04/2007 13:37:41

C'mon Wolfy, it's just a job! Leave it for the needy ones! Your wild imagination is urgently needed for spreading democracy to Iran! Now!!

12

bill, england,

26/04/2007 14:10:55

13. thatscottishwoman

I can do better than that!

Fiddling favours for floozy friends, furnishing falsifications for freeloading followers, finding fodder for further financial fixes....

It gets rude after that!

13

bill, england,

26/04/2007 14:18:07

10. Carolyn 1, unity 08

"You said Wolfowitz' proper place was The Hague- If so, charge him, and present the evidence."

I would say that would be up to the families of the people who have been murdered by his gang to do that; getting on for a million corpses as evidence.

"I can provide you a list of those who need a photo op at The Hague."

That would include all your congressmen and senators who supported the invasion of Iraq, and all our members of parliament who did the same. They knew it was illegal and they knew that many people would die but they went ahead and authorised it.

14

,

26/04/2007 14:46:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

Faramars,

Iran 26/04/2007 15:02:09

bill england
hello bill
“They knew it was illegal and they knew that many people would die but they went ahead and authorised it”
And nowadays they have understood that they must stop the illegal war but the most democrat president and peace lover of our time, I mean: Mr George .W. Bush has said to veto any timetable for withdrawal passed by congress!!!!!! This is the real meaning of democracy which Bush should spread throughout the world!!!!!!

16

Faramars,

Iran 26/04/2007 15:04:05

17. Halitosis
do you believe in something named " justice " in our time ?

17

Carolyn 1,

26/04/2007 15:06:21

#18
Yes, Faramars, with luck freedom and democracy will spread throughout the world, and to Iran.
Wolfowitz has long supported the Iranian people in this desire.

18

Carolyn 1,

26/04/2007 15:19:52

#17
Yes, liquidation of Israel, that is what so many want (need!), including members of the World Bank.
They can want the liquidation, but wanting is not getting, and it will not change the policy of the World Bank.
(It's somehow ironic, that as I am typing this comment, a few buildings away there is a Scottish funeral, with bagpipes at our Catholic Church-

19

Robin Bather,

Mexico 26/04/2007 19:57:26

Yes, "innocent until proven guilty" is the maxim to be admired Carolyn, however who is going to accuse Paul Wolfowitz of bad ethics and then permit a jury to decide?
Who? The man who put him in charge of the World Bank (George Bush)? No, GWB has declared that he backs PW so who will bring the charges?
Will the US authorities bring charges? Doubt it.
Hence in this case PW must be tried by the Court of Public Opinion where, it seems, he has been found guilty.
PW has lost all credibility and has laid himself open to sneers of unethical behavior.
A gentleman would resign, but.....

20

bill, england,

(I'm a troll) 26/04/2007 20:33:00

24. Robin Bather, Mexico

but...he has the money!

21

cognitorex,

Berkshires..USA 27/04/2007 11:46:34

Plutonium Parachutes for Bush and Cheney
.
Thinking about money, ethics, Bush and the GOP, maybe we're all missing an obvious point. Instead of instituting impeachment proceedings against these two top ranking incompetents why not offer them plutonium parachutes ( uhm, not the Russian kind).
It is no longer the American way for CEOs to quit for for reasons of moral, financial or leadership ineptitude.
In keeping with this, offer Bush and Cheney a billion dollars each to step down (and be prepared to go to two bil to close the deal: plus a hundred mil each for Alberto, comb-master Wolfowitz and each Cheney on the payroll.)
This is oligarchic morality.
Hold your nose. It's cheap at ten times the price!!
...craig johnson...

22

,

27/04/2007 14:13:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
23

Dragomir,

27/04/2007 20:50:58

"the poverty-fighting institution"

phahahhahAHahhahaha

It's amasing how they can make such complete opposite-to-reality claims. They must have some testicular-implants ...really huge balls.


they're a "povert-fighting institution" only if you consider poverty as the lack of enormous profits for their investors or the poverty of the corrupt elite rulers of third-world nations, that's the only "deficit" they're fixing.

IT"S A BANK. Period.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.