Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 19th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Council tax freeze is hot stuff for SNP



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 February 2008
An expected nationwide freeze on council tax rates is a major coup for the new SNP government – humiliating Labour while signalling a new partnership between central and local politicians
IT must have felt like Mission Impossible: make sure no-one in Scotland pays a penny more in council tax in the coming year. But Finance Secretary John Swinney accepted the task and now it looks as if he has succeeded. Twenty-six of Scotland's 32 lo
cal authorities have already officially set their council tax at the same level as last year. Another five – including Edinburgh – were set to do so today, leaving just Angus to complete the picture next week.

The council tax freeze is a major coup for the SNP government and in particular Mr Swinney, who had to come up with the deal and negotiate with council leaders to make it happen. There is a price to pay, of course, both for the government and for ordinary people. Mr Swinney handed the councils an extra £70m in order to freeze their tax levels. But there will still be cuts in services and some authorities have admitted jobs will be lost.

Nevertheless, even the SNP's political opponents are privately ready to give the government credit for their achievement.

"They have played it very cleverly," says one senior Labour politician in Edinburgh. "It was impossible for councils to say they would rather not take the money and put the council tax up instead. By delivering a council tax freeze, the SNP will be forgiven much else they fail to do." The council tax – introduced to replace the hated poll tax back in 1993 – has increased substantially over the years.

In Edinburgh, bills have soared by nearly a third just since devolution. Householders in Band D properties, regarded as the average, now pay £1169 a year in the Capital compared with £889 in 1999-2000. All the parties knew it was an issue they had to address. Labour fought last year's Holyrood election with a pledge that all Labour-controlled councils would peg council tax rises at below inflation for the next four years. They would also have cut, then scrapped, water and sewerage charges for pensioners, saving around £300.

The Tories proposed a 50 per cent council tax discount for pensioner households. The SNP's pledge was to freeze council tax for two years before bringing in a local income tax set nationally at 3p in the pound.

The Lib Dems said they wanted to scrap council tax and bring in a local income tax, set by councils, at around 3.6p in the pound.

When the SNP found itself elected as a minority government, the council tax freeze quickly became one of its top priorities. There was no guarantee of success in trying to persuade 32 councils, many of whom were not political friends, to co-operate in a daunting challenge which would allow the new government to claim a major victory. But the SNP pulled it off – and embarrassed Labour into the bargain, by showing they could forge a better relationship with Scottish local government in a few months than the previous Scottish Executive had managed in eight years.

NOT only did Mr Swinney get the councils to accept a freeze, he also agreed a "concordat" with them, setting out how central and local government will work together over the next three years.

It includes the reduction in ring-fencing – the government allocating specific amounts of cash for specific purposes – and allows the councils more flexibility to decide how money is spent.

Instead, each local authority signs up to "outcome agreements" covering a whole range of responsibilities.

And councils are also allowed to keep money from efficiency savings. Labour and Liberal Democrat MSPs accuse the SNP of holding a gun to councils' heads and forcing them into agreeing a freeze.

But the councils are not complaining. After Mr Swinney announced the local government settlement in November, Pat Watters, the president of the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (Cosla), hailed it as "the start of a new relationship between the two spheres of government in Scotland".

The cash was "not brilliant" but there would be "greater flexibility and greater responsibility" for councils.

A Labour insider admits the SNP has simply been better at engaging with local government.

Relations between the previous Labour-Lib Dem Scottish Executive and Cosla "could have been more positive", he says.

"There was a feeling of looking down on local government, but now these guys are being wined and dined and smooth-talked by senior ministers."

Cosla is not shy about welcoming the new respect it is being shown – and any time Wendy Alexander cares to touch on local government at First Minister's Questions, Alex Salmond is quick to quote Mr Watters and other Labour councillors, one of whom allegedly went as far as commenting: "God bless the SNP government".

It is deeply damaging to Labour's credibility. A senior Labour MSP says: "Pat Watters is manna from heaven for Alex Salmond."

Effectively, the council tax freeze has allowed the SNP to humiliate Labour, take the credit for the zero rise and leave the councils to take the blame for the cuts. The problems could come in the years ahead – finding enough money to repeat the freeze and then, when they have to argue for a local income tax, which could leave a lot of people worse off.





The full article contains 909 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Nikostratos,

21/02/2008 11:58:13
You can freeze you can change the way you collect it but you can't escape it snp or not..............

How much tax has been lost from those many who can well afford to pay and whose money could of helped those less fortunate in Scottish society..........


This stunt in time will be exposed as one of most the iniquitous episodes in Scottish politics.

The most effective way to reduce income inequalities in society is through redistribution of wealth through the tax system..............

The snp has set it's face against this policy as they are only concerned with appeasing the wealthy and powerful in Scottish society........very..very..nu-labour
2

Gregor Addison,

Glasgow 21/02/2008 12:08:00
Labour have been embarassed by this. For months they have claimed that there would be 'swathes of cuts' - but I read in the Clydebank Post and the Dumbarton Reporter that these much vaunted cuts have failed to materialize. All eyes will now be on Edinburgh, no doubt, to see how the budget will fare there. It underlines Wendy Alexander's mismanaging of her party; her failure to impact upon the budget at Holyrood, her failure to get across what Labour stand for, as well as her failure to engage with local government. She has chosen instead a tactic of attacking the SNP with rehashed slogans (such is 'tartan tories') rather than seek to rebuild a consensus with increasingly disparate elements of the labour movement. No wonder many people feel they are in better hands with the SNP in power.
3

,

21/02/2008 12:09:04
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Mercutio,

FALKIRK 21/02/2008 12:36:59
So far so good but when are they going to scrap Council Tax, that is what they promised, that is what the manifesto says.
5

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

21/02/2008 12:37:01
#3 Wardog

Well said, agreed totally.

The labour Party had no policies regarding Council Tax and/or Local Authority funding other than to let the status quo remain. As a result CT simply went up and up while John Prescott who's Department was supposed to control 'unreasonable' increases didn't do a damned thing about it (ever) as far as I can make out/remember.

The whole question of LA funding really needs to be looked into and CT must be replaced (throughout the UK).

Like you I believe that the introduction of a local income tax is a step in the right direction, but, unfortunately the levels of tax will probably be set by the same bunch of pirates who currently set the CT rates unless of course the Scottish Parliament exercises more control over LAs than the Labour Party at Westminster have ever done.

6

Auld Twa,

Edinburgh 21/02/2008 12:53:35
The new SNP Scottish Government has given local authorities money and the responsibility to spend it efficiently.
This is a sea change in attitude and will almost certainly lead to a reduction in the number of bodies carrying out similar work. There must be many examples of instances where a small specific project has grown haphazardly into a major organisation duplicating work being carried out by others.
7

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 21/02/2008 13:27:37
What's happened to that story in today's (printed) Scotsman (no trace in the OnLine version) about a dodgy £4000 donation to Labour from Mountgrange - a Champagne Reception - 2 months before the Election and 'at a crucial stage' before the Labour-Dominated council voted to support their Caltongate application? It's a matter of record that Dear Ex-Leader Anderson went down in a spectacular failure to win a Parliamentary seat. But then he got a nice job with PPS, Mountgrange's SpinDoctor Company. So that's nice. Could a rising tide of sleaze now be lapping round Donald's ankles?
8

Duncan in Edinburgh,

21/02/2008 13:43:15
More anti-SNP spin from the Evening News, eh?
9

 Ayrshire Scot™,

21/02/2008 14:10:55
4. The SNP manifesto says local income tax will be intrdoced over the period of the parliament - council tax freeze is a welcome first step
10

Miss H,

21/02/2008 15:02:07
Oh my Niko 1 you are excelling yourself today.

You have made an extremely good case for progressive taxation and I support what you say.

Only problem is that council tax is a regressive, not a progressive, form of taxation which is not based on ability to pay and hits those on low and fixed incomes the hardest.

But I expect Niko that when the SNP Government introduces its proposals for a progressive local income tax based on ability to pay that you will be supporting that.
11

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 21/02/2008 15:12:33
#4 Mercutio

As far as I know it is likely that the Council Tax will end and the new Local Income Tax will be brought in during the year prior to the next Scottish Parliamentary election i.e. around 2011/12?

#10 Miss H

Agreed the CT is regressive as were the old rates. The Poll Tax was fairer, but was not properly thought out and applied.

I think that the Labour Party will regret the day that they did not bring out a policy on LA funding/CT and that, combined with their fixation over ID cards, will be thier downfall at the next UK General Election while the removal of CT in Scotland will keep them out of government here.

While the new tax is a step in the right direction I would prefer to see LAs funded by the Treasury and that LAs were not allowed any fund raising powers whatsoever.



12

britfree,

camelon 21/02/2008 16:12:30
Is there no political barrel , no unpleasant constituency , malodorous "conspiracy" monger, that Hamish wouldnt use to defeat the scourge of his beloved union. I'm afraid theres little hope for that one
13

britfree,

camelon 21/02/2008 16:21:22
er yer on the wrang threid son this anes beh ian .ken? so its beh ken then ? nut ?!
14

Miss Jean Brodie,

21/02/2008 20:19:20
The only reason the tax has continually gone up is to line the black stuff labour cooncilors pooches - it’s becoming more evident everyday - they were so up themselves they never thoucht a day wid arrive that saw them exposed !
15

Boggle fey the Bog,

22/02/2008 04:41:33
#11 Peter etc;etc;
You suggest disbursement of funds from the centre, does this idea not 'fly in the face' of 'accountability', per se, if 'Central Government' were to supply all the funding for your, or my, or anyone's' local area, would not that negate the whole concept of democracy, by increasing the 'burden' on our already 'overworked' Parliamentarians, forcing them to make decisions about, whether Mrs MacGlumphie from Doonbraeside, should be given a grant of £1000 to enable 'Doonbraeside Twin Set Ladies Club' to have their annual 'Help the Silver Substance Abusers' fund raising bash?

Given that most of the money to run Local Authorities already comes from 'Central Government' is it not just, right and proper that local communities should 'input' money in the form of 'Specific' local taxation, as this then imputes a sense of 'contribution' at local level, as well as a sense of 'involvement' and responsibility.

To remove that 'local' contribution would make Local Authorities superfluous, and thereby redundant.

Thus removing 'accountability' further away from the citizens, who, lest we forget, are you and I and everyone else who lives in our fair and beautiful Country, and indeed makes for a more bureaucratic, cumbersome and centralised administration that is more akin to that of the failed Leninist-Stalinist regime's in Russia and Salazar's regime in Portugal.

Not in my humble opinion a good thing for the people or indeed for democracy.

Citizens have rights, but they also have obligations, and one of the foremost obligations, is the 'obligationt of responsibility', removing revenue generation from local control, removes the citizens 'obligation of responsibility' thereby diminishing their 'right of involment'!!!

16

Highland Mighty,

22/02/2008 09:28:12
Some "mission impossible"!

Said the SNP to all the councils: "Instead of raising council taxes, we'll give you millions and millions from the central budget instead. Just tell us how much you want.
Okay, so we won't have anywhere near enough money left for all our manifesto pledges but we knew they would never happen anyway. I mean, just LOOK at all we promised! Ha! Ha!"
17

Auckland Arab,

22/02/2008 10:05:14
Labour has been humiliated by this.

Says it all very nicely.
18

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 22/02/2008 10:23:11
#16 Boggle fey the Bog

Hi Boggle, "To remove that 'local' contribution would make Local Authorities superfluous, and thereby redundant."

Boggle, whole point of exercise!!

"removing revenue generation from local control, removes the citizens 'obligation of responsibility' thereby diminishing their 'right of involment'!!!"

'right of involment' Sorry, we don't have one anyway, Local Authorities would never allow it.

Much of what you say is correct, but only in theory. COSLA/LAs are cash bandits, pure and simple. The restoration of trams to Edinburgh is a blatant example.

We are paying more and more CT for less and less services, etc.

Regards,

Peter

19

kimba,

22/02/2008 14:04:11
Those who can afford to pay should!
20

Joe M.,

Edinburgh 02/03/2008 03:15:30
#1 Ho ho ho! Making taxation become related to income is called fairness and redistribution of wealth. I know that's a strange concept for Labour but the SNP believe that people should pay what they can afford for their local services.

I see that today Labour have announced that they are going to withdraw 450M from the Scottish budget because they are worried the SNP's plans (which they got elected on) might prove popular. Not very democratic is it?

Then again if you put UK parliamentary sovereignty over the concept of the sovereignty of the Scottish people then these kind of silly anti democratic decisions are going to happen.

Labour are showing their true colours. Not only Rosey Tories who have betrayed their own folk (ie the unions and the working classes), but also basically anti Scottish. Time to join their Conservative mentors in a last dance round the U-bend. F-L-U-S-H! There go your parties aspirations for Scotland, there go your votes, you won't be missed.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.