Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 9th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Record £5 million payout for actress struck down by hospital infection



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
17 January 2008
LESLIE Ash, the actress, yesterday won a £5 million compensation payout after she contracted a hospital bug, her lawyer said.
The star of Men Behaving Badly and Merseybeat was last night said to be "delighted" after reaching an out-of-court settlement with Chelsea and Westminster hospital.

The record-breaking award is so large because of the amount the actress was e
arning at the time and might have earned in the future, the NHS compensation body said.

Officials at Chelsea and Westminster have apologised to Ms Ash and said the hospital has reviewed its procedures in the wake of the incident.

Janice Gardner, the solicitor who represented Ms Ash, said the payout was expected to arrive within a month.

She said her client was pleased she would not have to go to court to fight the claim.

The case was due before a judge in April.

Ms Gardner said: "I think she is delighted that we could reach an amicable settlement.

"Nobody really wants to go to court. It would have been hard going for her.

"In a case when you have got serious injuries, you have to be reasonably satisfied that the injuries have settled before you can settle the claim."

The 47-year-old actress sought treatment for a punctured lung and two cracked ribs after falling off her bed on to a table.

However, after she was admitted to the hospital in April 2004, she became dangerously ill.

Ms Ash almost died after being struck down with Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus Aureus (MSSA).

She now walks with a stick and campaigns to prevent hospital-acquired infections, which are linked to more than 500 deaths a year in Scotland.

MSSA is similar to the superbug MRSA, but unlike MRSA, it does respond to antibiotics.

A spokesman for the Chelsea and Westminster said: "We wish to apologise to Mrs Chapman for the shortcomings in her care when she was a patient at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital.

"We sincerely regret the injuries that she sustained as a result of these failings."

The spokesman added: "The trust carried out a full review of all relevant procedures in this case to learn from its mistakes and to improve patient care.

"As a direct result, the trust updated its guidelines and provided nurses with additional training on monitoring infection."

Last night, Steve Walker, chief executive of the NHS Litigation Authority, said the payout set a new record for compensation following a hospital-acquired infection.

He said: "It's the highest we have ever paid out arising from a hospital-acquired infection.

"It's high because she was earning a lot of money before this happened.

"Most of the value of the award is either past loss of earnings or prospective future loss of earnings."

A spokeswoman for the Patients' Association, a campaign group, said that the payout would act as a warning to other hospitals to improve their infection prevention methods.

She added: "This is a wake-up call to the whole NHS, especially to those trusts not giving infection control top priority.

"Had best practice been carried out during (Ms Ash's] hospital care, we would not be in this position today."

ALL EYES ON SCOTS TEST CASE

THE £5 million payout to Lesley Ash came as an MRSA test case, which could cost the Scottish health service millions of pounds, continues at the Court of Session in Edinburgh.

Elizabeth Miller, 71, is claiming £30,000 in damages for allegedly contracting the bug in Glasgow Royal Infirmary after a heart operation in 2001.

If the judge, Lady Clark, allows the case to proceed, and were Mrs Miller to go on to win an award, hundreds of other patients are likely to follow suit and demand payments, some into six figures.

The hospital denies any negligence and wants the case dismissed. It claims Mrs Miller might have been carrying the bug before she was admitted.

However, Cameron Fyfe, Mrs Miller's solicitor, said that her litigation could ultimately help save money if it led to improved cleanliness in hospitals and a fall in the number of cases of MRSA.



The full article contains 692 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 January 2008 9:23 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Hospital superbugs
 
1

I-Mac,

17/01/2008 00:20:52
I sympathise with Leslie Ash but £5m is a crazy amount. The NHS badly needs funds. Such pay-outs should surely be capped, say at £1m.
2

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 17/01/2008 00:36:15
1 I-Mac, I agree!. but what is more annoying is the fact,.. if this was,..'you-or-me'..we would be lucky to get,..£100,000,000.!
3

Kipling,

17/01/2008 01:10:44
#2. Do you really mean £100,000,000 ? tell me the name of your nhs trust!
4

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta,.California ..a captured Mexican territor 17/01/2008 03:08:38
Now I understand why Madonna who lives on her 1200 acre estate in England , flew to the States to have her children born in a US hospital.

She wanted to have them in a UK hospital , but after she visited , she said they were filthy and and didn't want to risk getting infected and endanger her newborns.

Here they shut down unclean hospitals or litigation put them out of business.

GC

5

Guga II,

Rockall 17/01/2008 03:51:52
It will be interesting to see if ordinary patients are allowed to sue the NHS over Hospital Acquired Infections. If they are, it will only be paltry amounts they will get. However, it is likely to be only so-called celebrities and similar that will be allowed to sue.

Hospitals will also find it more difficult to blame patients for already having the infections before they were admitted as they are now supposed to test all patients on admission.

A series of successful law suits will be of great benefit to the ordinary people as it might force hospitals to clean up their act; especially the many doctors that seem to consider that washing their hands between patients is somehow beneath their dignity.
6

Mallory,

Edinburgh 17/01/2008 06:25:46
ridiculous award - how much did her treatment cost her?
7

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 17/01/2008 07:20:16
3 Kipling, it was a, 'kinda' example,,in REAL terms,
More like..£5000,, if ur lucky!
8

Paul Voltaire,

17/01/2008 07:54:20
The decision will have been based on her lost earnings as an actress.
Personally, I never ever regarded her as in the millionaire league at any stage.
NHS money wasted. This case should be a big lesson for NHS trusts to get their act together and get cleaned-up.
Now.
9

Unimpressed one,

17/01/2008 08:39:28
#8, Apparently doctors are still the worst offenders when it comes to hygiene issues in our hospitals. Looks like the NHS has an uphill battle!
10

Kipling,

17/01/2008 08:52:41
#7. Sadly, realisd this. Thought it might be an alternative to unemployment or a p***poor pension. Looking at it cynically, if not clinically, hospitals as providers of professional infection and the rewards that follow seem easier to come by than a good creative job.
11

Kipling,

17/01/2008 08:53:30
Sorry, should read, hospitals as professional providers of infection...
12

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 17/01/2008 09:17:59
8 Paul Voltaire,

"The decision will have been based on her lost earnings"

Soo, If it had been,..'The-Queen-of-England'.. the NHS would be NO MORE,,'wiped-out'.?

Ridiculous absolutely Ridiculous...state of affairs!
13

Upbeat,

17/01/2008 09:20:28
Every sympathy with the wonderful Lesley Ash.

Without the outcome that has been agreed in her case there would have been no justice.

What this precedent does is places the ball firmly back into the hands of NHS managers. At this price any failure to invest properly to ensure patient safety will be unthinkable. Hospital cleaning services will have to be properly funded now, otherwise the National Health service itself will " bleed to death " and free care for all at point of use will end.
14

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 17/01/2008 09:28:49
Now she's got that sorted out, when is she giong to sue the plastic surgeon who made her lips look like a sink-plunger?

£5M is too much. Loss of earnings? My a**e!. Lesley Ash simply isn't in that league.
15

Duncan in Edinburgh,

17/01/2008 09:35:26
#14 Good heavens, another in-depth assessment from you. I don't know why we bother with court assessments, legal arguments, weighing up of facts or indeed rational thought of any kind when we could just ask you for an off-the-cuff opinion about everything!

Do you think maybe, just maybe, the people involved in reaching this agreement know a teensy bit more about her potential loss of earnings than you do?
16

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 17/01/2008 09:55:48
#15:

Duncan, you know as well as I do that Lesley Ash would take decades to earn that kind of dough--even assuming she could do so.

If you want to subsidise this, then be my guest---pay my share of National Insurance and tax for me. I don't want to subsidise this rediculous claim. The settlement should have been far less.
17

yolanda,

17/01/2008 09:56:45
While I sympathise with her situation, I too believe that the sum awarded is ridiculously high. How much she would have earned in future had it not been for the poor standard of care she was given, I have no idea, but as others have said, the amount awarded should be capped. If these compensation claims become more frequent, and there is no control over the amounts paid out, the NHS will be crippled.
18

Duncan in Edinburgh,

17/01/2008 10:36:58
#16 Actually I don't. Any idea what she got paid for Men Behaving Badly, or that police thing she was in? Given how much we hear people like Jonathan Ross are being paid, it wouldn't surprise me if she was on many tens of thousands per episode. It would quickly add up.

I'm not saying such salaries for actors are justified, I'm just saying they are reality.
19

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 17/01/2008 11:54:36
Its quite simple, either you cap the claims as Yolanda says, or you don't treat high-earners such as Lesley Ash unless they first sign a waiver of their rights to sue.

She could have afforded to go private in any case---like she did when she had her lips inflated.
20

GP,

17/01/2008 12:03:01
18# you make the mistake of loking at past earnings in a hit show and before she disfigured herself with plastic surgery. How amny shows is/was she working in/on at the time of her so called accident?
In my view she was almost un-employable becasue of her looks nothing to do with any infections.
21

TSynicto the core,

Bellshill.Saltireland 17/01/2008 12:45:31
£5m x 12 MSSA compensation claims = £60m. That's how much the Northern Constabulary are today reported to be hopefully requesting this year to enable them to keep ahead of their widespread vital,often thankless task.
To which would New Labour give priority?
22

GraemeH,

Edinburgh 17/01/2008 13:09:19
-#20 - Agreed. Following her botched surgery her career was well on the slide. The size of the payout is a disgrace when soldiers who have lost both their legs are lucky to get 5% of what she has been awarded.
23

Duncan in Edinburgh,

17/01/2008 13:24:27
#19 Yes, you're probably right. :-)

#20 As I repeatedly stated, I have no idea how much she was earning - and neither do you. My point was that the legal teams which reached this agreement did have access to the facts, and we are in no position to second-guess them.
24

JG,

Fife 17/01/2008 13:30:34
#18 Duncan
You are right, these grossly inflated salaries paid to people with little or no talent are a reality - actions like this one only buy into this tosh. Of course I'm sorry Lesley Ash caught this infection (and I'm sorry the steps she took for vanity's sake left her facially deformed) - just as it's a shame my dad caught MRSA in his local hospital but HE didn't have the money to raise a private court action therefore no chance of compensation. It seems that the way this works is that rich people pay lawyers to raise court actions so they can cream more money out of a cash-strapped NHS. Want to volunteer to write to the numerous people who won't have their hip ops/heart bypasses/knee ops because their local health board can't afford it now?
25

Duncan in Edinburgh,

17/01/2008 13:49:33
#24 I agree that the legal system favours the rich. In fact, most systems in a capitalist society favour the rich. It's kinda how it works, and if we want it to be different we're going to have to vote for parties who seriously want it to change, rather than the mainstream ones who are all products and beneficiaries of the current system.

But as far the impact on the NHS goes, most Trusts have some form of insurance in place. All doctors have professional indemnity insurance as a condition of their right to practice in the UK. So in fact the risk to other patients' hips ops is minimal.
26

JG,

Fife 17/01/2008 13:59:51
#25 Duncan
I'm sure doctors and medical trusts DO have some kind of insurance but if they continually make claims on their policies to this degree then soon they'll be unable to pay the premiums or, in fact, become uninsurable. Never mind, if some or all of the NHS hospitals have to close, all of those rich people will have enough cash to go private so it won't be a problem, right?
27

Duncan in Edinburgh,

17/01/2008 14:21:27
#26 I suspect you are fully aware that you could make that argument about pretty much anything. I don't like it either, but it seems very difficult in our capitalist society to see an alternative. If, for example, you were to exempt the NHS from being subject to compensation claims, then you would not only condemn a large number of people to lives of suffering, you would also remove any motivation for them to avoid infecting people with MRSA or anything else. And why would you stop with the NHS? Plenty of other public services have to pay compensation for failures - why not exempt them all?
28

GP,

17/01/2008 17:14:57
27# no one is asking for excemption and you are being disingenuous when you try that route. The point you make about earnings and "experts" as you cakk them is also not quite as correct as you would wish the readers to believe. Most of these settlements are based on little or no facts but on how far each team is prepared to go or brinkmanship. Her team would have supporting evidence of past earnings no doubt but if this was factual then why when so called experts review unfair dismissals is there a maximum payment laid down?
No I say this is an obscene amount of compensation based on nothing more than finger in the air estimates.
29

Duncan in Edinburgh,

17/01/2008 17:25:51
#28 Well I would bow to your greater knowledge of this case - if I thought you had any. As I have repeatedly said, I have no idea how much she was earning, nor what was said in legal discussions - but neither do you. So why do you see fit to second-guess and tell us that these are finger in the air estimates. You simply don't know that.

People seem to forget that she was a successful stage actress as well as a TV celeb. Loss of mobility like this writes off her entire stage career too.
30

GP,

17/01/2008 17:36:37
Take your bow!
31

JG,

Fife 17/01/2008 18:30:25
#27 Duncan
I suppose you could, but can you think of anything more important than a person's health? No-one (apart from you) mentioned anything about exemptions, it's just that most people with a sense of common justice will find the amount involved in this payout obscene. You are correct, none of us has any idea what her earnings (past or future) was/might be, but do you really think giving her that money will solve the hospital infection problem? I wouldn't grudge anyone compensation in instances where they have been "wronged" but I fear this just another example of the establishment having lost the plot!
32

thomas,

midlothian 17/01/2008 19:12:18
#14 who is worth that amount of money? compensation usually follows the lines of your yearly income and actual loss. somebody was making a political statement here.
33

Duncan in Edinburgh,

17/01/2008 19:51:10
The issue is how much she was earning, because as #32 says, compensation follows the lines of your annual income.

If, for example, she was earning £200,000 a year, which I would suggest is not an unreasonable possibility for a TV actress, then £5 million represents a sum that could be invested in some sort of safe, cash-based fund manager at 4% interest and thereby produce a £200,000 annual income for her for life.

Alternatively, £5 million represents 25 years of an income of £200,000.

Either way, it is not hard to recognise that it could well be a fair deal.

I think sometimes we get blinded by the word "million" but in reality, if a well-paid person has been rendered unable to work by someone else's negligence, it is not so unreasonable to suggest that their compensation should keep them in the manner to which their hard work had previously allowed them to become accustomed.

Of course it is sickening that this money comes, at least in part, from the NHS - but if, as some have suggested, compensation were capped at £1 million, then you are telling someone previously earning £200,000 that their income is to be reduced to £40,000 a year, meaning that they can no longer afford their mortgage and probably other commitments. So they lose their home, their children have to move school, their loans become unpayable - all because of someone else's negligence! I doubt anyone would be happy with that would they?
34

OscarMacApfel,

Dumfries 17/01/2008 20:49:24
You have to say Lee Chapman was always lethal in the box...
35

Euan,

Edinburgh 17/01/2008 22:24:20
Ms. Ash was right to recieve compensation, but £5 million with a large part of the because loss of earnings? She scuppered her own employability by getting her own 'trout pout' and in the process ruining her looks for the rest of her life.

More British madness.

36

Kipling,

18/01/2008 00:10:02
About 15 years ago a rare book was privately printed by a lawyer (since deceased) on how difficult it was to sue for medical negligence, not least due to the incompetence of lawyers handling such issues. The proliferation of cases might have made things easier as further solicitors specialise in this area of negligence. But to assume suing is an easy matter for those affected, think again. There is many a terrible tale told here where those affected, family, the person injured, have to absorb the costs of the negligence before the matter ever reaches a court.
37

TSynicto the core,

Bellshill. Saltireland. 18/01/2008 13:26:04
#25. Thanks to Blair shackling us with the Human Rights Act lawyers - including him and his money-grubbing missus - are the noveau riche.
38

TSynicto the core,

Bellshill. Saltireland. 18/01/2008 13:26:05
#25. Thanks to Blair shackling us with the Human Rights Act lawyers - including him and his money-grubbing missus - are the noveau riche.
39

Furchrissake,

11/03/2008 01:10:13
Leslie Ash's career was down the pan after she got her lips done, so I don't know what they were basing her earnings on.

A wee bit dirt never hurt anybody and it's impossible for everything everywhere to be totally sterile, even in hospital wards - or especially!

I still believe she should have got something, but there should be a capped sliding scale - like criminal compensation. On the basis of Ms Ash's income, if this happens to a young lad on minimum wage, it would just a slap in the face.
40

celtic4,

USA 15/05/2008 01:29:45
Try suing a Dr. here, actress or no! They won't win! The US Dr.s are a brotherhood and stick together better than superglue. Period.
That said, I have to agree that the amount awarded was an awful lot of money for someone who lived thru it.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.