Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 14th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Winter of discontent over bid to privatise Hogmanay party



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 April 2008
EDINBURGH'S Hogmanay celebrations could be handed over to a private company to run under plans being considered by council chiefs.
The move, which would involve all the city's Winter Festival events, is designed to ensure "best value for the public purse" and to tap into the "expertise" of business leaders.

But the idea of the council losing control sparked some concern today, amid fears that the private companies could try to increase profits by raising prices.

Opposition councillors also warned that the proposed switch could be an attempt to cut jobs.

All the major summer festivals, such as the Fringe and film festival, are run separately from the council – although most still receive some public funding.

The proposed change was revealed in an internal memo from the new director of city development, Dave Anderson, leaked to the Evening News.

He said today: "The winter festivals are as important to Edinburgh's continued economic success as any of the other world-renowned festivals in the city.

"As the only festivals to be managed directly by the council, we need to constantly review the services we're providing to ensure best value for the public purse.

"As several aspects of the winter festivals are already delivered by the private sector, it makes practical sense to explore whether this can be extended to ensure our winter festivals continue to be the best in the world."

If the plans go ahead, the local authority would still be involved at a strategic level, but council employees would relinquish their management role.

Former Labour Lord Provost Lesley Hinds said: "This seems like a way to cut back on staff.

"It's also important to make sure that Hogmanay reflects the people who live in Edinburgh. If it is just about making money, then prices may well go up."

Labour group leader Ewan Aitken added: "This is not what the Lib Dem/SNP administration said it would do. This is yet another broken promise."

Last year, around 10,000 tickets and passes for Hogmanay remained unsold and the winter festivals overspent by around £310,000 as a result.

Council officials admitted they struggled to market the street party in the face of "extensive public speculation" about the future of the event, which led to "a considerable lag on ticket sales". Organisers also had to cope without the financial support of a main sponsor, after RBS ended its involvement the previous year.

But the event was still hailed a success, and over £1.3 million has been earmarked for this year's winter celebrations.

City leaders have predicted the winter festivals will now go on to attract larger audiences and big-name sponsors.

Deputy council leader Steve Cardownie said today: "Dave Anderson has come from Scottish Enterprise Edinburgh and Lothian, and anything he has to discuss on the future success of the festivals I will take on board.

"The winter festivals have been extremely successful and we want to be number one in the world."

Durham-based company She's Gott It! produced the programme of Christmas events for the council for the first time last year.

Unique Events ran the Hogmanay celebrations, but a decision on a new contract for 2008/9 will be reached shortly.


The full article contains 543 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

allknowing,

07/04/2008 12:23:06
Any why not!!! Why should tax payers pay for all the common folk to get drunk and make a mess!
2

Mallory,

Edinburgh 07/04/2008 12:40:56
Put it out to tender - whoever expects the LEAST or preferably NO public money should get it. In fact they should pay the City for the rights to make money out of it.
3

allknowing,

07/04/2008 12:47:10
#2 exactly. Its about time tax payers stop providing for those people who wont pay the going rate.
4

Epicuras,

07/04/2008 12:49:32
lets not forget the brown envelopes that will be flying cardownie's (and the other crooks in the administration)way once it's been 'privatised'.
how much more can/should edinburgh suffer before these clowns are thrown out of office?
5

Sedov,

Scotland 07/04/2008 12:55:47
I remember seeing in the bells for many years at the Tron - cost nought and why should it -its our town and we should be able to enjoy it responsibly as the vast majority do at any time including new year. Lets do away with the official party and like the past make our own casual and free entertainment as Scots are famous for. What will be privatised next by the tartan Tories?
6

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 07/04/2008 13:01:02
Maybe I've been missing something for the last 10 years, but since when was Pete Irvine's Far-from-Unique-Events anything else but a 'Private Company'?
Despite having massive sums of public (Taxpayer's) money flung at them, directly and indirectly, every year? And the suggestion that 'The Council' had any control is a joke - Irvine just 'had a word' with one or two influential individuals and what he wanted, he got. Sadly for him, neither of them remain in post.
7

brettgallacher,

edinburgh 07/04/2008 13:02:51
allknowing, you know nowt if this becomes a private enterprise it will cost 3 times as much to the tax payer because the first thing that happens is the private company applies for a grant out of public purse to run the hogmanay street party
8

Randan,

07/04/2008 13:10:47
And get them to concrete over Princes Street Gardens East, it'll be cheaper than replacing the turf every year after the winter festival mangles it.
9

allknowing,

07/04/2008 13:14:03
#7 why give it to them???

Its quite simple.

People want a party, people will pay a company to hold party.

If no one is willing to pay, then its clear its not wanted!!!
10

Annoyingboi,

Edinburgh 07/04/2008 13:28:01
Personally I want the whole thing ditched. Living in Edinburgh is nothing but a bind nowadays. We're over-run with tourists year in, year out and while tourism should be encouraged in part, the city council should also remember who LIVES here and PAYS TAXES! Give us a bit of peace in our own town for a while!
11

Steven P,

edinburgh 07/04/2008 13:31:59
Get the hotels restaurants and pubs who profit from the Festival to fund it.
It always baffles me, how Edinburgh is supposed to benefit. Certain Edinburgh-based businesses do very well but the Council and citizens get hee-haw.
12

gorgeousgorgieboy,

Edinburgh 07/04/2008 13:33:19
You can stick your new year party up your Scott monument. Its a pain from start to finish.
13

,

07/04/2008 14:02:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

,

07/04/2008 14:37:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

Calum McLeod 1,

07/04/2008 17:07:24
So let me understand this correctly. The Council think the Hogmanay Event should be run be a private company? Isn't that what Pete Irvine's Unique Events (who were mysteriously contracted by the Council to run it since 1993) and Winter Wonderland (a company run by the Gilded Balloon where Pete Irvine and the former police Chief Tom Wood were co-directors)have been doing? All that and no policing fees, estimated at £1/4 million per year, to pay for.
If the "event" is privatised in the way proposed, the cost for Edinburgh's citizens of attending an event on Edinburgh's streets will rocket and the die will have been cast for future events and money spinning chancers to cash in on.
16

me150,

07/04/2008 17:21:28
Why bother with privatisation where some corporate identity gets all the benefit and profit.

Let the council run it but charge each and every person to attend it. The council could then put any profit to good use. If there was a loss then that would be a good sign to cut back on costs or get rid of it altogether.
17

Brian M,

Edinburgh 07/04/2008 17:30:36
Stop all public funding of these events.

Put them out for offers.

If they are so much in demand that people will pay to attend then private events companies will be falling over themselves to run it at their own expense and make massive profits
18

Sumpplareasswholes,

Edinburgh 07/04/2008 18:31:50
For those of you that agree Visitors should pay their way, how about voting and lobying for a Visitor Levy which will be used to support and fund Festivals. Thus allowing ther public purse to open for legitimate Edinburgh punter benefits.
19

me150,

07/04/2008 18:54:12
Charge everyone, including Edinburgh residents.

Anyone wishing to take part should pay towards its cost.

Charge enough to cover costs and some. If that isn't possible then abondon the whole idea.
20

,

07/04/2008 21:00:37
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

,

07/04/2008 21:17:54
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
22

rs,

at the fringe 07/04/2008 21:25:53
2 Mallory,Edinburgh 07/04/2008 12:40:56
Put it out to tender - whoever expects the LEAST or preferably NO public money should get it. In fact they should pay the City for the rights to make money out of it.

no2 above is spot on, put the whole thing out to tender.

biggest question, we hear how many millions in benefits the various festivals bring into the city.

So why not get all the benefactors, namely the businesses and hotels to run the whole show...as they we are made to believe make millions from the festival.

if they dont have the money...then were is it or who has all the millions and millions that the festival generates?
23

rs,

in ma house 07/04/2008 21:30:59
no 20 its supposed to be a holiday period, and when are these people supposed to have a holiday.

They could of course all go to the zoo.

Mind you there Zombie state may be down to the fact that they are all completely DRUNK, would want them pucking up in there shop.

Andrew S maybe would want to work the christmas/new year holidays. Give people a break

You'll also find that many of the Museums on the high street are closed on Sundays apart from during the festival....bizarre given that the High Street is Edinburghs main tourist route.
24

rs,

07/04/2008 21:49:11
the council turned Hogmanay into the monster it is , it started with people meeting to see the new year in ,

Then the council made it a commercial enterprise as private companies made millions , while the taxpayer foots the bill ..sounds a good idea.
25

Peter Wyngarde,

07/04/2008 22:05:11
Good to see that every time Euan Aitken opens his gob he makes him self look more of a bitter little power craving individual, instead of positive comment on this issue, he's managed to drag it down to party politics! Maybe if his attitude was more for getting the best for Edinburgh then he and his brown envelope cronies would still be in power???
26

is it me?,

Edinburgh 07/04/2008 22:37:24
I think that the main problem is that the spirit of Hogmanay was never meant to be a Municipal party for cash paying visitors.

Hogmanay was always an occasion to cement friendships with neighbours, and by having an open door, to make new friends of casual acquaintances for the coming year.

Let them have their "party", but as far back as I can remember it's been a pretty dire affair.
27

Simino,

Edinburgh 08/04/2008 10:38:46
All these super rich megastars who come to perform at Hogmanay get a lot of media coverage out of it. Why don't we charge them for the privilege of playing at one of the top events in the world!


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Are you happy to see the city’s winter festival put into private hands?
Yes, as it will then have to pay for itself
No, the city needs to keep control of price and quality
Don’t care. It’s only tourists who go anyway

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.