Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Democrat convention: Hillary Clinton rallies delegates behind Obama

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 August 2008
"BARACK Obama is my candidate and he must be our president," his former rival Hillary Clinton said today.
Under pressure from senior Democratic Party officials to help unite the party behind Mr Obama at its national convention in Denver, Colorado, the former first lady wasted no time in her eagerly-awaited prime-time address.

Wearing a striking orange trouser suit, she urged her supporters, whom she described as "my sisterhood of the travelling pantsuits", to remember who was most important in this campaign.

"I want you to ask yourselves, 'Were you in this campaign just for me?' Or were you in it for... all the people in this country that feel invisible," she said.

"I'm here tonight as a proud mother, a proud Democrat, a proud senator from New York, a proud American and a proud supporter of Barack Obama.

"My friends it is time to take back the country we love.

"And whether you voted for me, or you voted for Barack, the time is now to unite as a single party with a single purpose.

"We are on the same team and none of us can afford to sit on the sidelines.

"This is a fight for the future and it is a fight we must win together."

Mrs Clinton went on: "I haven't spent the last 35 years in the trenches, advocating for children, campaigning for universal healthcare, helping parents balance work and family and fighting for women's rights here at home and around the world to see another Republican in the White House squander our promise of a country that really fulfils the hopes of our people."

She said she and Americans had not "endured the last eight years" to "suffer through more failed leadership".

"No way, no how, no McCain," she said.

Mrs Clinton, who lost an often-bitter primary election battle with Mr Obama, had to unite the party behind her former rival amid growing tensions between the two camps.

Polls show that a significant number of Clinton supporters have refused to fall in line behind Mr Obama and some activists have formed the Party Unity My Ass political group.

But Mrs Clinton forcefully endorsed Mr Obama in a speech which saw the convention floor change from a sea of white "Hillary" signs, as she came on to the stage, to a sea of blue "Unity" signs, bearing the names of both "Hillary" and "Obama".

Many US pundits labelled it the most important speech of her career as it had the dual purpose of garnering support for Mr Obama and securing her legacy within the Democratic Party.

Her political future would have been cast in doubt if she was seen to wreck the convention and damage the party's chances in November.

Mrs Clinton was greeted by more than 4,000 delegates who gave her a standing ovation, which lasted more than three minutes, before she had even spoken.

She said the United States needed a leader who could show Americans that there was no limit to what was possible in America and that she supported Mr Obama for all the same reasons that she ran for president.

"This will not be easy, progress never is," she said.

"But it will be impossible if we don't fight to put a Democrat back into the White House.

"He built his campaign on the fundamental belief that change in this country must start from the ground up, not the top down, and he knows that government must be about, 'We the people', not 'We the favoured few'.

"And when Barack Obama's in the White House, he'll revitalise our economy, defend the working people of America, and meet the global challenges of our time.

"Democrats know how to do this."

To roaring cheers and a standing ovation from the convention floor, she went on: "As I recall, we did it before with President Clinton and the Democrats.

"And if we do our part we'll do it again with President Obama."
Mrs Clinton went on: "We don't have a moment to lose or a vote to spare.".

She also criticised Mr Obama's Republican rival John McCain, who has used her past comments in a series of attack adverts against Mr Obama over the last few days, and tied him to the unpopular presidency of George W Bush.

"John McCain is my colleague and my friend," she said.

"He has served our country with honour and courage, but we don't need four more years of the last eight years.

"Well, John McCain says the economy is fundamentally sound; John McCain doesn't think 47 million people without health insurance is a crisis; John McCain wants to privatise social security, and in 2008 he still thinks it's OK when women don't earn equal pay for equal work.

"Now with an agenda like that it makes perfect sense that George Bush and John McCain will be together next week in the twin cities, because these days they're awfully hard to tell apart."

The Republican convention, which takes place in the twin cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, starts on Monday.

Mrs Clinton also said that Mr Obama's wife Michelle would make "a great first lady for America" and his vice presidential nominee Joe Biden was "a strong leader, a good man who understands both the economic stresses here at home and the strategic challenges abroad."

She said they would make "a great team for our country".

Her husband, former president Bill Clinton, looked on from his box in the Pepsi Centre and will take to the stage to make his own speech late tonight.

He is reported to be furious at suggestions that he incited racial politics during the primary season and his speech will be analysed closely to see how passionately he supports Mr Obama's campaign to become America's first black president.

The full article contains 979 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Boy Wonder,

27/08/2008 08:41:06
Still think Obama - Clinton (or vice versa) would have been the dream ticket. Hope they never have to regret not being that!

Anything but another feckless Republican in the USA's Casablanca!
2

Voice of reason,

EDINBURGH 27/08/2008 09:17:38
The sheer hypocrisy of the woman !!
3

The Strategist,

27/08/2008 09:45:41
Despite Hillary Clinton's efforts and those of Sarah Smith the Ch4 reporter I doubt Obama is going to win.
4

It's life but not as we know it,

The Oort Clouds 27/08/2008 09:57:08
Like many Democrats I would have voted for Hilary for President but will wouldn't touch this flashy chancer with a barge pole. He has no experience and no chance. Rock on McCain!
5

walter,

27/08/2008 09:58:20
Whether Clinton supports Obama or not she will have a speech saying she does for the sake of uniting the party.
The problem is that a lot of white democrats won't vote at all or will vote McCain.
They will not vote this way because they are racists they will vote this way because they were accused of being racist because they voted Clinton.
Bill Clinton has been said to have incited racial politics but he did not as Obama's support were using the fact he was Black from the beginning and still do.
6

bluehead,

edinburgh 27/08/2008 10:04:51
after listening to the American politicians spouting
stale air around their vast country when heading for their election,I can only conclude that their pile of politicians are even worse than ours,
I wouldn't have confidence in that bunch running a game of bingo,let alone a huge country like America,
no wonder this world is in a dreadful mess
7

Mikey,

27/08/2008 10:51:31
The problem with that peculiar American brand of 'democracy' is that the great unwashed only get to vote for the candidates selected by big business. Every four years, the money sucking begins and at the end of the campaign the winner is the stooge that's sucked up the most money!

It used to be said that the American Dream was that any native born American could become POTUS. Not now. Unless you are prepared to swallow your pride and principals, you've no chance! The fact that a candidate has to scramble for money to keep his/her campaign alive leaves tthem beholden to their contributors.

As my American wife says, the US is not a democracy. I'ts a republic!
8

Newman!,

27/08/2008 11:18:25
Its scary that there are people as dumb as #4 in the world.
9

wattie>x 1,

PLYMOUTH 27/08/2008 11:35:57
Another classical expose " of the land off the free" !But a sinister reality how this once great country and champion of "democracy" has now become one of the most despised on planet Earth.
The coming generations are being guaranteed a very precarious future for them and their families when one witnesses the current "democratic" charade going on. The "NOOSE" still remains prevalent in the background as a symbol of the past brutality and the racial hatred still existing in this so-called land of "Freedom" that still believes they have some divine right to interfere in any country on planet earth who dare to resist them or, their way of life!
10

,

27/08/2008 12:02:01
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

,

27/08/2008 12:05:39
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

2dogs in D.C.,

27/08/2008 12:25:46
#7-Mikey-I'm trying to remember who said "Anyone in America can grow up to be President.That's the chance they take." Or words to that effect..We now know that's not quite true, You pretty much have to have way to much money,or a law degree,and be a specialist at kissing butt.Who,(sane,that is,)would want that job anyway?
13

Miss Pixie,

formerly of Dinleyhaughfoot Cottage, Roxburghshire 27/08/2008 12:28:22
As for the incredible amount of money our political candidates spend (re: squander)on their campaigns; it's high time a restriction be put on the amount each one can spend on the campaign trail. That would make things very equal among them and would probably stop all the negative nasty TV ads. There is not enough focus on real issues. The squabbling is tiresome!
14

mike - across the pond,

hillaries speach.... 27/08/2008 14:12:41
hillary gave a great requiem for her 2008 campaign...

citing what she stood for
that she met a lot of good people
why she ran
what the dems stand for...
a couple of "soundbyte" jabs at the republican

a LOT of language that sounded a WHOLE lot like....
"oh and by the way, BO is your candidate now, if you voted for me, you probably should consider voting for him..."

not exactly a ringing endorsements of BO

2 days of the Dem convention, and IMHO they are still wishing for a "united party"

the only thing she was missing was... "see ya in 12"
15

SouthernGent,

27/08/2008 15:07:25
The problem with this country and many others around the world is we only get to choose from "politicians". Thats kin to choosing from snakeoil salespeople. The brightest minds in the country are in the private sector, and choose to stay there because of the politicians.
16

Climate change is a fraud,

27/08/2008 15:18:15
Hillary Clinton makes me want to vomit.

I'd much rather see Ron Paul as president.

Britain needs an alternative too. VOTE UKIP in Glenrothes.

We need a UKIP government!
17

Sandi,

San Diego 27/08/2008 16:05:02
Hillary was outstanding, as usual.

She should be the nominee, but as the Obama campaign has decided they don't want a full roll-call vote, which would actually decide the winner, we'll never know who really won. If he is so certain that he's the choice of Democrats, why are they so afraid to have a vote? The party "leaders", Dean, Pelosi, Brazile, Reid, decided a long time ago that they didn't want Hillary Clinton and they recruited Obama. The whole thing is a travesty and as far from being democratic as it could be. In any other country, the democracies of the world would be sending people to make sure the election was conducted fairly.

Obama, despite Hillary's best efforts, has to give people who currently don't think much of him some reason to vote for him other than he's not McCain. That's the only thing I hear from Obama followers, vote for him because he's not McCain. Isn't there anything vote-worthy about Obama? I have seen nothing myself, so he better step it up. The fabulous platform decor for his speech on Thursday isn't going to help. It will just add to the vision of him as a arrogant idiot.
18

Yankee girl,

USA 27/08/2008 17:10:51
Hillary messed up in her campaign - in trying to come across as tough, she came across as an unpleasant person instead and that turned a lot of people off. Obama, meanwhile, managed to look smooth and polished so he got the nod. It's unfortunate, because underneath it all, Hillary is the better one for the job.

I'll be doing just what Sandi is warning about - voting for Obama because he's not McCain. Another 4 years of Republicans is more than I can take.
19

Gere,

Scotland 27/08/2008 17:34:51
The one thing you can be certain of is that the man with Israel's endorsement will secure the Presidency!
20

2dogs in D.C.,

27/08/2008 17:42:04
Now, there's one hell of a campaign slogan-Vote for me,'cause I ain't McCain. Whoa, Nelly, what a sorryfull state of affairs.Souther Gents got it right.
21

2dogs in D.C.,

27/08/2008 17:43:01
Southern with the N that is,sorry.
22

Yankee girl,

USA 27/08/2008 18:31:28
21 2dogs

I prefer to think of it as 'voting Democrat.' But SouthernGent @15 is right - politicians are snake oil salesmen(saleswomen) - can't say we have much choice in the matter, though.
23

Tobytoo,

Southington, U.S.A. 27/08/2008 18:59:38
#10 & #11
How true both your comments are.
24

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 27/08/2008 19:49:08
Caratacus in 17:

you're thinking of Rue Paul. Rue Paul is the drag queen.

Ron Paul is the politician from Texas. Ron Paul ran in the republican primary for president. Ron Paul did excellent considering that the mass media gave him near 100% negative publicity. The Americans are like sheep and pay tremendous attention to the spin on mass media. In summer of 2007 when that race started McCain was a front-runner and polls were showing him much on top. Paul was at 0% in those polls. In almost all of the debates in 2007 (September to December) people who saw the debates selected Paul as the winner. In December of 2007 one poll showed Paul at 15% among Republican voters with McCain at 17%. Then the media got involved with its spin and its analysis where the public was educated to believe that Paul was not a real candidate. Despite this Paul did win the republican primary in 1 or 2 states. In Louisiana Paul won out-right and then the Republican Party nullified the results, changed the rules, did it again and Paul finished 2'nd. In Nevada something similar happened. In quite a few states Paul finished 2'nd. Paul defeated Rudy Guiliani in about 7 of the 8 states they faced each other before Guiliani dropped out of the race. But with the media against him and the majority of Americans being mindless sheeples he stood no real chance with the negative publicity stemming from the corporate media.

Ron Paul believes in the rule of law and wants the US government to follow the US Constitution unlike all of the other Republican candidates. Ron Paul wants to bring home all of the US soldiers from all of the countries they are in, all 70 of them including Germany, UK, Italy, Japan, S. Korea, Afghanistan, Georgia, Iraq, Ecuador, etc etc etc. Ron Paul believes in deleting the Federal Reserve which amounts to a huge tax on the Americans and would instead let the US government create new dollars as a sovereign entity which would save the American people about $1
25

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 27/08/2008 19:50:10
Ron Paul believes in the rule of law and wants the US government to follow the US Constitution unlike all of the other Republican candidates. Ron Paul wants to bring home all of the US soldiers from all of the countries they are in, all 70 of them including Germany, UK, Italy, Japan, S. Korea, Afghanistan, Georgia, Iraq, Ecuador, etc etc etc. Ron Paul believes in deleting the Federal Reserve which amounts to a huge tax on the Americans and would instead let the US government create new dollars as a sovereign entity which would save the American people about $1 trillion per year. Today the Federal Reserve is sovereign in America because it is allowed to both create the new dollars and profit from that money creation. THis is properly a function of government, not a private bank. The founders understood it so. Using the Federal Reserve in this capacity costs the Americans $1 trillion per year, money sucked from the economy like a tax and given to the Federal Reserve owners who are only 100 individuals, half of them European. Ron Paul believes in changing up the 'war on drugs' dramatically so that we don't throw drug users in jail and he wants to release people from jail who are merely there due to drug use. Ron Paul wants to eliminate much of the federal government including the Internal Revenue Service.

Ron Paul is not Rue Paul. Ron Paul is a medical doctor who has delivered about 4,000 babies. He's been a republican congressman for 20 years. He has a reputation for voting 'no' on spending bills and is thus nick-named 'Dr. No'. He says we should follow the 10'th Ammendment of the constitution that limits severely the proper place of the federal government - or else we should eliminate the 10'th Ammendment through a constitutional process. The 10'th Ammendment along with much else in the constitution is systematically ignored by the US establishment. Paul says 'lets live by the law - if we don't like the law, then lets change it, but lets live by th
26

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 27/08/2008 19:54:21
Paul says 'lets live by the law - if we don't like the law, then lets change it, but lets live by the constitution'.

Ron Paul believes in trade treaties that benefit the peoples of the nations and not for the sake of big business interests. Today the treaties the US government has orchestrated harm the Americans tremendously and are made for the sake of private business interests, not for the public good. Trade treaties should be mutually beneficial to the various nations, that is not the way it is today.
27

,

27/08/2008 23:06:55
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.