Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 20th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Call for answers as medical compensation tops £21m



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

NICOLA Sturgeon, the health secretary, was last night asked to explain why pay-outs for medical negligence surged 280 per cent last year.
The Conservatives have questioned why compensation payments rose from £7.7 million in 2005-6 to £21.5 million in 2006-7 for clinical negligence.

The figures were revealed in a Scottish Parliament answer to Jackson Carlaw, the Scottish Tories' pub
lic health spokesman.

They are similar to medical negligence figures published in January which revealed a 230 per cent increase. These latest figures exclude non-medical accidents on NHS premises.

Mr Carlaw said: "Perhaps the most striking aspect of the written answer is that Nicola Sturgeon provides no explanation for these increases.

"Further questions spring to mind. Do these increases result from a growing number of more serious clinical errors, 'compensation culture' or a bit of both?

"Who is being held accountable? What is the government doing to get to grips with this issue? What are the future implications for front-line services?"

A Scottish Government spokeswoman said that in recent years the number of claims had remained "relatively stable".

She added: "We believe the large increase in 2006-7 is exceptional and caused by a larger-than-normal number of high-value settlements – mostly birth-related cases which often take several years to settle."





The full article contains 226 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 April 2008 9:35 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Health of the NHS
 
1

Brian M,

Edinburgh 16/04/2008 08:00:20
most of the payouts would probably be for claims submitted before last year, claims for cases which happened during the time of the Labour 'Executive'.
2

Brian M,

Edinburgh 16/04/2008 08:05:06
and aren't we talking about financial years, ie 2006-7 runs from April 2006 to March 2007, so Mr Carlaw should really be asking Labour for an explanation
3

Jeeemy,

St Andrews 16/04/2008 08:57:41
I call for a trawl through “Jackson Carlaw’s” lifestyle what skeletons are residing in his cupboards?
I do find that people who live in glasshouses should not throw stones, the biggest glasshouse around in Scotland is Holyrood; therefore it is incumbent upon those who attend and collect finance from the tax payer for attending to the business within it’s walls to ensure that they ask questions of those who were in office at the relevant time that the reason for the questions arose.
With the relevant subject in mind might I suggest that Mr Carlaw enquires about the lists of those awaiting placement on the waiting lists be examined first.


4

Queen D,

Glasgow 16/04/2008 17:57:50
COWARDLY OF THE SCOTSMAN NOT TO PUBLISH THE POLL,
PRESUMABLY BECAUSE IT DOES NOT LIKE THE RESULT
IF THERE WAS AN E-MAIL , AND IT IS A BIG IF, YOU ARE DUTY BOUND TO PUBLISH IT OR THE RESULT OF THE POLL
EITHER WILL DO.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should gastric band ops to aid weight loss be available on the NHS?
Yes, this surgery will save lives
Yes, as long as it’s not a cop out for the obese
No, these people are responsible for their weight

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.