Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 10th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Want to invest in your own happiness? Then spend on others



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 March 2008
MONEY can buy you happiness after all – but only if you spend it on other people.
Researchers have found those who lavish friends and family with gifts and donate to charity are happier than those who spend on themselves.

Great Scottish philanthropists such as Sir Tom Hunter and Andrew Carnegie are among those likely to have be
nefited from such feelings of happiness with their multi-million pound charitable donations.

Yesterday, Sir Tom backed the findings, and said: "I have never had as much fun in my life as when I invested in the common good."

The research, published in the journal Science, found people experience greater happiness if they spend their money "pro- socially" – on gifts for others or charitable donations.

Lead researcher Professor Elizabeth Dunn, from the University of British Columbia (UBC), said: "We wanted to test our theory that how people spend their money is at least as important as how much they earn."

The researchers, from UBC and Harvard Business School, looked at a sample of 630 people who were asked to rate their general happiness.

This was then compared with their annual income and a breakdown of their monthly spending, including bills, gifts for themselves, gifts for others and donations to charity.

Prof Dunn said: "Regardless of how much income each person made, those who spent money on others reported greater happiness, while those who spent more on themselves did not."

The researchers also looked at levels of happiness among employees of a firm in Boston before and after they received their profit-sharing bonus, ranging between $3,000 (£1,500) and $8,000 (£4,000).

Prof Dunn said happiness was not affected so much by the size of the bonus, but how the money was spent.

Staff who devoted more of their bonus to gifts for others or towards charity consistently reported greater benefits than those who spent the money on their own needs.

In another experiment, the researchers gave volunteers either $5 or $20, telling them to spend the money either on themselves or others. Those who spent the cash on others reported feeling happier than those who spent the money on themselves.

Prof Dunn said: "These findings suggest very minor alterations in spending may be enough to produce real gains in happiness on a given day."

However, Sheila Panchal, a psychologist, said people did not necessarily have to spend money to get the same benefits from giving: "You could give your time or emotional support. It is about the act of giving – that does not mean it always has to be in financial terms.

"Giving is a two-way positive emotion because it makes both the giver and receiver feel good. It is a win-win situation."

Ms Panchal said such research should encourage people to give to others however they could.

She added: "It does not have to be big things. It could be small things like holding a door open for someone. It is small acts of kindness, where you put someone else before yourself."

THE GREAT GIVEAWAY

GIVING huge sums of money to others is commonplace for many.

Singer Sir Elton John has donated time and money to fighting Aids, while Microsoft chairman Bill Gates has given billions for causes to help developing countries.

Last year, Margie Moffat became one of Scotland's leading philanthropists by giving £50 million to charity.

She helped set up the travel agency AT Mays.





The full article contains 580 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 March 2008 9:54 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 21/03/2008 01:47:52
Soo that's the secret my DYW (darling young wife) Has!

She WILL spend, 'every last cent' in her Purse on others, before thinking about herself!

Puts mt theory,..'Charity begins at Home' all to Pot!
:-((
2

Gothic Rose,

21/03/2008 09:29:16
I like spending on me.It makes me very happy.I also have reasonably good manners,which are more of a habit than anything else.However if I had Millions, then it would be logical to spread it around,and have others get rid of it.No Worries= Max.Happiness.
3

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 21/03/2008 15:38:18
Dear, Dear, 'O' Me!

Looks like the People of Scotland are a bit mean!

Judging by the lack of comment in helping others!
4

Robert,

Kirriemuir 21/03/2008 16:16:06
This research is cockeyed. obviously if one has excess money for one's needs then to give some of the spare to others may bring a sense of false pleasure (it's the placebo-effect)! Money, as the saying goes, is like manure, it needs to be spread around (but don't believe it). Money, unless it is held in one's personal safe is always providing wealth for others. Shortage of money does create problems in trying to survive in today's society but it does not necessarily cause unhappiness. Half the population has an income less than average yet many of those who are unhappy come from those in the higher income group but then those researchers who are most likely to be in the higher earnings group would not be aware of this moot feature.
5

Starchief,

23/03/2008 11:24:03
Multi-millionaires giving away a small portion of money that lets them remain multi-millionaires but telling the rest of us...just give a little bit more.

Makes me sick.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.