Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Scots to help test jabs in bid to make male birth control more popular

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 October 2009
A NEW contraceptive that promises to make long-term birth control more acceptable to men is to be tested in Scotland.
Previous attempts at popularising the male "pill" have foundered because, although effective, they have involved weekly injections. But a new combination of hormones means that the jabs now only have to be administered once every two months.

Scot
tish couples are now being urged to come forward to help researchers trial the new method, which stops sperm production. The bi-monthly jab combines testosterone and progesterone. The addition of the progesterone hormone makes it possible to use less testosterone and also helps make the effects last longer than previous versions.

The team are now searching for 20 couples in south-east Scotland to take part in a one-year international trial involving 200 couples, run by the World Health Organisation.

Professor Richard Anderson, from Edinburgh University's reproductive and developmental sciences division, said a previous study in Scotland with the weekly male jab had shown that such a method worked.

"That was extremely successful and proved the concept that an injectable hormone could stop men's sperm production to very good contraceptive levels and be fully reversible," he said. "It was a proof of concept rather than anything that was ever going to be used, but it did prove that it could be done.

"What we are doing now is a substantial refinement of that, using the same theoretical approach of hormone injections that temporarily stop men producing sperm. The idea is to check that it really is a good contraceptive."

The new study will recruit men under the age of 45 with female partners under 37, with regular periods and no medical reason preventing pregnancy.

Tests have shown that the injection reduces a man's sperm count down from above 20 million sperm per millilitre to zero in most men, and to less than one million in others.

Such as result would provide better contraceptive protection than condoms, and a similar success rate to the female pill.

"Many of the couples we see for this type of study will be those with existing contraceptive problems who recognise that although theoretically there are a lot of options, you can run out quickly," Anderson explained.

But would men want the jab even if it were available in a more usable form? Anderson said he was in no doubt that there would be market for the male jab. "The surveys we have done have been very positive and particularly positive from women as much as men.

"You are in a stable relationship. You have had a baby or two. You have taken the reproductive burden on throughout. Maybe it's about time someone else took a turn."

Anderson said it was too early to talk about side-effects, but no serious problems were expected. Other hormone related treatments, such as the pill and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) have been linked to certain cancers.

"The risks with things like HRT and the pill are emerging after tens of millions of women have taken them for decades," he said. "These have shown that the risks, while real, are very small and take a vast amount of exposure to come to light."

A spokesman from the Family Planning Association said: "It is important that research continues to try to give men more contraceptive choice. But it is crucial that any new contraceptive is rigorously tested to make sure it is incredibly safe and effective."

• Couples interested in taking part in the study should call 0131-242 6196 or e-mail j.george@hrsu.mrc.ac.uk.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 October 2009 11:57 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 04/10/2009 01:04:54

Most Men will not be as gullible, to inject hormones into their body, not knowing the long term side effects, I doubt this will be a success, unless He never wants to bear Children again, and has no fear that this male contraceptive, may cause cancer.




2

Kipling,

04/10/2009 07:33:49
Or modify sp_rm production and produce 'thalidomide' style babies.
3

drunken proffet,

Tassy 04/10/2009 08:12:06
Well you could talk to your wife, within marriage and let her rule the roost for the jollies. Or practice celibacy outside marriage. Mind you I doubt if it will catch on, if it does not involve a pill, injection or advice from numerous qualified experts, how can you rely on a few thousand years of experience.
4

,

04/10/2009 09:04:03
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

,

04/10/2009 09:04:15
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

,

04/10/2009 09:04:36
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

,

04/10/2009 09:04:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

,

04/10/2009 09:04:58
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

,

04/10/2009 09:05:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

,

04/10/2009 09:05:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

It's life but not as we know it,

The Oort Clouds 04/10/2009 09:36:42
Men can't get pregnant so why should they have contraceptive injections? Women should jolly well take responsibility for looking after themselves.
12

,

04/10/2009 09:46:52
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

,

04/10/2009 09:47:00
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

,

04/10/2009 09:47:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

,

04/10/2009 09:47:22
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

,

04/10/2009 09:47:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

,

04/10/2009 10:16:35
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
18

erizo,

04/10/2009 16:05:08
Another batch of anti-medicine to be paid for by the taxpayer. A medicine is a substance for alleviating or removing disease. This jab, like all chemical contraceptives, is designed to induce a malfunction in the body - a malfunction that many seek a remedy for. What a perverse lot we are!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.