Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Prognosis looks good for the next 60 years

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 July 2008
The NHS is in better health than critics suggest, says Jim Devine.
THE essence of a satisfactory health service is that the poor and the rich are treated alike, that poverty is not a disability and wealth is not an advantage."

So wrote one of my political heroes, Aneurin Bevan in his book In Place of Fear.

La
st week, I joined staff and patients at St John's Hospital to celebrate Labour's greatest achievement, the National Health Service, on its 60th birthday. A former senior nurse criticised St John's last week in a national newspaper, but while the hospital – like the NHS – has its challenges, it is night and day away from the days preceding Aneurin Bevan's vision for the NHS.

It is testament to the endeavours of NHS Lothian and the team at St John's that 98 per cent of the people who have been, or are, treated at St John's report that they are satisfied with the hospital.

The record of the NHS in improving the health of millions of Scots is impressive and one in which we can all take pride. We now treat many conditions which were previously untreatable. Immunisation and screening have reduced the incidence of many diseases which in the past have been the cause of great suffering, and our primary care services are admired by other countries where people do not have access to free treatment. An Irish friend on a recent visit to Scotland was astonished to visit a GP and A&E unit without being charged. In Ireland, she would have paid £60 to the GP and £100 at A&E.

But every year since its birth we have heard siren voices telling us that the NHS cannot carry on. Too many patients, not enough staff and too much illness. But what has happened? Year after year the NHS has coped with each new demand from the public and each new medical advance. We have found new resources and this year £11 billion will be spent on health in Scotland.

We can't know where the NHS will be in another 60 years but we must ensure that it remains committed to its founding principles which were first realised on that summer's day on July 5, 1948.

Jim Devine is MP for Livingston





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 July 2008 10:21 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Health of the NHS
 
1

Merouane,

Edinburgh 08/07/2008 12:18:49
I hope you will remain equally committed to the NHS in England when you are given the opportunity to vote on it's future at Westminster.
2

Louis Catorze,

08/07/2008 13:15:53
Oooohhh....hark at #1!
3

Foresight,

By the Water of Leith 08/07/2008 14:40:58

The NHS has been stiched up by bleating Doctors and Nurses for the last sixty years. The largest percentage of the millions poured into the NHS in recent years has gone on pay rises to staff. Perhaps some enlightened health economist would take the time to demonstrate the incremental health benefit to the nation against the incremental benefit to staff over the last decade. The information I suspect would be most revealing.
4

Linda,

Edinburgh 08/07/2008 14:56:05
Jim Devine MP "We have found new resources and £11 billion will be spent on health in Scotland".

That of course is thanks to the SNP Scottish Government and not London Labour which awarded Scotland the lowest ever above inflation settlement at a time when Scotland is subsidising London by £6 billion a year.
5

Merouane,

Edinburgh 08/07/2008 15:14:42
#2. What's the problem? I think it's a fair point when you look at the voting record of Scottish Labour MPs.
6

patientpower,

WEST LOTHIAN 08/07/2008 15:40:20
What an absolute cheek Jim Devine has showing his face in St john's this is the MP who during his election denied any problems with St Johns denied to staff and the community in his acceptance speech and I quote "I can assure you there is No threat to mortuary services at st johns" then a matter of months later he and West lothian party and their then executive presided over the removal of mortuary services leaving St johns with a "body store" this was after they had allowed surgery adn trauma orthopeadics to be removed to Edinburgh and then pathology quickly followed the mortuary. Bevan would be SPINNING in his grave at what he and his Labour colleagues have done in West Lothian to St Johns he has forfeited right to let the name Bevan pass his lips. Mr Devine hang your head in shame.
7

Duncan in Edinburgh,

08/07/2008 16:06:03
#4 Still banging that drum Linda? At least you've acknowledged that it was above inflation. Now all you have to realise is that it was in fact the *highest* ever settlement. Yes, more actual money, and more money in real terms, than any previous Scottish Government/Executive.
8

Ian down under,

Kawerau 08/07/2008 21:54:12
#3 I agree it's a disgrace. Inmagine paying doctors and nurses. What do they think the NHS is for? At least nowadays they are getting their priorities right and paying heaps to business managers, PR companies, finance advisors, quality assurance teams, political correctness advisors and all the things the NHS really needs to keep it going.
I'd go a step further and emulate a fantastically wonderful idea from New Zealand. It was thought up by some PR bod and is called "Hospital in the Home". The idea is simplicity in itself. You go to hospital, they kick you out and you get treated at home by your GP and distric nurse. They log it on the books as an admission so the hospital gets credit for your recovery. No buildings for patients needed, more office blocks, NHS perfection. Managers galore and all provided by long suffering taxpayers.
Mind you I think Hans Christian Anderson thought of it first. He called it "The Emperor's New Clothes"
9

thibor,

musselburgh 09/09/2008 05:13:50

Well said No8

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.