Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Pool bug outbreak fuels call for tough water rules



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 December 2007
STRICT new water quality regulations are needed for public swimming pools, according to a long-awaited report into a serious outbreak of a stomach bug at a council-owned facility.
A total of 50 suspected cases of cryptosporidiosis linked to the Eastwood Pool in Giffnock, East Renfrewshire, were reported to health officials in September and October 2003.

The illness is caused by the cryptosporidium parasite, which can surviv
e for long periods in water. It can lead to vomiting, fever, stomach cramps and diarrhoea.

Experts found the outbreak spread because of a "multi-factorial" failure of the treatment plant at the pool, which is run by East Renfrewshire Council.

The report also pointed out that swimming pools throughout Britain are currently only subject to guidelines issued by the Pool Water Treatment Advisory Group.

The authors recommend that new swimming pool and spa regulations – enforceable under updated health and safety legislation – should be established in keeping with other European countries.

The report said: "Evidence from this outbreak investigation strongly suggests that a voluntary set of guidelines is not enough to ensure adequate control of pool water quality."

Its authors said the "persistent contamination" of the pool resulted from the failure of the treatment plant

The filters at the pool were found to be not fit for purpose and had not been inspected since a refurbishment took place in 2000, a clear breach of the existing guidelines.



The full article contains 243 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 December 2007 10:16 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

scotsdoc,

NANAIMO BC Canada 22/12/2007 05:45:19

Who is the pool supervisor? Fire him!! There are rules for pools that employees MUST follow.
It is inconceiveable to me that the filters had not been checked!

Proper chlorination is essential for a safe pool.
Organic or any matter adsorbs and in activates the residual chlorine. Clarity of the POOL WATER is a must!! If not clear there is suspended organic and other matter in the water....The unchecked filters were no doubt full of Hair and other matter that would absorb and inactivate the chlorine.

The POOL SUPERVISOR was not doing his job!! Why? Is he illiterate and can't read technical instructions??
Did he just make up the regular cleaning reports that have to be kept?? Or did he hand over the job to another employee??
2

scottish person,

paisley 27/12/2007 10:35:44
Chlorine does not kill chryptosporidium, it merely gives it the equivalent of an armour plating, helping it survive longer. The pool water advisory group are a joke. If the UK wants to get in line with the rest of Europe it must install proper pool water treatment equipment. I have been battering my head off a brick wall for years trying to convince them that chlorine is not good enough. I think that the pool water advisory group supply chlorine to pools and are scared to lose their contracts.I have proven equipment that kills cryptosporidium and any other nasty parasites but they will not give me a chance. Chlorine was used in the first world war to kill soldiers, they have since stopped using DDT, why not chlorine. They can also reduce the speed of their pumps therefore reducing pollution and reducing climate change. However no one in the uk is interested.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.