Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Older women have more abortions than teens

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 February 2010
WOMEN aged over 35 who believe they can have unprotected sex because their fertility is on the wane are fuelling the demand for abortions, according to a sexual health charity.
The Conceivable? campaign, launched by the Family Planning Association (FPA), says reports citing age as a leading cause of infertility is encouraging older women to abandon contraception.

However, figures show the abortion rate in Scotland is h
igher for over-35s than for the under-16s: the abortion rate for women in the 35-39 age range was 6.2 per 1,000 of the population in 2008 against 4.7 in the under-16s.

In England and Wales, the under-16s had an abortion rate of four per 1,000 women in 2008. Women aged 40-44 also have an abortion rate of four per 1,000.

The campaign, which runs until Valentine's Day, features posters with messages in which the wording becomes faint.

Slogans include "Fertility. You'd be surprised how long it takes to disappear" and "Unplanned pregnancy. You'd be surprised how long you're able to conceive before your fertility finally fades away."

The charity says the over-35s are often a forgotten group and that many thirtysomething women contact them saying that the only clinics in their area are for young women.

FPA chief executive Julie Bentley said: "While the message about fertility declining with age is an important one, it is often overplayed, alongside disproportionate messaging about unplanned teenage pregnancies.

"It sends an inaccurate message to women and society that only the young fall pregnant and is leading older women to believe their fertility has gone long before it actually has.

"Unplanned pregnancies at any age are very difficult."

She added: "It's important that women realise it's entirely conceivable that just one night of unprotected sex in your late 30s, 40s, even 50s can end in an unplanned pregnancy.

"Our helpline receives calls from such women, shocked this has happened to them. They thought their age would protect them from becoming pregnant."

Ms Bentley added there were 15 methods of contraception for the over-35s, but that on average women spent only about five minutes choosing which method to use, with many not making enough time for themselves to talk to the FPA or health professionals about which method best suited them.

The FPA said that women needed to keep using contraception until the menopause to avoid pregnancy. It also advises women to use it up to two years after the menopause if under 50 and for one year after if over 50.

Women are also being warned that fertility varies with lifestyle.

The FPA is urging health professionals to remember that older women also need contraceptive information and services.

A spokeswoman for the Scottish Government said: "Improving sexual health outcomes, including a reduction in the number of unintended pregnancies for all age groups, remains a Scottish Government commitment.

"The implementation of Respect and Responsibility, Scotland's national sexual health strategy is supported by £5.18 million each year until 2010-11.

"Since the launch of the strategy, services for sexual health in Scotland have both increased in number and improved in quality, in all areas of Scotland.

"The Scottish Government has also increased the availability of contraception, including in pharmacies."

'Three terminations since my mid-thirties'

JANIE, 52, a health worker from Edinburgh, has had three abortions since her mid-thirties. A single parent with a grown-up son from an earlier long-term relationship, she says she avoided going to her GP for contraception because she found it difficult to find a man to have a long-term relationship with.

"I got pregnant when I was 18 and going out with my boyfriend. We moved in together and were a couple for over 12 years. During that time, I was put on at least five types of the pill, but was always worried about side-effects.

"When we split up, I didn't think it would be so difficult to find someone else. But there was a time when I didn't have sex for five years. Then I met a man nine years younger than me and we were together for a few months.

"We didn't use contraception. I thought it would be OK because I was older, but it wasn't."

The first termination was when Janie was 36 and eight weeks pregnant. "I just blocked it out because I wanted it dealt with and for the subject to go away," she said.

Despite medical advice, she did not try other forms of contraception and did not carry condoms. "I think a man gets the wrong idea if a woman is prepared like that, even though it makes sense," she said.

Janie's second abortion took place two years later and after a short-lived relationship, again where no contraception had been used. "I risked it because I was lonely. Maybe I got pregnant because I was with younger men who are more fertile than older men. I didn't feel guilty about the terminations, which to me are medical procedures.

"My friends were disgusted at me and asked me how long I was going to carry on like that. I didn't want any more children, but didn't want to be sterilised as it seemed such a final step."

When she went to discuss a third termination at the age of 43, Janie claims she detected a change in attitude from the clinic's staff. "They seemed very businesslike and asked me if I wanted to be sterilised."

• Janie is not her real name.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 February 2010 9:58 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Pregnancy and birth
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 09/02/2010 00:43:05
It must have been a strange set of women that were used for the survey, because most women are savvy about their bodies and know they could get pregnant at the age of over 35, and furthermore would not take the risk, as the last thing they would want is a pregnancy, leading them to want an abortion.



2

Stephen Wayne Foster,

Miami, Florida 09/02/2010 00:53:20
As a person who believes that abortion is inherently wrong -- maybe not "murder" but one step away from it -- I must say that the cynical attitude of these women is disgusting. They get rid of unwanted human children just as casually as they would drown kittens that their pet cat had borne.
3

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 09/02/2010 01:08:04
~2.
Stephen,
I tend to think the same.


4

Duncan in Edinburgh,

09/02/2010 08:35:24
#2 I see no evidence of cynicism. In fact, I can't see on what basis you could possibly judge the actions of these women as being "casual" at all. I think you are simply projecting your own prejudice. It is their right to choose what happens to their own bodies. The day you have the right to make a decision about an abortion is the day you get pregnant.

5

Corky,

09/02/2010 09:48:34
Duncan,

It is perfectly reasonable to suspect people who elect for multiple terminations as using it casually. There are plenty of alternative methods which prevent conception.

You cannot possibly assume that these women are not being casual, can you?
6

Evidenced Based Thinking Please,

09/02/2010 10:53:27
All,
Typical - how about just shutting-up and giving women this space?
7

danbob,

09/02/2010 10:56:50
6# How about giving these woman some basic advice about how their bodies function. Or would that be too radical in "do as you like and the taxpayer will fund it" UK.
8

Duncan in Edinburgh,

09/02/2010 12:14:59
#5 No it isn't at all reasonable. In fact it is utterly unreasonable. It is pure assumption, based on prejudice. There could be any number of reasons, and knowing nothing more about them means neither of us are in a position to judge.
9

Stephen Wayne Foster,

Miami, Florida 09/02/2010 12:21:43
Are there no adoption agencies there to receive children born out of wedlock? Why do these women see abortion as the only solution when the unwanted children could be adopted?
10

Jo Public,

09/02/2010 12:40:00
#6. Evidenced.

Almost two hours have passed since your comment and I see no women have joined the debate.

we'll give it another two.

11

Duncan in Edinburgh,

09/02/2010 13:36:18
#9 Of course there are adoption agencies, though the idea that they exist "to receive children born out of wedlock" has not subsisted for at least a century in this country. And why do you assume that these women see abortion as the "only solution"? They are making informed choices, hopefully with as much expert support as possible. For many women adoption is not their choice.
12

IanW,

Somewhere 09/02/2010 15:31:31
Given that girls under the age of 16 should NOT be having sex it comes as no surprise to me that 'older' women have more abortions.

I would not dare say to a 35 year-old woman that she was an 'older' woman, I want to live.
13

Corky,

09/02/2010 15:31:43
Duncan,

You're a fool - too quick to jump into your tirade, I've been here before with you and you don't listen.

Read my post again, and carefully this time, and you'll find it is very carefully worded.

It is entirely reasonable to SUSPECT people who elect for multiple terminations are doing so casually.

And furthermore YOU cannot assume that they are not being casual - can you?

In fact I think it's probably highly likely that some women electing for multiple terminations may well be taking this option casually.
14

Duncan in Edinburgh,

09/02/2010 15:44:32
#13 I am not a fool, Corky, just because you disagree with me.

I read your post carefully the first time. You clearly didn't read my response very carefully or you wouldn't need to pose your question in the penultimate paragraph of your post.

To recap, you think it is reasonable to suspect that, and believe it is highly likely that, women who have had multiple terminations have elected to do so casually.

I do not think it is reasonable to suspect that, nor do I think it remotely likely. I think your position is based on prejudice, and given that there are any number of different reasons a woman might make such a choice, I find your position utterly unreasonable.

If you want to discuss this further, refrain from calling me names. Your invisible sky god doesn't like that.
15

Happychick1,

Edinburgh 09/02/2010 16:38:54
I see so far its just men that have commented on this article. As far as I can see you have NO RIGHT to comment on this article what so ever as you have never gone through this and never will.
Every woman has a right to do what she wants with her body and if she has gotten pregnant and doesnt wish to be then its her right to terminate.
16

Stephen Wayne Foster,

Miami, Florida 09/02/2010 17:35:12
One popular method of "choice" in Miami is for teenage girls to go into an alley, give birth, and dump the baby in a trash bin.
17

Ileach,

09/02/2010 21:58:53
OK, so for the "mature" (thank you, IanW) woman's view: This aka Janie person cannot be real? Does she know where children come from? The stork? If she was careless enough to "fall" pregnant in her 30s, and she had to have an abortion, why did she not ask questions before or after the procedure? How many times was she going to go back for abortions before realizing that she did not want further children, and making it "final"? On the day that I decided my family planning was complete, I went to my doctor for a sterilization, even before the age of 30. I simply knew that I did not want to get pregnant again, but I was, of course, aware that it was entirely possible, and would be for many years to come. I wanted it "final", and I made it "final". Come on, women, whoever heard of serial abortions as a method of birth control? There has to be a better way - and to think that some of my fellow women are too stupid to realize this makes me angry.
18

Duncan in Edinburgh,

10/02/2010 07:28:36
#15 While I agree completely with your second paragraph, your first is nonsense. Everyone has a right to an opinion on this article.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.