Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Nobody is being short-changed by bank's donation



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 May 2008
The Royal Bank of Scotland's donation of a state-of-the-art scanner to be used on NHS patients in the Capital has raised fears about backdoor privatisation of the NHS. But, asks Joanna Vallely, should we really be worried?
IT is one of the most emotive accusations to get thrown into rows about the National Health Service – queue-jumping. The idea that someone, somewhere is getting preferential treatment for any reason other than clinical need is guaranteed to create no
isy protests.

So when the Royal Bank of Scotland made a £4 million gift of one of the world's best scanners to test heart patients in the Capital – with the proviso its staff get 25 per cent of its use – it was perhaps inevitable there would be a fight.

One of Scotland's leading health experts, Edinburgh University's Professor Allyson Pollock, has raised concerns the "gift with strings" will undermine the principles of equal access to the NHS.

The Aquilion One scanner has been donated to the Queen's Medical Research Institute – part of Edinburgh University – to research conditions such as heart disease.

The RBS donation will not only buy the scanner, but also pay staff costs and maintenance for five years. After that, it's hoped grants will be found to keep it operating, if it has not become outdated.

As part of the deal, around 4000 NHS patients a year are likely to undergo tests on the scanner, alongside about 1000 RBS staff.

Prof Pollock fears that introducing such a system of public/private partnership means some people may get better access despite having lesser needs than others.

Independent Lothians MSP Margo MacDonald is to call for a Holyrood debate on the issue, concerned new ground rules need to be set out for future donations.

Labour health spokeswoman Margaret Curran MSP sums up the concerns, saying: "We would need a guarantee this will not lead to any queue-jumping and that access to this equipment will be determined by clinical need. It's obviously a very significant precedent.

"Health spending is going down in Scotland compared to England. We could never get ourselves into a position where corporate sponsorship filled that gap. That would not be acceptable."

But NHS Lothian's medical director Dr Charles Swainson is clear that it is NHS patients who will be the winners.

"It's really important when you get something new like this to do the research properly to determine who will benefit from it in future. I'm quite clear that no NHS patient is going to be disadvantaged.

"First of all this is not part of the NHS service (The scanner is being gifted to Edinburgh University and will be operated by its staff ]. We've already got a perfectly good service for patients with heart disease, good current scanners and there are no waiting lists for people requiring investigations for heart disease."

The main benefit will come in the long-term as the scanner is essentially to be used as a research tool – but some patients with highly complex cases could also see immediate dividends.

The scanner is expected to make a major contribution to Scotland's efforts to cut heart disease and cancer deaths.

Unlike conventional scanners, the Aquilion One can capture an image of the whole organ in just 0.35 seconds, meaning radiation exposure is reduced by 80 per cent compared with a CT scan.

It is also hoped the scanner will reduce the need for invasive procedures on patients, as well as help research on the internal workings of the body.

"The kind of ratio we've got, which is up to 25 per cent of time for RBS, is quite reasonable because three quarters of the time or more it will be used for research," says Dr Swainson.

"I have no doubt there will be cardiologists around Scotland who will put good clinical reasons why particular unusual patients might be better off being put through this scanner than having a conventional cardiac catheterisation.

"In that case we would be pleased to put those patients through the scanner, but I think those will be very few and far between.

"The big use will be for research on people who may be at higher risk of heart disease than usual, for example people from the Asian Subcontinent, particularly India and Pakistan.

"Heart disease is also more serious in poorer people so there's a real opportunity to address that problem in Scotland.

"What the machine does is give you a diagnosis and an assessment of whether somebody has heart disease and how bad. Professor (David] Newby (director of QMRI's clinical research imaging centre] has already done fantastic research using existing technology that demonstrates that if you treat people without symptoms aggressively you can demonstrate that the disease gets better. He would like to do that kind of research on larger numbers of people and with a far greater degree of accuracy than before."

With Scotland's woeful record on tackling heart disease, it should certainly take a powerful argument to hold back any research which may improve the situation.

There are always going to be concerns raised about any private involvement in the health service.

It is right there should be a debate about any wholesale move to replace public funding with money from private sources before it could be allowed to happen.

But it is hard to find fault with the Royal Bank's gift. Where are the losers when NHS patients can still expect to receive a prompt service? And when it will allow more groundbreaking research to take place?

It is tempting to suggest that in this situation at least a more apt accusation would involve the old adage about looking gift horses in the mouth.





The full article contains 958 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 May 2008 9:30 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Royal Bank of Scotland
 
1

Bertie The Bat,

28/05/2008 10:37:02
Let the train take the strain.
2

Proximaking,

Dundee 28/05/2008 12:26:01
Is the RBS bank really saying its staff are more important than me, one of its clients for over thirty years, or my family? Shorn of all the apologetic and excuse making flim-flam above it seems they are. The RBS should be ashamed of itself but then again so should anyone who queue jumps and we see people like film and rock stars do it all the time. Next time Madonna et all troop back into the country let's see if they have to stay in line for an hour with plebs like me.
3

Foresight,

By the Water of Leith 28/05/2008 12:59:20

Donations of equipment to the NHS do not infringe the ethos of the service provided the donor pays the running costs too. If this does not happen the NHS has to find the running costs from within its existing limited budget which inevitably leads to a distortion of its pre-set operational priorities.
4

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

, Newington 28/05/2008 13:22:30
Unbelievable. Someone does the Nationalised Health Service a favour and an bunch of socialist bedwetters start whining about it.
5

Jams,

Edinburgh 28/05/2008 13:24:28
Do those who claim to have higher moral standards believe that we should tell RBS to take their scanner and sod off with it? Or perhaps they think that we should take the scanner from them and say "thank you, but sod off now its ours".

It is a grey area I admit, but ask yourself this. Is it better for 3000 people per year to have scans at no cost to the NHS, or is you pride more important?

Also bear in mind that some of those 1000 RBS staff would be seeking scans under NHS anyway.
6

The Hallucinist,

28/05/2008 13:44:10
Where are thee today Kirtsy Boydie Boyd-Williamson?
7

,

28/05/2008 14:05:39
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

Koffindodger,

Edinburgh 28/05/2008 14:14:40
perhaps all the people complaining about RBS's donation can club together the 4 million, buy the scanner and tell rbs to get lost.

But what are the odds of that.

Typical socialists willing to let others suffer for their beliefs.
9

TB,

Edinburgh 28/05/2008 14:40:07
To turn it down would be to have it unavailable to several thousand people, so is this what the objectors want? We already have several tiers and in equalities in the Health Service, with post-code lotteries, etc.
Many large companies aready have taken block private insurance out, so that their employees can receive more prompt treatment (through private channels) than the NHS can (unfortunately)possibly offer: this in turn can reduce the number of days off work, on Statutory Sick Pay, Incapacity benefit, etc. as well as freeing up some NHS appointments.
I would say, "Thank you, RBS"
10

antifa,

28/05/2008 15:16:27
I would say, "Thank you, RBS".

But firms do not do things without a profit motive - it would be illegal for them to do otherwise.

And I'm still a bit confused about their motive in this case. Is it just an act of philanthropy (i.e. PR) or is there more to it than meets the eye?
11

Dragonlord,

28/05/2008 15:32:19
Had the RBS put the scanner in it's headquarters and then invited the NHS to use it, would it still be an issue?
The fact remains, that the NHS are getting a state of the art scanner for feck all, and no running costs. Can't see a down side to that at all.
12

,

28/05/2008 16:40:07
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

Furious,

Edinburgh 28/05/2008 16:48:40
RBS paid for it and donated it. If the NHS were going to buy one I could see why people are complaining. But we all know that NHS were not going to buy one. Not an ideal situation but the NHS should be bloody grateful under the circumstances. Accept it with good grace and say thanks.
14

,

28/05/2008 16:58:21
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

cheuchtar,

28/05/2008 17:07:40
Let's just accept this very generous donation with grateful thanks.
16

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

, Newington Tax Revolt 28/05/2008 17:55:22
Labour health spokeswoman Margaret Curran MSP screeches:

"Health spending is going down in Scotland compared to England. We could never get ourselves into a position where corporate sponsorship filled that gap. That would not be acceptable."

Typical bedwetting socialist. She'd rather extort money from the much put-upon taxpayers than accept gifts from well-meaning companies. I note that her Labour colleagues aren't quite so fussy about free cash when it's headed into the pockets of their own campaigns though.

Something to remember next time we see her name on a ballot paper.
17

Loki - The Scourge of the Schemies,

EH1 28/05/2008 18:52:10
The resaearch will be to the general benefit of all irrespective of who funded the machine!
Next question?
18

,

28/05/2008 20:24:36
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.