Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Dr Pod: Surveys won’t make you live longer… but might help

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 March 2008
YOUR risk of cancer, heart disease and even your life expectancy can now be worked out at the touch of a button.
The internet contains a plethora of so called “risk calculators”, some of which will even calculate your predicted date of death.

Many of these are found on US websites. They ask a series of questions about lifestyle, (diet, exercise, alcohol con
sumption, stress, sleep patterns), existing health, family history of disease, then use a statistical formula to make a calculation. Hit enter and they instantly feed back the good or bad news.

Of course, these website calculators should not be taken too seriously and are crude, but I was encouraged that many do offer sensible personalised advise, based on the answers, to encourage lifestyle change as a means to improve your odds. Personally, I was delighted to find I’m going to live to be 93, but could improve my chances further by regular teeth flossing!

The concept of “risk management” is new for medical staff and patients alike, and the use of information technology and statistics to aid in this process is still novel. Risk calculators, are however increasingly being used by doctors to calculate patients’ risk of developing heart disease and stroke, the UK’s biggest killers. Indeed new “cardiovascular risk clinics” are popping up throughout the UK to identify and offer preventative treatment and lifestyle advice to high-risk individuals.

Age, blood pressure, cholesterol level, smoking status, presence of diabetes, a history of disease in the family, and pre-existing heart disease are the main risk factors used by these calculators. The calculation however remains crude, as there are still many unknown or poorly understood contributing factors. Genetics undoubtedly plays a huge additional role but, until we have the means to screen genes easily and cheaply in the clinic, this can’t be factored in.

The onus in medicine is shifting from disease treatment to prevention. This will not only lead to better health for the population, but makes financial sense. Health economists are starting to appreciate the rationale behind investing “up front” to negate the greater cost of treating the disease later. As a result, health budgets for preventative treatments have risen dramatically.

GPs already spend considerable time preventing disease through immunisation schemes, cancer screening programmes, smoking cessation clinics and so on. The latest screening programme being piloted in England involves ultrasound scanning of the abdomen to detect swelling of the main blood vessel, a condition called abdominal aortic aneurysm. Aneurysms can rupture suddenly with catastrophic consequences, but can be treated surgically if detected early.

Lifestyle management remains the main preventative strategy for the most common UK diseases. Rapidly rising rates of high blood pressure, diabetes and obesity, however, suggest there is little motivation to change habits. The contribution of lifestyle to health has been further highlighted recently by two major studies. A government report on the nation’s diet suggests almost 70,000 deaths per year could be prevented if Britons followed sensible eating guidelines, saving the economy around £10 billion annually. A Cambridge University study of 20,000 people found taking exercise, not drinking too much alcohol, eating enough fruit and vegetables and not smoking can add up to 14 years to your life.

Our ability to screen for and detect high-risk individuals will continue to improve. A huge step toward disease prevention could be achieved however if the nation simply embraced the principles of sensible healthy living.

• Dr Debbie Wake is a specialist registrar and researcher at the Western General Hospital, Edinburgh. To listen to her podcasts, visit www.drpod.co.uk





The full article contains 614 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 March 2008 8:49 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Robert,

Kirriemuir 25/03/2008 11:21:41
"Sensible, healthy, living"? There are probably as many variations to this theme as there are individuals so who among us might be right?

The late Dr Roy Walford, the guru of calorie restriction who wrote the book, The 120 Year Diet, failed to meet his expectations having passed away prior to his 80th year and having suffered from a neurological problem for around 3 years prior to his demise yet he dieted, exercised regularly, and fasted too, and did not carry any excess weight, so what happened. Well, his diet consisted mainly of vegetarian dishes and it may also have contained fruit and vegetable (polyunsaturated) oils and there lies the problem. To those who consider a diet like this being healthy then think again. Many foods are nutritious but also possess a downside of which the public is not informed. For example, in nature, fruit was intended only to be eaten (in these northern climes) in the autumn so that we might gain weight to help us through the winter's famine just like the birds and animals of the wild. The problem lies not in the fruit's nutritious value but in its sugar content and if eaten on a regular basis it will undoubtedly and eventually cause weight and health problems. Strawberries and peaches just happen to be suspected of being goitrogenic.

Then we come to the polyunsaturated fats such a fish and vegetable oils which are touted as being highly beneficial and if you believe this then I have a seaside cottage for sale in Falkirk High Street! Vegetable oils are known to be toxic and, indeed, to suppress the immune system. After organ transplants, the medical profession uses an emulsion of vegetable oils which are known to be potent immunosuppressants but the healthy food-addicts decline to accept this. Vegetable oils in particular were originally used for paint making and what happens to paint when it is exposed to oxygen and heat? Well the same thing happens when it enters our bodies and especially at the cellular level. Research shows
2

Robert,

Kirriemuir 25/03/2008 11:39:26
My earlier post was truncated owing to word limitation so here is its continuation:

"Research shows that fish oils help to keep arteries clear from furring and the diets of the Inuits consisted mainly of marine life but what is ignored is that the Inuits did not live any longer than we in the western world and they appeared to be older when in middle age so what did they die from? They died mainly from anurisms and strokes or they bled to death whenever injured all due to their blood being too thin!

Then there are those lovely carbohydrates which provides us with our morning bowl of flakes, biscuits with tea, bread for sandwiches, and those delicious cakes and confectionaries but, carbs also raise the body's blood sugar level and their regular consumption keeps it high and have your ever heard of diabetes or diabetic related problems like arthritis, cancer, obesity, clogging of the arteries, and etcetera, well, carbs are the culprit.

I could continue as there is a lot more of which the public should be aware and which is being judiciously suppressed by those who are economical with the truth but, to those who are interested then start Googling as the information and the supporting research is available for all to read on the Net!

Interestingly, the late Dr Robert Atkins was not far from the truth on his advice about diet.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.