Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Caesarean babies more likely to suffer asthma

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 December 2008
WOMEN who choose to give birth by Caesarean section should be warned it could almost double their baby's chance of developing asthma, researchers said today.
Surgical deliveries alter the way the immune system develops by delaying exposure to gut bacteria, making infants more vulnerable to allergies.

A study of 2,917 births found Caesarean section babies were nearly 80 per cent more likely to be diagno
sed with asthma. The risk almost trebled for those with two allergic parents, giving them a genetic predisposition to the condition.

Dr Caroline Roduit, of the University Children's Hospital, Zurich, said: "The increased rate of Caesarean section is partly due to maternal demand without medical reason. In this situation, the mother should be informed of the risk of asthma for her child, especially when the parents have a history of allergy or asthma."

Her team monitored the respiratory health of the children until age eight, by which time 362 were asthmatic and prescribed inhaled steroids.

Even though only 247 (8.5 per cent) of the children had been born by Caesarean section, they were 79 per cent more likely to have asthma.

Latest figures show 23 per cent of all babies delivered in Britain's hospitals in 2005-6 were by C-section – more than twice the figure 15 years ago.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 December 2008 1:00 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Proximaking,

Aberdeen 02/12/2008 17:54:34
I've always found that doctors cause asthma by handing out drugs. Kids often have minor wheezes, it's perfectly normal during development but mothers then drag kids to doctors and demand something be done and away we go. Doctor knows best? Try asking the 50% of people put into hospital by GP mistakes and the families of the 30,000 people who died unnecessarily in hospital last year and those they didn't admit to killing. Doctors should be replaced by databases and we would see people given the correct drugs and the correct doses of those drugs and we could save vast sums presently given to worse than useless doctors who would rather choose a drug by how many ski holiday points it will earn from the drug company rather than how much good it will do their patients.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.