Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 23rd November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Fears HBOS investor take-up may be as low as 10%



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 July 2008
HBOS is expected to reveal today that as few as 10 per cent of its shareholders took part in its troubled £4 billion rights issue.
A take-up at that level – predicted by some observers last night – would represent one of the City's least successful cash calls.

The result would saddle underwriters Morgan Stanley and Dresdner with around £3.6bn worth of shares. Disposing of t
hat amount of HBOS stock could further hit the Edinburgh-based bank's share price.

HBOS last night refused to confirm the likely scale of the rights issue – or even formally say that the announcement would be today.

A 10 per cent take-up would compare with failed BP's £7bn issue scheme, which left big City backers owning most of the shares after the stock market crash of October 1987. And it would compare unfavourably with Barclays, which won 19 per cent support in its recent £4.5bn share placing.

Rival Royal Bank of Scotland raised £12bn earlier this year through a rights issue backed by more than 95 per cent of investors.

Many of HBOS's two million small investors – who own around 27 per cent of the bank – are thought to have turned their back on the rights issue. The cash call was launched in April to help strengthen the group's balance sheet.

The underwriters are likely to spend several days trying to place the shares with big City investors, accepting any taken up on to their own balance sheets until they can sell them for a profit.



The full article contains 264 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

11+failed,

the pans 21/07/2008 12:03:59
Well, I believe the take up was 8%. It beggars belief that 8% should be daft enough to buy at 275p. A few times in the past month holders of rights could have sold them for 8p to 14p and were they inclined to invest could have bought in the market at 260p to 270p. I wonder how much of the short selling of the past 3 months was the underwriters selling above 275p knowing that they were guaranteed to buy back in at 275p?
2

Socrates-1,

London 21/07/2008 23:12:04
Fact 1: HBOS is holding $40 billion of US "asset backed" securities.

Fact 2: it has just invested £40 million in Tullock Homes.

Fact 3. It has invested more money in another Scottish property company.

Fact 4. It has £ billion investment in McCarthy and Stone, Persimmon and Barratts.

Fact 5. It has recentlty lent £128 million in the Waterside Construction Project in Liverpool

Fact 6. It has recently provided a debt facility of over £100m to a Unit Trust sponsored by Tritax Securities 1 Ltd to finance a major construction at Quorum Business Park, Newcastle Upon Tyne.

Fact 7. It has advanced £21million to Henry Homes plc for the purchase and mixed-use redevelopment of the Canon House office block in Wallington, Surrey.

Bank of Scotland seems to be trying to outdo Northern Rock in heading for a brick wall at full speed, with the usual financial regulators fast asleep.

The bank's shareholders who rejected the rights issue were not half as daft as the bankers who promoted it.

3

Evan Owen,

Snowdonia 22/07/2008 22:25:07
10% too many?

Who will gain from this?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.