Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


GM crops: 'Point of no return in ten years'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 June 2007
EUROPE will increase its genetically modified (GMO) crop area by 50,000-100,000 hectares a year over the next decade, US biotech giant Monsanto has said.
"It will be slow but within ten years GMOs will have reached the point of no return," said Jean-Michel Duhamel, Monsanto's director for southern Europe.

"The technology will not impose itself on consumers but consumers will better understand the
usefulness of GMO technology as farmers increasingly adopt it," he added.

In France, the world's largest seed maker, GMO maize - the only biotech crop allowed in the country - was expected to be grown on 600,000 hectares in ten years, against 25,000 in 2007, despite fierce opposition to GMOs in the country.

"It is more complicated in France than elsewhere but if we reach a 50 per cent rise (in area) per year it wouldn't be bad, as at world level we expect it to rise 20 per cent," Duhamel said.

French consumers are well known for their scepticism, if not hostility, to GMO crops. "Within the next few years there will likely be some turbulence," Duhamel said. "Consumers receive false information on what GMO crops are so they are afraid. But I'm sure that within ten years they will have accepted them."

This year, French farmers have sown 25,000 hectares of special maize, which has been modified to resist insect pests.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 June 2007 11:04 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: GM food
 
1

Ian Forrester,

Calgary, Alberta 26/06/2007 01:52:15

"Consumers receive false information on what GMO crops are." So very true, unfortunately, most of this false information is put out by the very companies selling the GM seeds. One need only refer to the report by Monsanto on their MON 863 maize to see how they distort information. The report, finally released after a legal battle showed up the same types of abnormalities originally reported by Dr. Arpad Pusztai. The GMO zealots vilified Pusztai when his report was published almost 10 years ago.

The spin doctors at Monsanto claimed that the effects caused by their MON 863 maize were due to "normal biological variation."

The moral of this is "DON'T BELIEVE ANYTHING THAT MONSANTO SAYS."

Anyone who is seriously interested in obtaining factual information should visit the GMWatch.org website.

2

Michael Leonard,

Edinburgh 26/06/2007 02:00:29

Burn it all.

3

FreedomFighter,

USA 26/06/2007 03:39:23

another way the man is keeping us down. we should burn it all yea, that is an answer to it all.you cant respond with ideas just words. why dont you start your own farms? the fact is you people have no real ideas about farming, pool your moneys together and dooooo something. buy some land and grow your own food but that would not happen.

4

Guthrie,

26/06/2007 07:27:11

Oh no, we have no idea about farming, despite doing it for around 3,000 years or more in Western Europe.
:rolleyes:

5

57Nomad,

california 26/06/2007 08:54:54

#4 Guthrie

I think #3 was using the personal 'you' rather than the general 'you.' There are few commercialized agricultural products that have never been purposefully modified. That includes animals as well. Animal breeding is just a slow form of genetic modification. Plant hybridizing is the same.

The type of genetic modification being done in the laboratory will produce crops that will feed hungry people. Opposition to it seems emotionally rather than rationally driven. I'm not clear what the primary objection is. Could you tell me?

6

Cauchy Riemann,

Wales 26/06/2007 09:07:41

I agree that we will reach the point of no return - but for entirely different reasons. Cross contamination from GM crops occurs and will essentially contaminate most non GM crops in time.

Despite the usual initial government and pro GM 'scientist' denials that cross contamination would occur, it clearly has.

http://www.i-sis.org.uk/GMCANCEP.php

Plans for full commercial go ahead in the UK are in the pipeline. It would allow farmers to plant GM oilseed rape just 35 metres from non-GM crops. The minimum distances for GM maize would be longer, 80 metres for forage maize, and 110 metres for grain maize.

You only have to look at motorway verges to see that such distances will not stop cross contamination.
In Canada, the introduction of GM oilseed rape has all but wiped out the organic oilseed rape industry.

This pathetic Labour government have repeatedly forced the GM agenda when there is widespread public opposition to it, and clear evidence that organic farming wouldn't be sustainable. Lets face it there is one area where Labour excels. Ignoring democracy and pushing forward insane ideas.

Soil Association Policy Director, Peter Melchett said:

"The Government's proposals to deny organic and other farmers the choice of staying free of GM contamination break their repeated promises to keep organic food uncontaminated by GMOs. It is now clear that on top of banning choice and breaking their word, they will also be breaking the law."

and even Michael Meacher, former Environment Minister was critical:

"This consultation is the Government's latest attempt to back the GM industry over the wishes of the British public. Instead of paving the way for GM crops to be grown in England, David Miliband must take on board the thousands of responses rejecting the Government's GM contamination plans and put in place policies that protect G

7

Dragomir,

26/06/2007 10:43:42

#5, actually they produce crops which are more expensive and posiblity toxic, so not only will it feed less people, less poor people, but it could also hurt some of them too.

I want to make a clear observation here for readers:


NOTICE WHO IS SAYING THAT EUROPE WILL INCREASE ITS GM CROPS: --- M o n s a n t o --- a (the) chemical industry giant.

KEEP FOOD CLEAN and NATURAL.

8

AD in sunny Livingston,

26/06/2007 11:11:37

Want to stop this happening?? Read the labels on your food and don't buy anything with modified ingredients in it.

It's scary how many manufacturers use modified ingredients - even in a lot of the yogurts/fromage frais aimed at giving the impression of healthy lifestyles and also children's stuff.

It's not right and it's not healthy. We don't yet know all the long-term consequences of a diet filled with modified food but do you want yourself and your family to be the guinea pigs?

9

AD in sunny Livingston,

26/06/2007 11:12:25

Oh yes, and write to the manufacturers of the products you're NOT buying - it's so easy to email in this techno age.

Hopefully they'll get the message!

:o)

10

Macbeth,

26/06/2007 12:14:58

So if what Monsanto says isn't true, and if what NGOs say is true, why do more farmers plant more GM crops in more countries every year?
Are people really saying that us farmers are stupid - season after season? No, of course not.
Roll on the next generation with stress resistant crops so that they can withstand floods and drought. They're in field trials in the U.S. my friends tell me - at least other governments let their farmers choose which crops to sow.

11

Em,

26/06/2007 12:44:07

Most people don't realise what is involved in the genetic modification of crops. Genetic engineering is really a cell invasion technology.

Monsanto have created genetically modified seeds where the plant itself acts as an insecticide and it is also immune to roundup herbicides, in order for them to do this they must invade the plants cells with a combination of DNA from soil bacteria which is immune to the herbicide as well as e-coli viruses.

Cells will naturally reject foreign DNA so they developed a method using soil bacteria that causes tumours in plants, they use this bacteria to ferry the engineered DNA into the plants nucleus. One other thing they add to this cocktail of DNA is an anti-biotic marker gene, a gene which is resistant to a specific anti-biotics.

The most cataclysmic force in the food system right now is the fact that the medical community is terrified about the loss of anti-biotics, nobody really understands how using anti-biotic marker genes in genetic engineering techniques might contribute to the problem.

12

Em,

26/06/2007 13:05:02

Another issue regarding GM crops is that of patent law. The U.S patent office for around 200 years did not allow patents on living organisms. The right to patent is guarenteed in article 1 of the conststution, food crops were excluded from patenting on moral grounds. Now with the reforms in patent law companies such as monsanto are allowed to patent genes and the law says that whatever plant that gene goes into the company holding the patent for that gene also holds ownership of the plant containing it. This has resulted in many farmers loosing ownership of there crops due to cross pollenation even though the farmers did not want these GM crops in there fields.
Monsanto has spent billions of dollars buying up seed companies and by the 1990's corporations began patenting not only GMO seeds but seeds that heven't been genetically engineered, the only requirement is that they have not been patented before. this has opened the floodgates for the patenting of any kind of genetic material including human DNA.

There are two very specific patent claims in this field that are quite threatening. One of them is one that Monsanto has where it's claimed the species of soybeans. Any biotech work on the crop of soybeans anywhere in the world is a violation of Monsanto's patent. The idea that you can actually own an entire species of a major crop is simply outrageous.

One of the other big company's based in Switzerland, Syngenta has actually got a claim on how a plant flowers. So it's actually the strip of DNA that allows a plant to flower. And it's said that this claim applies to 40 different species in the food system including rice and wheat, bananas and so on. So if Syngenta's patent claim is ever accepted, Syngenta would own the world's food supply basically all by itself.

A good documentary which includes many of these issues is posted below.

Report Unsuitable

13

aljok.23,

the world 26/06/2007 13:37:21

The last freedom outpost on the planet. The freedom to grow food. Stolen from our mouths by 'frankenstein' crops and their 'owners??' . I agree with 1 . Burn them where you find them as they are an offence to Man and Nature. And for all the bleating bairns who will reply to support GM food . Please allow me the legal right to cut off your fundamental right to procreate and breath and we'll just be getting to the Orwellian dream.

14

AngusMor,

God's Own Island 26/06/2007 14:29:52

KEEP FOOD CLEAN and NATURAL.

How exactly? Everything we eat is totaly unrecognisable as NATURAL. There are 9000 species of potato, of which 5000 are in Europe. 3000 years ago, there were 2 species of potato.

Look, GM is coming, no way round it, better get used to it. Personally, if they can produce drought resistant crops, crops that require less inputs and produce larger yields in a smaller area faster than nature, then it's all good.

15

Ian Forrester,

Calgary, Alberta 26/06/2007 16:10:27

Re 10: The reason that US farmers are growing so many GM crops is "SUBSIDIES". Using GM they can plant more acres and get more dollars from their government.

GM crops are increasing in developing countries because of corrupt governments being bought by Monsanto dollars (check out the Phillipines and India).

Re 11: There is one other constituent in the witches' brew, the cauliflower mosaic virus promoter. This gene is inserted to encourage high expression of the other inserted genes. However, there is no knowing what it may do to other previously "silent" genes such as genes coding for plant toxins which have been bred out (or at least their expression has been bred out, the genes may still be present).

16

Eve,

Scotland 26/06/2007 19:36:38

Technology advance not because people want or have a need for it BUT because technology can advance.

We've created a monster people it's called "Technology" There's just no stopping it, run for your life the Killer tomatoes are about to attach.

OK I'm exsadurating, May be GM food is Safe and then again they said the beef from cows who were feed cattle would be safe to eat & look what happened BSE spread and gave us v.CJD. Something we still no little about!!!

17

Macbeth,

26/06/2007 19:39:23

Re 15. Only 10% of the 10 million farmers who planted GM crops last year were NOT from developing countries. The 9 million from China, India, Brazil, Argentina, South Africa, Phillipines etc are poor with just a few acres.
Re 12, patents last for a set number of years (about 15 - 20). then it's a free for all in every indstry when a new invention comes along.
Re 11. ARMs fears may have been understandable in the early days (GM technology was invented in the '70s) but now even the British Medical Association agrees with the Royal Society and says GM crops and food are ok once regulaters say so.
I just want farmers to have the same choice my mainland conpetitors have in the EU and elsewhere..

18

cjammenheuser,

New York State, USA 26/06/2007 19:53:56

There is growing proof that bees who have been exposed to these engineered crops are dying- whole hives of bees are dead/ disappeared-
why would these crops not also over a period of time have a similar effect of humans?

19

Em,

26/06/2007 20:58:33

17 Macbeth
What makes you think the regulators can be trusted?
If climate change and the CJD fiasco can teach us anything, it is that science is too important to be left to the politicians or to a scientific establishment in bed with big business. Our academic institutions have given up all pretence of being citadels of higher learning and disinterested enquiry into the nature of things; least of all, of being guardians of the public good. The corporate take-over of science is the greatest threat to our survival and the survival of our planet. It must be resisted and fought at every level.

"Biotechnology and GM crops are taking us down a dangerous road, creating the classic conditions for hunger, poverty and even famine. Ownership and control concentrated in too few hands and a food supply based on too few varieties of crops planted widely are the worst option for food security."
Christian Aid report - Biotechnology and GMOs

History has many records of crimes against humanity, which were also justified by dominant commercial interests and governments of the day... Today, patenting of life forms and the genetic engineering which it stimulates, is being justified on the grounds that it will benefit society... But in fact, by monopolising the 'raw' biological materials, the development of other options is deliberately blocked. Farmers therefore, become totally dependent on the corporations for seeds.

Dr Mae Wan-Ho, geneticist in the UK Open University Department of Biology says: "Genetic engineering bypasses conventional breeding by using artificially constructed parasitic genetic elements, including viruses, as vectors to carry and smuggle genes into cells. Once inside cells, these vectors slot themselves into the host genome. The insertion of foreign genes into the host genome has long been known to have many harmful and fatal effects including cancer of the organism."

#18 I think you may be correct as I

20

Paula,

26/06/2007 21:36:05

Why is Europe allowing an American company to do this?

21

Dragomir,

26/06/2007 23:26:23

#14, you're confusing agriCULTURE (that's what that words mean, CULTIVATING a species) with genetic manipulation. Humans have "helped" certain plants e-v-o-l-v-e to suit their needs, that takes many years of trial and error and very slow progress - that's how we know they're good to eat. GM crops are nothing like the old ways of eugenics and cross-breeding, GM crops are completly NEW species which may or MAY NOT react as their "parents" have. The safety of these crops has never been decently tested!

I'm not even going to delve into the topic of patents on this, I see some have already pointed out the problems above.

I'm not even sure burning the GM crops would be a good idea. First they would have to be removed from the soil, so they don't leave a permanent toxicity in it.

22

Another US Foible,

USA 27/06/2007 14:48:33

Look at what America has done in the middle-east. Do you honestly think they know what they are doing. Multinationals such as Monsanto had a blueprint for Iraqs agriculture before the war. The Americans posted here are either extremely ignorant or work for companies to debunk critiscism. It has been thirty years now since we first heard GMO's will feed the world. There is more starvation than ever! One post mentions that it is important not to buy products containing modified ingredients. We in the US of A have never had that choice, it is a secret to most consumers. One post asks if US farmers are that stupid, farmers are not, but most of our agriculture is produced through government agribusiness, massive energy intense systems subsidized to contaminate at will. Democracy, the corporations joke on the people, everytime we vote to resist them, they take away more local and state rights. We always looked to Europe as those who could save us from this control through their resistance. It looks like we're going to have to learn the hard way.

23

Another US Foible,

America 27/06/2007 16:21:44

To freedom fighter, The genocide (I mean war) was a good idea too? We do grow our own food. So we don't have to clean up the messes your type produces.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.