Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 30th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Glasgow East By-election: Candidates' photos on poll papers? They should be so lucky



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 July 2008
BEAUTY, it seems, is in the eye of the voter.
Plans to put photographs of candidates on ballot papers are unlikely to develop after researchers claimed it would turn politics into a beauty pageant. The Westminster Government has toyed with the idea as a way of reversing falling voting levels.

But political experts from Strathclyde University believe it would lead to able candidates being ditched in favour of more attractive opponents. Dr Robert Johns and Dr Mark Shephard of the University's Department of Government carried out research into the proposals. They asked a cross-section of 4,000 voters to choose between pairs of candidates.

The researchers found that the impact of aesthetically-pleasing candidates would be enough to swing the result in marginal constituencies.

Johns said: "A candidate's appearance is currently just one of many factors at play in elections, but if photos were included in ballot papers it would be much more significant. We carried out hypothetical elections using ballot papers featuring candidates who were rated quite high and quite low in terms of looks.

"We found that when those pairs were matched we found differences of around 4% in favour of the more attractive candidate.

"It would be enough to swing plenty of marginal constituencies."

Johns added that the advantage was certainly with the younger, more good-looking candidate.

He said: "The effect was magnified when it was a race between a man and a woman. A young man against an older woman, or vice versa, had a big advantage."

In the past decidedly unglamorous politicians such as Winston Churchill in the UK and Abraham Lincoln in the US achieved high office and served with distinction.

But Johns feels it is becoming increasingly difficult for less photogenic politicians to emulate their achievements.

"The knock-on effect would be that parties would pay far greater attention to who they were choosing and how they presented themselves.

"Selection committees would find themselves looking for ever younger, more attractive candidates. The pronounced youth advantage would undoubtedly lead to some people dusting down older more flattering pictures."

A spokesman for the Electoral Commission confirmed there were no current plans to introduce photographs on ballot paper.

But he added: "We believe that the ballot paper is one of the key components in the electoral process, and that it should be as user-friendly as possible."



The full article contains 407 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 July 2008 7:11 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

AM2,

Scotland,UK 19/07/2008 23:54:50
Would John Mason’s photo be in black-and-white, given former SNP MSP Dorothy-Grace Elder’s comment that, in her words, “he is the colourless man in the shadows”?
2

,

20/07/2008 00:12:17
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

,

20/07/2008 00:12:22
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

,

20/07/2008 00:16:12
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

,

20/07/2008 00:20:07
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

subrosa,

20/07/2008 00:30:52
'Plans to put photographs of candidates on ballot papers are unlikely to develop after researchers claimed it would turn politics into a beauty pageant.'

Beauty pageant? Haven't laughed so much for ages.
7

,

20/07/2008 00:36:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

,

20/07/2008 00:48:59
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

,

20/07/2008 00:58:45
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

,

20/07/2008 01:09:56
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

,

20/07/2008 02:00:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

,

20/07/2008 02:47:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

,

20/07/2008 03:29:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

,

20/07/2008 03:31:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

Jimmy the Pie,

20/07/2008 07:56:39
Due to the venomous nature of one of the candidates, I have just done a risk assessment on the announcement of the Glasgow East by-election.

When John Mason is announced as MP for the constituency he will have to wear double hearing protection, full body armour, face shield and a Formula 1 crash helmet.
Safety boots are recommended but not essential.

If John Mason was an employee it would be illegal for any employer to force him to attend the count. It would not be worth the risk!!

Children should not attend the count, with a minimum age of 25 recommended to avoid serious brain damage.

To make the count safe for everyone, Maggie Curran should not be allowed to attend, and should be held in a hermetically sealed room, preferably on Rannoch Moor.

Think Safety!
16

donald,

glasgow 20/07/2008 08:26:02
Little Red Monkey, Monkey.

Labour them song.
17

Guga II,

Rockall 20/07/2008 11:45:15
The Hootsmon Pravda Branch and Xinhua Branch censors have been active this morning. Yes, this free speech is a dangerous thing.
18

Iain's,

Barcelona 20/07/2008 12:18:10
Does one read into this that there is a serious literacy problem in the UK?
19

john z,

edinburgh 20/07/2008 14:40:00
Imagine having a picture of Margaret (I've not lived in the East end of Glasgow for twenty years) Curran on your ballot paper. Oh, my, god.
20

Richard Taylor,

Aberdin 20/07/2008 15:15:27
Their is nuffink rong with owr litteracy...
21

a proud doonhamer,

Dumfries 20/07/2008 15:18:59
17 Guga

The Troll is very upset with us not responding to him that he is lashing out and removing posts, even those that comply with the policies of the site.

Poor wee soul.
22

Eve,

Scotland 20/07/2008 15:36:08
why are ~ 1/2 of the comments gone on this page?

It's odd thogh, when you go the poll station and you don't have a clue what ~1/2 of the candates look like niver mind know what they stand for.

Intersting suggestion BUT i think putting the photo on the ballot would be costly. As the ballot paper could end up being A3, A2 or A1 in size to fit them in.

I don't think people vote on looks. If they did they would have already made up there minds before going in to the booth from the leflets and TV coverage.

The longist I've ever spent in a booth on polling day is 5mins and that was the 1st time I voted. I'm geussing thats the average time spent is about 1min.

Theres more chance of people voting for the person who is situated at the top of the page than by looks.

23

,

20/07/2008 15:39:37
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
24

Cadgers,

Perth 20/07/2008 17:22:50
I have yet to be in time to catch any of ","s comments...

RATS
25

,

20/07/2008 17:27:42
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
26

Willie Mor,

20/07/2008 21:40:51
Can you imagine Jabba Baillie winning a beauty pageant.

Or what about Lord George Foulkes with his drink bloated face.

No some of the politicains should be hidden from view.

Now what was that you said about having to listen to Nags Curran?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.