Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Action stations over deportation

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 December 2007
DOZENS of activists blockaded immigration offices in Glasgow yesterday as part of a co-ordinated nationwide protest against the Home Office's deportation of asylum seekers.
Demonstrators began arriving at the centre in the city's Brand Street at 4:45am. Their numbers were soon swelled by other activists and working professionals and students from Glasgow, Edinburgh and Stirling.

The protesters set up a 15ft tripod
to block the vehicle entrance of the building in an effort to prevent dawn raids. They also claimed to have stopped one dawn raid vehicle.

Three activists chained themselves to the gates but two were later removed by police.

One demonstrator was also positioned at the top of the tripod.

A spokeswoman for Strathclyde Police said two men and a woman had been arrested for breach of the peace during the Glasgow protest.

Mel Vegan, spokeswoman for the Unity Centre, one of a number of groups represented, said: "This is a nationwide protest against the practice of dawn raids and the structure of the immigration system in this country.

"We want Scotland and the UK to be a place that welcomes people who come to seek asylum rather than somewhere which persecutes people who have already suffered so much.

"I don't know how long we will be here. It's just for as long as it takes for the police to move us."

The Glasgow office was just one of a number of Home Office locations to be targeted by protesters early yesterday.

The campaign, loosely organised under the banner of the No Borders Network UK, also blockaded centres in Bristol, Portsmouth and Newcastle. A spokeswoman for the group said: "Government policy targets the most visible and the most vulnerable among those migrants that it sees as being undesirable and therefore fit for this form of administrative removal.

"The blacked-out vans are part of the forced removal of asylum seekers and their families who have been denied the right to stay in this country by an increasingly harsh legal system."

At the centre in Portishead, near Bristol, about 15 protesters blockaded the depot entrance with a car, and three people chained themselves to it.

In Portsmouth, ten protesters blockaded the immigration office at the international ferry port between 5am and 8:30am. A spokeswoman for the activists said they prevented an immigration van leaving to carry out a dawn raid.

A Border and Immigration Agency spokesman said: "We accept asylum can be an emotive issue and that people are entitled to peaceful protest.

"However, failed asylum seekers who have no right to remain in the country and who do not leave will be removed.

"The government will take a robust approach.

"This is done in the most sensitive way possible, treating those to be removed with courtesy and dignity."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 December 2007 9:57 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

John Blackley,

Austin, TX 19/12/2007 00:15:27
Oh my! The government's deporting asylum seekers! To the barricades!

Actually, the government isn't deporting asylum seekers. Heavens, they're not even deporting failed asylum seekers - those who came to Britain on the dodge and claimed to be seeking asylum, if this story is anything to go by. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/12/18/nmigrants218.xml

(Or is 'asylum' in many a foreign language translated as 'living off the labour of the British taxpayer'?)

The slight error ('failed' asylum seekers substituted by the much-more-emotive "asylum seekers") is just one of the problems I have with this piece.

The 'protestors' included "activists" (unwashed nuisances with no television), "working professionals" (professional benefit claimants - otherwise, why weren't they at work?) and "students" (younger unemployed layabouts and troublemakers). My question to this gaggle of two-legged potholes and traffic cones is this: If you're all so weepingly concerned with the plight of illegal immigrants, will you take them in, house them, feed them and pay them to live with you?

No, neither will I.
2

Lord Darnley,

19/12/2007 13:42:15
#1&2.
I find your compassion and understanding overwhelming.
3

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 19/12/2007 13:56:07
By the most recent Home Office estimates,(they can't even stop illegal migrants from working in the Ministers Office) there are more than 500,000 people living illegally in the UK. To put that in perspective that is more than 80% of Glasgows population or twice as many people as live North of Loch Lomond. This mess created by Tony Blairs goverment is going to take years to irradicate. At the present rate of outbound migration (from illegal migrant either moving voluntarely or being deported) this will take 12 years to clear the back log, even if the UK doesn't receive any more illegal migrants to replace the ones that have left. Their is a much simpilar solution. Cut them off. Turn off the sterling spilling spigot that attracts them. Stop giving then access to any Goverment Benefits,cash,housing or health care. Fine any one who provides them with employment a flat fine of 100,000 pounds per illegal migrant. In 6 months you will no longer have an illegal migration problem and we can start giving the refugee quota back to people living in refugee camps in appaling conditions and stop attracting these cue jumpers who endanger other peoples lives with their false refugee claims.
4

KampungHighlander,

Lord Darnleys brain 19/12/2007 14:12:44
So whats on for today, is it chaining myself the fence of a goverment building or signing on. If I only chain myself up till 10:30 I can still make it back to the benefits office by 11:00, that way avoiding all those lazy civil servants lunch break, and that will leave me loads of time for my leasurely lunch at chip shop before I go try my luck on the 1:30 at Doncaster. If I win its of to Tesco's for 6 litres of Strongbow if I lose its of to my ex-Misses flat to score some hash. Then I can sit down well stoned to watch on the BBC evening news how the Fat Cat Taxpayers are starting to get uppidy about paying me and my well deserving comrades freight. Eat the Rich! (it ends their because he's passed out.)
5

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 19/12/2007 14:47:38
Another interesting story about phony asylum seekers and what they contribute to Scotland.

http://news.scotsman.com/glasgow/Afghan-man-held-hostage-.3598640.jp

And this appears in todays edition of the Hootsman.

Why are their so many of these people appearing in Scotland. I read a story about one phony refugee claimant who filed a complaint against the Goverment with the courts because the Goverment had violated his human rights by givibg him a flat in Scotland. These people don't arrive at Glasgow or Edinburgh airport asking for asylum. They arrive in the South of England and are then shipped to Scotland by the British Goverment. It is the latest labour strategy to blunt the Scottish peoples demand for sovereignty. Flood them with the drose of the world and see if they still to leave when they have to support this worthless trash. Either way it works to their benefit, if Scotland leaves at least she can take some of the rubbish with her.
6

Lord Darnley,

19/12/2007 17:13:36
#6.
You better have a wee lie doon afore you burst a blood vessel,looks like you have been reading to much of the daily "Torygraph".
You make reference to the story "Afghan-man-held-hostage" where did it say in the article that any of the men involved are or were asylum seekers or illeagal immigrants?
Seems like that you have a rabid hatered of all foreigners
7

TSynicto the core,

Saltireland 20/12/2007 11:18:15
Aye,#7, if wanting this unwelcome avalanche of Eastern European 'Big Issue' sellers ,musicians and out and out beggars in every precinct and on on every corner sent back to where they came from is rabid hatred of foreigners put me on your list.
PS. Please brush up on your punctuation and spelling before your next PC diatribe. (illeagal/hatered)
8

James07,

Edinburgh 20/12/2007 16:39:25
Apparently according to the home office, dawn raids are "done in the most sensitive way possible, treating those to be removed with courtesy and dignity."

Is courtesy and dignity smashing down their doors at 6am, and dragging families, including very young children, from their beds into vans to be taken to prison?

They have committed no crime, and many have been tortured, raped, had their human rights violated in the countries they came from: I say 'Well Done!' to the protestors - i hope there are many more planned demonstrations at the Home Office.
9

John Blackley,

Austin, TX 20/12/2007 23:40:05
James07, I'm a little puzzled.

Do the authorities literally "smash down their doors" - or is that just hyperbole to heighten your point?

I take it that your point is "They have committed no crime" - and here was I thinking that the people being deported had arrived and stayed in Britain with no legal right to do so. I believe that's a crime.
10

James07,

Edinburgh 21/12/2007 01:25:13
yes indeed: doors are often literally smashed down.

"An unjust law is no law at all": Martin Luther King said this about laws that oppressed African-Americans. Laws that deport failed asylum seekers are unjust laws, and therefore these fellow human beings have not committed any crime.

We need to stop treating people as sub-human merely because they lack papers! It is as arbitrary as discriminating against someone because of their skin colour.
11

John Blackley,

Austin, TX 23/12/2007 19:29:02
James07, thanks for the insight into how the law works in the world you inhabit.

Unfortunately, in the world most-of-the-rest-of-us inhabit, that's not how it works and had you responded to my last point (instead of ducking it) I believe you would have had to agree - yes, they have committed crimes.
12

D.B,

Glasgow 24/12/2007 01:23:33
Hitler would be proud of you people,you seem to feel like you are missing out because people who have been raped,fled war(which our government is not completely innocent of)been tortured or watched parents or children being butcherd are begging for some help,none of you racists have a point as you all generalise on one or two specific races,not every person outwith america or europe wants to bomb you or rob you,having worked with many of these people i can assure you that the vast majority are genuine and do need help or face being sent back to war,famine or unjust legal systems in places such as saudi arabia 1 man's testimony is that of 2 women,if a woman is raped it counts as adultry unless she can prove otherwise that could mean the death sentence,but so what send them back?you lot should learn the mening of compasion.our beurocracy would kick in a persons door at 5:30-6:00 am drag the kids out of bed separate them from their parents and lock them up in dungavel instead of showing a bit of common decency.have i suddenly found myself in Nazi Germany?
13

Frodo the Scot,

Outer Limits 31/12/2007 19:03:30
Congratulations......No borders ? you folk are well on the way to being a Mundane one world hypocracy No tradition No identity ALL just friggin clones.
14

John Blackley,

Austin, TX 03/01/2008 21:39:58
DB (#13), "having worked with many of these people i can assure you that the vast majority are genuine".

How do you know?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.