Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Gerald Warner: North Korea raised ... and the Chicago chancer folded

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 April 2009
WHOOPS, apocalypse! Or perhaps not. The latest Taepodong-2 missile fired by that irrepressible prankster Kim Jong-il, the Dear Leader of North Korea, failed to fulfil its promise, petering out like a West Coast Line train around Carnforth. Or so the embattled PR men in the Pentagon and White House insist.
Technically, they are right. The missile did not complete its flight, nor did it launch its alleged "satellite" payload into space. So, that is all right. Or is it? At the risk of appearing to echo the triumphalist rhetoric of the North Korean news a
gency declaring the missile launch "not a mere fruition of wisdom and talent but a fierce confrontation with those who disliked it", the fact is, this was a significant success for the lunatic regime in Pyongyang.

The rocket's 2,000-mile flight was twice as long as any previous North Korean effort, giving the regime crucial credibility with its custom base in Iran and elsewhere. Pyongyang is the main supplier of ballistic missiles to the geopolitical demi-monde, including Iran and Syria. The news that Kim has a new line this season will draw the customers. Washington, for all its forced laughter at the rocket "fizzling out into the Pacific", knows perfectly well it took a heavy hit last week.

The Taepodong-2 may have dived into the Pacific geographically, but strategically it landed slam in the middle of the United Nations Security Council. The launch was in defiance of UN resolutions 1695 and 1718; but that is fine by permanent Security Council members Russia and China, who responded to Kim's provocation with an indulgent "boys will be boys" reaction.

So, effectively, did Barack Obama. Wakened in the middle of the night in Prague – the iconic symbol of appeasement and so the perfect venue – to be informed of the North Korean launch, the messiah retaliated with a deadly burst of Obamaguff. "Rules must be binding"… Uh-huh? "Violations must be punished"… "Words must mean something"… Now you're talking, Mr President. As you have been doing for a very long time; as you show every likelihood of doing for the next four years.

They are loving it – in Pyongyang, in Tehran, in Moscow, in Beijing, in Damascus, in every lair where the ungodly watch, hawk-like, for the least sign of weakness in their opponents. President Pantywaist is everything they have longed for: Jimmy Carter reborn, without the cynical realpolitik and steely core. The dismay infecting the media across the Far East was not provoked by the technical advance achieved by the bandits in Pyongyang but by recognition of the fatal failure of will in Washington. America can no longer be relied on to defend its allies.

America made all the moves that suggested it intended to play hardball. Two destroyers, USS McCain and USS Chafee, with missile-killing capabilities, were cruising Japanese waters. If they had shot down the North Korean missile, the ailing Kim's loss of face would have been terminal. The rhetoric deployed to deplore the launch would instead have been directed against American "aggression". Big deal. How far could Security Council members Russia and China react against the interdiction of a military breach of two UN resolutions?

But, insist the nay-sayers, what if North Korea had responded by invading the South? Well, that is where Obama's envoy to Pyongyang, Stephen W Bosworth, should have been deployed to explain that, while their 5.8 million-strong army and stockpiles of chemical weapons look fearsome on parade, they might look less impressive after vaporisation by a cruise missile with a nuclear payload.

Instead, Bosworth echoed President Pantywaist with the aphorism that "pressure is not the most productive line of approach" to North Korea. One wonders what more productive line of approach there is to a regime that has already sacrificed 1.3 million men in an aggressive war, murdered 1.5 million citizens in concentration camps, executed 90,000 party members in 10 successive purges and killed a further two million people by famine due to its deranged socialist creed. Even classic Marxist texts are forbidden in North Korea, being regarded as fascist-revisionist heresy.

Last week, Barack Obama blinked first, in confrontation with the heir of a man whose myth was almost as extravagant as his own: the late Kim Il-sung, founder of North Korea, invented modern physics, the automobile and the electric toaster, besides walking on the moon, and created the dawn of each new day. No wonder the Chicago chancer backed down. Just 80 days into his administration President Pantywaist is a busted flush.





Page 1 of 1

 
1

Florestan,

glasgow 12/04/2009 01:06:11
Spot on Gerry! Obama is a disaster.
2

Newton_Invented_Gravity,

12/04/2009 03:15:29
Clearly Obama must be 'weak' since he didn't raise North Korea to the ground.... My God the lunacy of the right wing just gets more ridiculous by the minute.
3

Mr. Lachie Todd,

Edinburgh 12/04/2009 07:45:06
Hawkish neoconservatives like the author will never be happy until a US President like meek Merkin Muffley is elected! (Apologies to Stanley Kubrick)
4

Newton_Invented_Gravity,

12/04/2009 10:02:56
There is something unseemly about the haste with which the right wing have rushed to go on the all out attack against President Obama. He may turn out to be all the things they are complaining about, but wouldn't it be wiser to give him some time in office so as to make a more informed judgment?

I can't help but reach the conclusion that with the likes of Warner, their political tribal instincts have taken over any good sense they might have had.
5

Itchy,

12/04/2009 10:04:43
#5 The 'right wing' knew what Obama was about when he was elected. All they had to do was to look at his record.

No need to jump to conclusions, there has already been ennough time to judge.
6

Newton_Invented_Gravity,

12/04/2009 10:44:30
#6 So they already knew exactly what kind of President he was the moment he was elected? That doesn't make any kind of sense at all.
Wiser heads would wait a while and see how he actually turns out.
For one thing, on a political level, the right have merely brought expectations down so far that all he needs to do is not be a nazi dictator and people will think he's a great president.
7

Teemackell the Scribe,

12/04/2009 11:42:57
There is much to dispute in Warner's article but some posters above seem more intent in attacking its author.

#3: "Clearly Obama must be 'weak' since he didn't raise (SIC) North Korea to the ground..."

Warner advocated nothing like "raze North Korea to the ground." What he actually writes is, "If they [US destroyers] had shot down the North Korean missile, the ailing Kim's loss of face would have been terminal."

THat argument is exteremely debatable so why not debate the actual argument instead of erecting a straw man?


#4: "Hawkish neoconservatives like the author will..."

Hawkish, Warner certainly can be. But you have been around here long enough to know that he despises neoconservatives. Why not revert to calling him "the old Indian diehard?"




8

Newton_Invented_Gravity,

12/04/2009 12:03:28
#8 I agree entirely that one should argue on the basis of facts.
Which is why I think you should perhaps go back and read the article properly-specifically this passage which I was refering to:

"Well, that is where Obama's envoy to Pyongyang, Stephen W Bosworth, should have been deployed to explain that, while their 5.8 million-strong army and stockpiles of chemical weapons look fearsome on parade, they might look less impressive after vaporisation by a cruise missile with a nuclear payload."



9

Bolivarian Scot,

BorisTown 12/04/2009 12:51:05
"They are loving it – in Pyongyang, in Tehran, in Moscow, in Beijing, in Damascus, in every lair where the ungodly watch, hawk-like, for the least sign of weakness in their opponents...."

Ungodly?

Yet a few paragraphs further down, Warner appears to recommend nuking North Korea.

Not very "godly" on this Easter Sunday.
10

Mr. Lachie Todd,

edinburgh 12/04/2009 13:24:54
.........Old Indian, hawkish, neocons never die, they just moan away!
11

Radge,

Aberdeen 12/04/2009 13:58:08
#11 Two pearls of wisdom in one week! You're spoiling us Lackey.
12

Observer,,

Glasgow 12/04/2009 15:45:24
10 Yes exactly, apparently any ''enemy'' of the ''West'' is ungodly, and liable to be vaporised, or else you're a big pantywaist.

He really is turning into a charicature of himself.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.