Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 17th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Another Blair who doesn't know when to quit



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 November 2007
WHAT does it take to make a member of Clan Blair resign from public office? After the political equivalent of a Russian deathbed scene that was the slow demise of the Great Charlatan himself - Tony the Legacy - we are now enduring the spectacle of his namesake and kindred spirit, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair, clinging to the furniture at New Scotland Yard after his force was found guilty over the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes.
This excessive attachment to office is a phenomenon that is universal throughout the New Labour nexus. Douglas Alexander's retention of his post after the double-whammy gaffe of turning the Scottish elections into a shambles and persuading Gordon Bro
wn to tease the public with a prospective general election is only the most recent example.

Sir Ian Blair is the most discredited public servant in Britain. His blunders have been not only egregious, but lethal. It took an Old Bailey jury just four hours to convict the Metropolitan Police of breach of health and safety laws, for which the judge fined the force £175,000 and ordered it to pay costs of £385,000. This travesty added insult to injury in the Menezes case and reflected appallingly upon the state of justice in Britain today.

An innocent man is shot dead in the London Tube - summarily executed by having seven dum-dum bullets fired into his brain - and this is classed as a 'health and safety' offence. It is utterly demeaning to the victim's memory. It is as if the police had been caught fly-tipping. It reflects the total incoherence of our current legal system. What must the rest of the world think of this grotesque charade? The punishment is equally absurd: the total penalty of £560,000 imposed on the Metropolitan Police will be paid by the taxpayer.

Not a penny of it will come out of the pockets of Sir Ian Blair, Commander Cressida Dick or the two SO19 officers who executed Jean Charles de Menezes. It is purely a ledger transaction involving the transfer of £0.56m from one part of the public accounts to another. Only the taxpayers are being penalised.

The two officers, after a 12-month suspension, are fully operational again. One of them shot dead a robber - legitimately on this occasion, in a firefight - three months after returning to work; but common sense dictates they should have been taken off firearms duties for the rest of their careers. They were not cross-examined at the Old Bailey trial, on the grounds that their presence would have been a "distraction". Some of the officers involved in the Menezes incident have already been told they will not even face disciplinary charges.

Commander Cressida Dick, who on the fatal day presided over a control room described as "chaotic", was promoted earlier this year to the £130,000 post of deputy assistant commissioner. Like Blair, she has built her career on political correctness, working on "diversity" issues in the wake of the Macpherson Report, the document that emasculated the Metropolitan Police and turned it from a crime-fighting force into an agency of social engineering, under graduate officers such as Blair and Dick.

Blair himself is the epitome of everything that is wrong with British policing today. When it comes to PC idiocy, Blair has previous. As deputy commissioner, in 2002, he proposed removing the crown from the Metropolitan force's badge, to avoid offending non-Christian officers. As commissioner he instituted PC verbiage and logos throughout his force and lobbied for 90-day detention of terror suspects and introduction of identity cards.

As his namesake Tony's poodle, at the 2005 general election he allowed police Range Rovers escorting Blair to display 'Vote Labour' posters. Even after the death of Menezes, he was still putting out self-exculpatory statements and seemed to have little idea what was happening, during a farrago of incompetence by his force that demonstrated the inadvisability of decommissioning the Bow Street Runners.

In 2006 he expressed bafflement that the Soham murders had become "the biggest story in Britain" and was exposed as having secretly recorded telephone conversations with the Attorney General and three police supervisory officials. Last month he was allegedly resentful that his deputy, Paul Stephenson, by his example, had "bounced" him into rejecting a £25,000 'performance' bonus, in deference to the Menezes incident. What a buffoon.

Blair's immediate reaction to last week's verdict was to insist he would not resign. To do so would make it difficult for his Labour masters to send him to the House of Lords, his next natural destination. He was instantly backed by Gordon Brown and the Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith. If Blair is not forced out, then Britain is a police state. It is as simple as that. Last week it was revealed the Metropolitan Police "give up" on half the cases referred to them. No wonder they had leisure to visit, interrogate and intimidate author Lynette Burrows about a possible 'hate crime' after she expressed her opposition to adoption by homosexuals on BBC Radio Five Live.

That is what MetroPlod is now for: enforcing political correctness. Burglars, rapists, muggers, murderers - nothing to do with us, guv. Nor is this mentality restricted to that force. Remember how Strathclyde Police abandoned Operation Gadher, designed to break Asian gang culture in Glasgow, on the grounds it was politically incorrect. Six months later Kriss Donald was murdered.

Things have turned out well for almost everybody involved in the Stockwell Tube execution. Blair continues to enjoy the confidence of his political masters, Cressida Dick has been promoted and the SO19 gunslingers are back on the job. The exceptions, of course, are the unfortunate Brazilian electrician and his bereaved family; but few of the buck-passers on the public payroll will lose sleep over them. The challenge to the British public is: do we have the decency and the will to insist that justice is done and the complacent, apparently unassailable, members of the nomenklatura are held to account?



The full article contains 1014 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 November 2007 7:45 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Gerald Warner
 
1

brassneck,

Brigadoon 04/11/2007 00:42:44

Gerald is correct. We live in a fascist state -
one in which the police (sorry - Blairs)
can do no wrong.

2

Teemackell the Scribe,

04/11/2007 02:01:33

GW is correct to excoriate PC Blair but wrong to attack the other officers. PC Blair is a figure of ridicule and contempt both inside the Met and in police forces across the UK -and in all ranks, from police constable to the very top. The trial judge described the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes as "a corporate failing." The corporate chief, PC Blair, must consequently take responsibility. He is surely dead meat, despite the misguided backing of Gordon Brown and the Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith. She, at least, has started to back pedal. Already, Sir Ronnie Flanagan, Chief Inspector of Police and former RUC chief is being sounded out for the job, it is reported.

It is significant that PC Blair's most diehard supporters are the very PC Ken Livingstone and the almost equally PC Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA). That says it all. PC Blair's most fervent backers are the old "Loony Left" of 1980s tabloid fame. They are the gallery to whom PC Blair has played in his successful ascent of the greasy pole. The MPA's Chairman, Len Duval acclaimed PC Blair's appointment in 2004 on grounds of PC Blair's record on "diversity issues” The same buffoon was defending his creature in similar terms the other day.

The trial judge and jury both went out of their way, however, to single out Cressida Dick for praise. This officer did her best with the rapidly changing, sometimes false and incomplete information she was fed. Whoever was to blame for this tragedy, she wasn't. Nor were the armed response officers. It is all very well for GW to criticise SO19 from the comfort of his desk. Remember, however, that SO19 went into the Stockwell tube believing, on good authority, that there was a serious risk that his wife would become a widow.

The truth is that the ability of the Met to combat terrorism has been seriously compromised by an excessive focus on "diversity issues" and the over-promotion of people not becaus

3

Willie Macleod,

Wick 04/11/2007 03:29:01

#1 We do not live in a Fascist State but we would be closer to one if Warner and his like had power

4

langtonian,

scotus 04/11/2007 05:42:51

#3 Right on -totally agree.

G.W. -Comments on Douglas Alexander are a complete disgrace, he knows full well the full story, that he chooses to present the matter in the way he does is a "fantoosh farrago" of inept journal-ease at best , and a simple lie at worst.

5

Neil The Mac,

Gloucestershire 04/11/2007 07:24:14

The tradition of public servants clinging to office when the public have lost confidence in them was actually started by Tony Blair. Remember Mandelson, Blunkett, etc etc. It seems this man, who has lost public confidence for a number of reasons - suspicion of not telling the truth being one - is the latest in a long line of failures who refuse to admit it.

6

langtonian,

scotus 04/11/2007 09:24:41

#5
Innuendo, half truths,personal presumposition,with a leavening of biased pure speculation are no substitute for the facts and reality.

Historical fixations should be left behind.

Much of the above is acceptable from commentators in these columns.

However there is no excuse for a professional columnist to infer half truths in a national quality paper.

7

weehumpty,

04/11/2007 10:53:23

While agreeing with the thrust of all that Gerald Warner and most of what Teemackell have said, I disagree with Teemackell's exoneration of the "other officers" or Blair's Boys as they have been termed. After all didn't "Ivor" (Blair), a special hero, pump seven bullets into Mr de Menezes having previously pinned his arms to his side thus making movement impossible? And was he compelled to answer the injunction to "stop him" by killing him? Then there was "Frank" (Blair) and his "services to public hygiene" by urinating into a hedge and thus missing the victim's emergence from his home building. Nor did "Malcolm" and "Ken" (Blair) exactly cover themselves in glory when behaving like headless chickens as they rushed into the Stockwell St tube station.

As for Cressida Dick (Blair), our only Girl, it's true that she was "singled out for praise" by the jury. Whatever for? Her command to "stop him" was answered by murdering Mr de Menezes. There was clearly something very badly flawed in a command system - for which she had responsibility - with instructions as ambiguous as that fateful last order.

Given the link to Tony Whathisname I'm beginning to think that there is something in the Blair gene that is at the bottom of all this. If so, whatever is the antidote? And shouldn't we be working on it as a matter of the greatest urgency?

Meanwhile, I await the distribution all round of the Queen's Medal for Gallantry. Perhaps Mr de Menezes' mother will be asked to make the presentations?

8

Teemackell the Scribe,

04/11/2007 11:29:32

weehumpty / 10:53am asks,

'After all didn't "Ivor" (Blair), a special hero, pump seven bullets into Mr de Menezes having previously pinned his arms to his side thus making movement impossible?'

Sorry, Humpty, you are a wee bit muddled.

Ivor was the code name of the surveillance officer who followed Jean Charles on to the tube. He also "pinned his arms to his side" as you say. How then could he pump a single bullet into the Brazilian's head? That was done by SO19, the code name of another officer from a quite different unit (armed response) who pumped seven in the mistaken belief that a "Kratos" codeword (shoot to kill) had been transmitted by Commander Dick. It never was.

There were 19 different failings here, human and systems. It is ludicrous to contradict a court that actually heard all the evidence of Cressida Dick's performance (including running out of time) and reached the conclusions they did. You come close to scapegoating the Gold Commander for what Mr Justice Henriques summed up as 'corporate failing." For that the corporate chief must go.

9

bus user,

edinburgh 04/11/2007 13:56:04

Benjamin Franklin said something along the lines of 'if you exchange freedom for security, you will have neither'
We're well on the way to that state after this shambolic action and more shambolic cover-up.
I'm in London on business a lot, and local papers frequently carry stories about police armed units shooting suspects dead. If I remember rightly, one of the officers involved in the Menendes case was also involved in a later shoot-out with a group of alleged bank robbers. There was far less of a fuss about the death of a suspect in that case.
The essence of this ballsup is, as it so often is, a lack of good communication among those involved. A former armed unit officer said yesterday that he spoke to one of the officers involved in the Menendes shooting. This officer thought, at the time, that he had done his job and saved London from a terrorist incident. I wonder how he felt when the body was searched?
If Cressida Dick was right when she said the operation she was controlling had lost control, then what conclusions are we to come to about the Met?

10

Proximaking,

Dundee 04/11/2007 14:31:54

Blair is incompetent in regards of this case only if he knowingly misled the public. His role is not the minute to minute or even day to day running of the MET, it is the direction of the MET he controls on a month by month and year by year basis, that is what leadership of that organisation is about surely, setting the tone.

However Cressida Dick was in minute to minute control of this case and she failed catastrophically and should have been summarily demoted and no further questions asked.

The officers who went into the underground should all have been charged with murder, most would have gotten off with severe reprimands and been thrown out of the police force by the sounds of things but in any sane world where the protection of the public comes first three of them, the three in the carriage, would have been found guilty of the charge and locked up.

We are not talking about a hooded man, a bag carrying man, a bulky jacketed man, a fat man, .... we are talking about a slim man with skimpy clothing (have you ever been on the underground at that time of year? Any more than thin clothes and you melt) who was closely followed for about an hour by someone (IVOR) sitting within a few feet of him for most of that time on buses or trains. We are talking about an honest to goodness execution killing, ..... of an innocent person, just like you or me. Sorry but if you think that shouldn't go unpunished then you should have yourself sectioned today, now, this instant because not only do youlack empathy but you also endanger the public by insisting that those same executioners are not held to account.

11

CouncilTAxPAyer,

ex-Londoner 04/11/2007 17:34:16

Mr Warner is way wrong here. The Metropolitan police have a dreadful dilemma with SUICIDE bombers. It's kill them or end up with another tube carnage with 20 or 30 tube users murdered again. It is about time that the Tories stopped this cheap political campaign against
Sir Ian Blair because he is not a Tory right winger. If he was a "hang em flog em" Tory right winger serving under Mrs T I have no doubt that Mr Warner would be cheering him on.

As for other comments on here that the Met is compromised by "political correctness" - have the people making these comments ever lived in a London Borough where up to half the population are from an ethnic minority background.? Many of these people pay taxes(inc Council Tax) which fund the Metropolitan police. These people have a right to respect by the police the same as the rest of us.

Yes the Metropolitan Police are not 100% perfect but I see more police on Oxford Street London than I ever do on Union Street Aberdeen or Princes Street Edinburgh!

12

Teemackell the Scribe,

05/11/2007 00:22:11

#10. Proximaking, Dundee / 2:31pm 4 Nov 2007 says

"However Cressida Dick was in minute to minute control of this case and she failed catastrophically and should have been summarily demoted and no further questions asked."

Both Justice Henriques and the jury exculpated -indeed commended-Commander Dick. They heard all the evidence. Did you? If not, why should anyone prefer your opinion to that of the judge and jury?

Before that you say, "Blair is incompetent in regards of this case only if he knowingly misled the public."

At first I thought you were talking about another Blair and WMD. Are you seriously arguing that misleading the public -which he did (allegedly) UNknowingly-is the only possible ground for a charge of incompetence?

You go on to say "His role is ... direction of the MET he controls on a month by month and year by year basis, that is what leadership of that organisation is about surely, setting the tone." Agree, absolutely. But the tone set by Sir Ian Blair and the direction charted by him has been one focused primarily on "diversity issues" pandering to the likes of Ken Livingstone and other high priests of political correctness on the Metropolitan Police Authority. Because it was so, when it should have been focused on tackling crime and terrorism, we have had this tragedy -a "corporate failing" as Mr Justice Henriques described it. If the corporate chief is not accountable for a corporate failing then who is? Certainly not a commander of an operation that went disastrously wrong.

13

Teemackell the Scribe,

05/11/2007 00:29:32

11. CouncilTAxPAyer, ex-Londoner / 5:34pm 4 Nov 2007

refers to "a London Borough where up to half the population are from an ethnic minority background.? Many of these people pay taxes(inc Council Tax) which fund the Metropolitan police. These people have a right to respect.."

Yes, indeed they do. But do some of their number have a right to be promoted in the police force, not on merit, but to meet ethnic diversity targets set by Metropolitan Police Authority? This surely pays no respect to those from minorities who deserve their advancement on merit and damages the overall quality and morale of the police force itself.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.