Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


France in the grip of new mental illness: obsessive Sarkosis

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 May 2008
SERGE Hefez, a practising psychiatrist, has identified a new mental illness among the French: obsessive Sarkosis, an unhealthy fascination with the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy.
"As I listened to my patients during consultations, many of them mentioned Sarkozy by name," Dr Hefez said. "He's penetrated some of their deepest fantasies.

"I noticed all this passion in people speaking of him, and I thought there is something
particular about this man – he's like a reflection of us in the mirror."

The French project themselves onto Sarkozy, too, Hefez said.

"He's the incarnation of the postmodern man, obsessed with himself, turned toward pleasure, autonomous and narcissistic," the psychiatrist said.

"And he exhibits his joys and sorrows, all his private life, his sentimental doubts and pleasures. He represents the individualism of the society to the extreme, that it's the individual who counts, not the society."

A year after taking office, Sarkozy can appear to be everywhere, at least in the world of television and print.

The daily newspaper Le Figaro counts at least 100 books devoted to the French president, his life and loves, with more than a million sold, for $25.1m.

Some of the titles display the fury and fascination that Sarkozy has stimulated: The King Is Naked; The Man Who Doesn't Know How To Pretend; The Liquidator; He Must Go!; The Duty Of Insolence; and Somersaults And Flips At The Élysée.

Hefez analysed this obsession in an article and then in his own book, Obsessive Sarkosis, in which he identifies related illnesses, such as Sarkophrenia and Sarkonoia.

Television covers Sarkozy's every gesture, in both homage and mockery, itself an effort to create distance from the phenomenon that it perpetuates and magnifies. But Hefez, too, has been infected by the condition he was among the first to diagnose.

And like any good analyst, he is fully aware of the problem, and the irony.

The heated reaction to his article "was interesting for a psychiatrist and didn't surprise me", he said, laughing, "because it corresponds precisely to the obsession".

For Hefez, Sarkozy's quick marriage to the rich, beautiful model Carla Bruni is telling. "She is the perfect feminine equivalent– very fascinating, very narcissistic, very occupied with herself," Hefez said.

For the French, it was all too much, too fast. Sarkozy's new relationship, first made public in the very unpresidential, un-French EuroDisney theme park less than two months after he and Cécilia, his wife of 11 years, announced their divorce, was seen in the collective consciousness as a kind of "betrayal of intimacy, of friendship" with the French people, Hefez said.

"It's true he's in love, and that has balanced him, but the French have lost confidence in him," the psychiatrist said. "All presidents lie, but this is a betrayal of friendship."

The passion has soured, said Eric Empatz, editor in chief of Le Canard Enchaîné, a weekly newspaper that combines satire and investigative reporting.

"This obsession of the French with Sarkozy has turned, and turned negative," Empatz said.

"The obsession continues, just as passionately, but now it's negative. In that, too, it's like a bad love affair."

With his opinion poll ratings at historic lows, Sarkozy has followed advice, including that of his wife, to appear more presidential in public, and to appear less often. The "bling-bling" of rich friends and extravagant, chunky watches has been largely replaced by discretion, seriousness and carefully managed appearances.

"He fascinates everyone," said a friend who knows Sarkozy well and did not want to be identified speaking about him. "He's passionate, and he polarises people.

"The French feel an intimacy with him as someone like them, but they also want a semi-royal president to represent the country," the friend said.

"So there was this slight misalignment between this man they identify with and this expectation they have of the president, any president.

"Then couple this with too much money, or too many visible signs of it, which relates to the funny relationship the French have with money." The result, the friend said, was disappointment.

The divorce and remarriage further upset the French. "He was theirs, and then suddenly he becomes hers, and now he has to restore this sense of 'I'm yours because I'm here to serve the country'," the friend said.

The Rue89 news website asked: "After a year of dependency, how can we stop being Sarkotoxicated?"

As yet, there appears to be no cure.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 May 2008 9:09 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: France
 
1

,

25/05/2008 00:37:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

,

25/05/2008 03:28:42
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Willie Macleod,

Wick 25/05/2008 03:45:21
#1 Rosie Why Scullion I think he is one of the few decent witty posters
4

,

25/05/2008 04:13:19
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

Willie Macleod,

Wick 25/05/2008 04:32:40
#4 Rosie Please help me is there a cure for BDS can you get me on to one of your thought changing courses I need your help now that you have found me out as a BDS poster.
6

,

25/05/2008 04:44:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

celtic4,

USA 25/05/2008 04:45:51
George Bush is a joke but he is,so far, our President.
8

,

25/05/2008 04:52:56
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

Willie Macleod,

Wick 25/05/2008 05:03:45
#6 Rosie Thanks for that I feel better already just talking to you about it.

I will follow your advice no Loony left and keep an open mind I have never seen CNN or AL JAZEERA apart from clips on the BBC Is there hope for me.
10

,

25/05/2008 05:33:15
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 25/05/2008 05:36:29
#8 Rosies Opinion.

You may be right that some of the posters on this page are very strident in their views GWB and in some case their posts have been quite over the top.

But to belittle their opinion by pretending that it is based on some invented psycological disorder is really quite juvenile.

If you have a real opinion maybe you should stick to defending GWB based on the facts of his Presidency rather than engaging in the kind of arguments that most of us left in the schoolyard.

"I don't agree with you so you are crazy" is hardly an argument, much less an opinion.
12

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 25/05/2008 05:43:39
#10

If you want to post some argument on this sight based on your belief in some higher power then you open it up for others to express their opinion.

Personaly I have found that to be a waste of time.

No matter how well thought out arguments are to the contrary it will not disuade any "true believer", religion it seems is incurable.
13

,

25/05/2008 05:44:01
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

,

25/05/2008 05:46:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

,

25/05/2008 05:57:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

,

25/05/2008 05:58:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 25/05/2008 06:05:04
#14

Whether or not GWB is a war criminal is for the International Criminal Court or alternatively, for history to decide.

They had some sort of vague UN mandate to use as a crutch, but they also fabricated all the intelligence about WMD's to justify the invasion.

What is very interesting though is the fact that the Pentagon was signing contracts for the charter of vessels able to carry tanks and other heavy equipment even before 9/11.

If GWB is not eventually indited by the ICC, which I doubt will ever happen. Then we will all have to wait 30 years till all the documentation about the war is declassified.

#15

Like I said in Post #12, If you bring it up, its open game.
18

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 25/05/2008 06:21:01
#15

"What do you blame Bush for? Have you stubed your toe lately? Has your car broken down lately?"

No broken toes, and the car is running just fine. So I guess GWB is of the hook, on those ones.

However their are a number of things that he has done that it is fair to blame him and his misguided policies for.

Invading Iraq with no coherent strategy about how he would deal with the aftermath.

Turning Iran from a failing Theocracy into a Regional Superpower.

A long drawn out occupation that has been a recruiting seargent for the Islamic Extremists.

Neglecting the conflict in Afghanistan where the West did have some legitimacy for its actions.

Neglecting the economy and adopting ridiculous economic policies that have seen the Dollar fall from 83 cents to the Euro in 2001 to $1.55 to Euro wher it is now.

Doing nothing to lessen America's dependence on foreign Oil.

Shredding the US Constitution with the Patriot Act.

Failing to provide aid to the survivors of Katrina.

The list goes on and on and on. I could spend the whole day doing this but before I waste my time lets see if you have anything to say in GWB's defence or are you just going to label me as having BDS?
19

donald,

glasgow 25/05/2008 07:31:19
Scotland in the grip of Old Firm mental illness: obsessive Schizophrenia.
20

missing home,

la verne 25/05/2008 07:31:40
Isn't this supposed to be about the FRENCH president??
21

W U Merchant,

Aberdeen 25/05/2008 07:34:30
Sounds a bit like Salmonditis.
22

Guga II,

Rockall 25/05/2008 08:02:22
#1 Rosie.

Best laugh I've had in a while. I didn't realise that you lot of red neck fundamentalists had a sense of humour.

Anyway, to confirm your views, yes, Bush, Bliar, Broon and their respective cabinets are all war criminals and, with a bit of luck, will one day have to face justice for their crimes.

As for your god bit, if there was one, people like Bush, Bliar and Broon would be quaking in their shoes, as they'd be joining people like Hitler, Stalin, Mao Tse Tung etc. in the big bad fire. It would be very crowded there though, as it would be full of red necks and fundamentalists. And to keep it relevant, people like Sarkozy would be there too.

However, you are getting a wee bit muddled. Religion is the opium of the masses, and a crutch for the weak minded. And, to quote a well known American, Mark Twain, "If there is a god, he is a malign thug".

#21 What's that word that rhymes with merchant banker?

23

2dogs in D.C.,

25/05/2008 11:04:41
All this jabber re:BDS is just BS. It's a phrase coined by one Charles Krauthammer, an Editorialist of right wing bent, no Dr.of psych. Just shows how easily some are led.
24

right of center,

Chicago 25/05/2008 12:27:08
18 KampungHighlander

You are not being honest, you just want to blame Bush for everything. You need help.

"Turning Iran from a failing Theocracy into a Regional Superpower" Bush did this? LOL

"Doing nothing to lessen America's dependence on foreign Oil" A true sign you blame Bush for everything since it's the Democrats that won't allow additional drilling or building of new refineries.

"Shredding the US Constitution with the Patriot Act" Passed by Congress, renewed by Congress yet you blame Bush, LOL. I guess you are bitter that it has saved American lives.

The best one - "Failing to provide aid to the survivors of Katrina" Why are you not blaming those who deserve the blame? The Mayor of New Orleans who did not evacuate the city, or the incompetent Governor that would not give the Feds the go ahead to come into her State to provide assistance. Neighboring States with good leaderships did just fine.

Your other comments are just stupid and hateful, you should work for CNN.









25

right of center,

Chicago 25/05/2008 12:32:26
22 Guga II,

Putting Bush and Blair in the same crowd with Hitler and Stalin I see. Your derangement has no boundaries.
26

Guga II,

Rockall 25/05/2008 15:57:16
#25 Far Right of Centre.

They may not be in the same scale class as the likes of Hitlet, Stalin and Mousey Dung, but they are definitely in the same scale class as Pol Pot.

In any event, the mass murder of people, whether in the thousands, hundreds of thousands or millions does not make any of the above any less guilty.

In terms of International law, remember what they did with Hess, and he was a comparative innocent, compared with Bush, Bliar and Broon.
27

Guga II,

Rockall 25/05/2008 15:58:55
Incidentally, why are we not being allowed to comment on the plans of the terrorist state of Israel?
28

,

25/05/2008 18:43:37
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
29

Lance Boyle,

Linlithgow 25/05/2008 19:10:51
The similarities between Sarkozy and Salmond are astounding. Right wing, small of stature, big of ego, infatuated with their respective wives.
30

Willie Macleod,

Wick 25/05/2008 19:11:13
I hope Barack Obama wins in November,and the Republicans are out of office for along time.

Sorry Rosie the treatment is not working maybe I need the advanced thought deconstruction and rehabilitation course.
31

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 26/05/2008 02:32:05
2 dogs in DC...shows you how you read..NOT VERY WELL.

Charles Krauthammer (born March 13, 1950 in New York City[1][2]), is a Pulitzer Prize-winning syndicated columnist and commentator. Krauthammer appears regularly as a commentator on Fox News and as a weekly panelist on Inside Washington[3]. His weekly column appears in the The Washington Post and is syndicated in more than 190 newspapers and media outlets[4]. He is a contributing editor to the Weekly Standard and The New Republic.
Career
Krauthammer was born in New York City[5] to Jewish parents of French citizenship.[6] He was raised in Montreal, Canada where he attended McGill University and obtained an honors degree in political science and economics in 1970. From 1970 to 1971, he was a Commonwealth Scholar in politics at Balliol College, Oxford. He later moved to the United States, where he attended Harvard Medical School. In his first year there in 1972, Krauthammer was paralyzed in a serious diving accident. Continuing medical studies during his year-long hospitalization, he graduated with his class, earning a M.D. from Harvard Medical School in 1975, and then began working as a psychiatrist at Massachusetts General Hospital. In October 1984, he became board certified in psychiatry by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology.
From 1975-1978, Krauthammer was a Resident and then a Chief Resident in Psychiatry at the Massachusetts General Hospital. During this time he and a colleague identified a form of mania (a part of bipolar disorder) which they named "secondary mania"[7] and published a second important paper.[8] The standard textbook for bipolar disease (“Manic Depressive Illness” by Goodwin and Jamison) contains nine citations of his work.
In 1978, Krauthammer quit medical practice to direct planning in psychiatric research for the Jimmy Carter administration, and began contributing to The New Republic magazine. During the presidential campaign of 1980, Krauthammer served as a speech writer
32

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 26/05/2008 02:34:21
CONTINUED...
During the presidential campaign of 1980, Krauthammer served as a speech writer to Vice President Walter Mondale.

In 1981, following the defeat of the Carter/Mondale ticket, Krauthammer began his journalistic career, joining The New Republic as a writer and editor. His New Republic writings won the 1984 "National Magazine Award for Essays and Criticism." In 1983, he began writing essays for Time magazine. In 1985, he began a weekly column for the Washington Post for which he won the 1987 Pulitzer Prize for commentary.
In 2006, the Financial Times named Krauthammer the most influential commentator in America,[9] saying “Krauthammer has influenced US foreign policy for more than two decades. He coined and developed `The Reagan Doctrine’ in 1985 and he defined the US role as sole superpower in his essay, `The Unipolar Moment’, published shortly after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Krauthammer’s 2004 speech `Democratic Realism’ set out a framework for tackling the post 9/11 world, focusing on the promotion of democracy in the Middle East.”
On the other hand, left-wing commentators have been quite hostile to Krauthammer. In a 2006 column in The American Prospect criticizing The New Republic and other proponents of the war in Iraq, liberal blogger Matthew Yglesias wrote that Mr. Krauthammer is "very possibly the worst journalist working in America today, a relentlessly pernicious force, never right about anything, who feels his commentary should not be shackled by the small-minded bonds of accuracy or logic."[10]

2 DOGS...I GUESS YOU WERE WRONG AGAIN. He was a Dr. of Psychiatry.

33

Lynne,

Palm Beach Gardens 26/05/2008 02:40:31
and 2 dogs..like Matthew Yglesias you won't give him his due.
34

Dáithí,

San Jose 26/05/2008 05:01:38
Rosie - Great posts! The first thing I thought of was the BDS that is so prevelent around here.

I'm sure that we can expect the same crowd to proclaim Sarkozy a 'war criminal' because in the 'war of the sexes', his wife is so good looking that it's 'CRIMINAL' - making him a 'WAR CRIMINAL'!

See how easy it is to think like a Leftist? ;)
35

Dáithí,

San Jose 26/05/2008 05:52:01
From the article:

>"The "bling-bling" of rich friends and extravagant, chunky watches has been largely replaced by discretion, seriousness and carefully managed appearances."

So this is the objection of the French Left - that he has a nice watch as well as a pretty wife?

Nice to see that the French Left are interested in substance, not style! Hahaha!

What phonies.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.