Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 25th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Lazarowicz to introduce bill on ship-to-ship oil transfers



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 December 2007
SCOTTISH MP Mark Lazarowicz is to introduce a bill to tighten up the regulation of ship-to-ship oil transfers around the UK following a row over plans to conduct them in the Firth of Forth.
Responsibility for authorising applications is currently split between port authorities, local councils, the UK-wide coastguard and maritime agency and environment agencies.

New powers enabling Scottish ministers to freeze plans for transfers in
the Forth were approved by Holyrood earlier this year.

However, shipping laws are reserved to Westminster and Mr Lazarowicz, MP for Edinburgh North and Leith, intends to introduce a private members' bill to simplify the legislation.

It is hoped the new powers would complement the moves already made by the Scottish Parliament.

If he gets government and opposition support, his Environmental Protection (Transfers at Sea) Bill, which is backed by the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds Scotland, has a reasonable chance of becoming law.

The Labour MP said: "The recent controversy surrounding ship-to-ship oil transfers in the Firth of Forth has highlighted the need for more effective regulation of ship-to-ship transfers.

"My bill aims to ensure that the whole marine environment is protected from this practice and that ship-to-ship transfers are only carried out where they can be done safely.

"I know this is an issue which the UK government have been consulting on and I hope the government will give this bill a positive response."

Proposals to transfer around 7.8 million tonnes of Russian crude oil each year between ships anchored four miles off the coast in the Firth of Forth have outraged environmentalists.



The full article contains 283 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

master mariner,

at sea. 03/12/2007 05:40:44

Strangly enough they have been doing this for donkeys years off the south coat, but to us its new so I supposed the morons in Holyrood will be afraid again

2

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Don't blame me, I didn't vote for any of them. 03/12/2007 08:20:45

This is a policy stolen from the Green Party. There is, simply, no need to transfer oil in so risky a way.

3

Ann,

03/12/2007 08:42:04

#1, what don't you understand about 'shipping laws are reserved to Westminster'?

4

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 03/12/2007 10:15:39

Lazarowicz knows nothing about this subject, so why is he getting involved? He is exactly the kind of knee-jerk politician that we DO NOT want meddling in these kind of things.

I'm quite sure that the port authority know what they are doing. Politicians should keep their noses out.

5

Rob - Honest Toun,

03/12/2007 10:54:43

Haes he spoken tae the RN yet? Aw naval ships an RFA tankers is equipped for RAS (Replenishment at Sea) an this includes refuellin at sea. This ongaun taks place at sea includin the high seas an whit's mair, the ile is transferred atween twa ships an whiles atween three ships wi a recipient ship on ilka side o the tanker. But wait, there's mair! The transfers taks place when thae ships is makin heidwey throu the sea on a parallel coorse tae ane anither.
The normal fuellin o naval ships is ship tae ship an this taks place in herbours, firths an at sea.

6

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 03/12/2007 19:09:25

Wheras few merchant tankers have these facilities and crew training for it. Or enough crew.

The emply tanker would have to be ballasted. Discharging this ballast would raise questions of introducing parasites and toxins into the local sea.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.