Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 9th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Campaigners claim victory as Forth oil transfer plan is sunk



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 January 2008
CAMPAIGNERS today claimed victory in their bid to block ship-to-ship oil transfers in the Forth.
City Labour MP Mark Lazarowicz announced he was dropping his Private Member's Bill to change the law on marine oil transfers after Shipping Minister Jim Fitzpatrick pledged to bring forward new regulations.

And the Royal Society for the Protection
of Birds said if the Government stuck to its promise, plans to pump millions of tonnes of crude oil between tankers anchored in the Firth of Forth were unlikely to get the go-ahead.

Mr Lazarowicz introduced his Environmental Protection (Transfers at Sea) Bill after winning eighth place in the annual ballot for Private Member's Bills. His move was prompted by the controversy over proposals by SPT Marine Services to transfer about 7.8 million tonnes of Russian crude oil every year between tankers anchored in the Forth.

But he said he had decided to withdraw the Bill after an undertaking from the minister in the House of Commons yesterday.

Mr Fitzpatrick said: "We have been working for some time on producing regulations under the Merchant Shipping Act of 1995 to control ship-to-ship oil transfers within UK territorial waters and to ensure any such transfers are subject to appropriate environmental scrutiny."

He said there would be a consultation in the spring and the regulations should go before parliament in the summer. The regulations are expected to spell out which types of cargo would be subject to control, where ship-to-ship transfers may or may not be carried out and what environmental protection measures could be taken.

A spokesman for the RSPB, key backers of Mr Lazarowicz's Bill, said: "If they do what they say, it's unlikely ship-to-ship transfers in the Forth would be allowed."

The Scottish Parliament last year agreed to give ministers new powers to put a brake on such transfers, but they only covered sites officially protected for wildlife.

Mr Lazarowicz's Bill would have imposed more general controls on the transfer of any hazardous material between ships in inshore UK waters.

Mr Lazarowicz said: "If successful, my Bill would have seen regulations brought forward towards the end of the year.

"The Government's pledge will see these brought in earlier, even though there will still be discussion to follow on the regulations."



The full article contains 394 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 January 2008 10:41 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Forth Estuary oil transfer
 
1

alex paterson,

embra 26/01/2008 14:34:48
Great Lazarowicz has woken up and the wild life will be safe.
2

weh,

26/01/2008 15:06:44
Another great SNP victory!"

Can't see this happening if the Scots nulab numpties were still in command!
3

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 26/01/2008 17:37:46
Oh so the idiots have claimed "victory" have they?

They are nothing but a bunch of interfering busibodies whose only mission is to stick their noses in where they are not wanted.

Ignore the regulations. Do the transfers anyway. THERE IS NO RISK.
4

Scots Man,

26/01/2008 19:09:35
Although it was the Greens that did most of the footwork and the campaigning for this!
5

Stevie S,

Ed'Burgh 26/01/2008 19:59:04
#2 - I suggest you read the article again. It's a UK government minister amking the change.

'The Scottish Parliament last year agreed to give ministers new powers to put a brake on such transfers, but they only covered sites officially protected for wildlife.' - in other words, the SNP move was irrelevant and ineffective at stopping the Forth oil transfer proposal.
6

livilion,

livingston 27/01/2008 02:10:25
#5 Stevie S,Ed'Burgh

>>>the SNP move was irrelevant and ineffective at stopping the Forth oil transfer proposal<<<

Curious, I was given the impression that this was just Alex Salmond picking fights with Westminster during his first 100 days as First Minister.

Irrelevant and ineffective eh, why the ban now?
7

weh,

28/01/2008 10:39:21
Thank god for the SNP!

Great to have someone putting Scotia's interests first after 300 years!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.