Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 5th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Forth bridge: Families close to site of new crossing set to protest



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 April 2008
FAMILIES living near the route of the new Forth crossing have formed a protest group amid fears they will be living on a building site for the next decade.
The move comes as engineers begin survey work around South Queensferry for the new bridge – which is expected to cost between £3.2 and £4.2 billion.

The roads leading to the bridge will skirt the west of the town, close to homes in the Springfield
, Clufflat and Linn Mill areas. It is not thought that any properties will have to be bulldozed.

However, residents today said concerns about noise and pollution, along with the impact on house prices, had spurred them into action.

The protest group – which has a working title of Queensferry Unite Against Destruction (QUAD) – is hoping to galvanise local opinion and stick up for locals as the project gathers pace.

The five-and-a-half-year construction scheme for the bridge is expected to get under way in 2011.

Steven Tidy, a chartered surveyor who lives in Clufflat Braes, some 40 metres from the field where the bridge access road is likely to go, moved to the area only five months ago.

He chose the quiet cul-de-sac because his five-year-old son Jack's autism means he is particularly sensitive to noise.

Mr Tidy said: "We deliberately chose this street because of Jack's autism and because he doesn't cope very well with unexpected noise. Obviously if we are to be next to a construction site for that many years that will change everything, as it will be taking place during the best of Jack's childhood years."

A survey in South Queensferry, carried out last August, found 85 per cent of people were in favour of a tunnel rather than a bridge.

Alan Doig, 40, whose home in Clufflat is just 30 metres from the proposed route of the approach roads, is one of the residents who started QUAD.

He said: "I am sure from the Transport Scotland point of view they just want to build the bridge from point A to B, but we want to make sure they are aware of the effect all these plans will have on South Queensferry.

"We don't have a lot of information from the Government and people are worried about the noise, traffic and the impact on house prices.

"I am not sure if everyone realises the impact that this will have and we feel we need to have a voice."

Transport Scotland, the Government agency in charge of the project, today said: "It is inevitable there will be some disruption with a project as significant as this, but we will ensure these impacts are mitigated against as much as possible.

"Among a variety of surveys taking place in a wide area, ground investigations are under way to inform the development of options for the connecting roads, then subsequently to inform on the design of preferred options."

www.transportscotland.gov.uk

www.feta.gov.uk





The full article contains 511 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 April 2008 3:50 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Forth Bridges
 
1

supersh,

South Queensferry 09/04/2008 12:25:27
Given the huge tailbacks through the ferry in recent weeks whenever the wind has got up, I'd have thought that most people here would now want the new crossing built ASAP.
2

no-name,

Edinburgh 09/04/2008 12:44:29
[Steven Tidy, a chartered surveyor who lives in Clufflat Braes, some 40 metres from the field where the bridge access road is likely to go, moved to the area only five months ago.

He chose the quiet cul-de-sac because his five-year-old son Jack's autism means he is particularly sensitive to noise.
Mr Tidy said: "We deliberately chose this street because of Jack's autism and because he doesn't cope very well with unexpected noise. Obviously if we are to be next to a construction site for that many years that will change everything, as it will be taking place during the best of Jack's childhood years." ]


Mr Tidy, Surely you knew that there was a strong chance that something going to be built there, you are a chartered surveyor after all, so why on earth did you buy the house?

I'm sorry, but if your Son is affected by the construction, you have to accept that you are responsible.
3

Randan,

09/04/2008 13:08:29
#1 'wind got up' - so the new bridge will not be shut by high winds?!?
#2 The route of the bridge was only decided recently, so if he bought 2-3 years ago he wouldnt have known.

Any anyway it should be a tunnel.
4

Embra boy,

Edinburgh 09/04/2008 13:10:56
NIMBIES!
5

Iain fae Elgin,

09/04/2008 13:12:31
#3..he bought his house 5 months ago. He probably didn't think of asking about a bridge (if you don't ask you won't be told) and now he doesn't want to look too daft.

6

allknowing,

09/04/2008 13:24:02
#5, his solicitor should have carried out searches for any mayjor projects in the local area deemed to affect the value of the house!
7

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 09/04/2008 13:31:50
"A survey in South Queensferry, carried out last August, found 85 per cent of people were in favour of a tunnel rather than a bridge."

Why? Do they think that the building of a tunnel is not going to result in a "building site" with loads of heavy equipment working and tonnes of materials being shifted around?
8

Numptie,

South Queensferry 09/04/2008 13:37:45
Every solicitor and resident of SQ knows that the fields near his house have been set aside for the bridge, and have been since the last one was built in 1964. I know there will be years of building work but I expect that the land between the Springfield houses and the bridge road will be sold for new houseing after the bridge is finished and Clufflat and Linn Mill will be under the bridge and not subject to much noise. Don't buy a house in SQ if you don't like bridges, we've already got 2 of them!!!
9

Samither Khant,

Linn Mill 09/04/2008 13:45:47
No doubt proposing to claim against the Council for 'loss of amenity' once the new bridge is built.
10

,

09/04/2008 23:24:37
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

Steven Tidy,

South Queensferry 14/04/2008 10:38:09
#2 I respect all individual's views and opinions, but sadly they are not always based on facts. When we purchased the property, we were never advised by either our solicitor nor estate agent about the bridge. Simply, if we had, we would never had purchased. The preferred siting of the bridge was also not confirmed until after we had purchased. I'm hardly going to buy a property close to a potential building site where my son will be adversley affected by noise ! Doh ! And I'm NOT a Chartered Surveyor but fail to understand what difference this wuld make if I was !!

#5 Hardly a question of "looking daft" ! Put yourself in my shoes; would you simply just accept it on your doorstep ? Think not !

#6 Correct - but nothing showed up. If anyone has any ideas as to why not, please advise !

#7 I assume that construction overground will be just a tad noisier than construction underground (sound carries does it not ?......)

#8 This is "local knwoledge" since 1964 ? Wow - that's some rumour mongering ! I wonder if this is writtenm anywhere ? Hah ! "Under the bridge and not subject to much noise" - "planet" and "which" spring to mind....

Thanks very much for everyone's sympathetic responses - doubt you'd be saying the same if our positions were reversed !
12

Made in Kirliston,

Kirkliston 16/04/2008 14:42:05
Good on you, QUAD ! If the new bridge is going to affect you, then you need to make a stance ! Earlier comments suggest that it's not going to affect these individuals, so obviously they're just happy harping on about a subject that has no "real" affect on them. As you say, Mr T, if the shoe was on the other foot they'd soon be shouting from the parapets !

Regarding searches when buying properties, these are somewhat limited and I would suggest that nothing came up on Mr T's as no final decision had been made by the Scottish Government as to the preferred location until AFTER he had bought. Eeven now, it is not necessarily something which would be brought to a potential buyers attention as there are still many regulatory/statutory processes to go through.

I hear that the current bridge, when "de-commissioned", will be left to rot as it would be too expensive to bring down. South Queensferry, currently, is one of the most picturesque and sought-after areas in the Lothians - sadly, I don't think this tag will last......
13

D Williams,

On the Forth 09/06/2008 14:46:28
#2 No-name; I wonder why....I hardly think Mr Tidy needs any reminding that he is ultimately responsible for his childs welfare, as any decent parent would.

#9 Linn Mill ? Strangely un-opposing a bridge which will be built in your back garden - if not directly above you ! you'll probably be heading the queue when they dish out compensation !! Just wait until they slap a compulsory purchase order on your £400,000 house, demolish it and compensate you £200,000 (as the land will be pretty much worthless !!).

Couldn't agree more with you, Mr T - the comments from some of these individuals would not be so off the cuff if they were in your shoes. I certainly don't envy your position and as a Queensferry resident since '58, I not only empathise with your predicament but support you wholeheartedly.
14

Desperately Seeking.......a solution,

South Queensferry 18/06/2008 12:48:25
Why haven't consultations been carried ut with the residents living in the direct vicinity of this proposed fabulous new "iconic" structure ? Initial public consulations are one thing, but once given the go-ahead, the powers-that-be should ensure that all residents fears are answered and not ignored.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.