Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


BNP facing legal action over membership policy

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the scotsman.com site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 June 2009
THE BNP could face a legal injunction over a potential breach of race discrimination law relating to its membership policies, it was announced today.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission said it had demanded that the party took action to address its constitution and membership criteria, employment practices and provision of services to the public and constituents.

The BNP was asked to provi
de written undertakings by July 20 that it will make the required changes or it could face a legal injunction.

The Commission said it believed the BNP's constitution and membership criteria may discriminate on the grounds of race and colour, contrary to the Race Relations Act.

The party's membership criteria appeared to restrict membership to those within what the BNP regarded as particular "ethnic groups" and those whose skin colour was white, according to the Commission.

"This exclusion is contrary to the Race Relations Act which the party is legally obliged to comply with. The Commission therefore thinks that the BNP may have acted, and be acting, illegally.

"The Commission has required the BNP to provide a written undertaking that it will not discriminate contrary to the Race Relations Act in its employment and recruitment policies, procedures and practices," the EHRC said in a statement.

"The BNP's website states that the party is looking to recruit people and states that any applicants should supply a membership number. The Commission thinks that this requirement is contrary to the Race Relations Act, which outlaws the refusal or deliberate omission to offer employment on the basis of non-membership of an organisation. The Commission is therefore concerned that the BNP may have acted, and be acting, illegally."

The Commission said it was also concerned that the BNP's elected representatives may not intend to offer or provide services on an equal basis to all their constituents and members of the public irrespective of race or colour, in contravention of the Race Relations Act and the Local Authority Model Code of Conduct.

John Wadham, the Commission's legal director, said: "The Commission's statutory role includes a duty to investigate possible breaches of discrimination law and take action where appropriate.

"The legal advice we have received indicates that the British National Party's constitution and membership criteria, employment practices and provision of services to constituents and the public may breach discrimination laws which all political parties are legally obliged to uphold.

"We await a response from the BNP to our letter before deciding what further action we may take. Litigation or enforcement action can be avoided by the BNP giving a satisfactory response to our letter."

The commission has received around 50 calls from members of the public recently about the BNP's membership policy, although it is believed that officials were already looking into the issue.

A spokesman said: "As part of its statutory remit, the EHRC continues to monitor the actions and statements of political parties in order to assess whether their constitutions or activities may breach equality law or incitement to racial hatred provisions."

It is believed that it is the first time the EHRC has threatened such legal action, which could lead to fines or possible imprisonment.



The full article contains 531 words and appears in scotsman.com newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 June 2009 12:01 PM
  • Source: scotsman.com
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Far Right in the UK
 
1

Grahamski,

Falkirk 23/06/2009 12:46:02
Using the law against these nazi scumbags is all well and good however to paraphrase the great Woody Allen: "Well, a legal challenge is one thing, but bricks and baseball bats really gets right to the point."
2

Andrew Morton,

Berkshire 23/06/2009 13:13:50
1

Are you advocating violence against a democractically elected party/person?
3

iain Dewar,

Glasgow 23/06/2009 13:29:22
Can I say that this is wholly justified. Political / racial parties like this should not be allow to populate the airwaves with their racial harted, However does this ruling not also apply to other single identity groups such as the association of black police officers.
4

Soosider,

Glasgow 23/06/2009 13:33:25
Violence is not the way to respond to the BNP. The best way is to engage them in open and frank dialogue, this way it soon becomes very clear that their "policies" are nothing more than thinly disguised racism. There was a really good programme on the other Sunday, the one with Nicky Campbell, he had a couple of folk on from the BNP. It was obvious that they had no rationale response to sensible questions, and that their" philosophy" was rather sad and in fact laughable. They had one guy on with a dog collar looked initially like a minister in a church, but it soon emerged that he was a minister in some very obscure church, the kind who get there degree in divinity through the post. When pressed on there definition of British they quoted the 1948 Nationality act as there basis.
This is how we confront these people in debate and discussion as it soon emerges they are actually just a bunch of balloons.
5

Willie Mor,

23/06/2009 14:16:05
The Equality and Human Rights Commission is another selective do gooder organisation that just loves to jump on a bandwagon.

Yes, I think we all know what the BNP stands for, and yes, EHRC are now going to give them some more publicity following their Euro election result in England.

What however the EHRC disregards at it's peril, well at least in England where these fascist scum picked up nearly a million votes, is that people are concerned about immigration, that many people have a perception that Muslims despise the western culture in which they live, and that there is widespread discontentment about ruined savings,lost jobs and rotten politicians.

Publicising the BNP's racist membership policy now, as opposed to before, is not exactly the smartest move.

Maybe if the EHRC addressed the human rights of losing ones pension, savings, job, the right to honest government or any of the other important issues, then they wouldn't be so widely despised as nothing more than a waste of space.
6

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 23/06/2009 14:44:33
I just worry that freedom of speech is being eroded and that the double standards at work are becoming laughable !

There is genuinely one rule for some and another rule for others and there is more than a hint of hypocrisy to all of this.

You are allowed to have men's golf clubs, insurance companies that do not accept male clients, you are allowed black, asian and oriental societies and associations. If the same 'law' were applied to all of them surely they would find that the BNP was no worse than the Black Police Association (BPA) in its stance on membership !

I humbly submit that if something like the BPA can 'discriminate' and have a 'black' stance the BNP cannot be prosecuted merely because of its 'white' stance ! It would make a mockery of justice and equality right to the very foundations of law itself. The BNP can rightly turn around and use this as a glaring example of double standards - and they would be right ! Like it or lump it the fact that there are ethnic associations with similar or even more racially 'discriminatory' constitutions than even that of the BNP means that that, ironically, it is the PC brigade and lefty ethnic lovers that have open the gates for a legal 'whites only' party .... !!

The BNP's massive support has come from perceived inequality and blatant double standards in the law. Coupled with a willingness of those whom the law is designed to protect abusing it for personal gain on an industrial scale.

If the EHRC wish to do a political party broadcast for the BNP they should continue with this nonsense and watch its support swell as more and more people watch themselves becoming disenfranchised by a government that seems to favour anybody but its own. The harder 'do-gooder' commissions slam the BNP the more attractive it becomes to more and more people.

If you want to stop the BNP then the country MUST address these double standards and learn to say 'NO' to ethnic groups and/or people who are clearly abusing racial
7

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 23/06/2009 14:45:58
Cont'

.... who are clearly abusing racial law as it stands. I have long said that 'racial' law will lead to a rise of the far right .... as soon as you deviate from a person being a person in law you create divides and whereas there may have been hairline cracks before - there are now clear breaks!

If you get the law and government working for ALL the BNP will disappear and so too will organisations like the BPA !
8

Alan B,

23/06/2009 16:28:11
#Voldemort

You come across as a bnp supporter by making excuses for them.

Why should the bnp be able to ignore laws regarding racial descrimination?

There is a big difference between wanting control of immigration and the bnp racism.

Your continual comments about the black police association is silly. We all know the police as society at large have racist elements. As such the black police association is to help those who have suffered racism. How do you think those police officers that have suffered at the hands of racism should deal with it?

It would help if the government banned all police officers who have serious criminal records. And also ensured any racist police officers were kicked out.

9

Yeti,

23/06/2009 16:43:54
I sincerely hope the BNP lose any injunction battle and that black, Asian, gay, lesbian and disabled people join the BNP en masse, thereby knocking it on the head.
10

Allan(handofgod137),

23/06/2009 18:21:56
#8 Alan B - 9. The two psychological tendencies that underlie modern leftism we call “feelings of inferiority” and “oversocialization.” Feelings of inferiority are characteristic of modern leftism as a whole, while oversocialization is characteristic only of a certain segment of modern leftism; but this segment is highly influential.
10. By “feelings of inferiority” we mean not only inferiority feelings in the strictest sense but a whole spectrum of related traits: low self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, depressive tendencies, defeatism, guilt, self-hatred, etc. We argue that modern leftists tend to have such feelings (possibly more or less repressed) and that these feelings are decisive in determining the direction of modern leftism.

Recognise Yourself?
11

Observer,,

Glasgow 23/06/2009 20:15:39
Since the election of two BNP MEP's the BNP will be in receipt of a large amount of public money. Now it might be European public money but we have all contributed to that. An organisation in receipt of public funds must have an obligation to abide by the law.

To me they have a simple option. If they don't want to comply with the law they can forego the public funds. After all they are white supremacists surely it is an issue of principle with them ? Imagine having to admit a black person ? Lord above imagine having to admit a gay black person ? Let's see if they stick to their ''principles''.

Alan hand of god you do talk plsh.
12

Electric Hermit,

23/06/2009 21:54:37
6
Voldemort

The Black Police Associations, like the British Association of Women Police, Gay Police Association and Federation of Christian Police Fellowships, is a minority representative organisation. The BNP professes to be a political party.

When and if you learn to tell the difference, perhaps you may have something sensible to say on the topic. Until then, you remain a rather pathetic apologist for some thoroughly despicable scumbags.

13

Electric Hermit,

23/06/2009 22:04:53
11
Observer

"Alan hand of god you do talk plsh."

Quoting the Unabomber's Manifesto is hardly the way to be taken seriously.


14

krusty the klown,

23/06/2009 22:40:04
#13 - where's the quote?
15

Electric Hermit,

23/06/2009 22:51:23
14
krusty the klown

"where's the quote?"

10
Allan(handofgod137)

16

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 23/06/2009 23:25:11
I don't think any of the loony lefties who would sell our country down the swanny are reading my posts properly ....

I am not supporting the BNP - the very reverse! I am merely pointing out very real reasons why people do so. I have then pointed out plain and simply what needs to be done to stop the BNP's potentially massive organic 'disenfranchised' voter growth group - none of it racist or unfair but redressing the double standards that DO exist - there is no use pretending they don't!

If you go on ignoring these double standards screaming at the top your voices in the hope that shouting louder makes you right then by all means do so. Try introducing more and more legislation that makes it more difficult for indigenous people to express their views on subjects like racism and immigration. But you have a problem ... the more and more you tie up and continue to disenfranchise the population at large the more they will turn to people with 'real' and radical soloutions ....

If you gag the BNP, if you make them illegal, if you try to fight them with laws that have so many perversions and contradictions so that it merely irrefutably demonstrates to people - who perhaps don't know any better - that the whole system is rotten to the core -- and to be honest they are not far wrong ! -- if this happens the BNP's ranks will swell far beyond the 1 million voter mark ...

So tell me do you want to see this happen or do you want to to address the utterly bias law system and the 'open door' immigration policy and STOP it from happening !
17

Electric Hermit,

23/06/2009 23:32:38
16
Voldemort

"If you go on ignoring these double standards..."

What "double standards"?

18

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 23/06/2009 23:52:49
8 -

I was not 1 of the 1 million people who voted BNP at the last elections. However I do understand why such a vast amount of people did ... that is much different from supporting the BNP !

This country is full - we do not have space for any more people - we are the 3rd most crowded country on the face of the planet -- yet our politicians want MORE immigration to prop up the economy which in the long runs destroys the quality of life for the rest of us YOU included - yours schools will be fuller, the roads will be clogged, the nhs will (is already) on its knees, council houses in even shorter supply, more state controls to manage overpopulation etc, etc .... the list is endless!

In the last 20 years we have added 10 million people to the head count of the UK - you can already feel the effects severely, when do we stop ? 70 million, 100 million ? 200 million ? I think we have to draw a line .... where do we go politically for this rather simple and fair belief ?

We all see that if a white lad beats up a black lad that is simply treated as 'normal' assault - if it is the other way around the black lad can easily tell a few little fibs and get the white lad done for racially aggravated assault which will land him in deeper trouble with a stiffer penalty for the same offence. Now this is NOT propaganda this happens every day and the denial of it is what annoys common people who can SEE it goes on whist it is being denied at the highest levels - that does not instill confidence in politicians when they say one thing yet a completely different thing is happening!

I do see double standards with the BPA being allowed to exist. It is a blacks only gang that has political influence and operational influence within the fabric of Britain. I can only imagine the outcry if there was a 'whites' only gang of police who tried to 'protect' their members from racism and influence the policy makers -- yet one is acceptable discrimination and one is not .... surely ALL d
19

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 23/06/2009 23:53:59
cont ....

.... surely ALL discrimination being eliminated is the basis for true equality ....! no?

I think organisations like BPA (there are hundreds of organisations with 'backlash' discriminatory agendas) serve only to create a much starker 'them' and 'us' culture which fans the flames of discrimination itself - in conclusion I think they defeat their own purpose and there would be a much more harmonic Britain if they disappeared ... I should think without these organisations fanning the flames of the racism, double standards and the 'them' and 'us' society the BNP wouldn't really get many votes at all ... after all the BNP seem to have gained a surge in votes because an increasing number of the majority in Britain now see themselves as the foreigner and underdog in their own country!
20

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 24/06/2009 00:07:24
17:-

See para 4 in post 18 .. for one example of how double standards can and have worked .... there is no point in denying double standards because the average person can reel off several instances either from personal experience or via the press of outrageous abuses or attempted abuses of racial 'power' given to the minorities by the law and political system that favours them.

An ordinary person of the majority cannot play the race card, men cannot play the gender card. White people get lambasted, fined and prosecuted for not allowing ethnic minorities into their organisations but ethnic minorities are applauded and given awards for not letting whites into their organisations .... now can you see just a little hint of hypocrisy and double standard there ?????
21

Electric Hermit,

24/06/2009 00:12:35
Voldemort

Your paranoid delusions of persecution and victimisation would surely make useful study for the text books.

22

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 24/06/2009 00:14:21
I've got to go to night night all ... and remember that if you want rid of the BNP - as I do ... we must get rid of the double standards and discrimination against the majority of Britons ....

That is not asking for a favour nor is unfair or racist .... giving everyone the SAME rights and recourse to justice will kill the BNP's argument stone dead. Getting the balance right will kill the BNP's argument stone dead, Dealing with outrageous immigration will kill their argument stone dead .... dealing with failing infrastructure will kill the BNP's argument stone dead - but in order to so we have got to start taking a tougher stance in many areas and regain control of our own island. Moreover we must get rid of the EU - who's elections allowed the BNP a power base in the first place !
23

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 24/06/2009 00:35:50
21:- I am not sure where you get you brand of mindless, militant, new age, free for all, pay for nothing prattle from - probably the same shop you got your fair trade, fruitarian friendly sandals from.

Common sense and an air of practical solution are doubtless strangers in your Jurt!

Thankfully you demonstrate the vile cheapskate, sell out, artist you are - you should listen to a speech called 'Catiline’s Exhortation to Conspiracy' --- you are definitely a pretender to a lesser modern day, Catiline !! Distorted, hateful of your own people, eager to the lift the foreigner to great heights whilst applauding the demise of your neighbour.
24

Electric Hermit,

24/06/2009 01:06:21
23
Voldemort

"I am not sure where you get you brand of mindless, militant, new age, free for all, pay for nothing prattle from - probably the same shop you got your fair trade, fruitarian friendly sandals from."

You're funny. From a safe distance, of course. Maybe even funnier than your neo-Nazi hero, Nick "The Slug" Griffin.

25

Anthony,

Glasgow 24/06/2009 01:40:12
Can I ask a serious question of those supporting the Commissions position?

Why is it fine for exemptions to be used under the Race Relations Act, to not only allow but to actively encourage and often fund non-white pro-black/asian/etc groups, but not to allow the same provision for one white/indigenous group?

I'm not being argumentative here - my question is a genuine one. I've never heard anyone give a rational explanation as to how they can support what appears to be two diametrically opposed positions at the same time. How can it be a member of an indigenous only organisation is 'Nazi scum', but a member of a black only organisation is 'an equal rights activist' or even 'a community leader'?
26

Electric Hermit,

24/06/2009 02:03:34
25
Anthony

"I've never heard anyone give a rational explanation..."

If you haven't heard the obvious rational explanation it can only be because you choose not to.

In the first place, what you are talking about is minority representative groups. Are you really too stupid to figure out that whites are not a minority?

And it's not as if whites don't also have minority representative groups. Gays, for example, have various representative groups which have nothing to do with race.

You might want to ask yourself why people like yourself make such a hysterical fuss about, for example, Black Police Associations, but have nothing whatever to say about, say, the Jewish Police Association or the Christian Police Association.

Maybe asking yourself such questions will help you to realise why others look at your obsession with ethnicity and see a racist mindset.

27

Electric Hermit,

24/06/2009 02:25:03
National Disabled Police Association - Discriminating against the able-bodied.

British Sikh Police Association - Discriminating against the turbanless.

British Association of Women Police - Discriminating against people who have a Y chromosome.

Muslim Police Association - Discriminating against people who have different holidays.

International Police Mountain Bike Association - Discriminating against people who have a life.

28

Anthony,

Glasgow 24/06/2009 09:46:00
26) Yep, this is what exponents of your position always do when I ask that question. I ask a reasonable question - no answer, just personal insults.

White people can actually belong to ethnic groups...I won't call YOU stupid though for not knowing that.

And the fact that the groups benefiting from the 'good' type of racial discrimination which you support, as opposed to the 'bad' type of racial discrimination, which you don't, are minority groups, really tells us nothing.

Just refining my question, isn't answering it. So why not take another stab at it? Without the insults this time? Why, in principle, is it okay to allow for example, black or asian only groups, but not white or indigenous only groups?
29

Dave Bhoy,

24/06/2009 11:10:19
Hi Anthony,

I think you have asked a serious and genuine question, and I will try to answer in the same spirit.

The law seeks to make discrimination in the provision of services unlawful, if it is for or against anyone, white, black, men or women. However, it recognises that this wouldn’t make sense for all situations i.e. churches are allowed some limited discrimination against people who are LGB. Also, it recognises that some groups were established, for good reason, for the purposes of just serving some people: National Disabled Police Association, British Sikh Police Association, women who have experienced domestic violence etc – these are people who have experienced discrimination. These are called membership associations and can discriminate except by race – you can’t have a white or a black organisation, but can have a celtic organisation (not the football team!).

However, a recent house of lords case has confirmed that political parties are not membership organisations and have to be open to everyone, and have to serve all constituents equally.

The crux of this case is that the bnp say that they are a club, not a political party (!) and that they discriminate by ethnicity and not race. Therefore, they are breaking the law (as set down by the UK parliament).

It’s not about shutting them up or making them illegal, it is just about them complying with the law, as everyone else has to do.

Hope that helps
30

Electric Hermit,

24/06/2009 11:45:02
28
Anthony

So you didn't understand the answer. Somehow, I'm not surprised.

And don't presume to represent my opinions and attitudes. You are not qualified; will invariably be wrong; and will simply make a bigger fool of yourself in the process.

"Why, in principle, is it okay to allow for example, black or asian only groups, but not white or indigenous only groups?"

In principle, it is not okay. In practice, however, minority groups have historically tended to be disadvantaged within society as a whole and within various professions and occupations relative to the "white or indigenous" population.

You to your dubious obsession with ethnicity but, as anyone less close-minded will immediately recognise, ethnicity is only one of many ways in which such disadvantaged minorities may be defined. Sex is another. For, although women are not a minority in society they tend to be under-represented in various areas of employment - especially at more senior level. Thus, they are effectively in the same relatively disadvantaged position as, for example, ethnic minorities.

Minority representative groups are simply a way of attempting to address such disadvantage.

Naturally, this does not please those who regard women, blacks, Asians etc. as innately inferior. But why would we want to pander to such ignorant bigotry?


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.