Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Director slams BBC for gag on wind farm film

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 November 2009
A BAFTA-nominated documentary maker has accused the BBC of banning his latest film about life in a remote Highland glen because it shows a lack of impartiality about wind farms.
BBC bosses part-funded the short film Arcadia by controversial Scots film producer David Graham Scott.

But the BBC has refused to broadcast the finished film, warning Scott that the documentary does not meet its strict rules on objectivity.

Sh
ot in Caithness, Arcadia includes footage of protests against a new wind farm development in Thrumster, near Wick, including a sequence where local residents burn a large "wicker-man" style wind farm turbine to the ground.

Scott is angry that his film has been prevented from being broadcast while the BBC has allowed the BNP leader Nick Griffin a platform to express extremist views. Wind farm campaigners back Scott, claiming the decision shows that the BBC is "biased" against them.

Last week, in a post on his website, Scott told followers he had received an e-mail from the BBC telling him it would not broadcast the film due to "impartiality" guidelines. He wrote: "While Nick Griffin speaks freely on the BBC, Douglas Graham Scott is banned."

Scott said: "This was not meant to be a political film. It is more about the impact of modernity on an ancient landscape where people are having to cope with the modern world.

"I don't have a problem with the BBC's impartiality guidelines, but I think my film has been misinterpreted. I wouldn't want to alter the film to get it broadcast as that might ruin it."

This is the first time any of Scott's work has faced a BBC blackout.

In his most controversial work, Detox Or Die, Scott filmed himself injecting heroin into his neck. The film followed his painful journey trying to quit the drug and was broadcast by the BBC in 2004 as part of its One Life series. The film went on to gain international acclaim, winning a gold medal at the 2005 New York Film festival.

In 2008, the BBC broadcast his film The New 10 Commandments, in which a Scottish republican protester launches a two-minute rant against the Royal family. No cuts were demanded to that film before it was broadcast.

Other controversial films by Scott broadcast by the BBC include The Dirty Digger, detailing life on a Glasgow-based crime magazine, and Wirecutters, following three homeless people as they try to scrape a living selling melted down scrap metal.

He was nominated for a Bafta for his 2001 film Little Criminals, following the lives of drug addicted teenagers in Glasgow.

A source close to his latest film said: "When you look at the controversial nature of his earlier films, David Graham Scott has made some very edgy stuff. It has all been broadcast on the BBC without complaint.

"Yet here we have a gentle and very beautiful film set in the Highlands, yet it is banned for expressing 'dangerous views' on wind farms."

Protesters fighting the impact of wind farms in Scotland insist the film should be aired to highlight one of the biggest issues in rural Scotland amid the plight of communities where the farms are planned.

Bob Graham, who has fought a long-running campaign against wind farms across Scotland because of their visual impact, said: "The BBC has a duty to show realistic depictions of what wind farms can do to fragile environments and communities. They say the film is biased. I would say the BBC is biased in favour of wind farms, and that is why it will not show this documentary."

The BBC part-funded Arcadia as part of the Scottish Documentary Institute's Bridging The Gap series. It is believed to have cost £16,000 to make.

It is one of seven films shot through the Bridging The Gap programme, which seeks to promote work by young Scots directors.

Since 2008, BBC Scotland has provided funding, along with the National Lottery and Scottish Screen.

A BBC spokesman insisted the corporation was under no obligation to show Arcadia. He said: "Although the BBC is a co-investor in Bridging The Gap, we do not give an undertaking that all the films will be transmitted.

"We have provisionally selected some of the films for transmission, but the details of when they might be shown have yet to be finalised. The final decision is being taken on quality grounds.

"Four out of the seven films are currently under consideration as being worthy of transmission and Arcadia is not one of those."

The Scottish Documentary Institute, which also backed the film, confirmed that it wasn't being broadcast by the BBC.

Institute director Noemie Mendelle said: "Scottish Documentary Institute is very grateful of the support and investment by BBC Scotland into our annual Bridging The Gap scheme, which is a training and production initiative encouraging a diversity of aesthetics and narratives in short documentaries. They have proven to be successful for festival and cinema distribution, but are not necessarily always in tune with the BBC's editorial line."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 November 2009 7:30 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: The BBC
 
1

Douglas,

Bathgate 08/11/2009 00:12:32
Not to worry, it'll soon blow over.
2

,

08/11/2009 00:54:36
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Fifi la Bonbon,

08/11/2009 00:57:40
I's great seeing theatricals get all upset because the Beeb wouldn't broadcast their stuff. If he's that keen on the Beeb showing it he should edit it to meet their standards. Otherwise, let him put it up on Youtube. Of course he won't get paid, but he's an artist, isn't he?
4

Linda,

Edinburgh 08/11/2009 08:12:14
When will BBC terrestrial channels show "Diomhair" (Secret)?

The story of how successive Labour and Conservative governments worked behind the scenes to discredit the Home Rule movement and the cause of independence for Scotland.
You will wait in vain for this to be shown on terrestrial television but try this link to You Tube http://www.scottishindependenceconvention.com/ResouceMain.asp
5

nabodican,

Newton Stewart 08/11/2009 08:29:06
"Bob Graham, who has fought a long-running campaign against wind farms across Scotland because of their visual impact"
Typical misinterpretation by the Scotsman, Bob is against windfarms because they do not do what they claim to do and are costing Scotland dearly.
The BBC are fully paid up members of the Global warming religion.
6

Andrah,

Embrugh 08/11/2009 09:19:42
#5 "The BBC are fully paid up members of the Global warming religion"

100% correct sir. If Mr Graham had spun it to suit the BBC's one-eyed reporting on this subject, the programme would have been widely shown and repeated.

Beeb bias is borne out by the comments of Peter Sissons, recently retired veteran Newsreader, and botanist Prof David Bellamy who was effectively fired after refusing to abandon his scientific principles and toe the Beeb line on the New Religion.

Worse of all we are forced to pay £142.50pa to fund this bias.
7

It's life but not as we know it,

The Oort Clouds 08/11/2009 09:43:04
It's time to get tough on bearded green nutters and the causes of bearded green nutters.
8

Unimpressed one,

08/11/2009 09:56:14
The BBC has aired enough one sided opinion on this myth and guilty of blatant hypocrisy in that they have never once given time to the other side of the argument. When was the last time you heard the real facts about sea level rises, drowning polar bears or the 'end of the world', from the perspective of someone who actually knows what the hell they're talking about as opposed to BBC guff masquerading as news? There are few too many well paid liberal dafties employed by this organisation for its own good. Time for severe cuts beginning at the top.
9

,

08/11/2009 10:38:30
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

,

08/11/2009 10:38:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

El Franko,

08/11/2009 11:17:16
The BBC is a biased broadcasting corporation. The direction of the bias can be guessed at by the fact that most of their recruitment is down via the pages of The Guardian. Some details of their bias can be found at a site dedicated to documenting them: http://biased-bbc.blogspot.com/.

Thus, re the environment, the BBC believes in the 3rd-rate science and 1st-rate propaganda of the global warming alarmists. It follows for them than windfarms are a 'good thing' (despite their fantasy economics and sheer ugliness). So any film taking a critical view will have a hard time being shown, or it will be shown surrounded by greenies rubbishing it.

12

Richard Lionheart,

08/11/2009 12:12:48
#5 You could say that the BBC Management and staff are leading lights in this oppressive Global Warming Religion!

Personally I’m expect a lot of anti manmade global warming campaign groups will start taking legal action against authorities which actively promote this new oppressive religion.
13

Whauped,

Borders 08/11/2009 16:36:14
I fondly remember listening to the boss of Ecotricity on Radio 4's 'You and Your's' telling us, at length, all about the benefits of wind power generation without any balancing opinion or even any informed questioning by a fawning, and ill-informed, interviewer.

A recent Countryfile also showed John Craven not asking any dificult questions of the industry.

There have been a couple of more rigorous efforts by 'Costing the Earth' but the general impression given, especially by TV, is that the Beeb views the world through the green-tinted spectacles of a Lib-Dem/Nu-Lab urban arts graduate with little understanding of the countryside and even less of wind power generation and the power industry.
14

Jockjpm,

Nairn 09/11/2009 13:24:31
There are a lot of comments which are negative about wind power but no one has suggested an alternative and where it should be located.
15

Whauped,

Borders 09/11/2009 14:30:04
#14

Jock.

There are any number of alternatives.

Biomass for starters. The wind industry and its apologists repeatedly suggest that wind turbines are the only "mature" and "proven" technology available. This is not true.

Denmark, often cited as the shining example of wind power, actually produces much more renewable power - and much more reliable power - from biomass:
"The largest output of sustainable energy in Denmark comes from biomass, that is, from the burning of, or the production of combustible gases from, hay, wood chips, manure from domestic animals, and garbage. Biomass accounts for 80% of the Danish production of sustainable energy." (Danish Government Portal).

We have only recently started to wake up to this in the UK.

The recently approved Teesport biomass power station, a compact industrial plant with a single 70-90 metre chimney, will occupy a brownfield, industrial site that is only 10% of the area of a small (7-10 turbine) wind project. It will operate for some 8,000 hours per annum producing 2,400,000MWh of predictable, base load power. The project scoping report notes:

"As the project will run 24 hours per day, 365 days per annum, it will generate as much renewable electricity as a 1,000MWe offshore wind farm (equivalent to that generated by the London Array wind farm which is one of the largest renewable energy projects in the world)".

This plant should be operational by 2012, and would alone fulfil 5.5% of English renewable energy requirements under the expected Renewables Obligation target for that year.

There are also plenty of proven marine technologies (power generation from tidal barriers is has been around longer than wind power generation).

Scotland, as has been often pointed out, has some of the best marine power resources in the world, both for tidal barriers and using tidal currents.

Marine power generation is much more promising than wind in the longer term. Unlike wind, Scotland has been up with t
16

Whauped,

Borders 09/11/2009 14:35:42
Marine power generation is much more promising than wind in the longer term. Unlike wind, Scotland has been up with the leaders in this area. But, as ever, it has suffered from derisory amounts of government funding for R&D and to implement full-scale schemes.

It should also be said that serious funding of energy saving building improvements is much the most effective way of saving CO2. Much more effective than carpeting the countryside in 400 ft high WT generators.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.