Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Universities funding war flares again



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 September 2008
UNIVERSITY rectors have joined forces for the first time to launch an attack on the Scottish Government, accusing ministers of failing to financially support the higher education sector.
The former Green MSP Mark Ballard, the rector of Edinburgh University, led the broadside, insisting the government's Joint Future Thinking Taskforce, set up to tackle higher education funding, was too focused on the present rather than the future.

He said: "While it has been talking at great length about how existing funding is divided, it has not actually dealt with the most pressing issue, which is increasing the size of funding for higher education in Scotland.

"While English and Welsh institutions have gone down the road of tuition fees, we in Scotland have chosen wisely not to do that. But the Scottish Government so far has failed to come up with proper funding to match the revenue that is being accrued by English and Welsh institutions from tuition fees."

He said more funding was crucial for Scottish universities to remain public institutions for the good of Scotland.

"There needs to be general public funding of a greater proportion and to a greater degree than came out of the last Scottish Government budget," he said.

The Joint Future Thinking Taskforce was set up after a low settlement for universities in the last Scottish Government budget. An interim report was published in June and consultation on it is due to finish in a week.

The attack represents the first time Scotland's rectors have spoken out as one on an issue since the first rector was invested at St Andrews University in the 15th century.

Simon Pepper, the rector at St Andrews, welcomed the expansion of postgraduate places and plans to match privately raised funds with government cash. However, he added:

"Most students leave university with debts of £13,500, which mitigates against the agenda of inclusiveness."

Charles Kennedy, the former Liberal Democrat leader and Glasgow University rector, said the group would lobby both Holyrood and Westminster.

He said: "We can't see the position in Scotland as in complete isolation to what is happening south of the Border.

"We know that the cap on tuition fees is being lifted there, and inevitably that is going to have knock-on effect on the Scottish dimension."

A spokesman for Universities Scotland, which represents principals, said: "Nobody involved in universities is unaware of the very real financial pressures we are under. There cannot be anyone left who does not think investment is necessary."

A spokeswoman for the Scottish Government said it was "always happy to listen to the views of students and student representatives".

BACKGROUND

RECTOR is a unique position in Scotland's five "ancient" universities: St Andrews, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Aberdeen and Dundee.

The first rector was Lawrence Lindores, at St Andrews, in the 1400s. He was the papal chief inquisitor for Scotland and would have been responsible for burning "heretics" at the stake.

Latterly, the holder of the post has been elected by the student body or, in Edinburgh's case, by the staff, and the incumbent serves on the university court.



The full article contains 518 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 September 2008 9:49 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

druidh,

edinburgh 05/09/2008 00:28:58
All these Rectors - they must be pretty clever. Perhaps they can explain where this additional funding is to come from and who must therefore do without?
2

Peekay,

05/09/2008 07:01:23
#1 Perhaps we might have expected our politicians to think of the answer to that one when they voted against tuition fees in Scottish Universities? On second thoughts, probably too much to expect our bandwagon-jumping politicians to do any thinking.
3

Boy Wonder,

05/09/2008 07:21:38
The money is already spread too thinly on more colleges and universities that this country requires! Close a few unnecessary ones down, sell off the land and re-spread the savings!

Rector?? Damn near killed her!!! :D
4

Duncan in Edinburgh,

05/09/2008 08:19:45
#1 But there must be loads of spare money sloshing around the Scottish Government's coffers surely? Otherwise how could they afford to splash out on rebranding exercises, free hospital parking, ending tolls and, most impressively, a £750 million a year tax cut?

Why not reduce that tax cut fractionally and give the universities the money they need?

Salmond gives the impression that there's no shortage of money. And no surprise really, since the "funding cut" that the SNP often bangs on about was actually an above-inflation increase in the block grant for the tenth year running.
5

Liberal for life,

Dunblane 05/09/2008 09:19:14
Well this comes as no real surprise. The SNP pay lip-service to making Scotland a base for science to thrive and become a knowledge based economy but as I am in this industry sector I know this is all hot air as usual from the GNATS. Indeed most of the "initiatives" they now claim to fund, e.g. in Dundee for example, were well underay before they came to office. The need is for them to continue with these initatives but thats where they are coming unstuck. The honeymoon is over guys, accept it even though we know the truth often hurts.

I suspect they will have yet another "conversation" about it rather than take proper action to resolve the situation!
6

Calvinist,

05/09/2008 10:27:55
This is an issue which needs to be resolved and resolved quickly. The latest estimates suggest that Scottish Universities are underfunded to the tune of £130 million. If this continues there will be serious consequences for our economy, culture and standing in the world. The university sector is the 7th largest net contributor to the Scottish economy and it is simply no good to do a Swinney and say that the money is not there and nothing can be done. Politicians do not seem to understand the relationship between higher education and a vibrant economy. Universities create spin-off companies and graduates, especially those in science and technology, are the driving force behind many of our major enterprises. I’m appalled by the indifference of the Scottish government and it’s obsequious supporters (as witnessed here) to this problem. As Scots we should be proud of the achievements of our Universities and graduates. Save them before it is too late!
7

Scotish Exile,

05/09/2008 12:21:48
There are far too many numpties at University these days, and I am not just referring to students!
8

danielrober,

05/09/2008 15:05:06
The oil, gas, money and even alcohol businesses mean nothing without the people to run them. For that you need properly funded universities.

Scotland needs more Uiversities and students, not less.
9

Banjo Face,

05/09/2008 15:22:35
Mark Ballard, former MSP
Charles Kennedy, former Lib Dem leader
Craig Murray, former diplomat
Stephen Robertson, former comedy turn
Simon Pepper...

who cares?

10

Smutley,

Embra 05/09/2008 15:35:12
Totally agree, Calvinist. A dire collection of cheerleaders in here.

The fact is that the SNP hates the university sector, because it is (UK) national and international in its outlook.
11

yoric,

05/09/2008 20:35:42
English Universities charging £3050 per year top up fees are able to, and are, attracting lecturers from Scotland in increasing numbers.
Not tied to state funding, English Uni's are paying top dollar and the cream of Scotlands Uni brains are heading south.
12

subrosa,

05/09/2008 23:22:04
Ah must be September. Every year, for a very long time, our overpaid academics and their cohorts shout this same message.

I agree with another poster, close quite a few down and leave the best. Then there will be enough money to go round. Most of the places give inferior degrees anyway and so many have more or less eliminated adult evening classes (because they don't make them money but they do break even).
13

whatisthis,

05/09/2008 23:31:30
Andrew Cubie queried the value for money to the Scottish economy of a target of 50% 18-22 year olds entering tertiary education. He said the increased number of graduates had failed to make any impression on the Scottish economy.

As an academic I would say that students of all abilities benefit from tertiary level study. This is purely in personal development terms. But many don't find graduate level jobs and struggle to pay off their student loans working in retail etc., so I have to query whether it is worth it in financial terms. The the stress on the system is huge. It has meant that university level education has been greatly watered down, so that degrees are not worth what they were 15 or 20 years ago.

If you want a mass university education system you have to fund it properly. Universities have been at breaking point for at least a decade. They can take no more.

If you can't find the money then limit the number of places to what you can afford.
14

whatisthis,

05/09/2008 23:36:07
By the way, 'overpaid academics' are a myth. Most teaching nowadays is done by post-grad students and contract workers ('teaching fellows') for less than the minimum wage.

In the trade we call it 'the academic proletariat'.

Few university staff have salaries on the official academic scale.
15

donald,

glasgow 06/09/2008 08:34:50
During the 1979 Devolution debate the Anglicised Universities in Scotland wanted to stay completely under London rule. Time to send the British Rectums to London.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.