Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Surge in bullying behind increase in home education



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 May 2008
INCREASING numbers of pupils are being withdrawn from state schools to be educated at home with large numbers blaming a bullying "avalanche", according to new figures.
The number of youngsters taken out of the state system in Scotland has doubled in five years, from 352 to 632, according to 26 local authorities who responded to a Freedom of Information request.

But home education groups said the number of pupils
learning outside of classrooms could be anywhere from 5,000 to 7,000.

Alison Preuss, of Scottish home education charity Schoolhouse, said a large number of parents inquire about taking their children out of the school system in the run up to a new school term. They see youngsters become stressed at the prospect of returning to school and parents are desperate for other options, she said.

The mother of three said: "A lot of enquiries come from parents that are pretty desperate and are looking at home education as a last resort. Bullying has resulted in an avalanche of inquiries each year – the school system has a lot to answer for.

"But many parents are making positive choices to home educate from the outset. Bullying is there and we get a lot of calls, but it is not the central issue. The central issue is parents just don't think the school system is suitable in this day and age. It is much better to have family-based and community-based learning."

According to the Scottish Government, a total of 703 children were known to councils in 2006-7 as being home educated, representing just 0.1 per cent of youngsters aged five-15.

That number does not include children still educated at home after the age of 16.

In Edinburgh, 21 schoolchildren were known to be home-schooled in the 2002-3 term. This year the figure has increased to 50. Glasgow also witnessed a leap with numbers doubling since 2003-4 from 13 to 27 this year.

A spokesman for East Lothian Council, where the number had risen from four to ten in the past five years, said: "The most common reason given is bullying."

Brenda Stafford, development manager of anti-bullying charity Kidscape, said the figures were a sign of "endemic problems" of bullying in schools. She said: "I predict these increases will continue until schools properly tackle bullying."

A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "Parents choose to home educate for many reasons, which may include cultural beliefs, philosophical views, a child's health and welfare etc. We don't collect information on their reasons for home educating. No matter where a child is educated, their interests must be paramount and that's why we issue guidance to help parents teaching at home develop trust, mutual respect and positive relationships with local authorities."

ANY FAMILY OF ANY BACKGROUND CAN MAKE CHOICE

UNDER revised guidance published by the Scottish Government in January, parents of every school-age child are responsible to provide education "either by sending the child to school, or by other means".

Scottish home education charity Schoolhouse states parents do not need teacher training or any qualifications. They said any family from any background or means can choose home education.

There is no definition of suitable and efficient education set out in primary legislation, but in a 1985 court case, Mr Justice Woolfe said local authorities might expect certain characteristics of home education. These included children being stimulated, access to appropriate resources and materials, a level of physical activity, and the chance to interact with other children and adults.



The full article contains 596 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 May 2008 10:38 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

W Smith,

Middle East 05/05/2008 04:09:18
I blame the idiots who banned the belt.

Our politicians are more concerned about excusing the behaviour and blaming the violence on "poverty".

Some bullys just need a good slap around the ear.

PROBLEM SORTED.

In politically correct Holyrood where everyone has lost their marbles belting pupils is 'teaching the kids that violence is an acceptable way of dealing with disputes'.

Eh...no it isn't.

Belting pupils is a good way of telling the bully that other pupils in the school are not there for the bully to use a punch bags.

END OF STORY.

Maybe these dolts are confusing belting pupils with terrorism.

No doubt the SNP MSP's will want to have a 'discussion' about bullying.

Fiona Hyslop is going to sort this out then, eh?
2

fife runner,

05/05/2008 07:54:06
in my local secondary one girl was badly beaten and she had to move schools!! The perpetrators should have been taken out. Only problem is they are moved then taxis are used to take them to the other school which here in Fife can be some distance. Take them out of school altogether.
3

yockel,

05/05/2008 08:01:52
Repeat after me, two times 352 = 704,
an increase from 352 to 632 is 79.5%
or 12.4% per annum compounded over 5 years.
632-352=280, 280/5=56.
56 children per year over a school lifetime of 13 school years = 4.3 kids per school year out of a total school population of what?
A leap, an avalanche?
Presumably somebody is justifying a budget somewhere in this story.
4

Boy Wonder,

05/05/2008 09:10:54
My daughter are home-studying. Mot because of the possible bullying ... but because the whole of Scottish Education has been turned into a mess over six decades!
5

Crank Parent,

Livingston 05/05/2008 09:44:13
#3

I think you're confused, which is not surprising.

The information in this article came from an article in The Sunday Post yesterday. The figures are a confused mix of numbers of children who required consent to be withdrawn from school this year in a particular authority and the total number of children known by a particular council to be home educated this year.

Neither includes children never educated at school, children who left because they moved house and were then home educated, children living in one authority who were withdrawn from school in another, children who have left primary and have not gone to secondary, children who have left private education...

The total number of home ed families in Scotland is currently estimated to be between 5,000 and 7,000 as quoted above. Many home ed families prefer not to be known the their local authority, as the majority of councils act outwith the law when dealing with home ed families.
6

musicmadmama1,

05/05/2008 09:48:21
"Under revised guidance published by the Scottish Government in January, parents of every school-age child are responsible to provide education "either by sending the child to school, or by other means"."

This statement is misleading. It gives the impression that it is only since the revised guidance was issued that parents now have this responsibility but in fact parents have had this responsibility and choice for many years.

The Education (Scotland) Act 1980 Section 30 (1 states: It shall be the duty of the parent of every child of school age to provide efficient education for him suitable to his age, ability and aptitude either by causing him to attend a public school regularly or by other means.
7

Crank Parent,

Livingston 05/05/2008 10:37:12
According to the article in yesterday's Sunday Post:

"Three authorities — West Lothian, Argyll and Bute and Moray — failed to provide figures for this year."

http://www.dcthomson.co.uk/mags/post/postindex.htm

WEST LOTHIAN - YOU ARE NAMED AND SHAMED!
8

Lillig,

05/05/2008 10:56:13
Bullying has become a real buzz-word recently. I know it exists and it should be condemned and, in extreme cases, parents should take their children out.

But, I think that the idea of bullying is often overused by children and parents.

The world is not a fair place - as children will find out when they start working and start their own lives. We also have to find a way of helping our children to cope with the unfair things that happen. If we keep them at home, it is hard for them to do that.
9

Crank Parent,

Livingston 05/05/2008 11:14:46
#8

Research shows that 50% of children at school are bullied (70% of gifted children). Anti-social behaviour occurs in large groups of same age children who have to spend long periods of time together regularly. It's not surprising really as they have little in common other than their year of birth. On the other hand adults chose to spend time with people of different ages with the same interests as them.

Home ed children are not kept at home, they learn in the community where they live. They mix with a wide range of people of different ages and abilities. They are not only more effective learners, they are more sociable.
10

Fishface,

Borders 05/05/2008 11:26:18
Bullying won't be eradicated from schools until it's eradicated from our culture. Children learn by example, after all. Many parents exercising their right to take their children out of school to educate them at home have experienced appalling bullying at the hands of Local Authority officials who seem to think they're above the law. Since such officials are mostly of an age to have been educated during W. Smith's "good old days" of the belt, it doesn't say much for its value as an educational tool, does it?

Bullying is institutionalised; endemic within the system. How else to you coerce thousands of children, with all their diverse and unique talents and interests, to jump through the identical hoops our government says they must in order to be considered acceptable "educated" human beings? As Yeats said, "Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire". Many parents take their children out of school because they've watched the system comprehensively smother that fire and feel they'd be failing their kids unless they did something to try and rekindle it. That's how I felt anyway.
11

unbiased,

Erehwon o Elddim 05/05/2008 11:30:53
W Smith, Middle East #1: You obviously didn't live through the era of instutional legal child abuse carried out by crazed, misfit bullies. I and many of my fellow pupils would be given "three of the belt" for such wildly terrible behaviour as not knowing our French verbs or Roman History. To condone such appalling violence as the norm is unbelievable. I suppose you also condone the chopping off of limbs and other draconian punishment!
12

Venachar,

05/05/2008 12:14:40
Yeh it used to be the useless teachers who used the belt frequently.

Now we have useless teachers and PC. Which means nothing gets done by nobody. However everyone knows their rights. We have a generation of staff in schools who know nothing else but schools, shool - uni - school. How can they educate youngsters about the world!

Students should be streamed and vocational training should be increased for those who do not wish to remain in education. The last thirty odd years have been a complete waste of time cos the educationalists have screwed everyone - otherwise we would have plumbers, lecky's, bricklayers and real jobs - not degree qualified event's organisers and the like.
13

Sue Taylor,

education 05/05/2008 12:34:54
My friend who has children is considering opting out of state school because she is fed up of teachers talking down to her as though she knows nothing about her own children. My friend is very well educated and has more education than that of the teacher on child development.

My friend had the headmistress phone her at home saying that her child who was in p7 at the time was watching Lord of the Rings and this is not suitable for her child. Her child had went legally to the cinema to see it, so why are the teachers putting their values over about what is right or wrong? It all seems to be part of the brainwashing they receive, teachers values before the parents. No wonder society is so warped, let kids be kids again!
14

Fishface,

Borders 05/05/2008 13:49:20
#13 Sue Taylor, your friend isn't alone. My eldest daughter's biology teacher asked for my help in making sure she did her biology homework. Seeing how little interest she had in the subject (which was why the homework wasn't being done) I thought the best thing I could do was to get her interested, so we talked about some of the scientific controversies surrounding her topic and how all the various different viewpoints were argued, evidenced and justified. Not surprisingly -- because this is what real science is all about -- she found this exciting and enthusiastically went to class to discuss.

No discussion was allowed and all the various theories that conflicted with the curriculum orthodoxy were judged "wrong" and "dangerous". I wrote to the teacher with a fully referenced rationale, suggesting that he might like to check out some of these studies. He never even had the courtesy to reply. And the government bemoan the fact that so few children are interested in "science" subjects ...?! Is it any wonder?

Yet for all that I don't blame the teachers because they have no freedom to educate. Nor any colour of government because they're all doing the same thing. It's the nature of the system. It's set up to select for successful hoop-jumping. As Bertrand Russell said, "We are faced with the paradoxical fact that education has become one of the chief obstacles to intelligence and freedom of thought."
15

,

05/05/2008 15:04:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

,

05/05/2008 15:05:53
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

Venachar,

05/05/2008 15:23:25
#15 C. David Parsons

As soon a religion crept up in the first sentence I stopped because you are full of tosh! You forgot to put on your straight jacket this morning.

I must go and get my gun to blow you back to hell and damnation for using something scientists developed and cannot be explained by fundamentalist bible thumpers.

Keep your rubbish in America!
18

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 05/05/2008 16:24:50
My kids were being bullied at one point. Complaints to teaching staff and head teacher made zero difference and the bullying persisted.

I sent them to learn Tae Kwon Do and after one episode where 3 bullies cornered the older lad in a toilet, one of them ended up with his head being flushed down the toilet and the other two ended up on the floor.

After that? No more bullying. Period. Head teacher most indignant. But he got short shrift from me for doing eff all about it in the first place. I emphasised they only learned this skill to defend themselves and they were strict instructions that that was all they were to do with it as did their instructors. From personal experience at school I learned the hard way that you do not wimp out, but tackle bullies head on. I'm sorry that so many parents feel the need to educate children at home, but discipline must be re-introduced to schools so they spend time educating and not sitting like wee mice in the staffroom afraid to do anything.
19

musicmadmama1,

05/05/2008 17:21:15
In any discussion about reasons for home educating the LAs usually focus on bullying being the main reason but they ignore that parents often choose home education from the outset or withdraw their children because they see the education system is failing young people.
Yes bullying by peers is there as one of the reasons but it is certainly not the only reason.
Bullying in a mental and emotionally abusive form by teachers themselves is also a reason cited - but of course the LAs will not admit to that!
Being disengaged from learning, boredom and realising that learning a load of useless facts to pass exams does not prepare you for life is a common reason too.
20

musicmadmama1,

05/05/2008 17:28:24
*18 "From personal experience at school I learned the hard way that you do not wimp out, but tackle bullies head on."

Ah but a wise warrior knows when to fight and when to retreat in order to live to fight another day.
21

MalcDow,

Berlin 05/05/2008 18:51:04
"SOARING numbers of Scottish children are being withdrawn from state
education to be schooled at home with experts saying the rise is
being driven by schools failing to beat bullying."

Perhaps the "experts" should be also saying the biggest bully is a
crass dysfunctional government agenda ridden education system and that
the buildings, facilities and time wasted on it could be put to better
use.

Malc Dow
Berlin
22

MalcDow,

05/05/2008 18:57:30
"*18 "From personal experience at school I learned the hard way that you do not wimp out, but tackle bullies head on."
---
I can't see how mutual head butting is going to solve this problem.
---
"Ah but a wise warrior knows when to fight and when to retreat in order to live to fight another day."
---
Quite so. The HomeSchoolers are in retreat it would seem.

Malc
Berlin


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.