Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 5th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Public to cover MPs' costs for child care



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 18 May 2008
TAXPAYERS will have to meet the cost of MPs' childcare costs under plans to make the House of Parliament's expenses system even more generous.
MPs with children are expected to be handed vouchers which they will then be able to cash in at nurseries across the country. Parliamentarians will be able to claim as much as £2,000 a year under the plan, greatly easing their costs.

Such nursery
rebates are rarely made available to workers. One survey recently found that just 2.5% of companies offered such perks to their employees.

It is currently only offered to members of staff employed by MPs who work at the Houses of Parliament.

However, it is understood that at a meeting of parliamentary officials last week, it was agreed to extend the plan to MPs as well.

Matthew Elliott, of the Taxpayers' Alliance, said: "It defies belief that they think they can get away with increasing their perks. There is still anger around the country at the Westminster expenses culture."

The move is being planned as part of changes to the controversial system of expenses offered to MPs, and follows revelations that hundreds of MPs are employing their own family members as staff.

It comes as MSPs at Holyrood are also expecting a major increase in the expenses they use to pay their own members of staff.

All 129 MSPs are to receive an increase in the fund from £46,567 to around £55,000 a year, which they can then use to meet the salaries of their staff. The boost follows complaints that they were being forced to pay their staff rock-bottom wages.

But the move will put an extra £1m on the annual bill that taxpayers are meeting for their MSPs – who spend about £7m to pay their staff.

The planned changes differ from proposals put forward by Sir Alan Langlands, who recently carried out an investigation into MSPs' expenses.

He concluded that only constituency MSPs should get an increase in the funds they can use to pay staff.

He said funding for parliament's other 59 'list' MSPs – who do not have a constituency – should be reduced.

But after complaints from list MSPs, mostly Tories, LibDems and SNP members, that has now been changed.

Labour MSP Jackie Baillie said: "They've arrived at a simple fix which is not evidence based."



The full article contains 399 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 17 May 2008 7:14 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Guga II,

Rockall 18/05/2008 01:39:45
So, they have now come up with yet another scam to rip-off the taxpayer.

With the amount of money that lot of charlatans are given by the taxpayer, including their existing scams on expenses, they could well afford to pay their own nursery fees.

What's the next rort they are going to come up with? Will they be claiming for domestic servants next?
2

911 was an inside job.,

18/05/2008 08:56:29
What do you expect?

NuLabour love to spend our money and tell us what to do.
3

JT,

18/05/2008 09:28:46
This is another kick in the teeth for the ordinary person. If a company offers child care vouchers its actually the person paying out of their salary package anyway. Also this really p's people who havent got kids right off even more than usual. My colleagues who have kids dont get this help why should politicians, its not as if they do any bloody work in the first place!
4

DouglasT,

18/05/2008 13:40:54
This is just one more reason to vote SNP and free ourselves from the immorality that is Westminster.
5

roughrider,

Glasgow 18/05/2008 16:21:38
The pigs at the trough just get greedier and greedier,fatter and fatter,oink ,oink.
6

yoric,

18/05/2008 16:45:56
Douglas T, I think you will find the Scottish Parliament just as bad.
I remember not so long ago the tale of MSPs catching taxi's to travel from their offices to the Parliament building, a distance of yards.
How many schools/hospitals could have been built or repaired with the billions spent building the Scottish Parliament Building?
A Politician is a Politician is a Politician, corrupt the lot of them, anywhere.
7

Joe Macdelta.,

18/05/2008 18:32:57
If they want to go out to work, no matter what the job, they should pay for child care out of their own wages, just like we had to do. The first lesson when they become MPs, is how to get their noses into the trough, some of them seem to be born to it. Pigs in mire come to mind.
8

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 19/05/2008 00:56:50

'Scandalous' and 'Disgraceful'!!

Do they,...'NOT EARN ENOUGH',?

While everyone else, struggles to meet the cost of 'Childcare'

Average now = £200 per week for full time 'Nursery Care'.
9

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 20/05/2008 05:51:06
Their remuneration should be tied to performance. They should have a salary that is tied to the Average Wage of the People they are supposed to be representing.

Additional Benefits should be tied to whats is available to the taxpayer.

If the want to give every taxpayer with pre school aged children vouchers for nursery care then they should be entitled to it to.

Otherwise it is just another abuse of the taxpayers hard earned money.
10

Proximaking,

Dundee 20/05/2008 07:25:06
It is supposed to be a PRIVILEGE to serve and not be some money making scam. When I work as I sometimes have to in London I am allowed to claim SOME expenses for 6 months after which time I am supposed to have moved down there so can claim nothing thereafter. And I have to live in a hotel not some fancy John Lewis inspired treasure house with jumping Jack Philipino maids round every corner. Given how little time most MPs spend in their constituencies I don't see why they shouldn't operate under the same rules that we have to. I saw Harman on the TV on Sunday explaining to a woman who was saying MPs should account for every penny with receipts because that is what we have to do and they are no different, Harman said oh but we are different because we work for you and wouldn't you want the cleaners at the house of commons to get a higher wage rather than hire "thousands" of extra people to check expenses? Harman then went on to explain that such costs for checking receipts would be prohibitive completely missing the point that if it is expensive for them what about the hundreds of thousands of companies up and down the land who have to jump through these hoops, I'm sure they'd love to have a £20 limit that they didn't have to have receipts below. Was the woman satisfied asked Harman, "Of course not" she said, "you are no different from us". Harman just looked at her as if she was an idiot who couldn't see Harman's clothes were made from a material so fine only intelligent people could see it ...... but to me she looked but-naked, not a pretty sight. But then I'm a commoner and I'm against all privilege, I'm not someone on the civil list for example who is selling pictures to "Hello" for a fast buck with a castle we pay for as the backdrop. Sorry Salmond but if she was Queen Elizabeth I of Great Britain, the commonwealth etc fine and dandy but she's not, she's Queen Elizabeth II and the II says loud and clear she is an English queen first and foremost, she chose the ti
11

Proximaking,

Dundee 20/05/2008 07:25:34
Sorry Salmond but if she was Queen Elizabeth I of Great Britain, the commonwealth etc fine and dandy but she's not, she's Queen Elizabeth II and the II says loud and clear she is an English queen first and foremost, she chose the title, so let them pay for her because I won't. And next time a toff tells you to get orf my land ask him how he created it and when he can't tell you tell him to push off. Balmoral should not be a castle for an English queen. lllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllll
12

,

22/05/2008 10:43:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.