Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 5th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Professor spreads the word on joy of text



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 July 2008
IT HAS become part of everyday life, especially for the younger generation, but texting has also been widely blamed for triggering a linguistic malaise that is undermining the nation's literacy skills.
Now a new book, published by the world-renowned Oxford University Press, has claimed that texting actually helps rather than hinders literacy.

The book's author, Professor David Crystal, insists the idea that mobile phone messaging is breeding an
illiterate and incomprehensible generation is nothing more than a myth.

The academic challenges the orthodox view head-on in 'txtng the gr8 db8' and points out that abbreviating English is nothing new.

Crystal said: "The popular belief is that texting has evolved as a 21st-century phenomenon – as a highly distinctive graphic style, full of abbreviations and deviant uses of language, used by a young generation that doesn't care about standards.

"There is a widely voiced concern that the practice is fostering a decline in literacy and some even think it is harming language as a whole. There is now a widespread folk belief that, whatever texting is, it must be a bad thing."

One critic is veteran broadcaster John Humphrys, who was so outraged by the trend that he labelled texters "vandals" who were "raping and pillaging" the English language.

But Crystal, a University of Wales academic and the author of the Cambridge Encyclopaedia of Language, said abbreviated sentences had a long and rich history.

"There is nothing novel at all about text messages such as 'cu l8r'. They are part of the European linguistic tradition, and can be found in all languages which have been written down.

"Individual texters may have devised some of the modern abbreviations, but they are only doing what generations have done before."

Crystal points out that non-standard spellings are a long-standing part of English literary tradition.

As such, the Oxford English Dictionary introduced "cos" in 1828, "wot" in 1829, "luv" in 1898, "thanx" in 1936 and "ya" in 1941.

"Many of the non-standard spellings in text messaging can be found in dialect representations such as by Charles Dickens, Mark Twain, Walter Twain, Walter Scott, Emily Bronte, Thomas Hardy or DH Lawrence," he added.

"The English essayist Joseph Addison complained about the way words were being 'miserably curtailed'. That was in 1711.

Crystal also pointed out that research by Coventry University showed that pre-teenagers who used text message abbreviations scored higher in reading and vocabulary than their non-texting peers.

He said: "Children could not be good at texting if they had not already developed quite considerable literacy awareness.

"Before you can write abbreviated forms effectively and play with them, you need to have a sense of how the sounds of your language relate to the letters."

The Headteachers' Association of Scotland has expressed concern over the increased acceptance of abbreviated English.

A spokesman for the association said: "Because of the rate in which text-speak is taking hold, I shudder to think what letters will look like in 10 years' time."





The full article contains 509 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 July 2008 8:19 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

The Batboy,

06/07/2008 08:47:07
Ancient Egyptian heiroglyphs are a form of texting - set in stone.
2

XINKR,

Midlands 07/07/2008 18:44:53
The problem with alot of texting is that it takes too long to read, so whatever time was saved by the sender is lost by the recipient!

The newest thing is slakrz nqalf. it's based on a phonetic system, so its easy to read even if you're a newbie.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.