Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Inside universities: Silence may signal a not-so-golden future



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 October 2008
SO, THE Joint Future Thinking Taskforce has had its final meeting and everyone in higher education is eagerly awaiting its final conclusions.
However, three weeks after the last gathering of select university principals and Scottish Government officials, no report has so far emerged.

The taskforce was set up after the last budget settlement saw universities receive far less than the £16
8 million over three years they said was necessary to compete with English institutions. It was meant to find future funding solutions, but critics complained the taskforce became mired in the present.

Now cynics are beginning to question the delay, claiming it marks a split between the sides. An insider said: "They expected to have a document after that meeting, but nothing came out of it.

"There are divisions, in particular over the Horizon fund – how the public funds will be split between general funds and the Horizon pot."

Horizon is intended to be a fund universities can bid for above the money they receive individually. The idea is it will pay for strategic joint projects, such as research pooling.

However, it is understood the Scottish Funding Council, which is represented on the taskforce, was keen to exert more control over this than universities would like.

There are also issues over the tripartite group expected to oversee the new "lighter touch" funding regime. But the meetings became so bogged down in disagreement that it was barely discussed.

The source asked: "Who will be on it? Staff and students, selected principals? It's all still to be agreed. They expected to have all that finalised by the last meeting. After three or four months of talk, nothing has come out of this taskforce."

There is a strong feeling that the final report will contain no more than the interim version – which did little more than say more state funding was needed.

A source added: "In order to save face, it is expected they will come out with a document with no firm conclusions.

"This is all about saving face until they can get through to the next spending review."

The final report is expected by Christmas, but such a lengthy and vague timescale indicates much needs to be ironed out between the two sides.

If the Scottish Funding Council doesn't back off and start living up to the government vow to give universities more freedom over spending, a very public spat could emerge.



The full article contains 411 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 October 2008 9:47 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

The Answer,

Glasgow 14/10/2008 01:59:27
8% is Scotland % share of the UK population!

7% is Scotlands share of new fulltime undergraduates entering UK universities 2008!

Why with such large handouts from tax payers is scotlands education system failing to supply at least 8% of new UK undergraduates?

UCAS website
tinyurl.com/4oj5mv

2

Boy Wonder,

14/10/2008 08:46:17
How to save money on Universities??

I am quite forcibly reminded of the scene from a film (can't remember the name of the movie) in which a student turns up to see no-one in the class because all the students have left recording devices ... and the lecturer is droning away from an old-fashioned reel-to-reel tape recorder!

The future indeed!!!
3

Calvinist,

14/10/2008 14:22:39
If the Scottish Government were serious about regenerating the economy of Scotland they would be pouring money into higher education and R&D and not deliberately starving our HE institutions to fund populist projects. Scotland has 3 universities ranked in the world top 100: Edinburgh (23); Glasgow (72) St. Andrews (83). This represents triumph in the face of adversity. The HE sector is the 7th largest net contributor to our economy. Universities have achieved this on shoe-string budgets. No bonuses, fancy cars etc for University Professors. We have a formidable natural resource here that needs to be nurtured. Our manufacturing industry virtually no longer exists, the service sector was a fraud, all we have left is the prospect of creating a "Knowledge-Based" economy. If the SNP government continue with their present policies on HE funding then we will lose that possibility also.
4

,

18/10/2008 10:12:19
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.