Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Hyslop rethinks 'leaving certificate' tests

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 December 2008
COMPULSORY literacy and numeracy tests could be taken a year earlier than previously proposed, the Scottish Government has revealed.
Teachers warned that the original proposal to test S4 – fourth-year secondary – children would leave no time to help any who failed and would become a label of illiteracy.

Fiona Hyslop, the education secretary, said she had asked the body over
seeing the new qualifications to look at bringing the tests forward.

She said: "This is not necessarily a leaving certificate.

"We are asking can this be internally assessed by teachers themselves and taken out of S4 and moved it into S3?"

She stressed it was crucial to tackle the problem in primary school and that literacy and numeracy should be embedded across schooling.

"We want to see a bigger focus on literacy and numeracy and look at how that's done in primary," she said. "That should prevent any difficulties later on."

She said primary children would not be tested or externally assessed, but added: "Problems have to be assessed early on."

Critics said the move did not go far enough and called for the tests to be scrapped.

Jim Docherty, deputy-general secretary of the Scottish Secondary Teachers' Association, said: "This move indicates the cabinet secretary realises these tests are fundamentally flawed.

"It was geared up towards employers and to prove to the public perceptions about levels of literacy and numeracy were ill-founded, rather than in the interests of educating children."

Ms Hyslop was speaking on publication of some of the 1,800 responses to consultation on plans for school qualifications. Respondents included parents, teachers, colleges, universities and business leaders.

In general, there was support for retention of Highers and Advanced Highers and, in principle, the scrapping of the Standard Grade, to be replaced with a new General Grade.

However, there were concerns about the narrowing of subject choice before Highers .

David Cameron, president of the Association of Directors of Education in Scotland, said it believed Ms Hyslop was taking the right approach.

He said: "We need to take the time to get things right, and this underlines the recent decision to extend the implementation programme. However, we also agree that it is important to make early decisions on literacy and numeracy and on assessment."





The full article contains 380 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 December 2008 10:48 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Stepford Nat,

03/12/2008 08:16:17
That David Cameron certainly gets around.
2

Warden An' All, Reborn,

03/12/2008 09:24:17
It would be far easier for the teachers to get the kids to write out something in the class, then copy it onto a computer, and have a program test out what it sees. Even microsoft word shows spelling mistakes and grammar.
3

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

03/12/2008 11:20:01
Any tests and changes must be seen in the context of the Curriculum for Excellence (CfE).

I was initially very sceptical about the CfE - but I am a lot more positive after understanding and supporting the general thrust of the policy.

The biggest obstacle to the CfE is not teacher scepticism, but resourcing, genuine leadership in schools and conflicts with the existing examination system. Therefore it is important that the examination review produces a response that is complimentary to the CfE not diamterically opposed to it. Unfortunately, it seems there are far too many reactionary traditionalists who will not allow this to happen.

I have a gut feeling that the review is not going to be the radical change that is required if the CfE is going to succeed. Instead of having a skills-driven curriculum it is likely that we will continue with the content-driven curriculum we have at present.

I just hope I am wrong.
4

Alan B,

03/12/2008 18:51:31
#The Federalist

"Instead of having a skills-driven curriculum it is likely that we will continue with the content-driven curriculum "

Care to explain what you want to see.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.