Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 6th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

'No excuses' warning over mobiles in exam hall



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 May 2008
PUPILS were warned yesterday they could have their exam papers torn up if they don't ditch their mobile phones.
Last year, 115 candidates were reported by invigilators for having mobiles on them in the exam hall. Of those, 63 had their award cancelled for using their phone to cheat, and 52 were cleared after an investigation found they had simply forgotten to
hand mobiles in beforehand.

Many pupils depend on exam results to win college and university places, and most were forced to wait until their exam results came through the post or went online in August to find out if their qualification had been scratched.

The new warning was issued after a 15-year-old boy in Aberdeenshire claims he was told his paper would be void because he had his phone in his pocket.

He alerted the invigilator, appointed by the exam board, only four minutes into the test but was told a report would have to be filed.

The boy's father said he feared his son would suffer for his honesty. He said: "He handed the phone in for the first paper then took it out to make a call in the break and forgot to return it to the box. He is being punished for being honest.

"What bothers him most is that people now believe he was cheating when it was an honest mistake. What if a university or college place was dependent on this result?"

Mobiles are banned to prevent candidates storing notes in them or accessing the internet to cheat, and to prevent others sitting the exam from being disturbed by noisy ringtones.

Scottish Qualification Authority (SQA) regulations state that invigilators must ensure any phone found is removed and that the pupil finishes the exam. The phone will be examined immediately to see if there are any signs it has been used to access information that may assist the student in the exam.

Invigilators, who are employed by the SQA and not by schools, must then submit a report on the incident, in which they can declare whether they believe it was an innocent mistake or cheating.

A spokesman for Aberdeenshire Council said pupils had been told repeatedly at assemblies and in letters to their parents that they must not have mobile phones during exams.

In the case of the 15-year-old boy, he said: "We have to make it clear the invigilator did not say the exam was invalid when the matter came to light.



"At the end of the exam, the chief invigilator and our SQA co-ordinator explained to the pupil that a report of the incident has to be sent to the SQA and that this may mean his paper has to be cancelled.

"As per SQA procedures, the chief invigilator has written a report to the SQA about the incident, which states that she believes this was a genuine error.

"This was a genuine mistake with no attempt to or opportunity to make use of the phone during the exam."

A malpractice committee made up of three senior SQA staff will decide on this, and all other reports of potential cheating during this year's exams, which began early this month and continue into early June.

The school, the candidate and his or her parents then have the right to appeal.

Judith Gillespie, the policy development officer for the Scottish Parent Teacher Council, said: "We hope all invigilators at the start of each exam take the time to remind youngsters that, if they have phones with them, they should hand them in.

"It should be part of the routine at the beginning of every exam."





The full article contains 615 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 May 2008 9:45 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Fanling,

Switzerland 15/05/2008 02:12:04
Ah ... progress. Thank god I packed in teaching way before the mobile disease became widespread. The Aberdeenshire incidence is but one of many potential headaches for teachers and examiners. Parents also need to face this issue head on.

Children do not need to carry mobile phones, regardless of paranoid arguments of safety etc. (My two and their contemporaries managed to have a [recent] life before the popularity of mobiles shot to the fore, as did all generations before them.)

There should not be an instance where a child can enter an examination hall with a means of cheating in his/her pocket whether by design or accident. That of course extends to calculators, scraps of paper and whatever else. A mobile nowadays has the potential to store and retrieve a tidy cache of info. Teachers and invigilators/examiners need to be protected from this folly.
2

Vincent-W,

15/05/2008 08:02:52
Silly boy and equally silly father. It's not a question whether he was or wasn't cheating or intended to cheat. It is not up to the invigilators or SQA to determine the 'honesty' or otherwise.

The rules are clear. Break them and you are disqualified. There can be no shades of grey with this issue and no appeals. Otherwise the validity of examinations will be undermined.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.