Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Fresh hope in tram compensation fight

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 January 2008
TRAM chiefs have agreed to look again at a rule which means some traders will miss out on compensation because they opened less than 21 months ago.
Shops, bars and restaurants which were set up after April 2006 are currently not eligible for compensation for the disruption caused by the massive project.

The cut-off date was agreed by the council and the city's Chamber of Commerce to coincide
with the date the £498 million scheme won parliamentary approval.

But earlier this week, newly-established traders on Leith Walk – which has borne the brunt of the trams disruption so far – argued they are being hit just as hard as the shops which have been open longer.

Trams firm TIE is offering compensation of up to £4000 to the worst-hit businesses, on top of a rates rebate, for which all businesses affected by the construction of the airport-to-Newhaven link can apply.

The council-backed firm has now agreed to revisit the cut off date to see if there is anything they can do to help traders, a move welcomed by business groups.

Willie Gallagher, chairman of TIE Limited, said: "I am going to have discussions to consider the arguments put forward for moving this cut-off date and see if any of the cases put to us can be accommodated within our compensation budget."

Work to move utility pipes and lay tramlines on Leith Walk began in August. The programme of tram roadworks will take more than three years to complete.

Graham Russell, chairman of the FSB Edinburgh branch, said: "I welcome this step forward but it is about time because we have been under tremendous pressure from our members for the last seven months telling us the compensation scheme isn't working.

"Disruption from the trams will affect all business regardless of when they opened and this needs to be recognised.

"We need TIE going out of their way to help businesses as this disruption will only get worse."

Yesterday, tram chiefs revealed that Shandwick Place is to close for five months as part of the first major city centre roadworks for the trams.

From the middle of next month, all traffic travelling west from Princes Street will be directed up Lothian Road and on to the West Approach Road.

Traffic heading from Haymarket towards the city centre will be re-routed along Melville Street.

Roadworks will also take place on Princes Street, which will be reduced to one lane in each direction, and on St Andrew Square.

Graham Bell, spokesman for the Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce, said: "It remains reasonable to have a cut-off point as people moving into the area after a certain point would have been fully aware that the tram was going to be a reality."


Dismay over five-month street closure

TRADERS have said they are "disappointed" that Shandwick Place is to shut for five months as part of the tram roadworks.

Tram firm TIE yesterday announced that next month's temporary closure will mean all traffic travelling west from Princes Street will be directed up Lothian Road and on to the West Approach Road.

Cars and buses heading from Haymarket towards the city centre will be re-routed along Melville Street.

Roadworks will also take place on Princes Street, which will be reduced to one lane in each direction, and on St Andrew Square.

Michael Apter, owner of Paper Tiger in Stafford Street, and chairman of the West End Traders Association, said: "We are disappointed at the length of time Shandwick Place will be closed, it is certainly longer than we were anticipating."


WEB LINK

tramsforedinburgh.com



The full article contains 612 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 January 2008 2:56 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Edinburgh transport plans
 
1

,

10/01/2008 13:23:01
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Baroness Fortitude III,

10/01/2008 13:23:10
ooooh are we getting trams? That'll be nice.
3

Fenon,

10/01/2008 13:36:13
Gorgie Tony blames the SNP,
4

Bob 2,

10/01/2008 13:36:35
will Bus Commuters getting compensation for the extra time that it will take during and after the Tram construction.

Its amazing that only a few years after spending millions on the City Centre Road Scheme that the COUNCIL are digging it all back up

Strange how things come FULL CIRCLE.

We've seen Princes Street Pavemnets Widened and now THEY are to be REDUCED for the TRAM Line.

I just can't wait for the main roadworks in the City Centre and the Line to Open.

It'll be great having to sit on a bus for hours extra a week.

Trams are Great..!!!
5

Fenon,

10/01/2008 13:44:49
So if Princess Street is one lane each way, if a bus stops, all stop, or will it be no stopping?
6

,

10/01/2008 13:48:16
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

NorT,

Edinburgh 10/01/2008 14:13:02
Mr Apter is perfectly correct - why is it taking so long to dig up a small stretch of road. It could be done in a quarter of the time if they really put their minds to it. The Council are letting TIE get away with murder (nothing new there then) - they should be imposing time conditions on them. I bet at least half the time there will be no workmen on site or work actually being done.
8

Gothic Rose,

10/01/2008 14:41:15
8# :)))
9

GrahamH,

Edinburgh 10/01/2008 14:59:46
Let's write off the money been wasted to date on planning before wasting hundreds of millions more pounds that could be better spent elsewhere.

The Scotsman has run many polls, all have been anti tram.
10

Think Tank,

10/01/2008 18:48:12
We went through this day before yesterday GrahamH (post 11)- stop lying through your teeth!

11

madrab,

edinburgh 10/01/2008 19:44:00
#9 You're sadly mistaken.

As with any other roadworks there will be several workmen, all standing doing nothing but watching one guy work.
12

AB_R,

10/01/2008 19:57:22
I despair, Six Hundred Million pounds to cut congestion by 1%. To partly replace 1 bus (the 22), with no comments on what other buses will be affected. No real plans distributed to show what roads will be affected, apart from the London Underground type map, which is useless. An amended route with no debate, the tram on the original route joined the fastrack at a different place to what is now being proposed (via a golf course and over the railway track).

We have had a tram in Princes Street Garden to show the people of Edinburgh what it will look like, apart from the fact that it wont, as TIE wants a tram that is wider and longer than any tram currently in service anywhere in the world.

We have (and the Scottish Government) been told by TIE that a shuttle bus would meet the tram to take passengers to the Western General, only to be told later that, rather than a shuttle to meet the tram it will be a bus and it wont meet the tram but will be dependant on the bus timetable.

We have been told that the power for the trams will be underground, only to be told that wasn't practical and we will have overhead cables.

Over the last couple of months we have been told that there was going to be another arms-length company to manage and maintain the trams, with no reference to Transdev, who have been contracted to manage and maintain the trams in Edinburgh.

I could go on and on.
13

,

10/01/2008 21:18:46
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

Leila,

Edinburgh 10/01/2008 22:04:29
#12: Are you saying that your comment of the day before yesterday settled the matter? You wrote that "all [opinion polls] have shown support for the tram. Even the "click a button" polls on this site (entirely skewed) show at worst a 50:50 split, which as anyone involved in major event/project planning would tell you, is amazing at this stage of the scheme". However you didn't provide any figures to back up your statement. So can you please provide the results from any recent opinion poll which gave respondents a choice between trams or no trams, or between trams and some other public transport initiative? I say a recent poll because you are claiming support "at this stage of the scheme".

And why bother mentioning EEN polls which we all know (and you admit) are open to manipulation and meaningless as a measure of public opinion.

15

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 10/01/2008 22:54:33
RAILS.OVERHEAD.WIRES.TRAMS.BUSES/REMEMBER.IT.WAS.UGLY

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should TIE be spending time Twittering and using social networking sites?
Yes, many people communicate this way now
No, it’s just another form of spin
No, it should focus on getting the work done on time

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.