Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Tram contributions: 'It appears to have seriously miscalculated'

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 June 2009
IT must be of some concern to the council that it appears to have seriously miscalculated the contribution from developers to fund the tram line.
Its inability to proceed with the Granton spur was almost solely down to the halting of development in the area – largely due to the recession – and the subsequent drop in developer contributions.

But even on the main line it is now running into p
roblems. Today's news that it will only receive £1.4 million from Henderson Global, which is redeveloping the St James Centre – rather than the £7m or £8m estimated – is a further body blow, even though the company has a valid argument that it already had a site there and was not therefore seeking to cash in on any increase in business from trams.

In recent months the council has also been forced to strike a poorer than anticipated deal with Tiger, which is redeveloping Haymarket – accepting £2.5m rather than £4m – and finally agreed to waive a contribution from Deramore, the developer behind a new £40m hotel in Princes Street.

So it is having to borrow the money against future contributions to make up the shortfall.

But it seems if it is to raise the money required it will either have to accept more realistic sums than first anticipated or adopt a tougher negotiating stance when granting planning permission for future developments which will benefit from being near the line.


Jobs optimism

ALTHOUGH the general unemployment figures for Edinburgh are somewhat poorer that they have been for some years it is pleasing to see that only two of the city's largest employers – Royal Bank of Scotland and BT – have actually shed jobs in the past year.

And although we are far from out of the woods yet, with the fallout from the collapse of parts of the financial sector not yet over and the recession expected to go on until at least the end of next year, there is optimism that the situation may not deteriorate to the levels that some had forecast. Such is the diversity of employment in the Capital that there is hope that overall we can ride out the worst of the slump.

But the situation remains volatile, so it is imperative that monitoring of the employment situation continues – and as the Capital remains the country's economic driver both central and local government must be involved in this, and they must be ready to take action if help is required.



The full article contains 420 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Mallory,

Edinburgh 10/06/2009 11:50:24
Look at the rose-tinted 'projections' of another Coucil Supported Project

http://eh8.org.uk/

It's easy to understand how a lack of acountancy skills and a basic understanding of the relationship between supply and demand could have allowed this happen.

Realism has arrived and a hard lesson in handling negotiations with developers.


2

Leila,

Edinburgh 10/06/2009 12:13:39
Now they've had to let the Princes Street and Haymarket hotel developers and the St James Centre developer pretty much off the hook, how can Edinburgh Council count on much of a tram contribution from ANY developer in future? I suspect even developers with previously agreed tram contributions will be looking to renegotiate.

Edinburgh has to pay not only its original £45 million contribution, but also any overspend on the tram project. That there will be an overspend is now certain. Where the money is to come from is a mystery.
3

P I Staker,

10/06/2009 13:14:54
"It must be of some concern to the council that it appears to have seriously miscalculated the contribution from developers to fund the tram line."

I wonder if its also occurred to them that they have also miscalculated the public's enthusiasm for this project?
4

Edinburgh 100,

Musselburgh 10/06/2009 13:41:23
#2
Its business basics You can get a 800million pound development but if you continue to ask us for money for the tram then we will go elsewhere. Simple who will eventually pay for the overspend on the tram its not a mystery its the Edinburgh Council Tax Payers. This is what happens when people use a hugely flawed business plan and let ametures run a city
5

Dragonlord,

10/06/2009 14:08:58
and finally agreed to waive a contribution from Deramore, the developer behind a new £40m hotel in Princes Street.


Yet they want Heart of Midlothian to stump up, even although the trams don't go anywhere near Tynecastle?
6

Road Raga,

EDINBURGH 10/06/2009 15:15:55
#4 that's ok then as I see you are not an Edinburgh Council tax payer.
7

madrab,

Edinburgh 10/06/2009 19:22:16
This all at a time when the council are buying up flats in Niddrie that nobody else wants, paying full price to a company they own, while claiming that they need to make cutbacks and close schools and community centre due to a lack of cash?

Are they storing up bad debt for a rainy day?
8

Sarah B,

Edinburgh 10/06/2009 21:23:26
I don't think it is so much the tram contribution which has been "miscalculated" as the assumption that Labour would be returned to government again at the last Scottish election and would, therefore, be willing to bail out the project when inevitably required.

As it is, the SNP government seems to be holding the Council to its side of the bargain and yet our new Director of City Development is happy to plunge the public purse into debt rather than enforce pre-existing agreements with developers.

I think Mr Anderson would be better placed in the private sector as he seems more interested in private development than demonstrating prudence on the taxpayers' behalf.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.