Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Look, we're making tracks at last in the capital's tram saga

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 June 2009
TRAM tracks returned to Princes Street yesterday after a gap of 53 years in the first tangible sign that the capital's new transport network is at last on its way.
The rails were lifted into place in a process which will continue until the road reopens to traffic in November.

However, people will be able to walk over the newly-laid tracks from next month when the first section of the road is reopened to pe
destrians.

Tram chiefs, who claim that such visible progress will turn around negative public opinion, hailed the new development as a "significant" step forward.

The 12-mile Edinburgh Airport-Newhaven line, which is currently expected to cost up to £545 million, is due to open in about two-and-a-half years' time.

Construction work in Princes Street got under way in earnest in March following a dispute with contractors over late-running preliminary work to move underground pipes and cables.

Steven Bell, the tram project director, said: "This is a very significant day for us. There is now tangible evidence of track laying – people will be able to see sleepers and rails being laid this week as we work along Princes Street."

Mr Bell said the work, which has started just east of the South Charlotte Street junction, would continue east, reaching the Mound junction by next month.

Once track-laying has been completed over each stretch, at least half the width of Princes Street will be reopened for pedestrians – currently confined to narrowed pavements on the shops side.

This will include the area covered by at least one of the two tram tracks in the centre of the street, but a corridor on the gardens side will remain closed for works access.

Mr Bell said the work would also include rebuilding the rest of the surface of Princes Street – whose remaining one lane in each direction will be for buses – for the first time in years.

Gordon Mackenzie, the city council's new transport convener, said evidence on the ground of the tram line would help boost public support.

He said: "This is a really positive day for the project. Even cynical politicians get enthusiastic when you see things like this. This is proof things are taking shape. Like everyone else, you see holes getting dug in the road and really want to see signs of progress. Today is a relief."

However, Mr Mackenzie, who replaced the widely criticised Phil Wheeler last month, admitted it would take time to improve the project's popularity.

Critics have questioned its cost and the disruption caused by its works to the city centre.

Mr Mackenzie said: "There will be a gradual process, and the laying of tram tracks is part of that. It will give some comfort for those adversely affected by the works going on.

"People are very happy with the concept of trams. By and large, they feel Edinburgh does need to have better transport, and that the tram is definitely going to offer that."

Mr Mackenzie said people had complained about the roadworks disruption caused by the trams, which they blamed on the utilities diversion work, which had still to be completed. But, he added, the council had "eased off" on roadworks elsewhere in the city to compensate.

Richard Jeffrey, the chief executive of council-owned tram developers TIE – the former Transport Initiatives Edinburgh – told The Scotsman last month that public opinion would swing behind the scheme as work progressed.

He said: "This will lead to a much more positive environment. I'm confident there will be an overall shift in public opinion this year."

Reading between the lines

RATHER than simply laying rails on roads, building a tram line involves a multi-layered design below the tracks.

The first section of line to be constructed, in Princes Street, has its foundations more than two feet below the surface of the road.

A thin layer of base concrete is overlaid with further concrete, wire mesh and then sleepers, on which the rails lie.

Once all the parts are in place, more concrete is poured in to fix the sleepers in place.

An official ceremony is planned in a few weeks' time, to mark the completion of this process on the first stretch of track.

The work is being done by Bam Rail, sub-contractor of Siemens, which forms part of the construction consortium building the tram line. Separate firms are moving underground cables and pipes in advance of construction work, and building the trams.





The full article contains 759 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Gina Gibson,

Wales 09/06/2009 00:27:13

"The work is being done by Bam Rail"

So it's official, the work is being done by a bunch of bams!
2

Julian.,

edinburgh 09/06/2009 02:14:20
"I would say that the current tram LINE's future is looking more a more precarious and I predict that the project will never be completed at all"

Source: Euan, yesterday.
3

hoblar,

09/06/2009 02:31:51
"However, people will be able to walk over the newly-laid tracks from next month when the first section of the road is reopened to pedestrians."

Aye "walk on the tram tracks":, a cheaper and better way to travel around the Toon perhaps?
4

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 09/06/2009 03:37:30

When all is done and settled, and the first "Tram" Runs in Edinburgh's rebirth, we will all take it as,,,
,,,'Candy-to-a-Baby'!, and wonder why we ever fussed!
Our Children and the future of Edinburghs trasport system, will take our "Trams", will be 'second nature'.
Change is a difficut thing, When one is like 'Victor Meldrew',,,'One-foot-in-the-Grave'!

5

AB_R,

09/06/2009 06:01:29
I can't see how the laying of the tracks will change people's minds about the tram.

This is a line that will serve only 5% percent of the Edinburgh population, it will be run and maintaned by a French company not TEL, it reduces congestion by 1% and even that figure will have changed due to the recent decisions like closing Shandwick Place to other traffic and unliked the No 100 or 35 bus, it will not terminate at the front doors of the airport but the park and ride.
6

Anecdotal,

Edinburgh 09/06/2009 07:04:58
Where does Mr McKenzie get the evidence to support this statement

"People are very happy with the concept of trams"

Give us the opportunity to comment via a referendum just like we did with the congestion charge. Not a chance I suspect because they wouldn't like the answer.
7

Goat Boy,

09/06/2009 07:42:26
£45,000,000 per mile. Is this value for money?
8

Boy Wonder,

09/06/2009 08:03:12
Chuckles @ #4 IS our version of Victor Meldrew ... except he's worse!
9

paulr,

edinburgh 09/06/2009 08:11:42
"Gordon Mackenzie, the city council's new transport convener, said evidence on the ground of the tram line would help boost public support"

These people live in their own fantasy world, there is no public support for these damn trams and a few rails appearing will not change that.
The council numpties have learned a valuable lesson, dont ask just push it through, but lets see what happens come election time.
10

Padraig,

09/06/2009 08:34:49
Gordon Mackenzie, the city council's new transport convener, said: "This is a really positive day for the project. Even cynical politicians get enthusiastic when you see things like this. This is proof things are taking shape. Like everyone else, you see holes getting dug in the road and really want to see signs of progress. Today is a relief."

And the laying of 19th Century tracks will be "signs of progress"?

Tracks were laid originally to make it easier for a horse to pull omnibus carriages, progress was when electricity enabled the horses to be replaced and progress again when the tracks weren't needed because the buses had sufficient power to do the job without them, making public transport much more flexible and enabling them to overtake each other at stops and the like.

Now this bampot McKenzie thinks that "progress" is the demonstrated ability to lay tracks on the road again, so that cyclists (the City Council's next most favoured form of transport) will get stuck in them, causing the riders to fall off and possibly injure themselves. Does Health & Safety not have any input here, or do they come into play only when there is a political need?
11

Americanbob,

09/06/2009 08:42:29
It was reported in the sister paper of the Scotsman last nite that the tram tracks were being delivered to South St. David Street yesterday morning - now we are told that they are at South Charlotte Street.
Has anybody actually seen these rails or has TIE come up with the wonderful idea of appeasing UNESCO's rules for a world heritage site by making them invisible?
12

OnTrack,

Leith 09/06/2009 09:22:56
#5, The tram goes to the doors of the airport. Do some research. In fact...the doors of the airport go to the tram...

The stop is being built outside where the new terminals doors will be, beside where the car park buses stop at the moment.

13

ChrisEH26,

Penicuik 09/06/2009 09:30:27
All hail the tram tracks! I am sure once the public can access the rails in Princes Street we will see millions bowing down to kiss and worship the mighty steel rails then demand that tram lines are built in every street in the country.
When does work on the Ben Nevis tram start?
14

Graeme,

Guangzhou 09/06/2009 09:42:01
Ahh, is this not our old friend B+B Construction? Were they not the group who were kicked out of Hong Kong for the $1b dollar short pile scam to new Housing Authority blocks?

If correct, which numpty in Edinburgh appointed them? You couldn’t make it up!!
15

The Tin Man,

09/06/2009 10:01:10
"Bam Rail"? Indeed.
16

Eric The Archer,

Edinburgh 09/06/2009 10:49:52
I would like to know the names and parties of the Councillors that voted for this scheme. These details would help the citizens of Edinburgh decide who to (not) vote for come the next elections. Enquiries at the Council Chambers have got nowhere.
17

Yonthing!,

09/06/2009 11:21:24
The Tram idea was originally sold as causing "minor disruption".

The description in the article of the extent of engineering required proves this was never a minor task. Two feet of foundations is not minor.

Just goes to prove the original plan was full of lies.
18

GraemeH,

Edinburgh 09/06/2009 11:24:31
#13 - No its not. The proposed stop is beyond the main black cab taxi rank and the multistorey car park. It is less convenient than the existing airport bus.

TIE had originally hoped to build it closer, next to where the airport taxi rank is, but the airport said no on the not unreasonable grounds that they were building an extension there.
19

PeeBee,

09/06/2009 15:28:11
36 reasons why trams are better than buses :-)

http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/06/03/36-reasons-that-streetcars-are-better-than-buses/
20

,

09/06/2009 16:30:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 09/06/2009 19:37:49
"The 12-mile Edinburgh Airport-Newhaven line, which is currently expected to cost up to £545 million, is due to open in about two-and-a-half years' time."

Whew! £545 million for 12 miles, after 4 years of work?! For that kind of money we could have had 250 hybrid buses and paid the salaries for their drivers for 30 years - and we could have had them at least 6 months ago. These buses could have driven all over Scotland, not just 12 miles, conferring great flexibility on the transport system and replacing bad, polluting buses in many areas. And no businesses would have been adversely affected.

I want the people responsible for this to know that I am deeply, deeply shocked at this cynical project, the benefits of which were misrepresented to the Council and general public. Buses don't block each other when they break down. Buses can swerve to avoid accidents. Buses don't have tracks that trip up elederly and inform people, and cause cyclists to fall.
22

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 09/06/2009 19:45:53
21 fooo:
1) Trams are not flexible and cannot be diverted to provide transport for a football match, pop concert, etc.
2) Trams block each other when they break down, bringing the whole line to a standstill.
3) Trams are much slower than buses.
4) Trams cannot swerve to avoid accidents. This is serious because...
5) elderly and infirm people, children, cyclists, and indeed anyone can easily catch their foot on the tracks and trip and fall. I've tripped and fallen catching my shoes on uneven paving stones, let alone tram tracks. And I'm young and fit.
6) The amount of energy invested in smelting all the metal for the rails, copper electrical lines, signalling equipment, and in ripping up streets etc, means that trams are not nearly as green and clean as people imagine.
7) The trams have caused a serious drop in business for many shops, because people avoid the noise of pneumatic drills, and the dust.

TRAMS ARE YESTERDAY'S SOLUTION FOR YESTERDAY'S PEOPLE.
The companies who make trams are selling an horrifically overpriced lie to the general public.
23

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 10/06/2009 07:07:04
Did anyone see the Simpsons episode where the swish salesman came and sold Mayor Quimby the 'Monorail' ????

The episode didn't end well for Springfield ....


24

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 10/06/2009 07:20:09
20:- 36 reasons trams are better than buses !

I Loaded this page up - I thought I would give it a chance ...

I have never laughed so hard in my life ! It is all utter piffle !!!!


Get this folks ..

'reason 3' - Streetcars (trams) don’t feel “low status” to transit riders. Buses often do. hahahaha £545 million to do what !?

'reason 6' - There is a compelling “coolness” and “newness” factor attached to streetcars(trams). Really ?

'reason 12' - Streetcars(trams) have an air of nostalgia. How very quaint that must be worth £545 million on it own !?

I could go on but honestly folks you should look at this crud -- it is such a laugh and ECC fell for it ...

http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/06/03/36-reasons-that-streetcars-are-better-than-buses/

Tram nerds at their best !

25

eric,

lothian 17/06/2009 07:16:10
GLASGOW And its Subway and cash starved is way more superior,out the rain and no traffic lights!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.