Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Stadium rethink after protests

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
31 January 2007
DESIGNS for a £53 million sports stadium are to be sent back to the drawing board following protests it would make a poor venue for rugby matches.
Architects are to look at the possibility of creating separate, back-to-back athletics and rugby arenas at the proposed Sighthill complex.

The move comes after former Scotland rugby star Scott Hastings led an outcry over the designs for the arena to replace the ageing Meadowbank Stadium.

It is hoped the new stadium will provide a home for Edinburgh's professional rugby team, as well as hosting athletics tournaments.

But the initial designs included a running track between the fans and the rugby pitch, which critics said would destroy any atmosphere and leave spectators with a poor view of the action.

As well as looking into separate arenas, the review ordered by council leaders will also consider an idea which could allow the two sports to share the same stadium more happily.

It may be possible to build the permanent seats in the stadium slightly higher so that temporary seating can be wheeled on to the running track for rugby matches.

The alternative idea of a split arena would involve a "main stand" being built with one half facing the rugby pitch and the other towards an athletics track.

The proposed stadium would be expected to have a capacity of more than 8000 for rugby matches if the council goes for the temporary seating and single arena option. That could fall if the council goes for the twin arena plan.

The council is understood to be weighing up various factors, including the possibility of Edinburgh Rugby committing to a long lease, and the likelihood of attracting top-flight athletics on a regular basis.

The cost impact and possibility of the construction timetable slipping will also be considered.

Councillors have ordered the review less than a week after unveiling the latest plans for the long-awaited scheme.

Council leader Ewan Aitken today said the local authority wanted to work with Edinburgh Rugby to ensure the club found a new home there.

He said: "Although the stadium is being built mainly for athletics, we want to be clear that we want Edinburgh Rugby to be based there and the club have told us they are right behind our plans.

"What we are looking at doing now is building the stands up higher so that temporary seating can be rolled out on to the running track when rugby events are on.

"That would mean the capacity of the stadium would be bigger for rugby matches but that is what Edinburgh Rugby are aiming for in future years."

Edinburgh Rugby chiefs have offered support for the scheme, but expressed reservations about the planned capacity and design.

City sports and culture leader Donald Anderson added: "We are going to ask the architects whether it would be possible to have the athletics arena and rugby pitch back to back with a stand in the middle, as at Meggetland.

"We understand the arguments for not having a running track around a rugby pitch, but a lot of it will depend on whether the site can be redesigned and also the cost implications."

The review was ordered as Tory and Lib Dem councillors threatened to scale back the plans if they win control of the city after May's elections.

Tory leader Iain Whyte said he was concerned there may not be enough demand for the proposed facilities.

He said: "Although we are fully supportive of the need to refurbish the Commonwealth Pool, we are much less convinced over the plans for the Sighthill scheme, particularly its suitability for both rugby and athletics."

The city's Lib Dem leader, Jenny Dawe, added: "We do not see the justification for selling off Meadowbank Stadium. The Sighthill scheme does not seem necessary and we should be looking at other ways of funding a refurbishment of the Commonwealth Pool."

Today, Graeme Stirling, managing director of Edinburgh Rugby, said: "Edinburgh Rugby are delighted to have the opportunity to share in the new vision for Sighthill and Edinburgh through the development of a fantastic new sports facility.

"We are in discussions with the council about how the requirements of Edinburgh Rugby can be best incorporated into the stadium plans and will be an active participant as the design evolves."

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 31 January 2007 1:57 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Edinburgh planning issues
 
1

Randan,

31/01/2007 12:32:32

So the moneyed folk who follow rugby get their way, the rest of the city lose a good central facility at Meadowbank.
Ever get the feeling you've been cheated?

2

GP,

31/01/2007 12:38:49

Meadowbank was always to be removed that decision was taken long before any rugby activity.
They want the land for housing.
But yes the east side of edinburgh is being cheated as it becomes less and less an area of employment and more and more just for housing.
Along with the relocation of jobs to the west side of the city and further afield I can see the day when there will be no employment either on the east side of the city or indeed the east in general.

3

Road Raga,

31/01/2007 12:59:32

and what about the Velodrome ? Not being replaced I believe SCANDAL !

4

IWright,

Edinburgh 31/01/2007 13:10:05

#1
Yes, compare this turnaround with the so-called Caltongate development which has a lot of opposition.

5

Jockyw,

31/01/2007 13:20:35

Why can't Meadowbank be flattened & rebuilt on? Seems the best solution for all. But there again all simple plans are to easy.

6

blackley,

31/01/2007 13:34:16

We don't need another stadium.

7

Finbarr Saunders,

31/01/2007 13:53:15

#6 - blackley - Exactly.

How often is Murrayfield stadium used every year?

Unless Hearts hire it out, I doubt it is used much more than half a dozen times a year - A handful of rugby matches and a pop concert or two.

This is just a multi-million pound waste of money.

8

Paul Voltaire,

www.paulvoltaire.spaces.live.com 31/01/2007 14:08:36

#6
Speak for yourself , Old Chap.
I was trying to give them up myself.

9

Big Smoke,

31/01/2007 16:39:51

Meadowbank has been inline for demolition for years, it's all about the money, private developers are going to pay alot more for Meadowbank than they will ever pay for Sighthill!

I beleive that we do need new sports facilities in the City, most are so old it would be cheaper to replace than it would be to maintain and the proposal that the council has/ re-thinking does sound good, still i'm not sure about the location, butstill think Meggetland was a waste and should have been planned alot better to accomodate Edinburgh Rugby.

10

supawhateva,

31/01/2007 16:40:30

Donald Anderson has the temerity to utter the word Meggetland - now a modern day euphemism for civic farce - when embarrassingly there's still outstanding issues to resolve there. Perhaps after May when the new administration seek to investigate this disgrace, and some searching questions are asked, his chutzpah might not be quite so evident.

11

Ramallah Hibbie,

Ramallah 31/01/2007 17:21:38

Yet another cock-up in my home city - more though goes into civic planning here.

12

GP,

31/01/2007 17:36:44

7# Murayfield is not amd never has cost you anthing it is owned by the SRU.
If you want facilities you should pay for them

13

Scaramouche,

31/01/2007 17:43:04

Out of the ruins
Out from the wreckage
Can't make the same mistake this time
We are the children
The last generation
We are the ones they left behind
And I wonder when we are ever gonna change it
Living under this council till nothing else remains

We don't need another stadium
We don't need to build on Sighthill land
All we want is a park for our kids and their dogs

Looking for something we can rely on
There's got to be something better out there
They say Meadowbank's finished
All else are stadiums built in the air
And I wonder when we are ever gonna change it
Living under this coun cil till nothing else remains
All the children say

We don't need another Stadium
We don't need to build on Sighthill land
All we want is a park for our kids and their dogs

*apologies to Tina Turner

14

Adopado,

local 31/01/2007 18:13:10

Do they know how windy it is up at Sighthill? There won't be many tries converted, I suspect!

15

Murielita,

Haddington 31/01/2007 19:17:17

They should build in the Meadows the skatepark which had been proposed in Inverleith Park and then opposed by residents...

16

Rod,

Kirkliston - European Village Jewel (2016) 31/01/2007 19:35:44

#3 and what about the Velodrome ? Not being replaced I believe SCANDAL

It was a scandal first time round (1970) when they tried to renege on the velodrome because of costs. The velodrome that was eventually built was a shadow of the original plan that was agreed. Perhaps it the present crop of trackies changed their names to Wayne 'spud face' Rooney, Gaza or Beckham they might get more official recognition.

17

Nick (Foul Play),

31/01/2007 21:52:28

Sounds fishy... similar to Murrayfield ?

I wonder if this is Ross Finnie (Lib Dem Councillor) lining up Murrayfield Stadium for demolition, after all you don't need 2 Rugby Stadiums. And I wonder if Ross Finnie has been siding with the SRU and Developers against the Edinburgh flood victims, possibly deliberately delaying the building of the Water Of Leith flood defenses thru appeals. What can a politician possibly gain from such developers?

Does he plan on staying quiet about it till after the elections in May and announcing the new property developments at Murrayfield once elected back in, will the press be brave enough to push him for an answer, is he part of the development team within the council?

Of course this is all conjecture and the SRU have no intentions of developing waste land or appealling against the flood defenses with the backing of Ross Finnie (Lib Dem Councillor)?

I challenge the press to put these questions to Ross Finnie and the SRU. No doubt they'll shy away from any answers.

18

GP,

01/02/2007 11:54:48

It would be a shame to lose Murrayfield as it is the best stadium in scotland bar none.

It is just a pity the SFA who have had so much subsidy cannot just let go of shamden as it is a hole.

19

Old Town Resident,

01/02/2007 13:17:31

**13 great....do you think this is sending the residents of the city mad....radio scotland recorded an hour long programme about SOOT then pulled it the day of the revised masterplan going before committee on the 5th October, saying it was too complicated for listeners???We got this memento from them ...
http://www.myspace.com/sootsingers

20

Arrow,

Edinburgh 01/02/2007 15:07:36

the Council own Meadowbank and they are planning to sell it and site something of the order of 800+ houses there. bound to be some money in that for the favourite developers of the Councillors.
one thing you can always say about Edinburgh Councillors the're the best that money can buy. they are so twisted that when they die they are not cremated they just have a slot cut in their head and screw'd into the ground.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Are Edinburgh’s planning regulations too strict on the city’s business community?
Yes - everything should be done to help businesses in a recession
Yes - they pale into insignificance when compared to the tram works
No - the city’s heritage and appearance can’t be compromised

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.