Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 12th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Hotel vision leaps over first hurdle



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 June 2008
A HOTEL, restaurant and five new car showrooms would be created on the outskirts of the city under new plans unveiled today.
The proposal would see the new development raised on a plot of vacant land on Whitehill Road, close to the Kinnaird Park shopping complex.

Plans for the scheme have been lodged with the city council by the South Yorkshire Pensions Authority, and w
ould include new access and service roads to the site.

The developers are only seeking outline permission at this stage, to ascertain whether the idea is one that would be acceptable. No details have been provided as to the possible size of the hotel or a timescale for when the development may be carried out.

However, the proposed scheme on land designated for business and industrial use, is already facing one objection, from Newcraighall resident Terence Olver, whose house is right on the edge of the site.

Mr Olver said the development would add to pollution in the already congested area and affect the privacy of his home.

"The area of land at Whitehill Road is already very congested and polluted, both in terms of noise and smell with vehicle exhaust fumes and carbon smells caused by constant congestion," he said.

"The proposal to install a hotel and car parking area to the rear of my property will effectively remove any privacy we have. It will affect our quality of life."

Heritage watchdog the Cockburn Association has also raised concerns about the development.

It says that while the proposed hotel and restaurant would be welcome, the car showrooms should be "critically assessed".

Particular attention should be given to concerns that the building could be converted into more out-of-town retail units in future, says the watchdog.

Despite these concerns, the plans have been recommended for approval by council planning officials, who suggest the potential noise and pollution problems could be "suitably controlled" by "restrictive" planning conditions.

Alan Henderson, the council's head of planning and strategy, said: "The introduction of a hotel could provide significant benefits to the area in terms of urban design, by way of presenting a strong building line to the street and increasing the security of the area by providing evening activity and a 24-hour presence."

He admitted there was a potential problem for local residents, in terms of both overshadowing and road safety, but insisted these issues could only be looked at once detailed plans for the hotel and associated developments were submitted.

A decision on the application is expected to be made by the council's planning committee on Wednesday.





The full article contains 436 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 June 2008 1:39 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Edinburgh planning issues
 
1

Buttress,

27/06/2008 13:52:41
Oh for heaven's sake - will the EEN PLEASE stop using the lazy and inaccurate phrase 'heritage watchdog'.

2

Statsman,

Edinburgh 27/06/2008 15:08:49
Alan Henderson is so out there, it's like he's a parody.
3

alex paterson,

edinburgh 27/06/2008 15:25:41
Alan Henderson,last of the summer wine.
4

The Genuine Mario Antoinette,

27/06/2008 15:54:39
Is Greyfriars bobby a heritage watchdog ?
5

I love to eat Sellotape,

27/06/2008 15:59:09
No, that's Lynn Faulds-Wood.
6

alex paterson,

edinburgh 27/06/2008 16:11:57
#5
Nice one.
7

Think Tank,

27/06/2008 20:35:12
#1 Quite right, the Cockburn Association isn't a heritage watchdog.

It hasn't got a clue about the city's heritage at all. We wouldn't have the Balmoral Hotel for starters if they designed Edinburgh.

Go on Buttress- hit the report button like you do with all my comments. It's tiresome but I'm used to seeing my posts mysteriously disappear when you can't refute the points put against you.

8

Buttress,

30/06/2008 09:09:04
Septic Tank - it's you without a clue, and as you must by now know, tha Cockburn's concerns with the Balmoral were with the height of the clock tower. It was reduced in height. All satisfied. Reduced so not to interfere with views of the castle. That's unlike the 17 storey ghastly hotel to be built in the Haymarket, against council policy, which mst certainly will.

OK. Got that? No matter how many times you are told, you still come up with the same low level tripe.

I don't know who reports your posts - I think people should be allowed to read them as they are so wrong headed. Quite laughable at times.

Now - do tell us all what qualifies you to think you know better than the Cockburn regarding the city's heritage? And have you taken up your concerns with the organisation?


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.