Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Edinburgh's standing in Europe threatened by design 'squabbles'

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 May 2009
SCOTLAND'S capital is in danger of losing its status as one of the finest cities in Europe, Edinburgh's design champion will warn council leaders today.
Sir Terry Farrell, a world- leading urban designer and architect, is frustrated that "complacency and squabbles" over individual projects have dominated the debate on the city's future.

Sir Terry, speaking at The Festival of Placemaking,
a conference marking the end of his five-year term as design champion for Edinburgh, will tell city leaders, architects and planners that, despite some positive changes, debate is being side-tracked by minor issues such as altering shop fronts on Princes Street.

The design guru – whose own work includes the Dean Gallery and the Edinburgh International Conference Centre as well as the MI6 headquarters in London and Beijing South railway station – said: "Edinburgh has been hobbled by a sterile debate that focuses on individual buildings rather than the value of the places around them.

"What is the point of arguing about a change of shop front on Princes Street when a lack of bigger thinking is allowing one of the finest promenading streets in Britain to slowly become a shambles of run-down shops, shabby street furniture and traffic muddle?"

He added: "Edinburgh needs better co-ordination and more input from a forum of urban designers and city-makers properly resourced, which could help the co-ordination of the largest docklands redevelopment in the UK and help to ensure that the hundreds of millions of pounds being invested in a new tram system are spent well.

"The tram has important and seriously unresolved planning and urban design issues, particularly along Princes Street, which need to be urgently and properly addressed."

Returning to the theme of "complacency", Sir Terry said there was a danger that the historic legacy bequeathed to the capital by its city fathers had given rise to a "dangerous complacency that has cloaked us in a wonderful, comfortable aura of fine places". He continued: "City-making is not static and all parties – private, public and voluntary sectors – have a duty to work together to preserve the best of the past in Edinburgh while proactively addressing the future economic vitality and liveability of the city."

While reluctant to be drawn into the controversy surrounding the £300 million Caltongate project, which intended building shops, offices and a hotel in the Canongate in the Royal Mile, Sir Terry has outlined his vision for many other parts of the city.

These include plans for redeveloping a stretch just less than seven miles long in the Leith docks and Newhaven area, which he dubs "Waterfront City" and which he says would be on a par with the creation of the New Town.

Sir Terry has also said that Leith Walk has the potential to become one of the greatest streets in Europe. But he has reserved some of his strongest criticism for Princes Street, saying that it has been damaged by the mistaken belief that it should be competing with out-of-town shopping complexes.

Instead, he proposed that the upper floor of the street's shops – many of which are used for storage – be converted to flats, restaurants and bars.

However, earlier this year the Architectural Heritage Society of Scotland accused Sir Terry of remaining "mute" while fierce controversy raged over major developments in the city such as Haymarket and Caltongate, which triggered an investigation by Unesco into the city's world heritage status.

The society also warned that inferior schemes were being approved by Edinburgh council in the rush to secure economic investment.





The full article contains 599 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Normie,

Toronto 21/05/2009 04:37:00
Well said.
I'm glad someone has the guts to speak up for the big picture.
2

eric,

Lothian 21/05/2009 07:09:44
"in danger of" mmm,damage is already done
3

MoiraMac,

21/05/2009 09:01:53
http://image10.webshots.com/11/9/52/64/180595264vrAExE_ph.jpg
4

Buttress,

21/05/2009 09:55:36
There is, of course, the fact some of those shop fronts are part of listed buildings, and in a conservation area, so naturally any alterations will have to be discussed if an application is made to alter.

But I do recall Sir Terry getting involved in Caltongate, on radio, and saying that the council should not have left masterplanning to the developer.
5

It's me!,

21/05/2009 10:13:05
"bold exciting developments' = architects egos

Not necessarily the same as what the citizens want.
6

Buttress,

21/05/2009 10:17:53
The proposal to use the upper floors of buildings in Princes Street isn't a radical new Sir Terry idea either, but there are access issues, issues with deliveries, and also the fact that these are privately owned, so you can't force owners to use them.
7

mad moo,

edinburgh 21/05/2009 10:26:43
"City-making is not static and all parties – private, public and voluntary sectors – have a duty to work together to preserve the best of the past in Edinburgh while proactively addressing the future economic vitality and liveability of the city."

What a pity CEC who have a STATUTORY DUTY to enforce democraticly agreed planning policies have been allowed to ignor the many statutory community and professional consultees and the residents who are their electorate to favour the private interests of speculative carpetbaggers who have empty promises and even more empty bank accounts.
8

Buttress,

21/05/2009 10:31:05
Of course, CEC takes note on the Chamber of Commerce, especially when it is promoting its own interests.
9

Seb,

21/05/2009 11:34:43
The waterfront, Princes Street and Leith Walk all need to improve. But the projects to address their problems that are already underway are nowt to do with Farrell, he's been a total waste of space.

10

Buttress,

21/05/2009 13:44:44
Yes, he of course cannot comment on individual buildings or his fellow architects will be baying for blood... you have to wonder what was the point of it all.
11

Buttress,

21/05/2009 14:20:54
Times yesterday:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/scotland/article6330039.ece
12

sjs,

Haddington 21/05/2009 14:29:43
Edinburgh just needs a little more optimism. The City Council were told off by UNESCO for not providing the urban designs for future developments; leaving it instead to money driven developers. They need to create a design panel who will provide the blueprint for the future. That is how the New Town was created; a competition.

Areas of heavy social use like Waverley need a complete re-think. Why not launch a campaign and then for city people to get together and figure out how it can get done? The potential is there. We have a beautiful city. We can surely do better than what we're doing and not be complacent :)

We don't need a design champion. We need enthusiastic city dwellers and the will/organisation to make it work. If you are interested visit my page on wikipedia and we'll sort something out. Don't just whine on here, let's make a difference:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edinburgh_Rebirth
13

Buttress,

21/05/2009 15:09:19
UNESCO has not actually published its report officially. It is believed that it will be critical of the council's lack of masterplnning, but even when it did have a plan for SoCo it ignored it when the developer siad it didn't like it.

Waverley is being revamped. I think that is looking good, so far.

And there is a new Edinburgh Urban Design Panel. Met for the first time in March.

I am not sure that yet another pressure group will have a great deal of effect on the complacent councillors on the planning committee.

14

Buttress,

21/05/2009 15:13:37
Then there is SOOT:

http://independentrepublicofthecanongate.blogspot.com/2009/05/soot-meeting-tonight-7pm.html
15

sjs,

Haddington 21/05/2009 15:17:53
Above page was deleted by an American wiki powertripper... so await a website I launch myself. Apologisies to wikipedia and any offended parties.

On that note, will there be a replacement of our design guru? We await with baited breath :)
16

Buttress,

21/05/2009 15:21:01
No, he is not being replaced, but there is a new Urban Design Panel. And the Cockburn Association...



17

Buttress,

21/05/2009 15:24:06
Director
Moira Tasker MA (hons) MSc FRSA

"Moira implements the policy decisions of the Cockburn Council and its Committees. She represents the Association at external events and at forums such as the Cross Party Group on Architecture and the Built Environment of the Scottish Parliament and the Edinburgh Urban Design Panel."

18

sjs,

Haddington 21/05/2009 15:52:31
Buttress, are you one of the members of SOOT? I don't always agree with SOOT and I think a wider forum/debate is needed. If you're interested let me know. If The Scotsman is listening why doesn't it launch some kind of a campaign?
19

Seb,

21/05/2009 16:06:18
I agree with Buttress, there are enough amenity and community groups. Farrell is right that we lack civic leadership. Is there a 21st century George Drummond out there?
20

sjs,

Haddington 21/05/2009 16:50:49
I think there are community groups out there but that perhaps they lack cohesion. They are mostly built around a single community area in response to a developer, rather than being interested in the city as a whole. That is the job of the city council.

Seb is right that it is about lack of civil leadership. The symbol of the City Council is sitting opposite an empty brownfield site and looking like any office development rather than the council for the capital of Scotland. Maybe we should have a democratically elected provost/mayor rather than the current set up. That way he/she can be the voice for the city and provide an alternative voice to the council.
21

Seb,

21/05/2009 17:06:10
The Cockburn Association takes a city wide view although it does tend to focus on heritage issues. It's very good at stopping things but a bit weak on the making-things-happen front. Barracking is all that independant groups end up doing.

An elected mayor/provost might indeed be a good thing but then again you get people like Trevor Davies who have their own vision that not everyone subscribes to. The lack of funds means that the Council have to get in to bed with a developer to do acheive anything hence Forth Ports and Mountgrange calling the shots.
22

Buttress,

21/05/2009 19:33:46
I looked up that Wiki lead, before it was removed. A 21 year old student at Edinburgh uni. I'm not saying that anyone of 21 and a student hasn't got ideas, but I do think that yet another voluntary pressure group isn't going to get anywhere much, frankly, and experienced people may not rush to join.

SOOT is trying to expand its work, look at the link, but I think the Cockburn Association should not be discounted as having some clout behind it.
23

Buttress,

21/05/2009 19:35:15
As for the Scotsman - it isn't interested. It's the Johnson Press, it's on the side of CEC and developers.
24

Failin Palin,

05/07/2009 03:47:30
#25 Buttress
You're right about that.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Are Edinburgh’s planning regulations too strict on the city’s business community?
Yes - everything should be done to help businesses in a recession
Yes - they pale into insignificance when compared to the tram works
No - the city’s heritage and appearance can’t be compromised

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.