Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


The Bacchae

****

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 August 2007
KING'S THEATRE
IT WAS perhaps the most glittering first night ever in Scottish theatre, as the blisteringly high-profile National Theatre of Scotland/Edinburgh International Festival production of Euripides's The Bacchae opened at the King's Theatre on Saturday. In the programme, there was a quote and a challenge, from the company to itself: "For centuries people have spoken of the Greek myths as something to be rediscovered and reawakened," says the Italian writer Roberto Calasso. "But the truth is that the myths are still out there, waiting to awaken us..."

And, whatever else is said about John Tiffany's new version of The Bacchae, in a contemporary translation by Ian Ruffell and David Greig, it certainly comes as a rude awakening to a culture that has often been lulled, over the centuries, into thinking of the great dramas of ancient Greece as dusty pieces of literature, performed - if at all - with an air of sonorous reverence.

First seen in 407 BC, The Bacchae is perhaps the most strange and unsettling of all the great Greek dramas. It tells the story of the god Dionysus, the son of Zeus and the Theban princess Semele, who has lived in exile in the countries of the East since his birth, but now returns to his homeland of Thebes with his band of wild dancing women, the Bacchae, to claim his status as a god.

At one level, the play is therefore a classic human drama about the illegitimate child returning to claim his own, and wreaking revenge when he finds only mockery and rejection. But it is also a political parable about the terrible fate that awaits a state which cannot acknowledge and find a balance between the different aspects of human nature, including the Dionysian impulse to drink, dance, play and play-act; to lose the self in rituals of sensual pleasure and transformation.

And in the powerful confrontation between the show's playful, dangerous star Alan Cumming as Dionysus, and a superbly grey and controlled Tony Curran as his cousin, the Theban prince Pentheus, it's possible to sense a whole rich vein of resonance for our own political culture, torn as it is between a growing binge-culture of uncontrolled excess on one hand and, on the other, a new authoritarian obsession with law and order, and the suppression of "anti-social" behaviour.

Now, it should be said that in trying to find a full theatrical expression of that confrontation, John Tiiffany's production makes legions of errors, some of them as baffling as they are disappointing. To begin with, its visual imagery is more intermittently spectacular than consistently dramatic and telling - Dionysus, for example, is supposed to be a physically gorgeous shape-changer, beautiful and dazzling. But here he is confined to one little golden outfit with a messy wig and is never allowed to look fabulous at all.

And, beyond the visual, the production suffers from strange lapses of pace and vocal energy - the final long, elegiac scene between Pentheus's mother and grandfather, for example, limps along at a snail's pace, despite a superbly moving performance from Ewan Hooper as old Cadmus.

And, most disappointingly of all, Tim Sutton's lightweight, soul-based score for Dionysus's mighty chorus of Bacchae - played by ten terrific black female actor/singers dressed in glittering shades of red - only rarely rises to the occasion. At the height of the narrative, it never begins to achieve the kind of volume, rhythm and power that would really express the mighty ecstasy of the Dionysian rite; and sometimes the ear aches for a few shuddering bars of Stravinsky's The Rite of Spring, which comes so much nearer the mark.

For all these weaknesses, though, Tiffany's production carries three strands of brave, ground-breaking energy that make it infinitely worth seeing. First, it achieves some astonishing visual coups-de-theatre, blazing exhibitions of fire and light that are as witty as they are thrilling. Secondly, in the great 7:84 tradition to which he belongs, Tiffany recognises the plain didactic simplicity of Euripides's drama - recognise all the gods, or suffer the consequences - and its place in popular culture. He uses popular forms freely throughout the production, from the opening pop-soul numbers in which the Bacchae become Dionysus's backing singers, to the Queer Eye for the Straight Guy-style sequence in which Dionysus seduces Pentheus into women's clothes. In every case, the popular form fits the drama better than more solemn and archaic forms of presentation.

And above all, Cumming's central performance as Dionysus - alternating with a terrifying swiftness between light-hearted, ultra-camp charm and raging, all-powerful fury - represents a real, if still uncertain, landmark in marrying the new strength of queer culture to one of the oldest stories of our civilisation. For when societies grow rigid, authoritarian and blinkered, the control of the sexuality of men who challenge and transgress traditional models of masculinity always becomes a central obsession, often expressed with a terrifying brutality.

In the last generation, our Western culture has taken some steps towards a true civic recognition of those aspects of Dionysian energy that were repressed for so long. But the danger of backlash, and the advance of new kinds of control-freakery, still stalks our civilisation. Euripides's warning is that we may pay a heavy price for that mood of reaction; and this strange, uneven show represents a tentative but thrilling first step towards making that warning real for a 21st-century audience.

• Until 18 August. Today 8pm

Page 1 of 1

 
1

SJErle,

Edinburgh 13/08/2007 21:59:59

This was one of the worst performances I have ever seen. Bad writing, bad directing, bad singing, bad scenery, horrid choregography and boring music. What a waste of an evening. I should have gone to the fringe.

2

Julia 73,

Edinburgh 13/08/2007 22:38:31

Alan Cumming was recently quoted as saying that acting is nothing more than dressing up and pretending to be someone else. With personal standards this low, it is little wonder he found himself part of this most atrocious production.

Dear Readers,
Approach the Scotsman review with caution! "Intermittently spectacular" means one fire effect. Ten "terrific black singer/actors," denotes neither singers nor actors. For the record, they're not dancers either. Their poorly timed movements, and I won't even comment on the attempted African dance, add nothing to the proceedings.

I think I'll just blame the choreographer.
And the director. And the playwright.

I know stars can be purchased in the heavens. Is it possible that they can also be purchased in The Scotsman?

Julia

3

Bookseller,

Edinburgh 14/08/2007 10:17:03

Well, well, well...

I saw the show last night and I still don't know what to make of it. It is truly a mixed bag of some stunning moments, and some moments that border on the amateur. At times the script adherence seems rigid, at others it seems to go out the window.

At times the chorus strike the right note, and the dancing and singing feels well-placed and staged. At times, very much not... and the choreographer should definitely bear the brunt of the criticism. The score likewise is best when removed and the chorus are left to sing unaccompanied. As such, some moments shine, and others seem distinctly under-rehearsed.

As for Mr Cumming... his High Life-ier moments are often his best, although it feels like the director has just let him have free-rein. The rage scenes are less effective - at one point I couldn't help thinking 'it's just all shouting'. Often, the script feels un-dramatised.

This is, I think, a 4-star show waiting to happen, and certainly I came away having enjoyed much of what I saw. At present though it has some decidedly 1 and 2-star moments which really let it down. In short, it would be great at C-Venues, but as the centre-piece of a National production for the EIF, I'm really not convinced.

In conclusion I should say again, I did enjoy my night out, and I've enjoyed discussions about the show since nearly as much! Go see, but stick to the cheap seats...

M

4

Steven McMahon,

Edinburgh 14/08/2007 14:10:06

I loved it.
Yes, it's flawed and doesn't quite hold together, but boasts some excellent acting and singing.
The technical side of things is superb; from the special effects to the lighting, music, sound and choreography, it's stunning.

5

Chrislovesbuffy1970,

Edinburgh 14/08/2007 20:04:34

I went on Saturday night as one in a group of 7 and everyone in our party loved it - in fact everyone we mingled with outside the theatre had the same opinion. Whilst not perfect, the play made for a great evening out - fantastic imagination in the mix of drama, farce, music, set design, costume, performance and tragedy ... in other words very entertaining. Alan Cumming and Tony Curran were strong leads and the gospel choir I thought hit the perfect note. I'd recommend it to anyone I know.

6

Saoifre, Dublin,

16/08/2007 12:43:59

I found it desperately dull and overlong. Alan Cumming was certainly watchable and has much charm but for great parts of the second half he isn't even on stage and then you have to to sit through just too many of the dreary, tuneless horrible songs which simply waste the talents of the gospel singers. Cut it by at least 45 minutes, sharpen the script and get some one in with a modicum of musical ability - then you might have a show worth sitting through. As it is, give it a miss - 2hours of tedium!

7

florence f,

Edinburgh 01/09/2007 19:21:32

I saw it in Glasgow today. In 40 years of studying and teaching Greek I've never seen anything like it, and even having taught the Bacchae as recently as 6 months ago I feel I got from this production new insights into what Euripides was really getting at in this play. I thought it was an amazing spectacle that achieved the difficult feat of seeming new to a jaded classicist while never straying from the original text as far as I could tell. Yes, the choruses were sometimes hard to hear the words of (though not always by any means) but it was a charge often levelled at Euripides that his choruses were getting more towards musical interludes than they should, by strictly 5C tragedy standards, have been, and thought the impact of them more than cancelled that out. Put it this way - I have seen quite a few productions of Greek tragedies and have never enjoyed one more than this one. A considerable achievement all round, I thought.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.