Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 14th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Fringe banned from St Andrew Square



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 June 2008
FRINGE performers have been warned to steer clear of the capital's newest open space – despite almost £3 million of public money having been spent on its refurbishment.
People have flocked to St Andrew Square Garden, in the New Town, since it was opened to the public in April, 238 years after its creation.

But street performers and buskers will be banned from the garden in August under a clampdown by the counci
l-owned company responsible for its maintenance. It has pledged that anyone performing "unauthorised activity" will be ejected from the new-look garden, which boasts a coffee shop, new seating and a "reflective pool".

The Edinburgh City Centre Management Company, which spent years persuading all the property owners around the square to agree to open the gardens to the public, has posted notices around the square outlawing alcohol, skateboarding and rowdy behaviour.

Fringe performers have already been dealt a major blow this year after being told they will have to pay £50 for a permit to perform in the only official entertainment area, in the High Street. Now they are being warned that security guards will be on permanent duty "to ensure that management rules are adhered to".

A spokeswoman said the management rules drawn up for the garden partly reflected conditions of the 50-year lease agreed by its owners.

Ian Broadfoot, City Centre manager, saied: "We're proud of what we've achieved with the opening of St Andrew Square Garden. The success is there for all to see in the number of people using the space.

"Our priority is to ensure the garden remains a haven of tranquillity."

However, Steve Cousins, a regular street entertainer on the Fringe, said: "Other festivals and cities around the world are paying big money to bring over street entertainers, yet in Edinburgh it's the exact opposite."

Gordon Drummond, the general manager at the nearby Harvey Nichols store, said: "The garden does seem to have been a real magnet for people. However, it may be the right thing not have to lots of Fringe performers competing for audiences in there."

A spokeswoman for the Fringe said it had not been involved in any discussions before the decision to ban performers was taken.

St Andrew Square, completed in 1770, is the oldest of Edinburgh's "pleasure gardens". Although no-one has lived on the square for more than 100 years, access was, until April, restricted to businesses and property owners.





The full article contains 411 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Pilrig.,

Livingston 27/06/2008 05:57:08
"A haven of tranquility" surrounded by roadworks !
2

an interested party,

27/06/2008 06:48:26
I look forward to the fringe acts

'argument with a guard'
'ejection from a public space'

daily performances
3

GrahamH,

Edinburgh 27/06/2008 06:54:50
First para says 'despite' public oney being spent - surely should be 'due' to public money being spent.

I go to events most nights during the festival when in town, but agree we need areas free from the bombardment of self publicists that are rightly welcome elsewhere.
4

Boy Wonder,

27/06/2008 07:10:58
You have to wonder if our city actually wants the Festival and Fringe or not! This is one of those decisions that smacks of "Not"! Or is it just the cops flexing their muscle and going all puritan and spoilsporty on us?

If the acts no longer come to the city due to these Draconian enactments ... the Festival will wither and die. Is that what they want?
5

Nell,

The Preservation Hall 27/06/2008 07:47:18
Whats wrong with having a fridge in St Andrews Square?
6

Liam,

27/06/2008 08:02:58
I don't think it's unreasonable to ask the fringe 'characters' to leave the good people of Edinburgh to have a sarnie and catch some rays in peace and quiet. There are plenty of alternative venues.
7

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 27/06/2008 08:55:46
I bet if Pete Irvine & his Chums came up with a proposal involving White-faced Mime Artistes on Stilts & Unicycles, the Cooncil would roll right over on their back!
8

Hermitage,

Edinburgh 27/06/2008 09:00:36
At least.........for the moment........it is free of the hellish noise of squawking bagpipers.
9

Buttress,

27/06/2008 09:07:12
Pity they made auch a mess of the gardens, wrong design, wrong materials, the pool, and the ghastly coffee pavilion. Less is more and it would have not cost as much.
10

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 27/06/2008 12:11:43
I was under the impression was that the Fringe was supposed to be on the fringe of the festival. It was once even called the "Festival Fringe". That of course was back in the 1980s before stupid labour took over and imposed all their jack-boot laws on everyone.

Leave the fringe alone. Stop ruining everyone's fun. Stop killing Edinburgh!
11

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 27/06/2008 12:12:54
#9:

"...and the ghastly coffee pavilion..."

I agree there. They should have built an open-air real-ale bar instead.
12

Mike Hunt,

Edinburgh 27/06/2008 14:18:59
Completly agree with no 3 "First para says 'despite' public oney being spent - surely should be 'due' to public money being spent."

Let's not spoil it with posters, flyers, and wasters shouting lines from their performances in yer face.

Who really likes the Fringe anyway, if truth be told? Everyone says they do for fear of being labelled a Jeremiah.
13

Adamsky,

Edinburgh 27/06/2008 14:40:10
I look forward to next year when they decide to take the Fringe shilling after all by pitching a marquee in the gardens and turning it into a venue.
14

AnnoyedLocal,

eidnburgh 04/07/2008 21:29:51
Number 10 - I agree - they are killing Edinburgh, and from what I can gather they feel etierly justified in doing so - THERE IS NO FRINGE any more - it is nothing more than another corporate label.

15

Logie Almond,

10/07/2008 09:49:22
The grass and landscaping in the square are only just established and this seems a sensible precaution as fringe performers are not known for their concern for the environment.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Has the Fringe ticket fiasco put you off going to see shows at the festival?
Yes, I don’t want to risk losing money for nothing.
No, a little bit of hassle is worth the quality
I was already put off by unaffordable ticket prices

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.