Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Capital is first UK city to sign up to ambitious European cycling targets

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 June 2009
TRANSPORT chiefs in Edinburgh have become the first in the UK to sign up to ambitious new cycling targets – with the aim that one in every six journeys will be by bicycle in 2020.
Edinburgh has joined cities including Madrid, Milan and Munich in agreeing to work towards a goal. The city's head of transport, Marshall Poulton, travelled to the European Parliament in Brussels earlier this month to sign up to the charter.

It co
mmits Edinburgh to promote cycling within its overall transport policy, as well as setting aside more money to help raise the proportion of bike journeys in relation to other forms of transport from 4 per cent to 15 per cent in just over ten years.

The council said the targets were "aspirational" and not legally binding, but they still drew criticism from one leading motoring organisation.

David Legge, of the Association of British Drivers, said: "This is another attempt to make life harder for drivers in Edinburgh. I don't know what mandate the council has for signing up to this or whether they have asked people on the streets whether they actually want this. It sounds ambitious and I'd like to know what research the council put into it before signing up."

The council said the decision to sign the agreement was part of its long-term vision for transport in the city, but said it had yet to decide on measures that would be used to work towards the 15 per cent target.

Transport bosses are set to develop a cycling action plan over the next year that is likely to build on recent initiatives such as reopening the Rodney Street tunnel and the possibility of a bike-share scheme similar to those operating in cities such as Paris and Barcelona.

Gary Bell, of the cycling lobby group Spokes, welcomed the decision to sign up to the European charter but said radically increasing the number of cycle journeys would not be easy. "I think the council will have to do a fair bit of work if they are to achieve that sort of target," he said.

Councillor Gordon Mackenzie, the city's transport convener, said: "Edinburgh has to address both congestion and healthy lifestyles. This is why we are so keen to sign up to the ambitious targets of the charter. Getting more people on to their bikes is not just good for the environment – it's good for their health and well-being, too."





The full article contains 421 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 June 2009 10:10 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Edinburgh Council
 
1

Daft Old Git,

03/06/2009 10:25:03
This plan may have to be scuppered if the trams are finished by 2020 as we'll all be travelling back and forward to Leith on them
2

me150,

03/06/2009 10:44:56
More than likely these targets are unachievable.

Of course if the council ban cars getting anywhere near Edinburghs centre then it might just work.
3

Incandescent,

03/06/2009 11:59:24
It's high time CEC stopped "signing-up" to every new "target" that pops out of the woodwork just so they can be "the first city in the UK".
4

Jeffrey Lebowski,

03/06/2009 12:02:14
The target should be more ambitious and way before 2020.
5

Unimpressed one,

03/06/2009 12:04:04
Yet more targets that'll never be met.
6

,

03/06/2009 12:05:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

Incandescent,

03/06/2009 12:15:38
"I don't know what mandate the council has for signing up to this..."

None.
8

alfonsa pedrosa,

embra 03/06/2009 12:21:34
Dose this mean by 2020 the council, or private company will have to make the pavements wider to accommodate the cyclists.
9

David Harrington,

Edinburgh 03/06/2009 12:33:46
Yet another piece of shoddy reporting - this has absolutely nothing to do with the ABD whose knowledge of cycling is, to put it mildly, zilch. As for being a "leading motoring organisation", is this a joke?
Spokes are correct - it will be a difficult target, but they are right to welcome it - best of luck to the council
10

antifa,

03/06/2009 12:35:46
"I don't know what mandate the council has for signing up to this..."

They have a mandate from city residents to make decisions on their behalf. What you really mean is: you don't like this decision.

But the council is surely right to be encouraging physical activity while cutting carbon emissions, and generally making Edinburgh a nicer place to be.
11

Road Raga,

EDINBURGH 03/06/2009 12:41:52
#9 exactly. They should be called the Association of Boy Racers, their web site encourages speeding and gives tips on how to get out of drink driving charges.
It gloats when it gets motorists off serious motoring offences by using loopholes in the law. It HATES public transport, cycling, pedestrians etc.
This organisation does no favours to law abiding motorists, or anyone else for that matter.
12

Brian Ferrari,

03/06/2009 12:45:43
Grandiose, but typical, gesture politics by the transport hacks.

It's a bit like McConnell or Salmond saying they aspire to Scotland having a "world class" education system.

They could start by trying for an "English class" education system and work up from there.
13

Ecto,

03/06/2009 12:54:56
Provide core services at reasonable cost and forget about all this other nonsense. No wonder there is a huge hole in the finances. Empty bins, clean the streets and fix the pot holes before wasting any money on this pile o sh*t FFS it aint rocket science.
14

,

03/06/2009 12:55:07
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

,

03/06/2009 13:10:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

Foo,

03/06/2009 13:10:35
14

UKIP, the voice of the terminally dim of mind.
17

Incandescent,

03/06/2009 13:14:06
#10 antifa

*Sigh*. Putting aside your blinkered focus on cars, what I'm actually saying here is that I'm tired of a Council in a deep financial hole expending valuable effort in grasping deperately to be "first in the UK" to "sign up" to every "target" that presents itself, be it transport-related or otherwise.

And, no: I think you'll find that Local Authorities have absolutely no mandate whatsoever to make European "commitments" on our behalf. It's notable that this one is not legally binding, for that very reason.

18

Incandescent,

03/06/2009 13:15:30
#11 Road Raga

You're one step above Gorgie_Tony - and that's not saying much.
19

Incandescent,

03/06/2009 13:36:26
#13 - Spot on.
20

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 03/06/2009 14:14:33
Not like the cooncil to rush like gardarene swine to grandstand yet another loony-greeny 'initiative' at the behest of their puppet-masters in Spokes.
21

Conclusive,

Liberton 03/06/2009 14:22:11
Long Term Transport solutions !! Congestion!! What a load of rubbish...... Cycling a transport solution for Edinburgh!! No it is not, it is simply a spin to save the council doing something. Congestion, what congestion? Its Edinburgh for god sake. The only congestion is the bypass at peak times or outer areas not covered by residents parking i.e congestion created by the council pushing motorists away from areas. We need a balance of good public transport networks, good parking and free flow of traffic. More cyclists means more congestion. Motorists will not go away, just accept it. Get the balance and cut this Green healthy fresh air bull.....
22

Statsman,

Edinburgh 03/06/2009 14:39:51
There are too many hills in Edinburgh and not enough segregated cycling paths for this to work. You have to be reasonably fit to cycle up Dundas Street for example. This isn't The Netherlands.

Cue howls of derision from the mental green cycling windmill lobby.
23

Foo,

03/06/2009 14:45:59
Anyone sitting writing how they don't like cyclists are invariably pot bellied slow thinkers, lacking the reactions or speed of thought to cope with a cyclist being within 20 yards.

Get out of my way.
24

roadstohell,

03/06/2009 15:02:48
Doesn't go far enough, BAN THE CAR NOW

Cycling is the answer to all of Edinburgh transport problems, in fact it is the answer to just about everthing.

Hail the Bicycle, KILL THE CAR
25

GJS,

03/06/2009 15:10:04
#24 What gives you (and CEC) the right to tell other people how to live their lives?
26

Foo,

03/06/2009 15:13:12
24

Would you ban the ambulance?
27

Jeffrey Lebowski,

03/06/2009 15:13:39
#23 #24

I agree with both posts.
28

Statsman,

Edinburgh 03/06/2009 15:24:12
25 GJS

Self-aggrandisement with an unhealthy dose of green pseudo-morality?

These folk are one step away from the types that think all humans should commit mass suicide to 'save the planet'.
29

Steve-o,

Edinburgh 03/06/2009 15:27:26
Not so keen that the council would actually grit the cycle paths in the winter though... that path up to Cramond is a death-trap.
30

Road Raga,

EDINBURGH 03/06/2009 15:48:16
#25 What gives car drivers the right to pollute the air, cause congestion, noise, danger etc etc ?
31

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 03/06/2009 15:49:04
#24 roadstohell,

Could cyclists be an alternative power source?

If we had each and everyone of them coupled into a dynamo of some kind they could be used to generate masses of free electricity.

Seriously, this predilection towards bikes is a lot of 'Greenie' bunk and should be ignored by as many of us as possible.

32

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 03/06/2009 15:55:23
#30 Road Raga,

"What gives car drivers the right to pollute the air, cause congestion, noise,..."

Answer, the same right which an increasing number of cyclists seem to think they have to cycle on pavements.
33

Road Raga,

EDINBURGH 03/06/2009 16:02:08
#32 I think I know which option I prefer.
34

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 03/06/2009 16:10:55
#33

Nothing wrong with a bit of noise, pullution and congestion, afterall think of the methane/ethane/CO/CO2 output from a crowd of sweaty cyclists?
35

GJS,

03/06/2009 16:45:50
#30 The tax they pay?

Cyclists are such an annoyance, they just get in everyone's way. It's not even like they're cycling cos they think it's the best form of transport, they're just cycling so they can be even more self-righteous and sanctimonious.
36

me150,

03/06/2009 16:49:17
One thing you all forget is that business needs vehicles to operate including in Edinburgh. Can you imagine how bad life would be if a vehicle ban was actually introduced.
37

Foo,

03/06/2009 16:51:36
#35
Cyclists pay tax too.

the world isn't divided into cyclists, pedestrians and motorists. Most normal peole do all three.

"they're just cycling so they can be even more self-righteous and sanctimonious."

Or to keep fit and for enjoyment?
38

GJS,

03/06/2009 16:58:47
#37 - I'm aware of that. I cycle in the country for enjoyment. Why would I want to cycle to work in the city for enjoyment though. You just end up fighting for space with the taxis, buses and vans, struggling to pedal up the Lothian Road and you end up all sweaty when you arrive in the office. That's a really professional look. Not. And even if some weirdo does enjoy cycling to work, why do they think that they have to make everyone else cycle to work too?
39

The real dracula,

03/06/2009 17:19:48
I for one am sick of hearing about cycling . By all means carry on cycling but give the discussions and persuasive news reports a rest.
I dont intend to take my life in my hands and end up mangled at the roadside just to say Ive done my bit for pollution.
Some of us will never cycle and all the guilt trips in the world will not make us ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,live and let live and I intend to live longer without cycling!
40

eDUCATIon,

03/06/2009 17:33:05
Well, I feel the time has come to take the 5 full toolboxes out my Transit and strap them to my back. I feel guilty now. We just cant keep living like this you know.

Now, whos going to sell me a rusty Raleigh Grifter thats stuck in 3rd gear?
41

Speedy Gonzales,

Edinburgh 03/06/2009 17:38:03
#38
I do cycle to work as well as get the train and on rare occasion, van. I enjoy cycling to work and the fight for road space with taxis/buses/vans is no different from when I'm in my car so there is no difference to me.
Apart from enjoyment, it is cheaper, even though I do have a fully paid and taxed vehicle sitting outside my house mon-fri.
My choice, I don't (to my knowledge) preach, how you get about is up to you, just get on with the other road users around you!
42

Tr1xx,

Edinburgh 03/06/2009 17:39:57
#35, et seq.

Fully agree with Speedy

I cycle to keep fit, save money, save time and avoid the daily depressing commute on buses and cars. The best bit of my day is cycling to and from work, (the worst bit is the time between). I really honestly enjoy it. You should give it a try sometime, especially this time of year when the weather's good.

I cycle over 2000 miles a year, and before anyone asks:

a) YES I DO HAVE A CAR TOO
b) I don't have a problem with motorists
c) I'm not a great fan of cycle paths generally
d) I have no involvement with Spokes, CEC, or whatever
e) Edinburgh hills aren't too bad
f) I don't go through red lights, honest
43

roadstohell,

03/06/2009 17:49:50
Comments like " car drivers will not go away" are just silly. We all know that "car drivers WILL just go away", when the oil runs out !!! FACT

BAN CARS NOW

44

roadstohell,

03/06/2009 17:55:22
CYCLING IS THE ANSWER - EMBRACE THE BICYCLE

Bicyles will still be rolling along when cars,vans,buses etc etc are just dim memories, and the world WILL be a better place, filled with better people.
All that is neede is an adjustement in our lives, ie ambulances = Ricksaw ambulances, White van man - don't take jobs that you can't deal with by a Cycle, it's really very simple,stop putting obstacles in the way.
YOU can change,
45

roadstohell,

03/06/2009 18:00:20
There will come a time, when SPOKES will be looked on as prophets, and Edinburgh will re-enter a golden age, driven by the bicycle
46

GJS,

03/06/2009 18:35:34
Let's play a game.

5 points for every cyclist you knock down.
10 points if they're wearing lycra.
47

krusty the klown,

03/06/2009 20:20:03
#46 lets play a game - A)consider where GJS 'cycles in the country' (hint- level canal towpath) and B) - wonder what is considers a 'professional look' (homer simpson tie, braces, aka Brent attire?)
48

radge dug,

03/06/2009 22:11:22
Good aims here but is Edinburgh serious?

The trams route on Leith Walk will apparently have no cycle route making it even more dangerous that it already is. At Waverly, bike racks are replaced by junk food machines and the existing racks are all full.

We need proper cycle lanes like most Euro cities have. Even the motorist will be happy to have cycles off the road.
49

Bob 2,

03/06/2009 22:20:42
David Legge, of the Association of British Drivers, said: "This is another attempt to make life harder for drivers in Edinburgh. I don't know what mandate the council has for signing up to this"

as much as a mandate as the ABD has, un unelected body, who thinks speeding is OK


comment 10 answers the question though

"I don't know what mandate the council has for signing up to this..."

They have a mandate from city residents to make decisions on their behalf. What you really mean is: you don't like this decision.

But the council is surely right to be encouraging physical activity while cutting carbon emissions, and generally making Edinburgh a nicer place to be."


simple and straight to the point
50

Bob 2,

03/06/2009 22:23:46
36 me150, 03/06/2009 16:49:17

One thing you all forget is that business needs vehicles to operate including in Edinburgh. Can you imagine how bad life would be if a vehicle ban was actually introduced.



yip a pollution and congestion free city...great idea me150
51

Artemis,

03/06/2009 23:04:44
Why does David Legge think that increasing cycling will make life difficult for motorists? Does he mean that if there are more cyclists on the roads, motorists will have to slow down, pay attention, stop chatting on their mobile phones, leave more room when overtaking, stay out of the ASLs, stop driving/parking in the bike lanes etc? And why does he think committing to increasing cycling is being done to make life harder for motorists? Isn't it possible it's being done to make life easier for cyclists? To misquote McFly, it's not all about you, motorists. Not every policy has to be about motorists. Other people are entitled to have policies made for them.

As for Edinburgh signing up to this, it'll probably be their usual half-hearted nonsense. Yes, we want to increase cycling. But we allow the creation of a dangerous cycle lane outside the new Missoni hotel. Yes, we want to encourage people to walk and cycle instead of driving. But we won't bother to grit the foot/cyclepaths such as Roseburn or the Innocent, no matter how many people fall and split their heads every winter. Yes, we think we want to be a model cycling city. But we'll allow broken glass to lie on cycle paths for weeks.

Sort the basics out before you go committing yourself to stuff like this.
52

The real dracula,

03/06/2009 23:28:29
#51 its also time for cyclists to stop listening to ipods , chatting on mobile phones , going thru red lights , weaving all over the road , riding more than one abreast, stop thinking they have priority , stop cycling in areas where its forbidden, stop terrorising and nearly knocking over pedestrians and dogs etc etc.
Oh and for them to start finding their manners , use lights that actually work and wear a helmet.
Maybe if they do this then cyclists will be tolerated more , as it is just now I find the majority of them obnoxious self righteous tvvats
53

jon20353,

Dalry 03/06/2009 23:31:21
Its a fright to say that one of the great western european cities is still controlled by gas guzzlers, (Scotland-home of the bicycle) should be able to take a leap from other european cities like Paris, Strasbourg, Amsterdam, Barcelona and Copenhagen, when trying to develop its public transport infrastructure, all the above cities are bicycle friendly and just prove how successful Edinburgh could be if it adopted similar policies.
One example is it takes roughly the same time to cycle, bus, tram or drive from one side of Strasbourg to the other (from previous experience) in peak times, due to the correct infrastructure and investments being made, a city similar in size to Edinburgh, which prior to 1994 would of being the equivalent of Edinburgh, with similar congestion.
As for No. 26 there are greener alternatives to diesel powered emergency vehicles and for comment no. 36, the majority of deliveries in Amsterdam city centre, are now made from enormous warehouses and depots in the surburbs, connected using the tram system and electric vans on board specially adapted trams!
By the way the tram system will be a success, possibly every single modern tram system has run into similar problems, (Dublin, Melbourne, Zagreb, Bordeaux, Strasbourg) theyve all run over but become huge success stories!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.