Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 9th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Cottage to move brick by brick



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
23 November 2007
A HISTORIC cottage is to be dismantled and moved brick by brick to a new home less than two miles away, under plans to preserve a piece of the city's botanical history.
The small house on Haddington Place, which was home to the head gardener when the city's Royal Botanic Garden was based in Leith, was designed by renowned architect John Adam and built in the late 1700s.

It has stood there ever since but is now in the way of a major new hotel and retail development. Developers are planning a major operation to preserve the cottage by relocating it to the current Botanic Garden on Inverleith Row. A survey is set to be carried out to explore the feasibility of the move, although no cost has yet been attached to the project.

James Simpson, a member of the working group which runs Simpson & Brown architects, said: "Everyone accepts that this building has lost its context and it is not sensible keeping it in its current location.

But it is still a very important cottage and needs to be preserved. There was another monument on the site which was dismantled and rebuilt at Inverleith some years ago and we are very keen to see the same happen with this."

Glasgow-based company Leith Walk Developments have included the move as part of their plans to build a 175-room hotel on the site of a former petrol station and garages on Haddington Place.

Henry Noltie, a senior botanist at the Royal Botanic Garden, said: "The cottage has an important place in our history, as it was an integral part of the Garden as built by Professor John Hope in 1764.

"We are concerned about the future of this building and have been in discussion with the Botanic Cottage Working Group. The group is trying to make sure that a careful archaeological survey is made of the building and its surrounding area."

The plans are expected to be discussed by councillors within the coming months. If approved, the building will have to undergo a full archeological survey before any work can begin on the site.


Capi

tal's changing places
BO

TANIC Cottage is not the only building restored to a different local location.

The most famous example is the Edinburgh Brass Rubbing Centre on Chalmers Close. Originally the Trinity College Church, Hospital and Apse, it was demolished in 1848 to make way for Waverley Station before being rebuilt at its current location in 1872.

The architect, John Lessels, was able to incorporate about a third of the original stones from the church.

Other examples include the Old Tollhouse on Morningside Road - relocated at the entrance to Hermitage Park, by Braid Road

and the Portobello Tower, erected in 1785, from Old Town rubble.

More recently, the arch from the former Fat Sam's restaurant in Fountainbridge was earmarked for the entrance of a new street in the area.

The full article contains 490 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 November 2007 10:55 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Edinburgh botanic gardens
 
1

Mr_H,

Embra 23/11/2007 12:34:20

"it is now in the way of a major new hotel and retail development."

Should that not be the other way around?

2

Roger Tichborne,

23/11/2007 12:44:59

How do you move a stone building brick by brick ?

3

Lionheart,

23/11/2007 12:49:21

How come they can move a building but not make a decision on a crossing for the Forth!!? I suppose that would be akin to moving a mountain.

4

Boy Wonder,

23/11/2007 13:34:03

Boo! Bad decision. Leave the cottage where it is and put the damn hotel elsewhere!

5

Diana,

Edinburgh 23/11/2007 13:49:37

As I see it, if there is a piece of history that they don't want destroyed, then the development should never have been given the green light.

6

Georgy Pordgy,

23/11/2007 14:02:26

Another hotel ??? surely not

7

Mike Hunt,

23/11/2007 14:04:04

Just watch as it "mysteriously" goes up in flames soon...

8

Mr_H,

Embra 23/11/2007 14:24:03

Is it built into the planning departments DNA that they must despoil the city and ravage our history at every opportunity. How the hell does it "preserve a piece of the city's botanical history" by moving the last link to the Haddington Place site. The gardens were moved there in 1763 after the Regius Keeper John Hope obtained permanent Crown funding for the Garden and is arguably the first Royal Botanic Garden.

Now isn't the kind of thing that should be kept in situ and marked, rather than allowing another bloody hotel to throw up concrete and glass?

Dirty bandits, the lot of them.

9

Angus R,

23/11/2007 16:44:04

if its the one where good news van hire is /was its derelict - why the feck waste money moving it like that?

10

gus1940,

23/11/2007 16:45:34

Funny looking bricks.

11

MacKenzie,

23/11/2007 16:58:52

# 4 Boy Wonder

You can't move the hotel.

If the EEN is to be believed it has been drawn to this very location by the prospect of the forthcoming tram line.

12

de Hairun,

23/11/2007 17:14:27

This might actually be a good thing if done properly this could stop lot of historic buildings being torn down and then can be used as a tourist attraction like Den Gamle By in Aarhus, Denmark, thus creating more jobs and raising more awareness about Scotlands heritage.

13

Stockbridge,

23/11/2007 17:18:18

They should have kept it there and built round it.

Think of the attraction of a 2008 hotel with a bar inside a building from the 1700s, contained within.

Immediate fame.

14

arthur mc,

23/11/2007 20:52:17

I agree with no2,very poor journalism,as a time served mason i found the "brick by brick" statement not only ignorant but mildly offensive,it is in fact coursed rubble and is a wonderfull we hoose,give it a wee point it,ll come up trumps!

15

is it me?,

Edinburgh 23/11/2007 21:45:20

#14
It's not clear from the article if James Simpson is involved in the new development, or if he's commenting as a person interested in preserving Edinburgh's heritage. I hope it's the latter. He used to be Untouchable.
It's fairly obvious that this little building has little going for it aesthetically, but it does have a lot going for it historically.
But moving it doesn't make any sense. It would be like re-building the Castle in Fife and saying "this building used to be significant in Edinburgh."
Architecturally it's not great, and I don't believe it was "designed by John Adam", (God I've lost count of these Adams). He probably told his Clerk of Works to build a house with bits left over from the main job, as frequently happened.
Anyway. They've no right to touch it. Leave it where it is.

16

is it me?,

Edinburgh 23/11/2007 21:53:07

#15 arthur mc
Quite right. Looks like it's been done by a brickie.

17

Jingsitsme,

Edinburgh 23/11/2007 22:22:40

wonder if they will preserve my house somewhere if I ask.........

18

observator,

Edinburgh 23/11/2007 23:05:16

Removing what is left of old Leith Walk further deprives the area. I have been wondering about what was going to happen to this cottage.

19

COLINTON.MAINS,

canadaa 24/11/2007 01:59:07

another.hotel.dear.god.hotel.city

20

COLINTON.MAINS,

canada 24/11/2007 02:00:40

another.hotel.dear.god.hotel.city


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.