Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 7th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Reach for the Skylon!



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 July 2008
Capital one of four cities in the running for ‘iconic structure’.
IT LOOKS like a giant gravity defying cigar tube and rumour goes the original was melted down into ashtrays.

But now a bizarre structure which captured the public’s imagination 50 years ago could be remade – this time right in the heart of Edinburgh.

The Skylon, said to be an engineering sleight of hand, was designed by Powell and Moya Architects and was originally built on London’s South Bank in 1951 for the Festival of Britain.

It was pulled down just a year later and has since been dubbed “London’s Lost Icon”. However, a campaign to recreate it has now been started to mark the 60th anniversary of the Festival of Britain in 2011, with Edinburgh one of only four cities being considered possible locations.

The 300ft tall structure was suspended more than 40ft off the ground by a series of almost invisible wires. The Skylon was also illuminated at night, and crowds flocked to see it. Yet, just a year after it was created, the structure was torn down in an act described as “architectural vandalism”.

Among the locations being considered for its new home is Princes Street Gardens, with a mock-up image of how the Skylon would look showing it rising out of the city centre park above even the famous Scott Monument.

The campaign is being led by Scots architect, and an ex-president of the Royal British Institute of Architects, Jack Pringle.

Mr Pringle admitted that, despite being a Glaswegian, he would love to see the structure put up in the Capital. He said: “This is an iconic structure and it is so impressive to see, which is why we want to bring it back.

“We chose Princes Street Gardens really as it seemed the most suitable location, and I think it would look incredible.

“We’re not reaching for the planning application just yet, but it would be interesting to see what residents of Edinburgh think.”

The organisers decided to look around for new sites as the original location of the Skylon is now dominated by the London Eye.

As well as Edinburgh, they are considering locations in Newcastle, Cambridge and several alternative sites in London, including Battersea Gardens, Battersea Power Station and City Hall.

Hayden Nuttall, design director for project engineers Atkins, said: “Everything about the Skylon seemed to defy gravity – it just looked like it shouldn’t stand up – yet it did. It was engineering sleight of hand – a magic trick using maths and physics. ”

City architect Malcolm Fraser said the original Skylon had been “jaw-dropping” but was not entirely convinced a re-creation would have the same effect.

He added: “To rebuild it would seem to be looking at an idea of yesterday’s tomorrow, whereas I’d prefer to see something which looked at today’s tomorrow.

“I’m not sure what relevance it would have for Edinburgh – we have plenty of monuments that need looking after without getting London’s retro sculptures.”

The campaign to rebuild the Skylon will be officially launched in London on Thursday, when a life-sized projection of the monument will be shone on the side of the Shell Building, next to the London Eye. The public will then be asked to vote on where they would most like to see the iconic structure rebuilt by visiting www.voteforskylon.com.


The full article contains 573 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 July 2008 11:11 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Amenemhat,

08/07/2008 12:05:17
Dont be so F***ing stupid
2

antifa,

08/07/2008 12:07:13
"The Skylon, said to be an engineering sleight of hand."

What does this mean?
3

Ganjass,

08/07/2008 12:10:01
What a lot of sheet, who thinks about this stuff? It looks rank!!
4

alex paterson,

edinburgh 08/07/2008 12:11:40
How can this tower of garbage be even seen in the same photo as the Scott Monument.
5

20something,

Edinburgh 08/07/2008 12:24:40
COOOOOOOOL!
6

Unimpressed one,

08/07/2008 12:31:52
Could be made to look fantastic if it was illuminated with the latest high powered colour changing LED technology. Many other cities have used this to good effect. However there a great many people in Edinburgh who have very conservative tastes to say nothing about the green luddites who would consider such use of power as needlessly increasing our 'carbon footprint'.
7

Feral Youth who make Gorgie Tony's life hell!,

08/07/2008 12:34:13
If it was ever to topple in the direction of Princes St it might take out, heaven forbid, a poor wee tram.
8

The Genuine Mario Antoinette,

08/07/2008 12:54:48
1) It wont Happen.
2) It wont Happen.
3) Is it sinking in yet.
9

blackley,

Edinburgh 08/07/2008 13:00:38
Put it in front of the St James Centre.
10

Dragonlord,

08/07/2008 13:08:24
6# They already tried that with the tower of neon lights at the roundabout at the top of the walk. What a mess that was and it never worked properly. Why does Edinburgh need this pile of cr*p? There are much more interesting things to see.
11

JT,

08/07/2008 13:09:05
Its bad enough with the trashy parliament building but this takes the p! If people down south want then let them pay for it. Not exactly what unesco have in mind for a world heritage site!
12

20something,

Edinburgh 08/07/2008 13:19:50
Away with your world heritage. Get the cool thing!
13

I love to eat Sellotape,

08/07/2008 13:27:36
It looks like it could play basketball quite competently.
14

The Genuine Mario Antoinette,

08/07/2008 13:31:48
It would be a bit silly if they put it here anyway, for two reasons

1) If you know Edinburgh, theres a wee slope here

2) Thats where the pigeons hang out.

3) It wont happen.
15

Salvatori,

08/07/2008 13:48:52
Sneak a mobile phone mast in there and Bob's yer uncle...
16

Dragonlord,

08/07/2008 13:58:31
15# It would also work well as a main pylon for the trams power supply.In fact that's what it will be, and Tie are at it again.
17

Johnny Yen,

08/07/2008 14:12:47
Someone thought about it.

EEN translates as ITS GOING TO HAPPEN!!!!!!
18

FatB,

08/07/2008 14:15:45
This is 2008 not 1951, leave it in the past and move on!
19

GrahamR,

Edinburgh 08/07/2008 15:02:23
Someone tell me that this is a mistimed April Fools Day joke.

At least it would stop there being any doubt over the World Heritage Site status of Edinburgh - UNESCO would strip the city of it ASAP.

Of all the pictures on http://www.voteforskylon.com/ of proposed sites, only Sydney looks as though it would blend in well. Of course, architects, especially ex-presidents of the Royal British Institute of Architects, are unlikely to want their work to blend in. They need to make their mark, even if it is made in excrement.
20

Smasher,

08/07/2008 15:22:43
People get paid money to do this? Art, it's a massive big con to keep stupid rich people out of the prison system. There are less disturbed people locked up in mental institutions than there are wondering round freely in the art world. Sky needle. Don't make me larf. It's a big pointed metal thing....thats it.
21

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 08/07/2008 16:20:50
It should really go well with the trams don't you think?

I wonder what all the 'conservation' groups will have to say?


22

The Genuine Mario Antoinette,

08/07/2008 17:55:42
Peter its not going to happen and its certainly not going where someone has plonked it in this picture.

You should listen to me sometimes. In amongst all the rubbish I actually talk lsome sense you know.
23

dad360,

westlothian 08/07/2008 18:27:25
shove it in tynecastle and stick romanovs er** up it
24

joppa jock,

Huntingdon 08/07/2008 18:28:52
The whole idea is pie in the sky, or maybe sausage.
25

Plodjfriss, Hammer of the Numpties,

Edinburgh 08/07/2008 20:56:46
“We chose Princes Street Gardens really as it seemed the most suitable location"

Uhhuhhhh...
26

Rodger the Leith lodger,

edinburgh 08/07/2008 22:22:17
Perhaps an erecti*n of this sort would be more welcome on Calton Hill - adjacent to the other folly?
27

Ian down under,

Kawerau 09/07/2008 04:04:04
Drop it from a great height onto the Parliament debating chamber. That will stop their 'work' for a considerable length of time while they organise enquiries, committees and overseas fact finding trips to work out what to do with it.
Then start a countdown clock in Princes St or somewhere public and see how long it takes before anybody notices our great leaders are not there.
I would have suggested the House of Lords but it would take centuries for anybody to notice if they were away.
28

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 09/07/2008 10:43:12
#12 20something,

"Away with your world heritage. Get the cool thing!"

Hi 20something,

Absolutely agreed, what a marvellous opportunity to do away with the poser-status of being a WHS.

You would really think that this plus Caltongate would surely upset UNESCO, but watch, they will do damn all other than offer a few UN-type platitudes. I am convinced that once something is 'on' the WHS list it's very hard to get off. Lets face it, UNESCO aren't going to vote themselves out of a job!!

Buttress et al must be just about apoplectic.




 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.